General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDemocrats Snub Netanyahu Address as Trump to Welcome Him to Mar-a-Lago
During his trip, Netanyahu is anticipated to deliver an address to Congress on Wednesday and meet with President Joe Biden Thursday, according to a report from the Associated Press (AP), which added that the Israeli leader will hold separate talks with Vice President Kamala Harris on Thursday.
Trump announced on Truth Social that Netanyahu will also make a stop at Mar-a-Lago on Friday.
"Looking forward to welcoming Bibi Netanyahu at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida During my first term, we had Peace and Stability in the Region, even signing the historic Abraham AccordsAnd we will have it again," Trump wrote on his Truth Social.
https://www.newsweek.com/democrats-snub-netanyahu-address-trump-welcome-him-mar-lago-1929352
Birds of a feather.

ananda
(32,566 posts)Saying no to war criminals is always a good thing.
Think. Again.
(22,363 posts)...or a different federal crime trump is committing by doing that?
I lose track of all the federal crimes garland doesn't proscute him for.
dflprincess
(28,915 posts)The Hatch Act governs how much political involvement government employees can have.
Think. Again.
(22,363 posts)karynnj
(60,395 posts)He can meet with foreign leaders, but he can claim to negotiate on behalf of then US.
However, there is Republican prededent:
Nixon and Kissinger persuaded South Vietnam that they could get a better deal waiting for them. Half the people with names on the VN wall died after Nixon became President. The terms in 1973 - the same as couldhave happened in 1968.
Before the Reagan election, Kissinger and at least GHWB got Iran to keep the hostages until Reagan the inauguration in exchange for selling them prohibited weapons. Part of Iran/contra.
What I worry about is that Netanyahu has been part of the problem getting a ceasefire. He could wait till he meets with Trump, agree to the ceasefire that Biden et AL have worked on for months and credit Trump with persuading him to do so. The thing that may prevent it is Ben G'ver and spotlight, 2 far right members of his government who have said they would bring the government down if he agrees.
no_hypocrisy
(52,242 posts)Klarkashton
(3,670 posts)Kegs that trump left for Biden.
Tax cuts, zero interest rates, Afghanistan... The list goes on and on.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)President Biden on Thursday said he strongly supports the Abraham Accords, promoting the Trump-era declarations as a way to integrate Israel in the Middle East.
We will also continue building on the Abraham Accords, which I strongly support because they deepen, they deepen Israels integration into the broader region and establish lasting ties for business, cooperation and tourism, Biden said during a press conference in Jerusalem.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/3558921-biden-says-he-strongly-supports-trumps-abraham-accords/
karynnj
(60,395 posts)if the Israel/ Palestine issue was resolved. Look at Clinton's words, Condi Rice's words, George Mitchell's words, and John Kerry's words. That integration was always the biggest of the "carrots" offered. Same with moving the embassy. Trump gave the carrots away without getting anything in return. (Not to mention, he pushed the Arab countries by allowing military purchases not approved before.)
So, yes, Biden accepted the fait accompli and even tried to expand the agreement before the Gaza attacks.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)What if the UK tells the U.S. its capital should be Omaha and that's where its embassy is going to be. Should the U.S. accept that? Jerusalem is and has been the capital of Israel and it is not up to negotiation or to be used as some sort of trade.
karynnj
(60,395 posts)Whether you agree that it was the correct thing to do, EVERY president before Trump kept the embassy in Tel Aviv. This even years after Congress voted for the embassy to be moved. You likely know that it was thought both Israel and Palestine would eventually have there capital in Jerusalem. ( The Palestinian one was to be in East Jerusalem.)
former9thward
(33,424 posts)Just because something has been done for decades does not make it right. Starting with Clinton every president elected promised in their election campaign to move the embassy. The U.S. did in 2017 and I am glad of that. Are you happy other president's broke their election promises to the American people?
All of Jerusalem belongs to Israel and that is the position of the vast majority of Israel and all of the major Israeli parties.
karynnj
(60,395 posts)The majority in Israel does not. The Knesset just passed a resolution that pretty much rules one out presumably forever. Do you agree with this?
Most of East Jerusalem was majority Palestinian.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)Gaza originally belonged to Egypt. Give it to them. The West Bank largely belonged to Jordan. Give it to them. The Palestinians do not have the economy for a nation. They don't have the geography. They don't have the national/political unity for a nation. Those fundamental reasons are why they rejected nationhood in 1948 when offered by the UN and why they have rejected every attempt to give them one ever since.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)ecstatic
(34,851 posts)Watch what they do, not what they say.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)It was bi-partisan.
LetMyPeopleVote
(166,210 posts)Bibi has to stay in power to keep from being tried for numerous crimes. Bibi is prolong the conflict in Gaza for his own purposes
Link to tweet

