General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Hillary is Running: A Dispatch from the Saban Forum"
Hillary is Running: A Dispatch from the Saban ForumPosted by David Remnick at the New Yorker
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2012/12/hillary-is-running-a-dispatch-from-the-saban-forum.html
"SNIP..............................................
Friday night, however, was on the recordand surprisingly revealing. Hillary Clinton was the main speaker. In a packed ballroom of the Willard Hotel, she was greeted with a standing ovation and then a short, adoring film, a video Festschrift testifying to her years as First Lady, senator, and, above all, Secretary of State. The film, an expensive-looking production, went to the trouble of collecting interviews with Israeli politiciansBenjamin Netanyahu, Ehud Barak, Tzipi Livniand American colleagues, like John Kerry. Tony Blair, striking the moony futuristic note that was general in the hall, said, I just have an instinct that the best is yet to come.
The film was like an international endorsement four years in advance of the Iowa caucus and the New Hampshire primary. The tone was so reverential that it resembled the sort of film that the Central Committee of the Communist Party might have produced for Leonid Brezhnevs retirement party if Leonid Brezhnev would only have retired and the Soviets had been in possession of advanced video technology. After it was over there was a separate video from the President. Looking straight into the camera, Obama kvelled at length: Youve been at my side at some of the most important moments of my Administration.
When the videos were over (and as the evening moved on), there was much chatter about what Clinton would do after she steps down from the Cabinet next monthget a haircut; take a few weeks sleeping off jet lag at Canyon Ranch; read the polls and the political landscape; do good works; do good works for the good people of, say, Iowaand so on. Everyone had a theory of which they were a hundred percent certain. There wasnt much doubt about the ultimate direction. 2007-8 was but a memory and 2016 was within sight. Shes running.
I am somewhat overwhelmed, but Im obviously thinking I should sit down, Clinton said as the videos concluded. I prepared some remarks for tonight, but then I thought maybe we could just watch that video a few more times. And then the next time, I could count the hairstyles, which is one of my favorite pastimes. An old joke with Hillary, but the crowd, tickled to be there, rosy with wine, roared.
.............................................SNIP"
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Hard to find the energy to even think about it.
applegrove
(118,674 posts)I don't think republicans could tarnish her narrative. She's been a known quantity and very talented at whatever she tries. She would make a great President. But yes, like you say, back to Obama. Where we belong.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Plus has a 70% approval rating as Sec of State. It's hard to imagine a Dem primary with any candidate having a single bad thing to say about her that could take her down. They love her. The Dem primaries would be a swoon-fest.
question everything
(47,483 posts)This is what many said in 2008. You never know which new star will show up.
antigop
(12,778 posts)DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)so she could have no worries about destroying the left once in office, and not even worry about Big Dawg supporting right wing ideas like the pipeline.
I could see her being a pres, but yes, she would have to earn my respect, by helpign undo the move to the right that she and her damn husband started.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)she will probably play as the centrist yet again, which will slap the faces of those who hoped to actually shift the center. of course, she could prove us wrong, and a few notes in the right direction (like ripping apart max baucus) could help. I am NOT counting on it.
antigop
(12,778 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)antigop
(12,778 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Not sure what you're so upset about.
antigop
(12,778 posts)krawhitham
(4,644 posts)Joe will run and inherit Obama ground game
krispos42
(49,445 posts)Hmmm...
tkmorris
(11,138 posts)Being ineligible to be President also means you cannot serve as the VP, at least that's how I've always understood it. Now that I think about it though I am not sure why that should be.
krispos42
(49,445 posts)Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.
Section 2. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress.
I read it as if Hillary left office (sick/dead/disgraced), Obama could be President again. But he could not run for re-election when Hillary's original term was up.
Alternately, Obama could simply be passed over and remain Veep as the Speaker of the House becomes the President. He could refuse to take the Presidential oath, and the line of succession would make the Speaker President.
ChoppinBroccoli
(3,784 posts).......that a two-term President couldn't occupy an elected office in which there was even the possibility that he might once again become President. I have nothing to back that up, but I remember hearing it a few years ago when people were suggesting that Bill Clinton be a VP consideration.
randome
(34,845 posts)antigop
(12,778 posts)inevitability meme down our throats.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)I really wish you folks would chill with the neolibs, it is going to break us.
antigop
(12,778 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)Why would we want less than we already have now in 2016?
It's like going from a 2009 Pontiac G8 GXP to a 2012 Kia Optima- Doesn't - Make - Sense-
applegrove
(118,674 posts)feel, we are lucky to have both of them in the party let alone running for President. And they'll bring something different to the Presidency. Obama no drama but a steady hand on the economy despite obstruction from the right. To do the things that need doing (like health care and soon to be immigration reform). If Clinton wins she may have the options of coming up with new programs/ideas as the economy will no doubt be doing better. I was saying on this forum two months ago how lucky we are to have both Clintons and both Obamas in the democratic party in the decades to come. Such gravitas vs. the sad, empty party the GOP is.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)applegrove
(118,674 posts)the GOP's relationship with the middle class. Obama is more popular than ever. Boehner looks like he is going to let the tax cuts expire on the middle class.
ChoppinBroccoli
(3,784 posts)That would make her the second-oldest President in history. In fact, there have only been 2 people elected President who were over the age of 65, and one of them died within months of assuming office. Voters are wary of this possibility. I think voters will also remember (with a great deal of help from the right-wing noise machine) that Hillary quit as Secretary of State after only one term, complaining about how tired she felt. And she's going to be 4 years older in 2016. Sorry, but I just don't see it.
I think it's time for our Party to be identifying new blood, anyway. We caught lightning in a bottle with Obama. Let's find the next Obama and stop trying to solve the problems of the future with names from the past.
Although, I must admit that it would be interesting to see another Clinton v. Bush, assuming the Republicans really do run Jeb Bush (and seeing as how they have no imagination whatsoever, I assume they will).
Whisp
(24,096 posts)All this talk of her being tired all the time sure doesn't help her.
That's good.
thelordofhell
(4,569 posts)mulsh
(2,959 posts)Aside from that yeah, sure, speculation based on nothing more than wishes mixed with admiration sure is fun.
Unfortunately Ms. Clinton has stated fairly clearly and consistently that she intends to withdraw from public life when she resigns as Secretary of State.
BTW if she does run in 2016 I'll vote for her.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)Have we not already waited long enough? If 2016 is too soon for a progressive nominee when we have already waited more than a generation - Just when will we be ready?
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)political dynasties.