Redirect questions for pecker

[JT45242]

1. If FOP, friends of pecker, were off limits including some political candidates...were any of these Democrats?
2. Why did you only protect the campaigns of Republicans?
3. Did you consider this to be something that could be valuable to a campaign of a friend or business associate?
4. Did you or the trump campaign report this value as a contribution in kind to his campaign?
5. The attack stories that you ran on trump opponents, what would be the approximate cost of these as attack ads?
6. Did you receive the value of the attack ads?
7. Did you or trump campaign include these as contribution in kind?
8. To address two other issues. Did you coordinate with Trump about who to attack?
9. So. Even if you were to somehow say that EMI and the national enquirer were operating as a SuperPAC, then it would have been in violation of campaign laws to coordinate between the PAC and the campaign. Who coordinated the messaging that was beneficial to trump? At whose direction?

(Gets you to Cohen as bag man and trump calling the shots with #9

[global1]

1. Tr**p Put Cohen In Place To Insulate Himself From Any Bad Fallout And Provide.....

him with 'plausible deniability'.

Pecker has allowed the prosecution to penetrate that barrier.

The Defense seems very intent on going after Cohen - as it is apparent Cohen is pivotal in this whole thing.

IMHO - I don't think that the Defense trying to discredit Cohen as a liar - will work. I believe the jury will see thru that tactic - because they know that Cohen was the main go-between of Tr**p and Pecker.

It is apparent that Tr**p really had little regard for Cohen and just used him to his advantage.

The Defense is really worried about Cohen's testimony - as no one knows as much about this whole 'catch & kill' plot - than Cohen.

As we move thru these witnesses - led off by Pecker - this whole thing just get juicier and juicier.