Judge Cannon's Law Clerks have been Quitting on her
https://davidlat.substack.com/p/judge-aileen-cannon-law-clerks-quit-on-herIn addition to the sheer importance of the role played by clerks in the judicial process, here are additional facts underscoring the significance of Judge Aileen Cannon having two (or more) clerks quit on her:
1. A federal district judge usually hires only two to three law clerks each year, so for two clerks to quit is quite notable. It’s nothing like a few associates quitting a 1,000-lawyer firm. And Judge Cannon, who took the bench in November 2020, has been a judge for less than four years—so she’s probably had a total of only eight to twelve clerks over her entire tenure.
2. As followers of the clerkship world well know, it’s highly unusual for a clerk to quit on a judge. Because a federal judicial clerkship typically lasts one year and is an extremely valuable credential, most clerks will “ride it out” instead of quitting, even if they’re miserable or have issues with their judge. The clerkship lasts only a year; the résumé value lasts for a career. For a law clerk to quit before the year is up often involves an extremely unpleasant situation in chambers.
3. As current and former judges and clerks can tell you, it’s highly disruptive to the work of a chambers when even one clerk quits, to say nothing of two. Judges in busy districts like the Southern District of Florida have heavy caseloads, but only two to three law clerks to help them handle all that work. To be short-staffed for even a brief period of time can generate a backlog very quickly.
= new reply since forum marked as read
It was a very crude attempt to spray some ridicule on judge I. Lean Bannon.
While the article did not indicate why they quit, I do have my suspicions, too.
It's like their destiny, along with all who support their warmongering greed.
That needs a *warning graphic* or *NSFW* notation!
With a side order of repossessed superyacht.
https://megayachtnews.com/2020/08/lady-may-sees-arrest-of-steve-bannon-onboard/
And hilarious 
He would know how to best use the information gathered. 
The writer doesn't know why the second clerk left. This is more of a gossip about the judge article.
appellate court might be alarmed by hearing that a lower court judge is soliciting views on final jury instructions before the pre-trial motions for exclusion of testimony etc. and even jury selection itself. Making such instructions public prior to those events, and the arguments both ways, would make it very possible and indeed likely that jurors could be influenced in their thinking in responding to questions during jury selection.
This "give me the ending before the beginning" approach would also give a judge in the case a "roadmap" of what to exclude in pre-trial motions about evidence/testimony in order to "fit" the ending instructions. It would give that judge a ready "defense" as it were for keeping parts of the prosecutions case out. Goodness me now it seems a bit fishy "I Lean" that you want to shape the end before the beginning. As Gomer would say "Shazam!!" 
