Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
140 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Breaking - the US has called for an immediate cease fire in Gaza (Original Post) malaise Mar 21 OP
K&R spanone Mar 21 #1
About time. marble falls Mar 21 #2
Release of Israeli hostages tied to Washington's demand as Biden administration ups pressure on ally Nanjeanne Mar 21 #3
Thanks for the link malaise Mar 21 #5
I'm not sure what the final text will be. I'd like to be hopeful but I don't feel it yet. Nanjeanne Mar 21 #7
That won't happen. BWdem4life Mar 21 #49
Hostages enid602 Mar 21 #84
Of course it is ripcord Mar 21 #58
This seems prudent Johnny2X2X Mar 21 #4
Any rooting out of Hamas will always result in the same outcome TheKentuckian Mar 21 #38
Will this appease edhopper Mar 21 #6
Anti-Biden Palestinian supporters were anti-Biden all along meow2u3 Mar 21 #14
NYT: Democratic Donors Warn Biden Over Israel-Gaza Policy 3/20/24 Gaugamela Mar 21 #17
That's not what I'm seeing on Facebook womanofthehills Mar 21 #112
Hmm, maybe they will vote No Labels. Oh wait.... louis-t Mar 21 #114
100 percent no BannonsLiver Mar 21 #22
No, most think it's too late to do so MuchBetterThanThis Mar 21 #31
Sorry, that's just dumb. Ocelot II Mar 21 #41
I really ForgedCrank Mar 21 #67
Reminds of of predictions sarisataka Mar 21 #69
They did... Steven Maurer Mar 21 #120
Black men? Are you kidding? What about the Pumas/white women? brush Mar 22 #127
Relative drop-off is what we're talking about here Steven Maurer Mar 23 #139
Place the blame where it's due...on white voters for trump. No excuses for them. brush Mar 23 #140
In every critical swing state in 2016 Hillary lost by less than 1%. In everyone of those critical JohnSJ Mar 22 #131
I agree with you 100%. skylucy Mar 21 #78
Well that is stupid edisdead Mar 21 #45
Trump and his Republicans thank your wife and any others like her for her support. W_HAMILTON Mar 21 #52
"Won't forgive him". How magnanimous of THEM. You don't vote for Biden means you help trump. Anything else is bulshit JohnSJ Mar 22 #126
Don't even call them that. They are the same wing that hasn't reliably voted BootinUp Mar 21 #111
Glad we finally got there. 2naSalit Mar 21 #8
If they were to release the surviving hostages PCIntern Mar 21 #9
Ceasefire is a lie. There are no fucks given if firing continues unabated TheKentuckian Mar 21 #24
Ex-actly! PCIntern Mar 21 #37
The surviving hostages and bodies of the deceased hostages. CincyDem Mar 21 #30
Yes. Terse and to the point BunkieBandit Mar 21 #76
There is only one reason why you say what you say. Brenda Mar 21 #103
Yeah, except poster did not do that. They were explicit that they were talking about Hamas and Hamas only. emulatorloo Mar 21 #108
We all know that ain't happening womanofthehills Mar 21 #117
Basically the same news from the beginning of March Donkees Mar 21 #10
A cease fire is long overdue. Sky Jewels Mar 21 #11
It's a step in the right direction to negotiations rather than killing. Ping Tung Mar 21 #12
Yes!! TODAY. AllyCat Mar 21 #13
Cut off our supply of weapons nowforever Mar 21 #15
Hamas has not been nullified. They are still attacking TheKentuckian Mar 21 #20
there's been more than enough time to eliminate Hamas TomDaisy Mar 22 #122
By what definition that doesn't escalate civilian casualties well beyond TheKentuckian Mar 22 #136
The day the ceasefire begins . . . Richard D Mar 21 #16
However Avalon Sparks Mar 21 #27
Um . . . Richard D Mar 21 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author Avalon Sparks Mar 21 #44
Post removed Post removed Mar 21 #47
This message was self-deleted by its author Avalon Sparks Mar 21 #60
Why? Butterflylady Mar 21 #73
Um . . . Richard D Mar 21 #48
This message was self-deleted by its author Avalon Sparks Mar 21 #56
Of course . . . Richard D Mar 21 #119
No, we shouldn't have bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki.. Butterflylady Mar 21 #80
Were... Richard D Mar 22 #134
Calling the prospect of something that just happened ludicrous and silly TheKentuckian Mar 22 #137
You do realize after 68 dead civilians at Pearl Harbor we proceeded to kill almost 3 million Japanese... EX500rider Mar 21 #68
This message was self-deleted by its author Avalon Sparks Mar 21 #81
So what was your plan to stop Japan enslaving all of Asia? EX500rider Mar 21 #86
FDR decided it was a good idea to round up all Americans of Japanese descent and put them in internment camps MichMan Mar 21 #118
That does not sound like a plan to defeat the Japanese Empire which is what I asked EX500rider Mar 22 #124
China might have disagreed sarisataka Mar 21 #88
Post removed Post removed Mar 21 #102
US is sending Ukraine old/decommissioned equipment. Do you have reputable sources to back up your opinion that emulatorloo Mar 21 #110
Ukraine might have chosen negotioation when they were invaded sarisataka Mar 21 #115
WTF? Mossfern Mar 21 #74
That's the exact fucking outcome TexasDem69 Mar 21 #85
This message was self-deleted by its author Avalon Sparks Mar 21 #91
If there is no opposing army in Gaza TexasDem69 Mar 21 #93
This message was self-deleted by its author Avalon Sparks Mar 21 #97
In your opinion sarisataka Mar 21 #98
I was reading DU in 2001 TexasDem69 Mar 21 #99
Weird we remember different things Avalon Sparks Mar 21 #105
This message was self-deleted by its author Avalon Sparks Mar 21 #94
What do you propose Israel do? TexasDem69 Mar 21 #96
This message was self-deleted by its author Avalon Sparks Mar 21 #107
You're right - the Palestinians have neither the money or the military...what they do have though is... CincyDem Mar 21 #35
Post removed Post removed Mar 21 #46
College students were chanting the "River to the Sea" slogan on US campuses NickB79 Mar 21 #54
This message was self-deleted by its author Avalon Sparks Mar 21 #57
Pure ignorance Zeitghost Mar 21 #62
Ignorance you say..... Butterflylady Mar 21 #82
It's what the saying means Zeitghost Mar 22 #123
Netanyahu also used the saying. brush Mar 22 #129
You may be unaware of anyone wishing harm to Israel sarisataka Mar 21 #65
This message was self-deleted by its author Avalon Sparks Mar 21 #113
" I'm not aware of even one Palestine supporter or wishing any direct harm to Israel." lol, eyes closed or what? EX500rider Mar 21 #70
If you support "from the river to the sea" TexasDem69 Mar 21 #101
Easy test...ask them what river and what sea. CincyDem Mar 21 #106
I was going to reply with snark sarisataka Mar 21 #75
This message was self-deleted by its author Avalon Sparks Mar 21 #55
Apples and oranges... CincyDem Mar 21 #104
This message was self-deleted by its author Avalon Sparks Mar 21 #109
Appreciate your perspective here and I'll like you to think about the difference between Gaza and Germany... CincyDem Mar 21 #116
Maybe Netanyahu will also take the time to strenthen border defenses... brush Mar 22 #128
It's time for president Biden to set aside American politics and assume the roll of interenational statesman. flashman13 Mar 21 #18
Upon returning to the DU home page I find this post by Nanjeanne of an article in Haaretz flashman13 Mar 21 #19
And when Hamas steals the aid Mountainguy Mar 21 #34
But what about? Put aside the talking points. I suggest you look up the definition of humanitarian. flashman13 Mar 21 #36
Its what has and will happen Mountainguy Mar 21 #39
You really should read up on the history of the Middle East.... Butterflylady Mar 21 #89
What is humanitarian about setting up the exact scenario described? TheKentuckian Mar 21 #43
Let me be blunt here. Israel is currently conducting mass murder against two million people flashman13 Mar 21 #59
Well said Avalon Sparks Mar 21 #63
However many it takes for them to release the hostages, surrender, and cease the attacks. TheKentuckian Mar 21 #79
You're simply wrong TexasDem69 Mar 21 #87
Well said, Goddessartist Mar 22 #133
Co-sign. I've take a lot of verbal garbage from people here for speaking for the innocent. onecaliberal Mar 22 #135
We will still be calling for an end to the killing of innocent women and children. EVERYDAY. onecaliberal Mar 21 #83
Post removed Post removed Mar 21 #95
Sure, Jan. onecaliberal Mar 21 #100
Hamas doesn't care. Fozzledick Mar 21 #21
That statement is .....wow I'm.... Butterflylady Mar 21 #92
YES!!!! And did you notice that the Trump shill Johnson has invited that nice Bibi to address the House? PatrickforB Mar 21 #23
Empty words unless we tell Israel that we will cut off military aid if they don't comply. Goodheart Mar 21 #25
long overdue, but, when it fails, are we dragged into this war? Against Israel? lindysalsagal Mar 21 #26
We aren't going to war with Israel. Ace Rothstein Mar 21 #28
There is fucked up and then there is, well, the Middle-East. twodogsbarking Mar 21 #32
Iraq violated, like, three UN resolutions, and got invaded. Aristus Mar 21 #33
Should the UN invade Israel? sarisataka Mar 21 #40
No. Definitely not. Aristus Mar 21 #51
Kinda hard to take the UN seriously when 2/3rds of the resolutions Mosby Mar 21 #53
This message was self-deleted by its author Avalon Sparks Mar 21 #64
And are 2/3's of the worlds Human Rights violations happening in Palestine & Israel? EX500rider Mar 21 #71
You're right Avalon Sparks Mar 21 #90
Recommended. H2O Man Mar 21 #42
Hopefully the US adds in punitive measures should this ceasefire, much like the last one, be violated. Lancero Mar 21 #50
DURec leftstreet Mar 21 #61
If Ukraine was doing to Russia after it invaded Zeitghost Mar 21 #66
Kick orangecrush Mar 21 #72
Finally! mahina Mar 21 #77
Good. TomDaisy Mar 22 #121
The latest -US, EU ratchet up pressure on Israel over Gaza ceasefire; UN vote planned malaise Mar 22 #125
BREAKING: The magical word "ceasefire." betsuni Mar 22 #130
It included a return of all the Hostages JI7 Mar 22 #132
Ceasefire got voted down - Sticking point was, apparently, Hamas releasing the hostages. Lancero Mar 22 #138

Nanjeanne

(4,961 posts)
3. Release of Israeli hostages tied to Washington's demand as Biden administration ups pressure on ally
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 10:06 AM
Mar 21

[link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/mar/21/us-calls-for-immediate-ceasefire-in-gaza-with-draft-un-resolution|]

Just heard that this resolution is still being negotiated and is not final. But hopefully it will be strong and soon.

BWdem4life

(1,675 posts)
49. That won't happen.
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 01:59 PM
Mar 21

If the hostages are even still alive, Hamas will not release them. They know Biden is under pressure to stop the carnage and they don't care about the Palestinian people who are also their hostages. To them, releasing the Israeli hostages would be a sign of weakness and they cannot afford to show any weakness.

JMO

ripcord

(5,409 posts)
58. Of course it is
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 05:29 PM
Mar 21

That was the plan all along but Hamas keeps rejecting it. How horrible dor the hostages and the fact that Israel is forced to negotiate with terrorist trash.

Johnny2X2X

(19,066 posts)
4. This seems prudent
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 10:07 AM
Mar 21

Israel has the right to defend itself and there can be no lasting peace with Hamas in power. But the humanitarian crisis is too dire to keep fighting right now. Hamas needs to relase all the hostages and the fighting needs to stop.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
38. Any rooting out of Hamas will always result in the same outcome
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 01:05 PM
Mar 21

That is the set up.

That is unfortunate but also beyond anyone's power that has any desire to make it otherwise.

None of that changes that Hamas has to go and they got to go now not in some "aspirational" sense.

meow2u3

(24,764 posts)
14. Anti-Biden Palestinian supporters were anti-Biden all along
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 11:07 AM
Mar 21

They never supported nor voted for Biden to begin with. I think they're mostly Republicans posing as former Biden voters; I've seen this scam repeatedly for years. Let's not fall for it.

Gaugamela

(2,496 posts)
17. NYT: Democratic Donors Warn Biden Over Israel-Gaza Policy 3/20/24
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 11:36 AM
Mar 21
More than 100 donors and activists, including a handful who have given six-figure sums to President Biden, signed a letter arguing that progressive anger could help Donald Trump.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/19/us/politics/biden-donors.html

I’m amused you think Republicans support the Palestinians. Mike Johnson wants to invite Netanyahu to address Congress, bypassing State Department protocols. Remember when the GOP gave the finger to Obama with this theater in 2015? Religious nationalism and white European colonialism — what’s not for a Republican to love?

https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/21/politics/benjamin-netanyahu-address-congress-mike-johnson/index.html

womanofthehills

(8,718 posts)
112. That's not what I'm seeing on Facebook
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 09:55 PM
Mar 21

Lots of arguments and mean fights among Democrats- half and half - some say they will not vote or vote 3 rd party over the genocide.

31. No, most think it's too late to do so
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 12:36 PM
Mar 21

My wife and I worked soo hard to get Biden elected but she and many others won’t forgive him.
However, on the good side, they WILL not vote for Trump. Some may stay home or write-in.
Also, that goes the same for Pro-Israel democrats that won’t agree with Bidens current stance.
So it’s a wash that only equals trouble for Biden, and Democracy, in the end👎🏽

Ocelot II

(115,735 posts)
41. Sorry, that's just dumb.
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 01:12 PM
Mar 21

Not voting for Biden is voting for Trump, including not voting at all. Does anyone seriously think Trump would improve the situation for the Palestinians? The guy who wanted to ban Muslims from the U.S.? He'd probably nuke Gaza if he could. To those who are so pure that they say their precious conscience won't allow them to vote for Biden on account of this situation, I say Fuck your conscience; you're delivering the whole country into the hands of a fascist lunatic.

ForgedCrank

(1,782 posts)
67. I really
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 05:57 PM
Mar 21

don't think any of these people will follow through. Anyone can talk, and this is an opportune time for threats and pressure, whatever. It's not that I don't understand their frustrations. But when election day comes around, none of them are going to stay home, they will be at the booth voting for Biden.

sarisataka

(18,663 posts)
69. Reminds of of predictions
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 06:09 PM
Mar 21

Of those who said they wouldn’t vote for Hillary as a protest. Everyone (almost) was so sure they would either come around or not be needed in the landslide.

Steven Maurer

(465 posts)
120. They did...
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 11:26 PM
Mar 21

The people, if you look at the crosstabs, that didn't show up for Hillary (who'd showed up for President Obama) were black men.
That's not all of what went wrong, but it was significant enough to throw the election.

brush

(53,788 posts)
127. Black men? Are you kidding? What about the Pumas/white women?
Fri Mar 22, 2024, 03:32 AM
Mar 22

Ridiculous. Black men voted in the high 80s percentile for Hillary, and Black women in the '90s percentile.

Place the blame where it belongs...on white men and women who wouldn't vote for a womam. And don't forget Comey announcing an investigation against a laptop of a Hillary staffer 11 days before the election.

And in addition there was the Jill Stein factor, another white woman.

You're dead wrong to blame it on Black men.

Steven Maurer

(465 posts)
139. Relative drop-off is what we're talking about here
Sat Mar 23, 2024, 01:51 AM
Mar 23

No one is saying that black men didn't vote heavily for Hillary. But it was a significant reduction of the vote Barack Obama got from the same constituency.

It wasn't that they voted for Trump. It's just that an election-outcome-changing number of them just decided not to vote at all.

This may be an inconvenient truth, but it's still truth.

JohnSJ

(92,219 posts)
131. In every critical swing state in 2016 Hillary lost by less than 1%. In everyone of those critical
Fri Mar 22, 2024, 06:20 AM
Mar 22

swing states Jill Stein received 1% of the vote.

It didn't much, and they didn't. They followed the advice of the Susan Sarandon's, David Sirota, Nina Turner, Brihana Joy Gray, and Cornell West, and without a doubt it contributed to 4 years of trump in the WH, the overturning of Roe and the Supreme Court we have today.



edisdead

(1,932 posts)
45. Well that is stupid
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 01:45 PM
Mar 21

Sorry but that about as dumb as can be. Tell her to enjoy authoritarianism. It will work out great for women I am sure.

JohnSJ

(92,219 posts)
126. "Won't forgive him". How magnanimous of THEM. You don't vote for Biden means you help trump. Anything else is bulshit
Fri Mar 22, 2024, 02:31 AM
Mar 22

I don't care what rationalization is used. THERE IS NO GOOD SIDE TO THAT.

It means they don't give a damn about Women's rights, worker's rights, civil rights, the environment, and most important, they don't give a damn if we lose our DEMOCRACY.

This is same crap used by those in 2016 that helped trump into the White House.

Isn't that wonderful.

In 2016 in every swing state Hillary lost by less than 1%, and in every one of those critical swing states, Jill Stein received 1% of the vote.

If they cannot see the DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A BIDEN PRESIDENCY AND a trump one, then THEY deserve trump






2naSalit

(86,647 posts)
8. Glad we finally got there.
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 10:18 AM
Mar 21

It takes time to go through the process, we don't have an emperor or kind who can make demands on other countries regarding policy. In this case, the country in question is receiving considerable support from us due to treaties of the past... which are being blatantly violated by bibi who leads that country and directing the offensive actions.

And that gives us cause to take more decisive action like this.

Nuances many fail to recognize. Negotiations work but incrementalism is the bugaboo of our time.

PCIntern

(25,556 posts)
9. If they were to release the surviving hostages
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 10:19 AM
Mar 21

there’d be an immediate cease fire and there would have been for weeks now. If they had taken 200+ American hostages, having mutilated while alive, tortured, and murdered 1200 Americans we would have sent the 101st Airborne and 50000 ground troops and laid waste to the territory. No ifs ands or buts. Release what’s left of the hostages, motherfuckers.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
24. Ceasefire is a lie. There are no fucks given if firing continues unabated
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 12:05 PM
Mar 21

as long as it is Hamas that does the firing.

Please release these hostages, kind sirs but absolutely feel free to take more.
Massacres encouraged and rape on!

CincyDem

(6,363 posts)
30. The surviving hostages and bodies of the deceased hostages.
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 12:33 PM
Mar 21

I can easily see an approach from Hamas that they release all ("wink wink" ) the surviving hostages and then, at some point convenient to Hamas or their puppetmasters...they announce "what do you know - we found 6 more hostages and here's what we want for them".

Nothing from them would surprise me.



added: you're right about the US response.

Brenda

(1,060 posts)
103. There is only one reason why you say what you say.
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 08:26 PM
Mar 21

Conflating Hamas with the Palestinian people who live in Gaza is an effort to label all Palestinians as terrorists and therefore they should all be laid to waste. Murder them all, filthy Palestinians you keep saying.

I don't understand why DU allows you to spew your bigotry.

emulatorloo

(44,131 posts)
108. Yeah, except poster did not do that. They were explicit that they were talking about Hamas and Hamas only.
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 09:29 PM
Mar 21

It isn't nice to put words in other people’s mouths they did not say.

Donkees

(31,418 posts)
10. Basically the same news from the beginning of March
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 10:51 AM
Mar 21
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100218748918

US now pushes UN to back 'immediate' Gaza ceasefire to free hostages
By Michelle Nichols March 5, 2024 8:07 PM EST

UNITED NATIONS, March 5 (Reuters) - The United States on Tuesday revised language in a draft United Nations Security Council resolution to back "an immediate ceasefire of roughly six-weeks in Gaza together with the release of all hostages," according to the text seen by Reuters.

The third revision of the text - first proposed by the U.S. two weeks ago - now reflects blunt remarks by Vice President Kamala Harris. The initial U.S. draft had shown support for "a temporary ceasefire" in the Israel-Hamas war.

Washington had been averse to the word ceasefire.

It has vetoed three draft council resolutions - two of which would have demanded an immediate ceasefire - during the five-month-long war. Most recently, the U.S. justified its veto by saying that such council action could jeopardize efforts by the U.S., Egypt and Qatar to broker a pause in the war and the release of hostages.

The United States has said it plans to allow time for negotiations on its draft and will not rush to a vote. To pass, a resolution needs at least nine votes in favor and no vetoes by the U.S., France, Britain, Russia or China.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-now-pushes-un-back-immediate-gaza-ceasefire-free-hostages-2024-03-06/

nowforever

(302 posts)
15. Cut off our supply of weapons
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 11:12 AM
Mar 21

It's become a slaughter now the notion it's a war is ridiculous. No justification for this level of revenge and retribution. You've obliterated most of Gaza your mission to nullify Hamas is accomplished now to the World it seems like unmitigated genocide.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
20. Hamas has not been nullified. They are still attacking
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 11:47 AM
Mar 21

still at least supposedly hold hostages, and still have the same intent.

The same but even more dangerous with Hezbollah with Iran behind them and other groups is true.

The demand is for this to continue and then escalate.

The insistence here is for impunity for the terrorists to do their damndest and any effort to stop them faces at least condemnation.

Fuck that noise. It seems there is no option left but to settle all family business so goodbye regional stability.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
136. By what definition that doesn't escalate civilian casualties well beyond
Fri Mar 22, 2024, 01:32 PM
Mar 22

the current toll?

Yeah, the whole thing could be wrapped up really quickly if the aim is to just annihilate all that lives in the area.

I don't see how that is preferable just to fit within your timeline.

What do you think this is, Granada or something?

Richard D

(8,754 posts)
16. The day the ceasefire begins . . .
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 11:14 AM
Mar 21

. . . will be the day that Hamas will regroup, rearm, and plan for the next attack on Israeli civilians.

Avalon Sparks

(2,566 posts)
27. However
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 12:20 PM
Mar 21

Hamas can claim all it wants that their goal is to drive Israel out of existence, but they have neither the military nor the money to do so. Nor do they have the support of most of their Middle East neighbors except for Iran, so Israel as a country is not under threat. 



I heard an interview recently during which the interviewee said that Israel must fight because its people have nowhere to go. Palestinians have nowhere to go either, yet Israelis think it is just fine to force them to leave all of Palestine. It is duplicitous to believe that only Israelis have rights to the land because some ancestors lived there many thousands of years ago but Palestinians whose ancestors have lived there as a majority for the most recent thousand years have no rights at all.

Response to Richard D (Reply #29)

Response to Avalon Sparks (Reply #44)

Response to Post removed (Reply #47)

Richard D

(8,754 posts)
48. Um . . .
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 01:48 PM
Mar 21

. . . I guess the exact number of Palestinians as Israelis should have been killed to keep it fair? I wonder how that could be arranged. Volunteers? Lottery? Should the same number be tortured, raped, kidnapped and kept in horrific conditions for six months? Dismembered? Burned to death?
We'd have to also match their ages and professions and family size to be fair, no? Sounds like a sci fi movie.

I'm struck that only a million German civilians were killed in WWII. It really should have gone up to at least 12 million, probably a whole lot more to be fair.

The Japanese killed very few American civilians, yet we killed almost half a million Japanese civilians just in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Highly disproportionate! Why wasn't America charged with genocide and crimes against humanity? Certainly the allied forces should have been so charged for all the German civilians killed.

Sounds like a plot for a B grade scifi movie.

Response to Richard D (Reply #48)

Richard D

(8,754 posts)
119. Of course . . .
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 11:16 PM
Mar 21

. . . I did not mention nor did I approve of the disastrous bombing of Iraq and Afghanistan. It's one of the reasons I joined DU after 9/11.
Japan? I don't really know. The world would be a very different place had Japan walked away from WWII victorious. Germany, I do know. If the Nazis had won WWII, and they could have done so, this world would be hell. Oddly, both Japan and Germany quickly evolved into peaceful world powers after their defeat. I don't think anyone holds animosity to those two nations now. Nor do they hold animosity towards the nations who helped defeat them.

This is a very great difference in the the Gazans, who still hold hatred towards Israel. Notice I did not say Palestinians as 250,000 live in Israel as citizens, something that was available to all Palestinians who lived there when Israel was established. Sadly, for whatever reason, many chose instead to hold hatred and separation for 75 years.

So, yes. My preference is no deaths, but I cannot ignore nor deny nor ever forget what Hamas did on October 7, as many non-Jews seem to have done.

I love the idea of a cease-fire, but if there is a cease-fire today, by tomorrow, Hamas will be regrouping, rearming, digging new terror tunnels, and making plans for the next horrors they will unleash on Israel. These are their words, written in their charter.

The best option is for Hamas to release all the hostages and surrender. They are losing this war, and they know it. So let's have a cease-fire, which will be celebrated as a victory by Hamas. And so the pain, suffering, and deaths will continue and be repeated over and over.

Yes, it is tragic that there are any deaths from war. But that is war. Hopefully, they and the rest of the world will learn that the best and surest way to avoid the deaths of innocents in a war is not to start one. But they refuse to learn that, and so, a cease-fire may be imposed on Israel, but weeks, months, or years in the future, Hamas will attack Israel again. Israel will respond, and the world, with an attention span of a gnat, will again condemn Israel and rinse and repeat. Perhaps I am wrong, but I would put money on it. A lot of money.

Gaza could be a modern paradise. But not with Hamas or any other iteration of ISIS/Muslim Brotherhood. When the people really want peace, I assure you that Israelis will do whatever they are capable of doing to help lift Gaza up into a truly beautiful and peaceful place. I would also bet money on that.

Butterflylady

(3,544 posts)
80. No, we shouldn't have bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki..
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 07:12 PM
Mar 21

And I'm sure a lot of people here will disagree with me on that. But, our country is paying for that now. Israel will not be and will never be gone.
A lot of you say that if a ceasefire will let Hamas reorganize and attack Israel again. That is just ludicrous and silly. I'm sure Israel has learned from that attack.
It's one thing to retaliate for the attack, but to do what Israel is doing now is entirely wrong. Hopefully they'll learn before it's to late, and by that I mean Netanyahu. He is leading the country down the wrong path and the whole country will pay.

Richard D

(8,754 posts)
134. Were...
Fri Mar 22, 2024, 09:27 AM
Mar 22

... The actions of the allied forces in WW2 that killed over the a million German civilians also wrong?

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
137. Calling the prospect of something that just happened ludicrous and silly
Fri Mar 22, 2024, 01:41 PM
Mar 22

is just that itself.

Your only supporting rationale is your own espoused certainty of what Israel has learned and then we have to assume an inference that such learning is on such a grand scale as to make a repeat cranked all the way up to "ludicrous and silly".

What this is based on who possibly knows.

Right and wrong? I don't even see a firm handle on reason.

EX500rider

(10,849 posts)
68. You do realize after 68 dead civilians at Pearl Harbor we proceeded to kill almost 3 million Japanese...
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 06:04 PM
Mar 21

....until they surrendered, then we stopped.

Israel is in the same mood, surrender or die, your choice.

Response to EX500rider (Reply #68)

EX500rider

(10,849 posts)
86. So what was your plan to stop Japan enslaving all of Asia?
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 07:27 PM
Mar 21
From the invasion of China in 1937 to the end of World War II, the Japanese military regime murdered near 3,000,000 to over 10,000,000 people, most probably almost 6,000,000 Chinese, Indonesians, Koreans, Filipinos, and Indochinese, among others, including Western prisoners of war.

MichMan

(11,938 posts)
118. FDR decided it was a good idea to round up all Americans of Japanese descent and put them in internment camps
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 11:13 PM
Mar 21

sarisataka

(18,663 posts)
88. China might have disagreed
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 07:33 PM
Mar 21

With your opinion of the U.S right/wrongness.

Is the new morality of the modern world he who strikes first is in the right?

What is your opinion of Ukraine fighting rather than submitting?

Response to sarisataka (Reply #88)

emulatorloo

(44,131 posts)
110. US is sending Ukraine old/decommissioned equipment. Do you have reputable sources to back up your opinion that
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 09:48 PM
Mar 21

“ the US has involved themselves mostly to enrich the defense industry here, and I’d be surprised if there wasn’t a great deal of money laundering occurring involving the funds we sent to the Ukraine, there’s been no accountability.”

Also do you have reputable sources that indicate Putin will negotiate? All his actions so far indicate otherwise.

sarisataka

(18,663 posts)
115. Ukraine might have chosen negotioation when they were invaded
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 10:02 PM
Mar 21

the likely outcome would be the eastern Oblasts would now be Russian territory, Zelensky would be in prison or dead and a puppet of Putin would tule in Kyiv. Alternately 'the Ukraine' would again be a province of the Russian empire.

The future hopes for peace would involve an emboldened Russia sitting at the borders of Poland, Slovakia, Hungary and Romania.

A bit of history on the Second Sino-Japanese War. After provoking the Marco Polo Bridge incident to justify an invasion in July of 1937, Japan advanced, seizing the capital Nanjing in December of the same year. After the city fell, the Japanese soldiers went on a six week spree of murder and rape. Since there was no documentation the estimates vary widely. In that time 40-300,000 people were killed and 20-80,000 women raped.

It doesn't require a nuclear weapon to kill masses of people. Bayonets work just as well, it only takes longer.

TexasDem69

(1,789 posts)
85. That's the exact fucking outcome
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 07:27 PM
Mar 21

When a terrorist group, supported by the people of Gaza, rapes and massacres thousands of Israeli civilians. Do you think the U.S. should have stopped attacking Japan once it had killed more than the 2,403 Americans who died at Pearl Harbor? That’s not how war works, so why are you blaming Israel for waging war?

Response to TexasDem69 (Reply #85)

TexasDem69

(1,789 posts)
93. If there is no opposing army in Gaza
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 07:55 PM
Mar 21

Who is shooting the Israeli soldiers?

I’d say you are a super, super-minority on the WW2 and 9-11 issues but thanks for responding on that piece. I personally supported the U.S. in both instances.

Response to TexasDem69 (Reply #93)

TexasDem69

(1,789 posts)
99. I was reading DU in 2001
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 08:09 PM
Mar 21

And I don’t recall a single post against the actions in Afghanistan. Iraq was 2 years later and was plainly based on bad intel, and perhaps simply fabricated.

The problem with the response to 9-11 was that the US didn’t take more proactive steps to prevent it from happening in the first place.

Avalon Sparks

(2,566 posts)
105. Weird we remember different things
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 08:55 PM
Mar 21

I was so happy to find so many like minded people here, especially about Afghanistan.
No reason for either of us to lie.

Response to TexasDem69 (Reply #85)

TexasDem69

(1,789 posts)
96. What do you propose Israel do?
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 08:05 PM
Mar 21

Other than lay down arms and let Hamas commit another 10/7 massacre a month from now, and again a month after that, and again a month after that? I support Israel’s right to exist, despite Hamas’ stated intent to kill every Jew in the Middle East. Supporting Israel is what every single Democrat on DU should do. Its morally correct and consistent with our liberal ideals.

I don’t understand as a compassionate human being how you don’t support Israel’s right to defend its citizens and its efforts to both prevent future attacks by Hamas and bring to justice those responsible for 10/7.

Response to TexasDem69 (Reply #96)

CincyDem

(6,363 posts)
35. You're right - the Palestinians have neither the money or the military...what they do have though is...
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 12:54 PM
Mar 21

...a global propaganda network that plays into subconscious tropes nurtured over generations.

When you say "Palestinians have nowhere to go either"...ask yourself, why is that? Why is it that Egypt keeps it's borders closed to their Arab/Muslim neighbors...or Saudi...or Tunisia...or...or...or. With consistency, countries throughout the Arab world have resisted any kind of Palestinian immigration. Wonder why? I think it's because the more complete phrase is "Palestinians have nowhere to go that will tolerate/accept their single minded jihad to kill Jews anywhere in the world"...yeah...I can see why Saudi or Egypt doesn't want to give that, and everything that goes along with it, a home.

Israel proper - excluding the WB and Gaza - is over 20% Palestinian, second only to Jordan. They're teachers, doctors, lawyers, politicians, Knesset members...fully functioning members of Israeli society. They're descendants of Palestinians who, in 1948, accepted Israels invitation to stay and peacefully be part of accepting and growing this new country.

That said, a large group of Palestinians in 1948 decided they'd listen to their Arab neighbors who urged them to stay committed to their "Let's Kill Jews" way of life. Their descents are the refugees of Gaza/WB who haven't given up on that mantra and the Arab world has been using them as their weapon to terrorize Israel ever since.

Response to CincyDem (Reply #35)

NickB79

(19,253 posts)
54. College students were chanting the "River to the Sea" slogan on US campuses
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 05:10 PM
Mar 21

You really don't believe there's a global Palestinian propaganda network?

Response to NickB79 (Reply #54)

Butterflylady

(3,544 posts)
82. Ignorance you say.....
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 07:25 PM
Mar 21

That saying is used by both parties. So please don't call anyone ignorant if you don't know that.

Zeitghost

(3,862 posts)
123. It's what the saying means
Fri Mar 22, 2024, 12:07 AM
Mar 22

And despite your efforts to bothsides it, it's used almost exclusively by those who seek the destruction of Israel.

sarisataka

(18,663 posts)
65. You may be unaware of anyone wishing harm to Israel
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 05:53 PM
Mar 21

If so, you are simply ignorant of the many who wish to see Israel become a historical footnote.

At worst, you are lying to yourself that the ultimate goal of Hamas and others is a Jew free Palestine.

Response to sarisataka (Reply #65)

EX500rider

(10,849 posts)
70. " I'm not aware of even one Palestine supporter or wishing any direct harm to Israel." lol, eyes closed or what?
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 06:09 PM
Mar 21

I wonder what "By any means necessary" means...I am guessing not hugs & kisses

?w=525

TexasDem69

(1,789 posts)
101. If you support "from the river to the sea"
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 08:14 PM
Mar 21

Then you support Hamas and Hamas’ stated intention to eliminate Israel and its citizens. I don’t generally think that folks on DU are Hamas supporters, but that’s pretty indisputable.

sarisataka

(18,663 posts)
75. I was going to reply with snark
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 06:53 PM
Mar 21

But I think the post speaks clearly. I just want to make one adjustment

Something that the U.S. gov and most US and UK media have shamefully endorsed, because of "Israel’s" funding or them as part of their global propaganda network.


You are claiming Israel, or most honestly "Israel" is funding the US government and most US and UK media. Do you have a shred of evidence to back this claim of hidden influence or is it just known?

Response to CincyDem (Reply #35)

CincyDem

(6,363 posts)
104. Apples and oranges...
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 08:41 PM
Mar 21

To be clear, what I was saying is that Palestinians who are overwhelmingly Muslim seem to be unwelcome in other countries that are overwhelmingly Muslim. I highlighted Egypt and Saudi specifically because they are, like Palestinians, overwhelmingly Sunni Muslim.

In response, you asked if I blame the Jewish people when no one wanted them in their own countries. Prior to 1948, the high water mark for Jewish populations was 1938 in Europe, when Jews represented just under 2%, a percentage reduced to just over 0.5% by 1946. So I think your real question is if I blame the Jewish people for their refugee status when no overwhelmingly non-Jewish populations wanted them in their countries.

And you’re right…the answer is of course not but that’s not an applicable comparison.

Jews have been the nomadic “others” for millennium since Cyrus the Great conquered Jude’s hundreds of years BC. Be it the Germans in WWII, the Russians & Turks in WWI, or Rome during the Spanish Inqusition…Jews have been blamed for everything from the Plague to Infant Death to taking the sun away during solar eclipses. And that doesn’t even include the whole Good Friday revisionist history thing.So it’s easy for the 98% to lay societal blames at the feet of the most visible minority, independent of any truth. And it’s the same today with Republicans and “immigrants” (the generic “other”).

My point was that there are countries that are 95% plus Sunni Muslim and instead of reaching out to other Sunni Muslims in great pain (not just recently but for 75+ years)…instead of giving them a sanctuary, they’re building taller/thicker/longer walls to keep them out. Don’t believe me? Look at Egypt’s wall along southern Gaza…puts any “prison wall” built by Israel to shame.

They don’t have “no where to go”…they have many places to go who will not tolerate their terrorist activites. In fact, as I said, they had somewhere to go in 1948 and the precedents of today’s Gaza residents said “Nope - our commitment to kill Jews is stronger than I desired to life comfortably in peace.” And it’s been that way ever since.

Response to CincyDem (Reply #104)

CincyDem

(6,363 posts)
116. Appreciate your perspective here and I'll like you to think about the difference between Gaza and Germany...
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 10:14 PM
Mar 21

When you propose that the Palestinian people are under a similar horror as the Jewish were in Germany then [referring to WWII Germany]. That invites a comparison and the most objective measure is the numbers - as gruesome as that maybe.

Best measure I find for Gaza fatalities to date is “about 30,000” over the past 5 1/2 months. Let’s ignore that this likely includes Hamas fighters embedded in the civilian population. 30k is about 1.5% of the population of Gaza.

At its peak in 1945, Germany would consider 30k dead jews as a bad week. Think about that…as upset as the world is about the past 5 1/2 month response to Hamas’ terrorist attack of 10/7 and their continued hostage holding…imagine what it would take to kill 30k Palestinians in 7 days. For the record, once Germany got their camps and rail lines running, Jews were being killed at the rate of 40k per week…for 3 years. 6,000 systemically killed every day on average for almost 1,100 consecutive days. But that’s just an average…”peak holocaust” in the summer of 1942 was 15,000 per day for almost 4 months. Ovens and gas chambers working 24/7. When it was all over, Europe’s Jewish population dropped from 9 million to just over 3 million…4 years to kill 66% of European Jews.

Wrap your mind around that…as ugly as Gaza is…it was 2 days work for the Germans when they were “at their best (or worst, I guess)”.

Just wanted to offer up some objective data to help you consider the difference between what’s happening to Palestinians in Gaza vs. Jews in Germany. That doesn’t make Gaza nothing but it’s sure not Germany and I’m not sharing this to poo-poo the casualties in Gaza. But let’s be realistic here - there is no similarity between the two circumstances.

I’m not even going to wade into the land question except to say you’re right…Gaza is prime seaside real estate (as I think Jared recently pointed out). Over the past 30-40 years, billions and billions of dollars of foreign aid have been poured into Gaza. If the Palestinian leadership spent that money on development for their region vs. building terrorist capability…sheesh…Gaza would be the f’ing Riviera of the Middle East. But that wasn’t their priority.



brush

(53,788 posts)
128. Maybe Netanyahu will also take the time to strenthen border defenses...
Fri Mar 22, 2024, 03:45 AM
Mar 22

something he didn't do after being warned months before Oct. 7 that a big attack was coming.

Then waiting multiple hours to deploy IDF forces against the attackers. That delay has never been explained.

Israel needs to kick corrupt Netanyahu to the curb asap. He's just fighting to keep himself out of jail.

flashman13

(667 posts)
18. It's time for president Biden to set aside American politics and assume the roll of interenational statesman.
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 11:37 AM
Mar 21

He has the leverage. He can pick up the phone and give Bibi a call. The message is simple. He, Biden, is going to tell Bibi that he is turning off the switch. There will be no more military aid. There will be no more monetary aid. All official U.S. and Israeli contacts will be suspended. The switch will remain off until there is a cease fire and humanitarian aid to Gaza is restored. End of conversation.

By doing this Biden will prevent a humanitarian catastrophe. It will also give Israel a chance to avoid becoming a world pariah and lose any moral credibility it might still have.

It will be a tough call, but very often doing the right thing is tough.

flashman13

(667 posts)
19. Upon returning to the DU home page I find this post by Nanjeanne of an article in Haaretz
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 11:45 AM
Mar 21

by David Rothkopf, a former senior U.S. government official and the author of ten books on foreign policy and politics.

Let me quote: "As bad as the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7 was, the people and government of Israel must now recognize that today not just the country's security but its legitimacy are at stake as never before."

 

Mountainguy

(537 posts)
34. And when Hamas steals the aid
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 12:40 PM
Mar 21

Fills their bellies, and launches more attacks...... what will you call for then?

 

Mountainguy

(537 posts)
39. Its what has and will happen
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 01:07 PM
Mar 21

If you forget there was a cease fire that Hamas broke already

But go on expecting anything different from a people who have been picking this fight for 75 years

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
43. What is humanitarian about setting up the exact scenario described?
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 01:30 PM
Mar 21

The appropriate and customary unconditional surrender of Hamas not Israel who they attacked under such circumstances is what needed for peace.

Things work out better for folks when they refrain from raping, rampaging, murdering, and hostage taking and you damn sure don't have room to make any fucking demands or sick blubbering about the consequences of your own depravity.

Humanitarian my ass!

Surrender, release the hostages, cease the attacks, and put down the genocidal aspirations forever or hell yes your capacity to persecute those aims will be rightfully relentlessly quelled.

Humanitarian!?!

Motherfuckers will twist anything ever to prop these fucks up.

flashman13

(667 posts)
59. Let me be blunt here. Israel is currently conducting mass murder against two million people
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 05:31 PM
Mar 21

that they have locked into a ghetto. That's a fact. There is nothing righteous about it. How many dead, the majority of which will be women and children, will it take to satisfy you? Will two million be enough?

Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot and Mao killed tens of millions of people through starvation. If this situation in Gaza does not change very soon, you will be able to add Netanyahu to that list.

I suggest you read the Haaretz article. It won't change your mind, but at least you will have to look at the children you are condemning.

If this post sounds harsh, it is because that is my intent. I quit posting on this subject months ago because I could not stand the endless diatribes of hateful talking points. But I will not remain silent.

https://archive.is/KXavj#selection-1307.4-1307.13



TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
79. However many it takes for them to release the hostages, surrender, and cease the attacks.
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 07:02 PM
Mar 21

I prefer that be zero but however many it takes.

Even now they make demands leveraging their own people's suffering on the terms of a ceasefire they swear to break in explosive fashion to stop the suffering they brought down on their people by using them as some perverse force fields and failing that bloody shirts to waive for their propaganda campaign.

The brass on some fucks without honor!
They can burn in hell.

Motherfuck a ceasefire.

SURRENDER UNCONDITIONALLY!

TexasDem69

(1,789 posts)
87. You're simply wrong
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 07:32 PM
Mar 21

And would have been better off staying silent. Hamas is responsible for the ongoing deaths and Hamas can end it by releasing hostages and surrendering its murderers and rapists. Because Hamas is comprised of cowards, rapists, and murderers it won’t, so the bloodshed continues. Any post on DU that doesn’t acknowledge this simple, indisputable fact is wrong.

Response to onecaliberal (Reply #83)

Fozzledick

(3,860 posts)
21. Hamas doesn't care.
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 11:53 AM
Mar 21

They're openly trying to expand their genocidal war against Israel to the West bank and Lebanon.

Butterflylady

(3,544 posts)
92. That statement is .....wow I'm....
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 07:50 PM
Mar 21

I'm flabbergasted by it. It is so not true that I don't know what to say except that you must love Netanyahu..because he's doing exactly that to the Palestinians.

PatrickforB

(14,577 posts)
23. YES!!!! And did you notice that the Trump shill Johnson has invited that nice Bibi to address the House?
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 12:04 PM
Mar 21

Sigh.

In the meantime kids are starving to death right in front of our faces.

Biden is doing great!

Goodheart

(5,327 posts)
25. Empty words unless we tell Israel that we will cut off military aid if they don't comply.
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 12:06 PM
Mar 21

It makes no sense to supply Israel with bombs at the same time we're trying to feed people who are being bombed.

Aristus

(66,388 posts)
33. Iraq violated, like, three UN resolutions, and got invaded.
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 12:37 PM
Mar 21

Israel has violated over forty UN resolutions, and no invasion in sight.

Aristus

(66,388 posts)
51. No. Definitely not.
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 04:05 PM
Mar 21

But that's the point; we shouldn't have invaded Iraq. Certainly not over U.N. resolutions. I think the U.N. is an important organization, and General Assembly resolutions should be taken seriously. But if they're not going to be taken seriously, or else enforced indifferently, or with a self-serving political agenda, we need some genuine reform.

Mosby

(16,319 posts)
53. Kinda hard to take the UN seriously when 2/3rds of the resolutions
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 04:12 PM
Mar 21

Passed in 2023 (about human rights) were about Israel. Seems like an unhealthy obsession.

Eta link:

https://unwatch.org/2023-unga-resolutions-on-israel-vs-rest-of-the-world/

This is what modern antisemitism looks like.

Response to Mosby (Reply #53)

EX500rider

(10,849 posts)
71. And are 2/3's of the worlds Human Rights violations happening in Palestine & Israel?
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 06:22 PM
Mar 21

Seems unlikely what with N Korea having 200,000 in internment camps, 18 million nearing starvation in the Sudan, Putin’s deliberate attacks on civilians in Ukraine and Xi Jinping’s open-air prison for the Uyghurs in China, the Taliban’s putting millions of Afghans at risk of starvation & imprisoning women in their homes, then we have Ethiopia doing a ethnic cleansing campaign against the Tigrayan population resulting in many deaths, sexual violence, mass detention, and the forced displacement of thousands.
Not to mention Somalia, Venezuela, Iran, etc..

But sure, it's all Israel, lol

Avalon Sparks

(2,566 posts)
90. You're right
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 07:41 PM
Mar 21

Those are all horrible things and we all need to focus on them as well.

I will look into more detail about the 2/3rds focus from human rights organizations.

Lancero

(3,003 posts)
50. Hopefully the US adds in punitive measures should this ceasefire, much like the last one, be violated.
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 02:31 PM
Mar 21

Perhaps we should consider deploying UN Peacekeepers to enforce this one?

Zeitghost

(3,862 posts)
66. If Ukraine was doing to Russia after it invaded
Thu Mar 21, 2024, 05:53 PM
Mar 21

What Israel is doing to Hamas and Palestine, would anyone here be upset?

Defense against an enemy intent on your destruction isn’t unethical, even when you’re winning.

malaise

(269,054 posts)
125. The latest -US, EU ratchet up pressure on Israel over Gaza ceasefire; UN vote planned
Fri Mar 22, 2024, 01:34 AM
Mar 22
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/3/22/us-eu-ratchet-up-pressure-on-israel-over-gaza-ceasefire-un-vote-planned

The latest draft resolution marks a further toughening of Washington’s approach amid rising global condemnation of a war in which some 32,000 Palestinians have been killed.

UN experts have also warned of an imminent famine as a result of Israel’s blockade.

The draft US text describes an “immediate and sustained ceasefire” as an imperative to protect civilians and allow for the delivery of humanitarian aid. A ceasefire would also be conditional on the release of some of the remaining captives taken by Hamas in its attack on Israel on October 7.

Lancero

(3,003 posts)
138. Ceasefire got voted down - Sticking point was, apparently, Hamas releasing the hostages.
Fri Mar 22, 2024, 10:52 PM
Mar 22

Why is the UN is against them being released?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking - the US has cal...