Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 11:45 AM Dec 2012

Decade of US 'War on Terror' Yields More 'Terrorism'

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/12/04



After more than eleven years of the US waging wars abroad in the name of "fighting terrorism" a new report released Tuesday shows that the number of global terror attacks has dramatically increased during the post-9/11 era, not decreased.


The new Global Terrorism Index (GTI) found that while the US wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and elsewhere generated huge spikes in terrorist activity and civilian deaths in those countries, it is North America which has been most insulated from the growth in violence.

Produced by the Institute for Economics & Peace (IEP) the GTI is the first index to rank countries on the impact of terrorism and analyses the associated economic and social dimensions. The index is based on data from the Global Terrorism Database, which is collected and collated by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START), headquartered at the University of Maryland.

"After 9/11, terrorist activity fell back to pre-2000 levels until after the Iraq invasion, and has since escalated dramatically," Steve Killelea, founder and executive chairman of the Institute for Economics and Peace, told Reuters in an e-mail interview.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Decade of US 'War on Terror' Yields More 'Terrorism' (Original Post) xchrom Dec 2012 OP
Same with the drugs malaise Dec 2012 #1
No disrespect, but that should come as no surprise. n/t Flying Dream Blues Dec 2012 #2
it's always good to have numbers and stats. xchrom Dec 2012 #4
The glaring fault with the study... DreamGypsy Dec 2012 #3
Probably part of the plan.... Junkdrawer Dec 2012 #5

DreamGypsy

(2,252 posts)
3. The glaring fault with the study...
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 12:18 PM
Dec 2012

From the article:

The glaring fault of the study, which demands note, is that it employs a very narrow definition of the term "terrorism"—a word that Glenn Greenwald says "simultaneously means nothing and justifies everything." Within the scope of GTI report, the term excludes the violence of state or government-based actors like the US armed forces or NATO's military regime.

As Reuters notes:

The researchers used the University of Maryland definition of "terrorism": "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".

It did not include casualties from government-backed action such as aerial bombing or other killings.

Long a critique of the "global war on terrorism" is that the definition of the word "terrorism" is meant to connote violence perpetrated by less powerful, though committed, militant networks and not the politically motivated violence of powerful nations, such as the United States or others.



America is not the world.

Junkdrawer

(27,993 posts)
5. Probably part of the plan....
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 12:18 PM
Dec 2012

The War on Terror was and is a desperate attempt to re-justify US Imperial war spending and deployments after the collapse of the USSR.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Decade of US 'War on Terr...