Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stinky The Clown

(67,799 posts)
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 09:25 PM Mar 27

Just putting this thought out there regarding tugboats and big ships

Tugboats most usually get a big ship out away from the pier and on its way out under its own steam.

The tragedy in Baltimore shows how this works well . . . . until it doesn't. Two tugs pulled Dali off her berth, turned her 180, cast off and tooted buhbye. Had they continued on for another 15 or 20 minutes, yesterday might have been a slow news day., with the worst case maybe being a very local story about a big ship run aground

How about we require tugs for ships over some certain size (determined by the individual ports) to get the ship out into open water before they cast off.

Given what we now know about the Key Bridge disaster, it is quite likely had the tugs stayed with the Dali they would have prevented all this.

Given the number of containers on the Dali, this added cost would be pennies per imported TV or car, or any other item of freight. Assuming more or less standard rates, a two tug tow for a ship like the Dali could be $60-70,000. A single tug assist for a much smaller ship might be $4-5,000.
https://www.morantug.com/Customer-Content/www/ports-and-operations/Files/Moran_Baltimore_Schedule_of_Rates_Terms_and_Conditions_07_15_23.pdf

Making greater use of tugs and making them mandatory might be a good was to minimize to some degree the danger of these behemoth ships in ports that were never designed for them.

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just putting this thought out there regarding tugboats and big ships (Original Post) Stinky The Clown Mar 27 OP
'about we require tugs for ships over some certain size,' you mean REGULATION??? elleng Mar 27 #1
elleng....... Upthevibe Mar 27 #6
Yes and more than that case, elleng Mar 27 #8
If they don't want government regulation. LiberalFighter Mar 28 #33
That's not a bad idea RainCaster Mar 27 #2
Talking with my bro last night. We can't understand why the tugs don't stay with the ships through a bridge like this, OAITW r.2.0 Mar 27 #3
I'm betting money is the answer Kennah Mar 27 #11
That was... 2naSalit Mar 28 #19
This is NY State canal tug. amerikat Mar 27 #4
Skeptical until more is learned. SnarkSavant Mar 27 #5
8 mph, for one thing. elleng Mar 27 #9
Speed is required in order to navigate Thunderbeast Mar 28 #36
Two tugs plus the ship's power plant means three power plants to rely on. Hassin Bin Sober Mar 28 #16
That's what I heard.... 2naSalit Mar 28 #20
Common for large cargo vessels FBaggins Mar 28 #28
Tugs don't pull from the bow nor push from the stern. They control the direction after the docks. They steer big ships. Marcus IM Mar 28 #35
If only the professionals had consulted you. Ptah Mar 27 #7
Which ones? The bottom line professionals? n/t Marcus IM Mar 27 #12
The people that have sailed under that bridge for forty years. Ptah Mar 27 #13
Modernity. Ships are now guided by computers. cachukis Mar 27 #10
Great post FHRRK Mar 28 #18
The tugs did their job by getting the ship out of port and into the shipping lane, where the pilot Bev54 Mar 27 #14
Nope. Harbor pilots board outbound ships from the dock. Most harbors require tugs all the way to the harbor exit. Marcus IM Mar 28 #34
could station a tug or 2 near the bridge. there if there's a mayday, or if they're needed farther in. mopinko Mar 27 #15
What would that have accomplished? AkFemDem Mar 28 #31
Far from a knowledgeable person on this, and Far is not representitive, it is Far, far, far, far, far, far. With that FHRRK Mar 28 #17
good idea BlueWaveNeverEnd Mar 28 #21
How about protect the foundation of the bridge with concrete bumpers (dolphins)? Hermit-The-Prog Mar 28 #22
it has them, but minimal number. mopinko Mar 28 #38
I think the Sunshine Skyway should have been enough warning... Hermit-The-Prog Mar 28 #39
In the Navy we used tug boats to bring our Emile Mar 28 #23
Our captain hit the pilings in the degassing range in Charleston harbor Stinky The Clown Mar 28 #24
That's strange.. Omnipresent Mar 28 #27
I'm sure it did. But a large ship 530 foot long Emile Mar 28 #32
Do you know what a degassing range is? Stinky The Clown Mar 28 #40
I know nothing about tugboating even though my cousin was a TB Captain in Boston on the Mystic river. Fla Dem Mar 28 #25
I just assumed large ships like this would have tug boats. Omnipresent Mar 28 #26
Every harbor provides tug boats to assist those big-ass container ships FakeNoose Mar 28 #29
Am curious, in this case, what you mean by "open water" eallen Mar 28 #30
Good Point RobinA Mar 28 #37
Outside theKey Bridge is considered open water Stinky The Clown Mar 28 #41
Yet transits another bridge on way to Atlantic eallen Mar 29 #42
while everyone is playing 'Wack-a-Mole'... Conjuay Mar 29 #43
Booyah for Tugboats, But let's still build better bridge fenders Model35mech Mar 29 #44

elleng

(130,912 posts)
1. 'about we require tugs for ships over some certain size,' you mean REGULATION???
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 09:32 PM
Mar 27

Thanks for the suggestion; won't be the first or last; fairly large part of what made this country what it is.

'The Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) was a regulatory agency in the United States created by the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887. The agency's original purpose was to regulate railroads (and later trucking) to ensure fair rates, to eliminate rate discrimination, and to regulate other aspects of common carriers, including interstate bus lines and telephone companies. Congress expanded ICC authority to regulate other modes of commerce beginning in 1906. Throughout the 20th century, several of ICC's authorities were transferred to other federal agencies. The ICC was abolished in 1995, and its remaining functions were transferred to the Surface Transportation Board.' >>>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_Commerce_Commission

Upthevibe

(8,051 posts)
6. elleng.......
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 09:48 PM
Mar 27

The first thing I thought of was "but that would mean regulations." The policies that would make us all safer and prevent crises but nooooooooooooooo......those horrible regulations.

I think the keep the government our of my business mentality has kind of lost its "credibility" since the overturning of Roe V Wade.

elleng

(130,912 posts)
8. Yes and more than that case,
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 09:53 PM
Mar 27

enabling unlimited $$$, and enabling lies/untruths 2 that cross my mind.

LiberalFighter

(50,930 posts)
33. If they don't want government regulation.
Thu Mar 28, 2024, 11:40 AM
Mar 28

1) Find a business that doesn't require government regulation.

or

2) Go someplace else that doesn't require government regulation.

RainCaster

(10,877 posts)
2. That's not a bad idea
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 09:34 PM
Mar 27

Of course it would be different for every port, but if each port would review all the potential "what if" scenarios, that could work.

Similar arrangements are already made for ships pilots.

OAITW r.2.0

(24,504 posts)
3. Talking with my bro last night. We can't understand why the tugs don't stay with the ships through a bridge like this,
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 09:34 PM
Mar 27

2naSalit

(86,628 posts)
19. That was...
Thu Mar 28, 2024, 01:01 AM
Mar 28

Probably my first thought. Where were the tugs?

It rally makes sense with such a busy port to have a more secure manner for them the traverse the bridge underpass as well.

SnarkSavant

(13 posts)
5. Skeptical until more is learned.
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 09:44 PM
Mar 27

Big ass ship moving is a big ass ship moving and it's a big ass body in motion. It ain't a car that you slam the brakes on. Would love to know the speed, weight and displacement before I would speculate on what ifs.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
16. Two tugs plus the ship's power plant means three power plants to rely on.
Thu Mar 28, 2024, 12:15 AM
Mar 28

Did I hear the big ship only had one screw?

Seems like more redundancy around this critical infrastructure would be warranted.

2naSalit

(86,628 posts)
20. That's what I heard....
Thu Mar 28, 2024, 01:04 AM
Mar 28

On a video of a harbor watcher who was analyzing the event right away. He started with a description of the vessel and I recall the he said it had a single prop.

Marcus IM

(2,203 posts)
35. Tugs don't pull from the bow nor push from the stern. They control the direction after the docks. They steer big ships.
Thu Mar 28, 2024, 11:52 AM
Mar 28

Maybe in narrow canals they pull and push from the bow and stern, but large container ships in a harbor, no.
There's lots of harbor tug vids around.
You'll see that they attach lines to the big ship to control the direction of forward (or backward) motion by pushing or pulling from the sides. The container ship propels itself forward. The harbor tugs have extremely powerful twin engines to steer the ships attached by ropes.

This is done at the direction of the harbor pilots who are aboard the ship.

Only very large open ocean tugs directly pull ships across the water. They are not the same as harbor tugs.

cachukis

(2,239 posts)
10. Modernity. Ships are now guided by computers.
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 09:55 PM
Mar 27

My nephew designs software for robotic ships.
Even had tugboats released the ship after it had passed the bridge a power failure in an incoming tide would be the conversation.
We have a zillion vehicles transporting a zillion things.
The accident rate is negligible.
This one was spectacular.
Safety response, overall, was topnotch.
The real test will be in the resolution.
This is the big time that will resolve any competence issues in the administration.
Impressive was the response today in front of the press and the world.
The world will be watching.
Mayor Pete needs to be doing daily and then weekly updates like the Covid response.
Remember Ted Koppel. We all do.

FHRRK

(481 posts)
18. Great post
Thu Mar 28, 2024, 12:42 AM
Mar 28
The real test will be in the resolution.


So far the response has been great by the Biden Admin.

But damn, we need to get people to focus. (and the Media is our enemy)

The root cause will be determined, the proper corrective action will be the issue. With that, Repugs will fight it every step of the way.

Bev54

(10,052 posts)
14. The tugs did their job by getting the ship out of port and into the shipping lane, where the pilot
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 10:58 PM
Mar 27

takes over. This is the same in most countries.

Marcus IM

(2,203 posts)
34. Nope. Harbor pilots board outbound ships from the dock. Most harbors require tugs all the way to the harbor exit.
Thu Mar 28, 2024, 11:42 AM
Mar 28

Harbor pilots exit outbound ships at the harbor exits in most cases.
Baltimore is an exception.

Also, Harbor Pilots don't run nor maintain the engines.

mopinko

(70,109 posts)
15. could station a tug or 2 near the bridge. there if there's a mayday, or if they're needed farther in.
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 11:04 PM
Mar 27

prolly a plum job for some crony’s kid, but i’ll allow it.
let em troll for trash if there’s nothing to do.

AkFemDem

(1,826 posts)
31. What would that have accomplished?
Thu Mar 28, 2024, 11:37 AM
Mar 28

There was 90 seconds from Mayday to full collapse, a tug or two near the bridge wouldn’t actually do anything except possibly be another casualty in an event like this. They’re not going to rig tow lines and gain control of the vessel and steer away in 90 seconds.

FHRRK

(481 posts)
17. Far from a knowledgeable person on this, and Far is not representitive, it is Far, far, far, far, far, far. With that
Thu Mar 28, 2024, 12:37 AM
Mar 28

I believe in the Port of Long Beach and Los Angeles the 'pilots' take them out past the breakwater to open seas prior to turning the ship over.
Not sure if that would have helped having a local take them under the bridge, but it seems logical that a local is more familiar and more experienced in navigating the ports and would be more responsive to emergency situations. For example the shit hits the fan and you have trained a couple dozen locals on emergency procedures compared to generic procedures in multiple languages for thousands of Captains.

Btw, I believe these port 'pilots' make over 200k per year. Could see some Execs being pissed off that some HS Graduates are getting paid to guide the ships out of the Ports. Damn bonus on their 2 million dollar salary was impacted by the uneducated takers.

mopinko

(70,109 posts)
38. it has them, but minimal number.
Thu Mar 28, 2024, 01:11 PM
Mar 28

this hit at an odd angle, hit the corner of the support. few places have a barrier at the corner. usually they just protect the sides.
suspect there will b a minimum required going forward. like 8. no exactly a mission to the moon.

Emile

(22,765 posts)
23. In the Navy we used tug boats to bring our
Thu Mar 28, 2024, 08:07 AM
Mar 28

larger ships in and out of Mayport Naval Station. One time coming back from Guantanamo Bay, Cuba the captain not wanting to wait on a pilot and tug boats thought he could pilot the ship into port. He ended up grounding the ship on a sand bar at the mouth of the St. John's river. We had to wait hours for high tide so tug boats could pull us off the sand bar and guide us safely into port. I think the captain got into a lot of trouble over that.

Stinky The Clown

(67,799 posts)
24. Our captain hit the pilings in the degassing range in Charleston harbor
Thu Mar 28, 2024, 10:29 AM
Mar 28

He broke two pilings and put the range out of commission for a while.

Meanwhile we returned to our berth with a huge scar across our port bow numbers. Lots of pointing and laughing.

Fla Dem

(23,673 posts)
25. I know nothing about tugboating even though my cousin was a TB Captain in Boston on the Mystic river.
Thu Mar 28, 2024, 11:05 AM
Mar 28

But I agree, it would make so much sense for the tugboats to maintain control on a huge ship until it clears all possible obstructions and is in clear water ahead.

Omnipresent

(5,711 posts)
26. I just assumed large ships like this would have tug boats.
Thu Mar 28, 2024, 11:10 AM
Mar 28

It’s like cargo ships were never given a second thought, when it comes to regulating them for operation near ports or bridges.

FakeNoose

(32,639 posts)
29. Every harbor provides tug boats to assist those big-ass container ships
Thu Mar 28, 2024, 11:30 AM
Mar 28

... also the tugs accompany the smaller ships too. But when the large ocean-going vessels have power issues, and that's the case here, the harbor's tugs are pretty helpless.

In fact the Dali should have never left the dock until its power issues were resolved. But who has the authority to prevent them from leaving? Not the Baltimore harbor patrol.

eallen

(2,953 posts)
30. Am curious, in this case, what you mean by "open water"
Thu Mar 28, 2024, 11:37 AM
Mar 28

Past Ft. Howard and into the Chesapeake proper? Past Annapolis? Past Virginia Beach and into the Atlantic?

Chesapeake bay is quite long. If you require tugs the whole trip, I suspect that is enough cost to make shippers think Baltimore is an expensive port, and they should prefer others.


RobinA

(9,893 posts)
37. Good Point
Thu Mar 28, 2024, 01:07 PM
Mar 28

The Key Bridge wasn't exactly the Gateway to the Atlantic. As the crow flies it's about 169 miles from Baltimore to Norfolk, with several twists, turns and bridges. And considering the number of gigantic container ships I've seen hanging out just outside the Chesapeake, it does seem that it would require a lot of tug time.

Conjuay

(1,386 posts)
43. while everyone is playing 'Wack-a-Mole'...
Fri Mar 29, 2024, 11:43 AM
Mar 29

Does anyone remember that NOAA put out a warning that March 25, 26, and 27th would experience possible electronic disturbances? Could it be that a poorly shielded electronics system scrambled the ships computer?
Could a solar flair (a lesbian DEI solar flair, if you must) be a factor?

Model35mech

(1,535 posts)
44. Booyah for Tugboats, But let's still build better bridge fenders
Fri Mar 29, 2024, 12:16 PM
Mar 29

I am not opposed to Tugboats, but they are an active defense against ship collisions with obstructions in a port. Active means they need a crew, they need to be available for use and 'in contact' with ships needing assistance. They can't perform in severe weather (granted the Key-bridge crash wasn't in bad weather) or if the crew is on strike. A bad contract negotiation can stop a tugboat.

I am wondering about more passive defenses, such as bridge fenders. A bridge fender is a large(!!) heavy, concrete pier or artificial island of gravel with concrete margins. The job of a fender is to STOP a ship from hitting the piers of a bridge. These things are passive structures. Once built they are there doing their job 24/7/12 months out of the year until it is badly damaged by a collision, or until the size of ship traffic get so large that in order to remain protective, they must be replaced with even larger fenders.

Looking at the aerial views of the Key Bridge prior to the collision it is clear that there are far too few fenders and those fenders are woefully small to stop a supersized container-carrier cargo ship.

Whose responsibility is it to keep the harbor safe? Is it a federal issue? A port authority issue? A city issue? Private port maintenance issue? I don't know. I'm from farm country in the midwest. We don;t have seaports. Though, we can recognize the importance of these protective things, we have no idea about the structure of the authority involved in building and maintaining them.

Booyah for tugboats! But, lets still build better bridge fenders.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just putting this thought...