General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYou don't know whether to laugh or cry...
A new Public Policy Polling survey shows finds that 49% of Republican voters nationally say they think that ACORN stole the election for President Obama, as compared to 52% that thought ACORN stole the 2008 election, "a modest decline, but perhaps smaller than might have been expected given that ACORN doesn't exist anymore."
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/12/04/nearly_half_of_republicans_think_election_was_stolen.html
Archae
(46,328 posts)siligut
(12,272 posts)It's double-duty stupid.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Little Star
(17,055 posts)graham4anything
(11,464 posts)[img][/img]
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)This is just BS that shows that a large number of people are gleefully ignorant, hateful, or as Faux calls them "their target demographic"
rurallib
(62,416 posts)throughout the land. And they will blame Acorn for everything from the case of syphilis they contracted to the election of any democrat to office.
dballance
(5,756 posts)So they believe ACORN stole the election. Most likely based on the testaments coming from their high priests and priestess' like Limbaugh, Coulter, Malkin, Hannity and the rest.
These are probably the same people who believe the Earth is only 6,000 years old and that Jesus was a real person rather than a mythical character like Zeus or Poseidon.
The Wizard
(12,545 posts)and flat.
mlevans
(843 posts)How I do grieve for thee.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)intersectionality
(106 posts)"The 39% of Americans with an opinion about Bowles/Simpson is only slightly higher than the 25% with one about Panetta/Burns, a mythical Clinton Chief of Staff/former western Republican Senator combo we conceived of to test how many people would say they had an opinion even about something that doesn't exist."
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)barbtries
(28,795 posts)do they have a sampling of nothing but teabaggers or something?
Enrique
(27,461 posts)and among the most accurate for the 2012 election, as I understand it.
that is tragic
Lydia Leftcoast
(48,217 posts)Someone actually posted on the Facebook page of Acorn Media (a distributor of British and Canadian DVDs) a couple of years ago, asking if they were related to ACORN, and if not, urging them to change their name. They responded that they'd had the name since 1979 and that all sorts of businesses use the word "Acorn" in their names.
LisaLynne
(14,554 posts)an acorn for a brain?
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)We would have known better than to vote for Obama, acceding to these same geniuses who think Acorn stole the election.
libodem
(19,288 posts)It is sad.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)with their "re-education camps".
Just kidding, of course ... but jeesh. this just boggles the
mind, to see what a bunch of absolute idiots we are, and
must appear to the rest of the world.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)I use an ACORN base.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)the kids call it "tossing your cookies"...but only in an academic sort of way.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)"Here are two major newspaper accounts and a press release. Acorn was disbanded two years ago, and they are no longer in existence. Does this change your answer?"
I would be for over half of them it wouldn't, and that's really scary...
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)hue
(4,949 posts)TxVietVet
(1,905 posts)They keep their audience very uninformed.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)wiggs
(7,814 posts)represent, what, 35% of the people who vote? 49% of 35% is 17% of voters, about 10% of the nation?
Still....In addition to the 49%, I bet there are many more voters unsure, uncertain, confused, ignorant, willing to consider it, etc.. Confusion seems to be a goal of the propagandists too...even if they can't convince enough people that POTUS is a not citizen, they muddy the waters, make clear issues gray...generally piss on knowledge, honesty, and information.
If there were no FOX and the percentages of talk radio were evenly split between progressive, unbiased, and conservative (instead of the 90% conservative we have now)...you'd have to say that people would be better informed...and public discourse and democracy would be the better for it.
Propagandists on the public airwaves is an irresponsible and diminishing influence on democracy, IMHO. Shouldn't be allowed.
progressoid
(49,990 posts)Solly Mack
(90,767 posts)The Doctor.
(17,266 posts)then shake your head.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)So much Win.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)So this doesn't surprise me.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)sellitman
(11,606 posts)Why must you always be so negative?
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)these klowns could buy a significant chunk of the galaxy.