General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWest Point cadet drops out to protest influence of fundamentalist Christianity
WED DEC 05, 2012 AT 06:41 AM PST
West Point cadet drops out to protest influence of fundamentalist Christianity
byChristian Dem in NCFollow
Cadet, United States Military Academy at West Point
Why I Don't Want to Be a West Point Graduate
.................
While there are certainly numerous problems with the developmental program at West Point and all service academies, the tipping point of my decision to resign was the realization that countless officers here and throughout the military are guilty of blatantly violating the oaths they swore to defend the Constitution. These men and women are criminals, complicit in light of day defiance of the Uniform Code of Military Justice through unconstitutional proselytism, discrimination against the non-religious and establishing formal policies to reward, encourage and even at times require sectarian religious participation.
These transgressions are nearly always committed in the name of fundamentalist evangelical Christianity. The sparse leaders who object to these egregious violations are relegated to the position of silent bystanders, because they understand all too well the potential ramifications of publically expressing their loyalty to the laws of our country. These are strong words that I do not use lightly, but after years of clear personal observation I am certain that they are true.
...................
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/blake-page/west-point-religious-freedom_b_2232279.html
LiberalLoner
(9,762 posts)This cadet is brave and a hero. It is a huge sacrifice to give up what would have been a successful career for this issue.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)To counter that we need the d word, but people will have allergic reactions to citizen soldiers who are drafted.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)It's a lot harder to get draftees to go along with stupid wars and the like. You have to have a fairly good cause in order to secure the willing cooperation of people who didn't self-select into the military.
I say this from the point of view of someone who was drafted & sent to Vietnam in 1967.
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)And me in '69.
Hells Liberal
(88 posts)Having a draft did nothing to discourage our leaders from sending young men to fight in illegal, immoral wars. It didn't keep us out of Korea nor Vietnam. All a draft did was provide a healthy supply of cannon fodder because most people would rather take their chances in the service than in Leavenworth.
And once those young men (and possibly women) are in, what they think won't matter. Part of the purpose of basic training is to condition them, yes, brainwash them, into following orders, even knowing that those orders will probably get them killed. All a draft will do is give proselytizers a larger, captive audience with which to brainwash.
Finally, let's be honest - has there ever been a draft that was applied fairly? Lincoln allowed the families of rich campaign contributors to hire mercenaries in place of their children. In the post-war era, we had college deferments which helped well-to-do and some middle-class avoid Vietnam. There were also cushy National Guard posts reserved for the George W. Bushes and Dan Quayles of America.
I don't know what the solution is, but history shows that a draft is not only contrary to what our founding fathers intended, but it won't work and won't be applied fairly.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)and the movement was fueled in large measure by those in danger of the draft and those who came back to create Vets for Peace, VVAW, etc. I know in my case I started covertly engaging in antiwar activities as soon as I got back, while I had 6 months left to serve in uniform. Google "Oleo Strut" sometime.
Unknown Beatle
(2,672 posts)Wow! I salute you.
I was going to attend Central Texas College in Killeen, TX in 1972 but decided to go to a 4 year university instead. Wasn't Oleo Strut shut down in 1972?
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Hung out some at the Strut & got involved in creating some of the the little antiwar skits.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)a lot of people had a stake in protest.
a voluntary military doesn't have that.
Thunderbeast
(3,417 posts)I think we need to have a serious discussion about compulsory service for young men and women which could take the form of military service, community service, or an effort to repair and maintain the treasure left in our forest system by the Civilian Conservation Corps in the 30's. Our wilderness an parks trail systems are falling into disrepair. Diverting a portion of the pentagon budget (let's start with Officer's Golf Clubs and cadre's of personal valets and drivers, military bands, etc) would go a long way to preserving our natural heritage, and make it available to our grandchildren.
What school system would not want a qualified teacher's aid in each classroom. Hospitals could augment staff. Young people could learn job skills and develop the basic skills (eg show up on time, learn to communicate, do a little arithmetic) that many employers feel are lacking in new hires.
We all need to invest in our communities and our countries.
The military, in particular, needs a broad new perspective. The academies are WAY out of line in their evangelical zeal. Muslims, Jews, Animists, and Atheists has shed blood for this country. They did it for US, not their religious totems, human and otherwise.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)the golf courses are for all ranks and are self supporting without appropriated funds. However, when I was in Korea, many of the ROKAF officers did complain about American enlisted using the Osan golf course.
LiberalLoner
(9,762 posts)jmowreader
(50,560 posts)Officers golf clubs -which are now very rare in the military; I think there are only a couple left because most of the clubs are all-ranks now - are self funding. The facilities were built decades ago, and ongoing operations are funded by players' fees.
Colonels and generals have drivers but those are troops from the ranks.
If you want to cut the military budget, start with cutting Natick Labs. And this would be expensive up front, but why in hell does the Army's field car, the Humvee, get six miles to the gallon? We have sixty thousand of these monstrosities. My thought is to hire Robby Gordon, who's won the Baja 1000 many times, to design a new field car. It will have to seat four, get 15 mpg unarmored and 8 armored (I think a HMMWV with an armor kit gets three), tow a two-ton trailer, last through five laps of the Baja 1000 course without disabling frame damage, and run on diesel.
Hells Liberal
(88 posts)It is contrary to what our founding fathers intended. History shows again and again that having a draft does not democratize our military. All it does is provide the cannon fodder for the elites to fight their wars.
If we had a draft, I would gladly assist my son or any other loyal American to evade that service in any way I can.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)The founders intended for a non military in peacetime, and citizen soldiers in wartime. 1812 removed any doubt that we needed to have a small core of lifers, and the military has been democratized every time it is majorly draftee and the culture of the force changes.
Small professional forces are easier to turn against citizens, and with the exception of the civil war, it was a civil war, citizen soldiers tend to have more doubts.
If you think democratizing a force means voting on every order, you mistake a mob for an army.
TheMadMonk
(6,187 posts)With not even a volunteer's option to go AWOL and resign with a dishonourable.
Draftees who walk are deserters.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)To a once proud military run by citizen soldiers when it becomes a praetorian guard with it's own, separate values, than the society they supposedly serve. Cicero did well describing the rise of that Guard in Rome. We have also seen it in the modern period with many a military pushing for coups. We are not different than Argentina and we have a military that increasingly sees itself as the one with the solutions. There is a danger in that.
The Founders, with all their defects, and they were men not gods, also described the problems with a professional military. In fact, they warned against it. 1812 changed some of that. But truth be told, having draftees changes the nature of the force and democratized it. It also stops some of this self creation of a separate culture.
What we are seeing at service academies should still be reversed...if not, the danger of a coup only increases, as well as the risk of a religious war and the end of religious freedom in the US. It is dangerous.
Oh and yes, we served in this house before you even say it.
loudsue
(14,087 posts)with the current military situation....one which the bush regime pushed along in the wrong direction.
TheMadMonk
(6,187 posts)...that the US is already 90-95% of the way there. Right now it is really only a matter of degree, not kind.
The Founding Fathers as you say tried to constitutionally guard against it, and instead got a gun culture full of yahoos convinced they need enough guns to hold off a platoon or two on hand at all times, just in case the government ever turns on them.
You allowed your standing army to grow larger and larger until it outmuscles the entire world; allowed it to consume a larger and larger proportion of the budget; you increasingly poke your nose into the business of other nations and relatively routinely topple foreign governments; military spending is pretty much whatever the vendor chooses to charge, for everyone else it's: How cheaply can it be done? Who can do without?
Simplistic? Yes. Without factual basis? No.
I'm not trying to rag, I didn't even realise who I was talking to for quite some time, but I recalled your military background as soon as you reminded me of it. Please believe me when I say I hadn't considered who you were or your background at all when I offered my 2 cents worth.
Adding draftees to that mix I think is a recipe for disaster. They'd be forever second class citizens and relatively powerless to do anything about it. It would be yet one more bi-polarity that is so definitive of American culture. In nearly every comparison of significance, it's one side vs. another, there's no middle ground. No third way. Indeed, third ways tend to be looked upon with great disdain and even independents are barely tollerated evils to many.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)I hope you enjoy the show.
Hells Liberal
(88 posts)All that would happen is that draftees would be an even larger, captive audience for illegal proselytizing.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)They figure, go let the crazies and the desperate fight these stupid wars. Why should WE stick our necks out???
I'm ahshamed at what my once proud branch of the service has become. It's sure not the Air Force I remember!
mulsh
(2,959 posts)that would certainly bolster gender equality and help to ensure are truly diverse military.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Raster
(20,998 posts)Everyone serves. Everyone. No one is exempt.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)You are six months out of your college degree, six months, and see you in as a butter bar. After that absolutely.
Raster
(20,998 posts)And yes, I can see that TEMPORARY exception.
On edit: No need to clarify "butter bar" (clarified butter bar)...I looked it up.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)The bar is gold hence, butter bar.
AndyTiedye
(23,500 posts)Draftees never got to go to West Point. Places there are doled out by Congresscritters.
In much of the country, the Congresscritters are Fundies, so guess who gets to go to West Point.
Starting up a draft would only allow them to indoctrinate a larger captive audience.
NO DRAFT
ESPECIALLY Not Now!
The problem is in the officer corps. The ones who get to give the orders to all those draftees you want to bring in.
If they start up a draft, we will be dragged into war with Iran.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)AndyTiedye
(23,500 posts)I already read that post. Could you explain how it is relevant to mine?
The brass, and the people who run West Point, and the people who go there, are not draftees and never were.
The place has been gerrymandered along with Congress (because Congressmen and Senators decide who gets to go there).
And they are the ones who get to give the orders. Draftees cannot resign. They lost all their rights when they got drafted.
If a draft were in effect then a whole generation would have been subject to this forced Fundie indoctrination.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Would remain silent. Historically private so and so dad or mom or both wrote letters to both pols and papers. That is what historically has happened for excessive kp, you think they would stay quiet over this? And some of them were even influential.
pasto76
(1,589 posts)although the air force academy here is guilty of the same climate.
Fortunately us enlisted outnumber the brass hats 10:1, and we dont swallow their bullshit easily.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Of general officers in all branches. Mustangs seem to hit a ceiling at Lt. Colonel and most ROTC at Colonel. Shilaskavilli notwithstanding, most ROTC rarely make it to the general ranks. Why JCOS chairman Shilashkavili was a soldier's soldier.
And the bullshit, err tone, is being set up by that general officer corp. if they had thrown the book at Boykin I'd agree with you, alas that never happened.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)They should either change their ways, or be sued for everything they have. Why should this cadet or any other cadets lives be screwed up by these bible thumpers. Same with the military. They have no business asking you what religion you are or aren't. Unless you want them to know, it shouldn't be a question that they can ask.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Is if you buy the farm, or certain dietary accommodations need to be made. See Jews, eating kosher style. The military will not buy kosher meat ( or Hallal if you are Muslim)
The military also offers services of multiple denominations but those should be voluntary. The rub is some commands are making it mandatory. Also proselitation is against the UCMJ and that should be enforced and chaplains who do, should be shown the door.
Oh and spiritual fitness doctrines must go the way of the dodo.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)his principles. K&R
Are_grits_groceries
(17,111 posts)The scope of the problem is widespread and scary. West Point can't hold a candle to The Air Force Academy.
What you will find on this site is gobsmacking!
duhneece
(4,113 posts)And read their article, "Jesus Killed Mohammed The crusade for a Christian military"
http://harpers.org/archive/2009/05/jesus-killed-mohammed/
whathehell
(29,067 posts)the crap out of me.
It doesn't even matter if you are a "Christian", so to speak. You have to be THEIR
kind of "christian". I believe they're known as Dominionists and they are aggressive and really NUTS!
ChachaCha
(22 posts)of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation in a film called Constantine's Sword. It's a documentary based on the book of the same title written by former Jesuit priest James Carroll who is also a journalist and author of several other books, and covers the topic of the merging of religion and the military. It's a great film, great interview with Mikey and really provides a lot of insight on what the West Point cadet was subjected to. I really commend this young man for his stance.
Overseas
(12,121 posts)Rockyj
(538 posts)They are ALL nuts and bent on starting a holy war!
How can we stop this insanity?
12AngryBorneoWildmen
(536 posts)Fundamentalism is Fundamentalism (and is not Fun).
TheMadMonk
(6,187 posts)Any hint of conciliation is enough to reinforce what is already an absolute belief in their God given certitude and any offer for compromise is proof of weakness. And so far, Democratic party has prooven to be pretty good at fiercly negotiating until the Republicans get pretty much everything they want.
People have been making noises about Obama being about to steamroll the Republicans and taking everything he wants. They better be right. Because if he fails to deliver, there's a very real chance people might decide "Dog in the manger" is a better role for the Democratic party, and hand the Senate over as well. At which point the total lack of a viable Republican candidate for President becomes irrelevant.
It wouldn't surprise me at all, if this were in fact the Republican strategy. Seize control of both houses and keep a Democratic president to pin all the blame on.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)It's scary to think that the people we put in charge of our security strategy come at their job with a belief that we are in "the end times".
jmowreader
(50,560 posts)Religious organizations headquartered in Colorado Springs:
Association of Christian Schools International
Christian and Missionary Alliance
Compassion International
Every Home for Christ
Focus on the Family
HCJB, a network of Christian shortwave stations
International Bible Society
The Navigators
Roman Catholic Diocese of Colorado Springs
WAY-FM Media Group
Andrew Wommack Ministries
Young Life
Add to that storefront churches and other religious outlets and there are probably a hundred or more rabid fundamentalist groups within 20 miles of the Air Force Academy. This makes a lot of sense; if your theology calls for the world to end in a bath of fire, the best place to go is the town where they train people who can do it.
hunter
(38,317 posts)Hell, maybe the entire Air Force.
If I was slashing the Pentagon budget, and I would, that's where I'd start.
"American Taliban" indeed...
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)Smilo
(1,944 posts)very well written article and obviously we have lost one of the brightest and promising because of the proselytizing.
Our military needs an overhaul badly. As others have mentioned the Military Religious Freedom organization is doing its best to get the obvious "talibanistic" thinking out of the military.
It is a frightening thought that the religious are not only running our military, but are clamoring to go and fight others who think differently. The mistaken and dangerous thinking that led to the crusades is happening again.
ROBROX
(392 posts)During basic training EVERYONE was required to attend Sunday services even if you were NOT Christan. Some dudes got to alternate where they wanted to go. I am not sure about the Jewish members who were in my group?
Basically the military is NOT ready to have non religious members in their "basic" training groups. Now after military members are cut lose to their assignments it is drinking and going wild time, Then there is a minority who goes to church, etc.
Times are changing and this action may bring attention to those who like "routine" versus thinking OUTSIDE THE BOX.
SaveAmerica
(5,342 posts)and was then counseled to stop and then he decided to leave. Imagine my shock to find that the cadet was trying to protect religious freedoms of everyone who attends West Point.
I saw this article yesterday on a military FB page and the comments by the Conservatives were eye-opening and ironic. Calling him a heathen and saying that if he's not praying to God and following God's laws he will never be a good leader anyway. How full would their drawls be if it were the other way around and a Muslim Commander/Counselor was trying to convert everyone to muslin? And was showing favoritism to the muslins in the class? We would not hear the end of their fit pitching.
Hypocrites.
Baitball Blogger
(46,736 posts)triplepoint
(431 posts)They NEVER sleep.....I remember back to when I was a cadet at the Air Force Academy how I was given the choice to clean toilets or attend church services at the Air Force Academy chapel. This was back in the mid-seventies. When my class started, the Academy had just gotten busted by Congress for operating a mock POW camp. A cadet had contacted his Congressman about it. Definitely now though, it appears the Dominionists there are training their "Christian Soldiers" for their hoped-for End Times/Final Conflict. They're worse than rust in many respects...more like a form of cancer.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)I thought it was the Air Force Academy that had become the military equivalent of Liberty University.
Initech
(100,081 posts)Initech
(100,081 posts)Yeah I'd say that's extremely hypocritical.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,035 posts)The reason I bring that up is the fundamentalist influence at West Point may not be as big as claimed.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)My daughter was told this in Basic Training at Lackland AFB. She isn't religoius and said, "No way, am I going to any Christian service down here", so she opted to go to a Wiccan service. It was PACKED she said with about 100 people! Must be a lot of Wiccans in the Military, or maybe a lot who thought the same as she did. She told me the Sunday Menu Special was "Grilled Cheese and JESUS Sandwiches". What does THAT tell you?
I also wondered what do they do for Jewish soldiers? I always thought that Jews hold Saturdays as their Sabboth? Not ALL religions hold Sundays as they holy day. Apart from the Military, Chick-Fil-A also thinks everyone is CHRISTIAN.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)Last edited Wed Dec 5, 2012, 02:44 PM - Edit history (1)
I worked for one, and Wiccan was on his dog tags since 1965. Since then, I ran into more than a couple. He was raised in the religion. When I was in Lackland, those who didn't go to chapel slept in, and we had details in the afternoon. The Mormon services were in the afternoon. First time I went to Mormon services since my parents' divorce (Dad was Mormon, Mom was Methodist. I was raised as both, but I practice neither.)
As I remember it, the fundamentalists started to take over in the early to mid 1990s.
From the Chaplain's handbook
http://www.religioustolerance.org/wic_usbk.htm
sakabatou
(42,157 posts)Starting with morning service, then Torah service and finally, afternoon service (all of this is in roughly 3 hours or less).
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)the officer corps of religious zealots and reinstate the draft. Problem solved.
marlakay
(11,476 posts)In the air force, is not religious at all and keeps real quiet about it because of his career.
That is why they live off base most of the time so they won't be seen not going to church.
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)DemoTex
(25,399 posts)A scary doctrine when embraced by combat commanders who are itching for Armageddon.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)His little picadilos, some of which happened while in uniform and in the field, should be enough to put a kibosh to it...but it won't.
stanwyck
(6,620 posts)throughout his service was relentless. Plus, you get pressure from commanding officers.
Lightbulb_on
(315 posts)I haven't gotten a whiff of it since basic... and that was basically a break for cookies at services.
Occulus
(20,599 posts)I don't.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)When one enlists, an oath of allegiance to the Constitution is taken. No religious oath is taken as that would be unconstitutional. Any military person thinking that his or her commitment to the "Great Commission" transcends his or her oath of allegiance to the secular Constitution and to an obligation to adhere to the UCMJ is an oath breaker who needs to get the fuck out of the uniform of the United States and join the ministry. Period. Such zealots are a threat to unit morale and to national security. They have no place in the armed forces of a free people.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)uponit7771
(90,347 posts)Lightbulb_on
(315 posts)I have not once ever felt singled out for a lack of outward show of faith.
I'm not an ass about it. I stand quietly when the Chaplain gives a prayer before a jump. I've counseled Soldiers on religious issues. I've had interesting debates with both higher and lower ranks about religion.
I have a live and let live attitude about it as opposed to the cadet in the OP.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)Lightbulb_on
(315 posts)Though many of my colleagues did.
My school followed a similar format.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)I was ordered to make my platoon sit on a sweltering log pad and listen to a fire and brimstone sermon about being right with the Lord and hell awaiting those who might die that day if they weren't saved. Then the chaplain gave an alter call. To their credit no one crawled to the alter, even though some of them were visibly shaken. We were waiting for choppers to lift us into a hot LZ. That sermon was not the kind of crap you tell men who are going into combat. We saddled up and got on the choppers. The chaplain slithered back to his hooch. I've had problems with religion in the military since. Even so, I can understand why you handle it the way you do.
Lightbulb_on
(315 posts)I've got shit to do and PCCs/PCIs to finish.
I wouldn't let that happen to my guys and frankly it wouldn't get as far as me. I do work in a unique community though with only senior NCOs and CPTs and up.
Maybe it's different in the deuce...
Uncle Joe
(58,366 posts)Thanks for the thread, kpete.
Berlum
(7,044 posts)Ugly, ugly development for America.
felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)is the result when religion combines with military, or corporate power merges with political--consolidated power is the recipe for abuse. The ideal of separation of powers, where each is the check on the other, was something I always admired in social studies back in the day.
olegramps
(8,200 posts)Like General Petraeus, who was considered a outstanding leader, they could go to universities that also offer Officer Candidate training. I realize that they have a commitment following graduation, however, they receive a a top rated education along with too much indoctrination all at no expense to themselves or their families. Aren't doctors, scientists, teachers, etc. just as crucial for the wellbeing of the nation as military leader yet their education cost are for a great extent shoulder by them. If we can afford to educate military with total costs paid by the government then why shouldn't we apply the same reasoning to others especially when alternatives are available. I don't suppose this would be very popular with the right wing chickenhawks.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)And point is till the source of top engineers who tend to leave the military after one to two tours.
olegramps
(8,200 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Has ten to twelve years in, and doctors commit to two years for each year of training. Specialties, it pretty much translates to a full twenty year career. Lawyers also commit to two years per year of training. So you will get at least eight years out of them after they get their degree. Most lawyers either get out at that point, 12 in, or stay for a full 20 year career.
Also the military has no place for the same number of colonels as majors, why at the ten to twelve year point both enlisted and officers have to consider the possibility of higher rank versus civilian life. Due to the longest war in American history a higher number of junior officers (and NCO) have left and that is a worry for the next generation of general officers, (and senior NCO's)
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)after the gay wedding there the other day.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)As applied to the military and the corporate world at least. If you agree to help the US government kill people who are a nuisance to its goals we will give you money and gifts.
And of course in the corporate world all the words of Jesus Christ fall on deaf ears M-F 9-5 but they line up to hear the word on Sundays.
"Howdy. I'm a super Christian businessman. I'll profit off slave labor in third world countries where children play in chemicals and women burn alive in sweatshops. I then use those profits to support Christian outreach in my local community. God bless."
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)Tsiyu
(18,186 posts)and justify the meanness:
"As long as I get the approval of U.S. Christians, I can behave like the devil himself - murder, pillage, deny justice to the poor - and I am still a moral, shining example of Jesus' love!"
If your Commander in Chief is the JesusduJour, you don't have to obey any laws- just make them up as you go along, I guess...
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)indepat
(20,899 posts)expected of a rabid Tali-ban.
patrice
(47,992 posts)they identify with very intimately.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)Fundamentalism has no place in our military, least of all the training academies that are supposed to produce our future military leaders.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)Overseas
(12,121 posts)a small clip:
When Barack Obama moved into the Oval Office in January, he inherited a military not just drained by a two-front war overseas but fighting a third battle on the home front, a subtle civil war over its own soul. On one side are the majority of military personnel, professionals who regardless of their faith or lack thereof simply want to get their jobs done; on the other is a small but powerful movement of Christian soldiers concentrated in the officer corps. Theres Major General Johnny A. Weida, who as commandant at the Air Force Academy made its National Day of Prayer services exclusively Christian, and also created a code for evangelical cadets: whenever Weida said, Airpower, they were to respond Rock Sir!a reference to Matthew 7:25. (The general told them that when non-evangelical cadets asked about the mysterious call-and-response, they should share the gospel.) Theres Major General Robert Caslencommander of the 25th Infantry Division, a.k.a. Tropic Lightningwho in 2007 was found by a Pentagon inspector generals report to have violated military ethics by appearing in uniform, along with six other senior Pentagon officers, in a video for the Christian Embassy, a fundamentalist ministry to Washington elites. Theres Lieutenant General Robert Van Antwerp, the Army chief of engineers, who has also lent his uniform to the Christian cause, both in a Trinity Broadcasting Network tribute to Christian soldiers called Red, White, and Blue Spectacular and at a 2003 Billy Graham rallytelevised around the world on the Armed Forces Networkat which he declared the baptisms of 700 soldiers under his command evidence of the Lords plan to raise up a godly army.
sarchasm
(1,012 posts)I firmly put the blame for this on W. No matter what happened before, W's misguided response to 9/11 was a clarion call for muslim-hating christian soldiers.