Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

trailmonkee

(2,681 posts)
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 08:42 PM Dec 2012

These Fucking People are Monsters....

Last edited Wed Dec 5, 2012, 06:04 PM - Edit history (1)

Really?

Their level of disdain for humanity is downright creepy...

Maddow Blog



Former Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole (R-Kan.) made a rare Senate appearance this morning, sitting in a wheelchair just off the floor so that members would have to see him as they entered the chamber. Why? Because they were poised to vote on ratification of the U.N. Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities, and Dole hoped to send a message.

It didn't work. The Senate killed the treaty this afternoon, with a final vote of 61 to 38, which seems like a lopsided majority, but which fell short of the two-thirds necessary for ratification. Eight Republicans broke ranks and joined Democrats in support of the treaty, but the clear majority of the Senate GOP voted to block it.

The U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities, for those who've forgotten, is a human rights treaty negotiated by the George H.W. Bush administration, which has been ratified by 126 nations, including China, Russia, Iran, Cuba, Syria, and Saudi Arabia.

the roll call on the vote. All 38 opponents were Republicans:

The Monster List (the assholes are on the bottom of the list)




This is what they voted against (thanks handmade34) link
74 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
These Fucking People are Monsters.... (Original Post) trailmonkee Dec 2012 OP
They have no shame. Little Star Dec 2012 #1
Kirk didn't vote, recovering from stroke RomneyLies Dec 2012 #2
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr very mad about this vote DonRedwood Dec 2012 #3
Their hot day in hell is coming. lonestarnot Dec 2012 #4
Just not fast enough lonestarnot. nc4bo Dec 2012 #52
Monsters indeed, and in deed... nt Mnemosyne Dec 2012 #5
And the " Americans " that vote for these Misanthropes don't even know . orpupilofnature57 Dec 2012 #6
Our asshole senators voted against it, par for the course in a place that RKP5637 Dec 2012 #7
Luckily, I don't have to worry about Levin and Stabenow. louis-t Dec 2012 #61
We have that, plus our asshole teabagger governor, and then we RKP5637 Dec 2012 #67
Oh yeah? Well our teabagger governor and House are trying to pass louis-t Dec 2012 #70
We've gotta move!!! It's all getting RKP5637 Dec 2012 #71
both of my republican tennessee senators predictably voted against compassion spanone Dec 2012 #8
Dallas Morning News now knows what monsters OUR Senators are. w8liftinglady Dec 2012 #9
sad Liberal_in_LA Dec 2012 #10
A sad, sad day. thucythucy Dec 2012 #11
An embarrassing, disgusting, bewildering, shameful day. calimary Dec 2012 #60
Good job, Lisa Murkowski. Blue_In_AK Dec 2012 #12
WHAT are their objections to this? Canuckistanian Dec 2012 #13
maybe just a continuation of their existing policy of obstructing EVERYTHING 0rganism Dec 2012 #14
Because the treaty had the words "United Nations" in it MrScorpio Dec 2012 #16
"United Nations", Abortion, and too many regulations Mrs. Ted Nancy Dec 2012 #26
It's their hatred of anything connected with the UN progressoid Dec 2012 #41
They Can Vote Again, After January 3rd? mckara Dec 2012 #15
K & R !!! WillyT Dec 2012 #17
Republican senator from NC voted no, of course. This is a good time to mention how the DNC yardwork Dec 2012 #18
Disgusting are the R-Nays. PufPuf23 Dec 2012 #19
Both Senators from Kansas voted against it Mrs. Ted Nancy Dec 2012 #20
Butttttttt, those f'reigners Smilo Dec 2012 #21
Well, when a Dem runs against any of these Monsters.. Cha Dec 2012 #22
38 non-Christians nakocal Dec 2012 #23
We need to stop thinking of them as human Doctor_J Dec 2012 #24
Calling rethug Senators animals degrades the animals meow2u3 Dec 2012 #28
Wish I could say I was surprised. But I'm not. forestpath Dec 2012 #25
Recognizing that John McCain voted in favor. no_hypocrisy Dec 2012 #27
I don't recognize these miscreants as human sellitman Dec 2012 #29
What do you expect from an old boys' club with a former member like this? Archae Dec 2012 #30
This is so. Cruel mrsadm Dec 2012 #31
KANSAS senators voted against this. Bob Dole is a HERO in Kansas. proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #32
More proof that texshelters Dec 2012 #33
There was a time in which the Republican Party had a liberal wing - and this wing would have been Douglas Carpenter Dec 2012 #34
WOW! both of the Kansas Senators voted against Dole's interest in the legislation! patrice Dec 2012 #35
dole was probably freaked out about the whole thing trailmonkee Dec 2012 #47
There really aren't words hifiguy Dec 2012 #36
It's a warm-up for Rand Paul to show he can get party discipline for his Pledge of Allegiance to patrice Dec 2012 #37
Un-fucking-believable... MrMickeysMom Dec 2012 #38
Idaho volstork Dec 2012 #39
He is the only senator with a tutorial on his website jmowreader Dec 2012 #69
I figured volstork Dec 2012 #72
True dat jmowreader Dec 2012 #74
Does voting against this treaty change anything in US law? Flatulo Dec 2012 #40
No. nm rhett o rick Dec 2012 #42
It is saying to the rest of the world that we do not stand with them when it comes to the rights... trailmonkee Dec 2012 #43
It's way crazier than that. We have the ADA. This is just a Republican poke in the eye of rhett o rick Dec 2012 #44
they are last gasping while they still can trailmonkee Dec 2012 #45
ADA would never xxqqqzme Dec 2012 #51
K&R. Overseas Dec 2012 #46
And they claim to be "pro-life" PA Democrat Dec 2012 #48
In the ney list Highway61 Dec 2012 #49
Ugh ismnotwasm Dec 2012 #50
I understand their rationalization for voting Nay, but I see it as twisted and bizarre. slackmaster Dec 2012 #53
this is what they voted against... handmade34 Dec 2012 #54
thanks handmade34.. trailmonkee Dec 2012 #64
Just sent an e-mail to Senator Blunt Hayabusa Dec 2012 #55
Bob Dole is a World War 2 veteran Downtown Hound Dec 2012 #56
I wish to thank my states senators for Javaman Dec 2012 #57
No moral compass with those Sons of the Confederacy!!!!! mfcorey1 Dec 2012 #58
When fascism comes to America The Wizard Dec 2012 #59
Their power is waning. They can't even pick coherent candidates any longer. randome Dec 2012 #73
Rubio is a monster lark Dec 2012 #62
What the hell is wrong with these creatures? rivegauche Dec 2012 #63
they are creatures of hate and separation... trailmonkee Dec 2012 #68
re:These Fucking People are Monsters.... allan01 Dec 2012 #65
Oh come on! Do you really want the genetically impure holding back the Galts of the world? Bucky Dec 2012 #66

louis-t

(23,295 posts)
61. Luckily, I don't have to worry about Levin and Stabenow.
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 05:15 PM
Dec 2012

It's our asshole repug governor that makes my hair fall out.

RKP5637

(67,111 posts)
67. We have that, plus our asshole teabagger governor, and then we
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 07:20 PM
Dec 2012

move onto congressmen. And our entire statehouse, for the most part, is full of teabaggers ... and the Cock Brothers own the government.
Lovely place.

louis-t

(23,295 posts)
70. Oh yeah? Well our teabagger governor and House are trying to pass
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 01:45 PM
Dec 2012

right-to-work crap right now as we speak! So there!

Canuckistanian

(42,290 posts)
13. WHAT are their objections to this?
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 09:46 PM
Dec 2012

Seriously, what kind of person votes AGAINST rights for the disabled?

And it doesn't even require America to change any laws. It's sort of a "we agree with our own laws"

WTF?

0rganism

(23,957 posts)
14. maybe just a continuation of their existing policy of obstructing EVERYTHING
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 09:50 PM
Dec 2012

regardless of its intrinsic or possible merits.

MrScorpio

(73,631 posts)
16. Because the treaty had the words "United Nations" in it
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 09:54 PM
Dec 2012

To these Tea Bagger Republicans, even doing something that we already do and wouldn't force us to do anything else differently is an affront to our own American sovereignty IF the United Nations EVER gets involved.

I don't get it either.

Mrs. Ted Nancy

(462 posts)
26. "United Nations", Abortion, and too many regulations
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:19 PM
Dec 2012

"I do not support the cumbersome regulations and potentially overzealous international organizations with anti-American biases that infringe upon American society," said Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla.

Sen. Mike Lee "argued that the treaty by its very nature threatened U.S. sovereignty," and that because it includes language about providing equal access to reproductive health care to disabled people, it would lead to abortion."

In addition to what Mr. Scorpio wrote, if there is any way to tie an issue to abortion or regulations, they will do it. And they will vote against the U.N., abortion, and regulations every time. They are a bunch of crazy assholes.

progressoid

(49,991 posts)
41. It's their hatred of anything connected with the UN
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 12:29 AM
Dec 2012

Unless it suits their needs - like an excuse to invade another nation.

yardwork

(61,650 posts)
18. Republican senator from NC voted no, of course. This is a good time to mention how the DNC
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 09:55 PM
Dec 2012

primaried an excellent candidate - our long-time Secretary of State, Elaine Marshall - and then even forced her to undergo a run-off election! - against an unknown candidate that the national party wanted to run instead. As a result, by the time Marshall received the party's nomination she was out of money and battered by the primary battle, losing to the complete asshole Republican Burr.

I still bring this up when the DNC calls my house for money.

Mrs. Ted Nancy

(462 posts)
20. Both Senators from Kansas voted against it
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:02 PM
Dec 2012

Pat Roberts and Jerry Moran.

Whenever I see "Moran", I think of this

Smilo

(1,944 posts)
21. Butttttttt, those f'reigners
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:08 PM
Dec 2012

are trying to take away our guns and our values.

Led by a bagger these stupid Senators are showing the world how shallow and disgusting they are.

So much for compassionate conservatism.

Cha

(297,322 posts)
22. Well, when a Dem runs against any of these Monsters..
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:12 PM
Dec 2012

they can bring up this vote for one very important issue that needs to be changed about the calibre of the Senate.

nakocal

(552 posts)
23. 38 non-Christians
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:13 PM
Dec 2012

Anybody of the right that claims that the US is a Christian country is lying. And these 38 inhumane Senators prove my point.

meow2u3

(24,764 posts)
28. Calling rethug Senators animals degrades the animals
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:37 PM
Dec 2012

They're freakin' DEMONS--not animals. Animals are good.

sellitman

(11,607 posts)
29. I don't recognize these miscreants as human
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:43 PM
Dec 2012

They are horrible representatives of the human race let alone their constituents.

Archae

(46,337 posts)
30. What do you expect from an old boys' club with a former member like this?
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 10:56 PM
Dec 2012

"Sanctimonious" Santorum in his first column at WND said the UN would let his child die.

http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/rick-santorum-un-might-decide-let-my-

Don't forget this is the same liar-for-Jesus who claimed Dutch authorities were killing off old people.

texshelters

(1,979 posts)
33. More proof that
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 11:16 PM
Dec 2012

Republicans hate us and want us to "die quickly".

What did Palin think of this vote, considering she has a Downs baby Trig.

PTxS

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
34. There was a time in which the Republican Party had a liberal wing - and this wing would have been
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 11:17 PM
Dec 2012

considered absolutely nuts by respectable Republicans

patrice

(47,992 posts)
35. WOW! both of the Kansas Senators voted against Dole's interest in the legislation!
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 11:23 PM
Dec 2012

Republicans are SCREWED. They're a bunch of zombies.

trailmonkee

(2,681 posts)
47. dole was probably freaked out about the whole thing
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 10:14 AM
Dec 2012


Their lack of compassion probably scares the shit out of him

patrice

(47,992 posts)
37. It's a warm-up for Rand Paul to show he can get party discipline for his Pledge of Allegiance to
Tue Dec 4, 2012, 11:28 PM
Dec 2012

the NRA, for senators to kill any ***UN*** treaties to control the flow of American made weapons into other countries around the world, thus increasing the probability that our War Profiteers will push us into yet another phase of the Unending War and the deaths of American soldiers.

jmowreader

(50,560 posts)
69. He is the only senator with a tutorial on his website
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 08:52 PM
Dec 2012

He has to teach people how to pronounce his name...it's cray-poe

 

Flatulo

(5,005 posts)
40. Does voting against this treaty change anything in US law?
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 12:05 AM
Dec 2012

Did this treaty grant additional rights to the disabled that are not already recognized under our laws?

trailmonkee

(2,681 posts)
43. It is saying to the rest of the world that we do not stand with them when it comes to the rights...
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 01:24 AM
Dec 2012

...of the disabled... and we don't care about their opinion and they can go fuck themselves.... it is potentially harmful to those outside of the country more so than inside

Highway61

(2,568 posts)
49. In the ney list
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 01:23 PM
Dec 2012

I can't believe diaper Vitter is listed. Why is he still there in the House?????? Call me silly or not paying attention but Damn...some of the people in the house who get re-elected boggles the mind.

ismnotwasm

(41,989 posts)
50. Ugh
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 01:28 PM
Dec 2012

WHY is anyone Republican? You're right, it seems to take away a little-- or a lot of the humanity of anyone claiming to be one

handmade34

(22,756 posts)
54. this is what they voted against...
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 03:01 PM
Dec 2012

http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=259

Article 1 - Purpose

"The purpose of the present Convention is to promote, protect and ensure the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by all persons with disabilities, and to promote respect for their inherent dignity.

Persons with disabilities include those who have long-term physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairments which in interaction with various barriers may hinder their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others."
.
.
.


Preamble

The States Parties to the present Convention,

Recalling the principles proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations which recognize the inherent dignity and worth and the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family as the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,
Recognizing that the United Nations, in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in the International Covenants on Human Rights, has proclaimed and agreed that everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth therein, without distinction of any kind,
Reaffirming the universality, indivisibility, interdependence and interrelatedness of all human rights and fundamental freedoms and the need for persons with disabilities to be guaranteed their full enjoyment without discrimination,
Recalling the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families,
Recognizing that disability is an evolving concept and that disability results from the interaction between persons with impairments and attitudinal and environmental barriers that hinders their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others,
Recognizing the importance of the principles and policy guidelines contained in the World Programme of Action concerning Disabled Persons and in the Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities in influencing the promotion, formulation and evaluation of the policies, plans, programmes and actions at the national, regional and international levels to further equalize opportunities for persons with disabilities,
Emphasizing the importance of mainstreaming disability issues as an integral part of relevant strategies of sustainable development,
Recognizing also that discrimination against any person on the basis of disability is a violation of the inherent dignity and worth of the human person,
Recognizing further the diversity of persons with disabilities,
Recognizing the need to promote and protect the human rights of all persons with disabilities, including those who require more intensive support,
Concerned that, despite these various instruments and undertakings, persons with disabilities continue to face barriers in their participation as equal members of society and violations of their human rights in all parts of the world,
Recognizing the importance of international cooperation for improving the living conditions of persons with disabilities in every country, particularly in developing countries,
Recognizing the valued existing and potential contributions made by persons with disabilities to the overall well-being and diversity of their communities, and that the promotion of the full enjoyment by persons with disabilities of their human rights and fundamental freedoms and of full participation by persons with disabilities will result in their enhanced sense of belonging and in significant advances in the human, social and economic development of society and the eradication of poverty,
Recognizing the importance for persons with disabilities of their individual autonomy and independence, including the freedom to make their own choices,
Considering that persons with disabilities should have the opportunity to be actively involved in decision-making processes about policies and programmes, including those directly concerning them,
Concerned about the difficult conditions faced by persons with disabilities who are subject to multiple or aggravated forms of discrimination on the basis of race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national, ethnic, indigenous or social origin, property, birth, age or other status,
Recognizing that women and girls with disabilities are often at greater risk, both within and outside the home, of violence, injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment, maltreatment or exploitation,
Recognizing that children with disabilities should have full enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms on an equal basis with other children, and recalling obligations to that end undertaken by States Parties to the Convention on the Rights of the Child,
Emphasizing the need to incorporate a gender perspective in all efforts to promote the full enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms by persons with disabilities,
Highlighting the fact that the majority of persons with disabilities live in conditions of poverty, and in this regard recognizing the critical need to address the negative impact of poverty on persons with disabilities,
Bearing in mind that conditions of peace and security based on full respect for the purposes and principles contained in the Charter of the United Nations and observance of applicable human rights instruments are indispensable for the full protection of persons with disabilities, in particular during armed conflicts and foreign occupation,
Recognizing the importance of accessibility to the physical, social, economic and cultural environment, to health and education and to information and communication, in enabling persons with disabilities to fully enjoy all human rights and fundamental freedoms,
Realizing that the individual, having duties to other individuals and to the community to which he or she belongs, is under a responsibility to strive for the promotion and observance of the rights recognized in the International Bill of Human Rights,
Convinced that the family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State, and that persons with disabilities and their family members should receive the necessary protection and assistance to enable families to contribute towards the full and equal enjoyment of the rights of persons with disabilities,
Convinced that a comprehensive and integral international convention to promote and protect the rights and dignity of persons with disabilities will make a significant contribution to redressing the profound social disadvantage of persons with disabilities and promote their participation in the civil, political, economic, social and cultural spheres with equal opportunities, in both developing and developed countries,

Hayabusa

(2,135 posts)
55. Just sent an e-mail to Senator Blunt
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 03:17 PM
Dec 2012

"You seriously voted against the U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities? Really? To call you foolish in this matter is an insult to all fools world-wide."

***

What an idiot... Then again, he's a Blunt so that's a little redundant, isn't it?

Downtown Hound

(12,618 posts)
56. Bob Dole is a World War 2 veteran
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 03:25 PM
Dec 2012

I never thought I would see the day that I would come to the aid of Bob Dole, but if you need any further evidence of which party really supports the troops (hint: NOT the Republicans), then look here.

And Bob, maybe now you understand why so many of us voted against you all those years ago. Your party has no compassion. NONE AT ALL.

Javaman

(62,530 posts)
57. I wish to thank my states senators for
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 03:28 PM
Dec 2012

continually showing the nation that Texas is represented by assholes.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
73. Their power is waning. They can't even pick coherent candidates any longer.
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 04:59 PM
Dec 2012

Fascism requires a sense of organization. They have none.

rivegauche

(601 posts)
63. What the hell is wrong with these creatures?
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 05:51 PM
Dec 2012

I refuse to call them people, because clearly they are soulless and indifferent. I despise them.

allan01

(1,950 posts)
65. re:These Fucking People are Monsters....
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 06:17 PM
Dec 2012

i am mad as one of these


would love to see one of those on the other list without legs , arms and stuff going pitty me .

Bucky

(54,027 posts)
66. Oh come on! Do you really want the genetically impure holding back the Galts of the world?
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 06:26 PM
Dec 2012

You make it sound like respect for human beings and the capacity to overcome human imperfections is inspiring or something. These are the weak and wrong-place-at-the-wrong-timed among the human species. They're luck we don't relocate them onto Ted Nugent's privant "forbidden game" hunting island in Lake Michigan! Don't you realize "reasonable accommodations" is a just a slippery slope away from loading up the oppressed wealthy and healthy among us onto boxcars?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»These Fucking People are ...