Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(46,802 posts)
Sat Aug 17, 2024, 12:19 AM Aug 2024

How C L R James foresaw the crisis of US democracy



The brilliant Trinidadian thinker is remembered as an admirer of the US but he also warned of its dark political future

https://aeon.co/essays/c-l-r-james-foresaw-the-crisis-of-us-liberal-democracy


James Cagney in The Public Enemy (1931). Courtesy and © Warner Bros






In late 1949, the West Indian intellectual C L R James sat down in his residence in Compton, California and, in a burst of creative energy, composed what turned out to be a frightfully prophetic analysis of the historical fate of democracy in the United States. Titled ‘Notes on American Civilization’, the piece was a thick prospectus for a slim book (never started) in which James promised to show how the failed historical promise of its unbridled liberalism had prepared the contemporary republic for a variant of totalitarian rule. ‘I trace as carefully as I can the forces making for totalitarianism in modern American life,’ explained the then little-known radical. ‘I relate them very carefully to the degradation of human personality under Hitler and under Stalin.’


C L R James in 1938. Courtesy Wikipedia


At the climactic centre of this ominous analysis was the contemporary entertainment industry, which, James argued, set the stage for a totalitarian turn through its projections of fictional heroic gangsters as well as its production of celebrities as real-life heroes. A manufactured Hollywood heroism, he warned, had the potential to cross over from popular culture to political rule. ‘By carefully observing the trends in modern popular art, and the responses of the people, we can see the tendencies which explode into the monstrous caricatures of human existence which appear under totalitarianism.’ Completed in early 1950, James’s proposal remained underground for decades until it found publication under the abbreviated title American Civilization in 1993. Four years earlier, the author had passed on into history as one of the finest minds of the 20th century.

Given the din of bookish discussion about the spectacular antidemocratic turn in US politics in recent years, one would expect mention of American Civilization somewhere alongside, say, the work of the Frankfurt School. James, after all, stands today as one of the most renowned, even revered, thinkers in the North Atlantic. A novelist, journalist, pamphleteer, philosopher, Marxist theoretician and, in the words of V S Naipaul, ‘impresario of revolution’, this West Indian has acquired a posthumous stature in the West that would stun most people in the region where he was born in 1901. James is to the world of critical intellect as Brian Charles Lara is to the world of cricket – to use an apt analogy. His obituary in the The Times of London employed the sobriquet ‘Black Plato’. And, within a year of his death, The C L R James Journal was established in his name. In the ensuing decades, there has been an outpouring of books, anthologies and articles about his life and work, the vast majority coming out of the United Kingdom and the US, where James spent most of his mature years. A veritable ‘Jamesian industry’ now thrives in the 21st-century North Atlantic. Yet, for all this First-Worldly industriousness, or maybe because of it, James’s analysis of totalitarianism in American Civilization remains ignored.



At the base of this ignorance is a 30-year-old tale of radical misreading. Beginning in the 1990s, commentaries on American Civilization have erased its concern with the dark cultural politics of totalitarianism, dismissing the manuscript as quixotic and optimistic, even embarrassingly romantic. James, according to reviewers, fell for the US with the naive zeal of what Trinidadians would call a never-see-come-see. This radical was so dazzled by the North American republic that his radicalism disappeared once he sat down to write about its history and culture. In American Civilization, James was ‘enthusing with the greatest passion about the democratic capacity of the civilization with which he had fallen in love,’ the UK-based historian Bill Schwarz wrote. In a review for The New Yorker, Paul Berman concurred, describing the work as proof that ‘James basically loved the United States’. Yet, far from love and happiness, the manuscript was inspired, we will see, by a concern with the despair and hopelessness of US citizens and by a worry about the political portent of these mass feelings.

snip
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How C L R James foresaw the crisis of US democracy (Original Post) Celerity Aug 2024 OP
I read this when I was.youmg. Scruffy1 Aug 2024 #1
C L R James was/is an historic and influential figure in world history. brush Aug 2024 #2
Ah. The "John Wayne" syndrome. mucholderthandirt Aug 2024 #3

Scruffy1

(3,420 posts)
1. I read this when I was.youmg.
Sat Aug 17, 2024, 01:24 AM
Aug 2024

Fifty plus years later it is still rings true.He saw beneath the veneer of our civilization.

brush

(58,012 posts)
2. C L R James was/is an historic and influential figure in world history.
Sat Aug 17, 2024, 04:34 AM
Aug 2024

Who foresaw the direction our democratic society was moving towards — perhaps towards a totalitarian future. It sure seems that way.

Wish he had live to chart what happens to totalitarian regimes when the reach their end-game.

In Germany Hitler wanted "elbow room" and so attack its neighbors to achieve such. We know the end of that story.

The USSR/Russia, even though it has 11 times zones of territory, has continually attacked neighboring countries for more. IMO it will not end well for what Putin intended by invading Ukraine, a nation one fifth its size.

Imperial Japan certainly didn't do well in its conquest for oil and land in Asia.

Hard to see much future in the Hungarian dictatorship where Orban has no room to expand, or Meloni's Italy, or Le Pen who can't win an election in France.

What happens when the end comes to these totalitarian regimes? Do they resort back to democracies of some sort or descend into dystopian disorder which eventually become collections of fiefdoms with warlords battling for control?


mucholderthandirt

(1,201 posts)
3. Ah. The "John Wayne" syndrome.
Sat Aug 17, 2024, 07:56 AM
Aug 2024
A manufactured Hollywood heroism


Not just him, but the elevation of pretty much anyone into a "true American", often if not always for some made up patriotism ideal. Ronald Reagan got some of that, a "great" American actor, turned Republican and began climbing the ladder to political power. Reagan could play a hero, but he was unfit for military service, something often overlooked by his followers (reminds one of Trump, with his bone spurs).

A lot of things in the past were warnings about what we're seeing today, but it was ignored. We must never let that happen again, we've come too close to Project 2025 becoming reality even more than it is already. We've allowed religious freaks take away women's rights, and that must be fixed. We've let our populace be dumbed down, and that must be fixed. Corporations are not people, and that must be undone. And so much more, like war for profit.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How C L R James foresaw t...