Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Playinghardball

(11,665 posts)
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 03:38 PM Dec 2012

Maddow: Secret Petraeus audio means Fox News ‘officially’ part of the GOP

When Fox News chief Roger Ailes sent one of his national security correspondents to interview then-General David Petraeus in 2011, chances are he didn’t want the full conversation to ever see the light of day — because if it did, the network’s claim of being “fair and balanced” could be forever buried.

As it happened, someone was recording. The Washington Post revealed Monday that Ailes had contributor K.T. Mcfarland deliver a message to Petraeus directly: run for president as a Republican and News Corporation chairman Rupert Murdoch will bankroll you.

Audio of the discussion, published by reporter Bob Woodward, was aired again Tuesday night by MSNBC host Rachel Maddow, who couldn’t quite figure out why such a “strange bombshell” of a story would run in the Post‘s “Style” section instead of near the front of the paper.

“That recording was made April 16th of last year,” she explained. “A week and a half later the president announced he was nominating General Petraeus to head the CIA. Right before the president announced him as his choice, the chairman of Fox News was urging the general not to take the job, not to take any job short of being [chairman] of the Joint Chiefs, saying he should run for president instead as a Republican against President Obama in this past election. And it’s all on tape.”

Raw Story (http://s.tt/1vXiE)

26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Maddow: Secret Petraeus audio means Fox News ‘officially’ part of the GOP (Original Post) Playinghardball Dec 2012 OP
Does this really surprise anyone? nt kelliekat44 Dec 2012 #1
No, I read it yesterday and didn't even blink. Business as usual Cha Dec 2012 #6
I missed Rachel last night... ReRe Dec 2012 #11
Stop call them Fox, then. randome Dec 2012 #2
Unfortunately calling them RNN would imply they are a news organization. n/t dsharp88 Dec 2012 #13
Perhaps RPN then, but I think Pravda has a nicer ring to it. Faryn Balyncd Dec 2012 #14
I was waiting for this: louis-t Dec 2012 #3
So, even Fox knew none of the Republican cvandidates could win. That's not Coyotl Dec 2012 #4
Reading the full transcript is well worth the time it takes... Spazito Dec 2012 #5
I think he was moved into the CIA so that the agency could keep an eye on him. LiberalArkie Dec 2012 #7
She made the point last night that Fox has every right to act in bullwinkle428 Dec 2012 #8
More like, the GOP is a subsidiary of Fox/Murdoch/Ailes Corp. Myrina Dec 2012 #9
Rec AnotherMcIntosh Dec 2012 #10
The funniest part of this was that Ailes supposedly was going to manage the Petraeus Presidential yellowcanine Dec 2012 #12
All The News Unfit to Publish elbloggoZY27 Dec 2012 #15
Doesn't anyone else wonder if Petraeus was already having the affair with what'shername. Texin Dec 2012 #16
Kicking for later. Also, DUrec. nt longship Dec 2012 #17
K and R nt. thanks for posting Stuart G Dec 2012 #18
Yikes! Baitball Blogger Dec 2012 #19
Wrong! Wrong! Wrong! rablrouzer Dec 2012 #20
It ran in the "Style" section because the WaPost is now run by cowards. Ken Burch Dec 2012 #21
Fairness Doctrine needed more now than ever. go west young man Dec 2012 #22
In other news, it's dark at nighttime. AllyCat Dec 2012 #23
I've known this for years. Third Doctor Dec 2012 #24
A FOREIGN OWNED communication/entertainment company tried to BUY the Presidency. nt patrice Dec 2012 #25
Whiskey Tango FOXtrot Blue Owl Dec 2012 #26

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
11. I missed Rachel last night...
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 05:10 PM
Dec 2012

but really, is anyone shocked with this revelation about FOX? Now the part about Betrayus was news. Bob Woodward? (Excuse me while I puke. )

Spazito

(50,365 posts)
5. Reading the full transcript is well worth the time it takes...
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 04:13 PM
Dec 2012

it wasn't the reaffirmation that Fox is a propaganda outlet for the repubs (we all knew that already) that made me go it was Petraeus on the future role of the CIA and this interview took place BEFORE it was announced he would be CIA chief along with other issues covered in this secret interview. The interview took place April 16th, 2011 and the announcement of his nomination to the position took place on April 28th, 2011.

His comments re the CIA (Intelligence community) becoming the growth industry is near the bottom of page 4 and then on page 5 of the transcript:



"Petraeus: Yeah. Yeah. But on the other hand, the other folks — on the other hand — I think are going to be in a growth industry.

Q: You mean Obamacare . . .

Petraeus: No, intelligence.

Q: Oh, the bad guys?

Petraeus: Yeah, the intelligence community, I think, is going to be . . .

Q: The bad guys, or our — you mean our intelligence community?

Petraeus: Our intelligence community. Going to have to be. I mean, there’s so much going on."



Here's the link to the full transcript:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/transcript-kathleen-t-mcfarland-talks-with-gen-david-h-petraeus/2012/12/03/c0467cd4-3d8b-11e2-a2d9-822f58ac9fd5_story.html

bullwinkle428

(20,629 posts)
8. She made the point last night that Fox has every right to act in
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 04:54 PM
Dec 2012

this fashion, but it's incumbent that they drop any pretense of being a "news" outfit if they want to continue to be taken seriously by anyone...

yellowcanine

(35,699 posts)
12. The funniest part of this was that Ailes supposedly was going to manage the Petraeus Presidential
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 05:10 PM
Dec 2012

campaign. Now THAT would have been a real hoot.

Texin

(2,596 posts)
16. Doesn't anyone else wonder if Petraeus was already having the affair with what'shername.
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 05:34 PM
Dec 2012

If that was the case, and IIRC a recent article about that liaison mentioned that it started almost immediately after he returned from Iraq, that means he probably realized that he couldn't pass Presidential vetting, but might squeak past any scrutiny for the CIA post.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
21. It ran in the "Style" section because the WaPost is now run by cowards.
Wed Dec 5, 2012, 06:03 PM
Dec 2012

That rag has been like this since Katherine Graham ordered them to not ever be like "Woodstein" again, back in the late 70's.

If they could get away with it, they'd put Woodward on the obits desk.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maddow: Secret Petraeus a...