Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueWaveNeverEnd

(7,962 posts)
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 09:06 PM Mar 26

BlackRock CEO believes boomers should retire later than 65

BlackRock (BLK) CEO Larry Fink has some strict criticism for the generation born in the 1950s, often known as baby boomers, or boomers for short. The executive, who is a boomer himself, claimed in a new letter to BlackRock investors that the older generation hasn’t been doing enough to help the “economically anxious” younger generations and should retire at an age later than 65.

“It’s no wonder younger generations, Millennials and Gen Z, are so economically anxious,” said Fink in the letter. “They believe my generation — the baby boomers — have focused on their own financial well-being to the detriment of who comes next. And in the case of retirement, they’re right.”

Fink also said in the letter that younger generations “have lost trust in older generations,” and that it is the responsibility for boomers to gain it back by making investments. “Young people have lost trust in older generations,” he said. “The burden is on us to get it back. And maybe investing for their long-term goals, including retirement, isn’t such a bad place to begin.”

Fink also states in the letter that he believes that older generations should retire at an age over 65 due to changing demographics in the country. He claims that people are living longer than they did in the early 20th century, and that the Social Security program worked during that era because “more than half the people who worked and paid into the system never lived to retire and be paid from the system.

Read more at: https://www.sacbee.com/news/business/article287120430.html#storylink=cpy

68 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BlackRock CEO believes boomers should retire later than 65 (Original Post) BlueWaveNeverEnd Mar 26 OP
Too late... brooklynite Mar 26 #1
me too BlueWaveNeverEnd Mar 26 #3
Me, too. My wife retired at 48. marble falls Mar 26 #9
61 GoodRaisin Mar 27 #46
Cancer got in my way. marble falls Mar 27 #53
Spinal cord deterioration sidelined me. GoodRaisin Mar 27 #66
Aging is not for pansies. I tell my wife sometimes, "I'm getting a job!". She just shakes her head and laughs. marble falls Mar 27 #67
Me too! phylny Mar 27 #48
Fuck him edhopper Mar 26 #2
It's always projection with these senseandsensibility Mar 26 #4
Fuck Black Rock too Captain Zero Mar 27 #43
FUCK.HIM! 50 Shades Of Blue Mar 26 #5
Guy who sits behind a desk telling carpenters and plumbers to keep working #SodOff irisblue Mar 26 #6
I retired at 59 ripcord Mar 26 #7
I retired at 60, about eight months ago... Silent3 Mar 27 #41
And I think Larry Fink should sink his head to his shoulders up his butt. marble falls Mar 26 #8
Young people have lost faith in older fat cats who are hoarding 90% of the wealth. usonian Mar 26 #10
During times of layoffs, companies KarenS Mar 26 #11
They do want it both ways. Especially when they are not on the receiving end for either. LiberalFighter Mar 26 #17
64 was enpogh for me quaker bill Mar 26 #12
Then, I guess he wouldn't mind paying SS on all his salary and perks. By the way, the remaining sinkingfeeling Mar 26 #13
Isn't it amusing when someone who is pontificating about spooky3 Mar 26 #31
The SS tax limit for 2024 is 168,600.$ Prairie_Seagull Mar 27 #50
I was glad that when I retired my well-paying job went to a much younger person wishstar Mar 26 #14
I was more than happy to retire 3 years early. Delmette2.0 Mar 27 #64
Hasan eviserating Shapiro DJ Porkchop Mar 26 #15
Why does anyone care what Shapiro thinks? LastLiberal in PalmSprings Mar 27 #38
Nope! Upthevibe Mar 26 #16
I put in my 30 years and retired at 52. LiberalFighter Mar 26 #18
Some for Rebl2 Mar 26 #19
Particularly people who did physical jobs. Bodies wear out. catrose Mar 27 #40
Sort Of ProfessorGAC Mar 27 #47
Even with SS I'll have to work till I drop. pecosbob Mar 26 #20
Huh? Retire later and not free up a job for younger workers? brush Mar 26 #21
being smart and being politcal are two different things,,,, KarenS Mar 26 #22
Correct about "guys like him..." They somehow get kicked upstairs. brush Mar 26 #24
"Guys like him just think they're smart." yep BlueWaveNeverEnd Mar 26 #28
Nepotism? eom/ Backseat Driver Mar 27 #35
More like the opposite. Not helping a relative to get hired...keeping the job. brush Mar 27 #37
How's that for perverse incentives? Renew Deal Mar 26 #23
he is having a sad because people don't work themselves to death anymore DBoon Mar 26 #25
I believe Black Rock CEOs should die sooner Hassler Mar 26 #26
Fuck you, you entitled jerk. niyad Mar 26 #27
Greedy prick wants it both ways. Wants the businesses he owns or has stock in to pay as little employers SSA..... MMBeilis Mar 26 #29
Pre-boomer here....1943. Wife and I retired from teaching at 55. albacore Mar 26 #30
Facebook meme: CrispyQ Mar 26 #32
Is the Fink going to hire anyone over age 65? dlk Mar 26 #33
I thought it was 67 now Bucky Mar 26 #34
It keeps inching up. It's been some years since it was 65. catrose Mar 27 #39
It is GrapesOfWrath Mar 27 #49
Give me an offer I can't refuse... LakeVermilion Mar 27 #36
And the wonderful house and senate that passed it. jimfields33 Mar 27 #52
Hell, we should be heading toward 4-day work weeks and retirement at 60 Silent3 Mar 27 #42
what they do/ video link Captain Zero Mar 27 #44
My guess is this guy wants to privatize Social Security Captain Zero Mar 27 #45
"But at BlackRock, we won't hire you bc you're too old." Yavin4 Mar 27 #51
Says the wanker with more privilege than he deserves NanaCat Mar 27 #54
I wish just once one of these over-privileged jerks would bother to learn about jobs with tough physical labor. Lonestarblue Mar 27 #55
I'm 65 and just accepted a part time job Kaleva Mar 27 #56
Oh, gimme a fucking break. DFW Mar 27 #57
"Everybody has to spend their lives doing what I want, because I am rich and I always get what I want!" Midnight Writer Mar 27 #58
My employer went out of buisiness when I was 61 so I collected unemplyment doc03 Mar 27 #59
Larry Fink needs remedial math. Voltaire2 Mar 27 #60
Dude appears to be talking out of both sides of his derriere. intheflow Mar 27 #61
Most of my friends didn't retire. They got leftyladyfrommo Mar 27 #62
Tell him he doesn't have a say in the matter. LiberalFighter Mar 27 #63
Too Late! Deep State Witch Mar 27 #65
I'm probably going to work till 70 at least. Mosby Mar 27 #68

GoodRaisin

(8,924 posts)
46. 61
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 03:22 AM
Mar 27

And that decision was based on deteriorating health. Not everybody can go on working and working and working. Republicans would have us believe that 65 is the fountain of youth, which, of course is baloney.

GoodRaisin

(8,924 posts)
66. Spinal cord deterioration sidelined me.
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 12:38 PM
Mar 27

There are all kinds of things that can get you when you start getting older. Younger generations had better wise up to these Republican lies or they are going to live in hell when they reach our age.

marble falls

(57,102 posts)
67. Aging is not for pansies. I tell my wife sometimes, "I'm getting a job!". She just shakes her head and laughs.
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 01:41 PM
Mar 27

phylny

(8,380 posts)
48. Me too!
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 07:44 AM
Mar 27

Someone younger than I am now has a job with benefits since I vacated it. See how that works, Mr. Fink?

Captain Zero

(6,810 posts)
43. Fuck Black Rock too
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 02:28 AM
Mar 27

I'm sure this ass and his company had something to do with at least one of my lay-offs over the years, that resulted in less pay at my next job, and lower social security benefits. And I'm probably not the only fellow boomer he screwed over that way.

Fuck him.

Silent3

(15,221 posts)
41. I retired at 60, about eight months ago...
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 02:10 AM
Mar 27

...and don't feel at the slightest risk of getting so bored I'd want to go back to work!

I might consider a contract job now and again to make a few extra bucks, but I'm in no rush whatsoever for that.

usonian

(9,813 posts)
10. Young people have lost faith in older fat cats who are hoarding 90% of the wealth.
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 09:26 PM
Mar 26

If they paid their fair share, young people would have a much easier time.

Most of us have been generous with the scraps that CEO's reluctantly pay to people who actually work(ed) for a living.

No yachts, no golf courses, no airplanes, no bomb-proof bunker.

I am so tired of morans projecting their own guilt on others.

KarenS

(4,079 posts)
11. During times of layoffs, companies
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 09:28 PM
Mar 26

often targeted the older workers,,,,

Plus, it was said if the Boomers would retire there were more jobs for the younger folks.

They can't have it both ways

sinkingfeeling

(51,457 posts)
13. Then, I guess he wouldn't mind paying SS on all his salary and perks. By the way, the remaining
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 09:34 PM
Mar 26

Last edited Wed Mar 27, 2024, 11:34 AM - Edit history (1)

boomers are retiring at 66 or 67, not 65.

spooky3

(34,458 posts)
31. Isn't it amusing when someone who is pontificating about
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 11:01 PM
Mar 26

What is wrong with Social Security doesn’t have even the most basic facts straight?

And, the US normal retirement age is in line with, and in many cases, higher than, that in other developed countries.

Prairie_Seagull

(3,329 posts)
50. The SS tax limit for 2024 is 168,600.$
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 07:59 AM
Mar 27

Some, even many have been talking about raising this limit. I think this greedy fuck is afraid of it's increase for myriad reasons. Greed, greed greed and of course greed.

He knows that increasing this limit is the best answer. IMO.

Good morning,

wishstar

(5,270 posts)
14. I was glad that when I retired my well-paying job went to a much younger person
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 09:36 PM
Mar 26

I retired from a fairly lucrative but stressful job after 26 years but had a good pension with healthcare and adequate savings. I always felt it was selfish for those of us "boomers" to continue working if we were well off financially and could retire with a pension and savings. My job went to someone just starting out who needed the chance for a good career.

But my main reason for retiring early was because my parents and my mother-in-law all required intensive caregiving assistance that I could only adequately provide wihout having the responsibilities of a full time job.

Delmette2.0

(4,166 posts)
64. I was more than happy to retire 3 years early.
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 11:01 AM
Mar 27

I started by using my ex deceased husband's SS benefits. He never remarried and my SS advisor suggested it.
I was caring for my son who had muscular dystrophy and my 89 year old mother with macular degeneration.
They were able to care for themselves but I knew it would only get worse.
Within two years they were both deceased. I am glad I was able to be available for them and to enjoy both without the stress of working.

My SS had time to grow a bit more which includes Medicare and an excellent supplement. This helped me cope with my medical issues that showed up.




38. Why does anyone care what Shapiro thinks?
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 12:50 AM
Mar 27

Other than looking like the spawn of Satan, what qualifications does he have to espouse his negative philosophy wherever there is a microphone? He sounds like the smart-ass kid in high school who had to argue with the teachers, no matter what the subject. All he did was waste the time of the rest of us who were there to learn.

I read that people who just have to argue do so because they are addicted to the adrenaline high they get from the "flight or fight" situation they've created. Shapiro fits that description.

BTW, my opinion is that anti-abortion people have the same addiction. What better trigger than believing you are fighting for the life of an unborn child? Once Dobbs was passed, the source of their addiction was removed, so they've been forced to look for another trigger. Birth control and IVF are temporary sources, but they don't provide the incredible high they got from their anti-Roe fight. Even getting a nationwide ban on abortion is dull when compared with thrill of fighting for an unborn child. (Once the child is born, however, they're on their own.)

What will be the next target they'll use to feed the dragon?

I am now permanently kicking Shapiro out of the place he's been living rent-free in my head.

Upthevibe

(8,052 posts)
16. Nope!
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 09:40 PM
Mar 26

I just turned full retirement age, 66 1/2 on March 1st. If you were born in 1957, that's the age when you get your full retirement check. I should be getting my first direct deposit in April.

I've worked since I was 16 years old. I'm tired!

Rebl2

(13,523 posts)
19. Some for
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 09:48 PM
Mar 26

health reasons need to retire at 65 or younger. He is wrong saying we live longer. I am sure I heard earlier this year that we are going backwards and dying younger. I sure see a lot of obituaries in the paper the last few years and many people dying in their 50’s, 60’s and 70’s. He should just shut the F up.

ProfessorGAC

(65,076 posts)
47. Sort Of
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 07:39 AM
Mar 27

The slide in life expectancy is over a shorter time frame than going back to the 30s, 40s, or 50s.
The life expectancy is still higher than when SocSec started, but much less significantly than Shapiro suggests.
It's simply untrue that "most people" didn't live to collect the benefit.
He just pulled that "fact" out of thin air.

brush

(53,787 posts)
21. Huh? Retire later and not free up a job for younger workers?
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 09:57 PM
Mar 26

That helps how?

How about raising the ceiling on FICA deductions to insure SS will continue to be funded?

Duh!

How'd that guy get to be a CEO?

KarenS

(4,079 posts)
22. being smart and being politcal are two different things,,,,
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 10:09 PM
Mar 26

Guys like him just think they're smart.

plus

The only thing wrong with Social Security is that they borrowed money from it to pay for wars,,,, now they don't want to pay it back,,,, remember when those coffers were overflowing??

MMBeilis

(191 posts)
29. Greedy prick wants it both ways. Wants the businesses he owns or has stock in to pay as little employers SSA.....
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 10:56 PM
Mar 26

......tax on employees wages, both by the rate and by paying them as little as possible. And doesn't want to pay into the system on income over $168,600 because he views it as a bad investment compared to his portfolio. This is reason that Social Security's solvency is always a long term concern. He doesn't want to pay on more of his income and prefers that low income workers just work longer and pay more.

albacore

(2,399 posts)
30. Pre-boomer here....1943. Wife and I retired from teaching at 55.
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 10:56 PM
Mar 26

Very few teachers can last beyond 30 years. Kids and schools change.

CrispyQ

(36,478 posts)
32. Facebook meme:
Tue Mar 26, 2024, 11:24 PM
Mar 26

The same people who want us to work until we're 70 are the same ones who won't hire us after we're 50.

GrapesOfWrath

(524 posts)
49. It is
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 07:50 AM
Mar 27

Funny how nobody mentions this. Full retirement has been moving up every year… thanks Ronnie Raygun…

LakeVermilion

(1,042 posts)
36. Give me an offer I can't refuse...
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 12:06 AM
Mar 27

He's got lots of money, so he can hire "Boomers." But don't expect us to work for nothing. I'll work if the job and the pay meet my worth. In a market economy don't expect me to work for peanuts. I have value.

Just sayin'.

Silent3

(15,221 posts)
42. Hell, we should be heading toward 4-day work weeks and retirement at 60
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 02:14 AM
Mar 27

Especially if AI and other automation starts reducing employment opportunities without, as we've often been able to count on in the past, creating new jobs.

It's all quite doable if wealth distribution doesn't remain so insanely lopsided.

Captain Zero

(6,810 posts)
45. My guess is this guy wants to privatize Social Security
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 02:39 AM
Mar 27

And of course he will want Black Rock to scoop up some of that privatization.

Yavin4

(35,441 posts)
51. "But at BlackRock, we won't hire you bc you're too old."
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 08:04 AM
Mar 27

"But you should keep working...just not for us. But definitely keep working past 65... just not for us."

NanaCat

(1,161 posts)
54. Says the wanker with more privilege than he deserves
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 08:37 AM
Mar 27

With the shine on his arse from sitting on it all day and exploiting everyone and everything that strikes his fancy on a given day, rather than, you know, working for a living.

Lonestarblue

(10,011 posts)
55. I wish just once one of these over-privileged jerks would bother to learn about jobs with tough physical labor.
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 08:39 AM
Mar 27

He might not be so eager to extend retirement age. This attitude also ignores the reality that average life spans for Native Americans is 62 and 70 for Black Americans. He also thinks people don’t save enough for retirement, which is because they aren’t paid enough for working. Every idea that people like this pontificate about is based on assumptions they make because they are white and wealthy.

DFW

(54,405 posts)
57. Oh, gimme a fucking break.
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 08:59 AM
Mar 27

I'm 72 and I'll retire when I feel like it. My wife felt like it at age 60, and did. The only reason she's "living longer" is because when she was 64, a very aware oncologist told her that she might have one of the worst forms of cancer out there (she did), and she needed to have it treated immediately to have a chance of survival (she did, and she survived, even if statistics said she wouldn't).

Our two children are now 39 and 41, and have all the trust in the world in generations both older and younger, as well as their own. One of them lives in New York City, and, along with her husband, makes enough to live there and not be in dire financial straits. The other lives outside Frankfurt am Main, Germany, and makes five times as much as I do if not more. She pays more in taxes than my gross income is altogether. We hear more generalizations than there are stars in the Milky Way. We stopped paying them much attention a long time ago, since none of them seem to have any relevance to us at all.

Midnight Writer

(21,768 posts)
58. "Everybody has to spend their lives doing what I want, because I am rich and I always get what I want!"
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 09:02 AM
Mar 27

"Boomers have focused on their own financial well-being to the detriment of who comes next."?

Does this guy have a mirror? Has he got any self-awareness at all?

What has a hedge fund ever done for you? What has a hedge fund ever done to help "those who come next"?

doc03

(35,346 posts)
59. My employer went out of buisiness when I was 61 so I collected unemplyment
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 09:35 AM
Mar 27

until I was 62 then retired and haven't regretted it for one second.

intheflow

(28,476 posts)
61. Dude appears to be talking out of both sides of his derriere.
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 10:18 AM
Mar 27

Like, young people are economically anxious, so let's make sure the older generation stays in jobs longer, giving younger people less actual job openings.

LiberalFighter

(50,947 posts)
63. Tell him he doesn't have a say in the matter.
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 10:27 AM
Mar 27

It is easy for him to continue working past 65 when he has a cushy job with top-level health care and living conditions.

Deep State Witch

(10,429 posts)
65. Too Late!
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 11:12 AM
Mar 27

I retired at 56, about a month after I became eligible in 2020. Between COVID and being a Federal employee under TFG, I'd had it. Hubs retired six months later. We're happily spending my parents' money.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BlackRock CEO believes bo...