Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonRedwood

(4,359 posts)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 11:37 AM Dec 2012

How much did Jan Brewer's "surreal" undercover trip cost the taxpayers of AZ and the US?

I can think of no real reason why the governor of Arizona has any need to go to Afghanistan unless it is to bolster herself for a run for public office. Jan Brewer has nothing to add the war effort, she did nothing to bolster the troops, all that she did was cost the US taxpayers a whole heap of money so she could go sight seeing.

As Brewer screams for more cuts, as she dismantles democracy in her state, as they ignore votes of the people so their hand-picked religious zealots can achieve office, Brewer decided to go to Afghanistan.

Oh, wait... now it makes sense. She needed to see how it is done first hand so they get it right in their state.

1. Religious zealots all armed and ready to take over. Check.
2. Hard-lined Religious zealots taking over government and stopping voting, women's rights, education. Check.


Brewer wasn't checking on the war effort...she was seeing how fascists and zealots take over a country.

Now it all makes sense.....

59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How much did Jan Brewer's "surreal" undercover trip cost the taxpayers of AZ and the US? (Original Post) DonRedwood Dec 2012 OP
Yours is the only plausible explanation I've heard. Scuba Dec 2012 #1
Thank you. It is all that makes sense to me too DonRedwood Dec 2012 #2
your alternative explanation is plausible as well...... think Dec 2012 #5
two sides of the same coin DonRedwood Dec 2012 #6
She appears UNWELL Darly314 Dec 2012 #54
Did she get transport from the Air National Guard? Downwinder Dec 2012 #3
I haven't seen the reports yet DonRedwood Dec 2012 #4
She paid in chickens. Ikonoklast Dec 2012 #37
I suspect she flew on a routine Air Force flight hack89 Dec 2012 #19
Well ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2012 #7
Not much has been said about the nutball that blew up the social security office here now that you lonestarnot Dec 2012 #8
Suspect in Social Security explosion to remain in custody RoxyNexus Dec 2012 #51
Thanks for the update. I missed it. lonestarnot Dec 2012 #58
Commanders are expected to visit their troops Abnredleg Dec 2012 #9
The only thing surreal about it, then, is that she kept it a secret. randome Dec 2012 #10
Security Abnredleg Dec 2012 #11
Ah. Thanks for that. randome Dec 2012 #13
Sorry, but she's never publicly stated caring about "her" troops in the past.... OldDem2012 Dec 2012 #17
They're under Centcom when they deploy. She isn't "commanding" TwilightGardener Dec 2012 #18
Thank you. nt. OldDem2012 Dec 2012 #21
But the troops and the voters expect a visit. hack89 Dec 2012 #29
As if the troopps don't have enough on their plate atreides1 Dec 2012 #30
Speaking from experience it was never that big a deal hack89 Dec 2012 #33
You are right about the DOG show part julian09 Dec 2012 #48
Senators, Congressmen, Presidents, yeah. Governors are state-level. TwilightGardener Dec 2012 #36
When a state National Guard is deployed hack89 Dec 2012 #42
The press made a big deal about "where in the world TwilightGardener Dec 2012 #49
Because the MSM in Arizona are clueless idiots? That's my guess. nt hack89 Dec 2012 #50
Who or what Island Deac Dec 2012 #12
We now have more Democrats than Republicans in the US House. Ptah Dec 2012 #31
That is a bright spot Art_from_Ark Dec 2012 #59
More details please on how taxpayers were defrauded? Coyotl Dec 2012 #14
Everything associated with the trip Occulus Dec 2012 #32
She went because that's what governors do hack89 Dec 2012 #44
Defrauded? That is your term HangOnKids Dec 2012 #34
That's a good question. TwilightGardener Dec 2012 #15
Many Governors have visited their state's National Guard troops in combat zones hack89 Dec 2012 #16
JMHO, but it's all about political posturing no matter the political party. nt. OldDem2012 Dec 2012 #20
Governor are the commander-in-chiefs of state NG units when not federalized hack89 Dec 2012 #27
The governors command nothing when those troops are in combat zones overseas.... OldDem2012 Dec 2012 #35
The troops and the voters expect it hack89 Dec 2012 #39
LOL! Oh, please. Nobody but politicians believe "the troops and voters expect it". nt. OldDem2012 Dec 2012 #52
What were your experiences while overseas? hack89 Dec 2012 #53
I was a Naval Gunfire Liaison Officer attached to the Marines... OldDem2012 Dec 2012 #55
OK nt hack89 Dec 2012 #56
I think it's a pointless joke when ANY governor does it. TwilightGardener Dec 2012 #22
I know Jack Markell has visited Afghanistan and there are far less people from Delaware LynneSin Dec 2012 #23
If she wanted to visit wounded, she didn't need to leave the fucking state on our dime. We have lonestarnot Dec 2012 #24
She went to Afghanistan?... SidDithers Dec 2012 #25
Janet Napolitano made an identical trip in 2007 hack89 Dec 2012 #26
You stonecutter357 Dec 2012 #38
No - my point is that this type of visit is common hack89 Dec 2012 #40
Agreed Sherman A1 Dec 2012 #43
Could she be tracking her drug deliveries? n/t peace13 Dec 2012 #28
Don't you get it? 99Forever Dec 2012 #41
Brewer in Afghanistan? Why? Why would a governor of Arizona want, much less need, JDPriestly Dec 2012 #45
Good point. What is the pressing need for the Governor of Arizona to spend our money Zorra Dec 2012 #46
I guess AZ Lib Dec 2012 #47
Maybe she thinks that if she flies around the world backwards she can reverse the aging process.... Walk away Dec 2012 #57

DonRedwood

(4,359 posts)
2. Thank you. It is all that makes sense to me too
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 11:40 AM
Dec 2012

Unless she is having an affair with Taliban leadership....

Darly314

(23 posts)
54. She appears UNWELL
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 08:38 PM
Dec 2012

Perhaps a LONG rest is in order, YEARS in fact.......I want to know IF there was an unauthorized, INTENTIONAL touching, is this being reviewed by the State/District* attorney? There is no 'minimum' level for battery. Of course Dick "I had OTHER PRIORITIES than military service" Cheney shot a guy, and flew away..........

*Florida uses the term "State" Attorney, I do not know AZ legalese.

DonRedwood

(4,359 posts)
4. I haven't seen the reports yet
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 11:47 AM
Dec 2012

She stopped in Washington to visit someone and then flew on to Afghanistan.

Just the cost of protecting her was probably half of what I make in a year...

hack89

(39,171 posts)
19. I suspect she flew on a routine Air Force flight
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 12:27 PM
Dec 2012

like every other Governor has used when they flew to Iraq or Afghanistan.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
7. Well ...
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 11:56 AM
Dec 2012
http://dynamic.azstarnet.com/comments/viewcommentsnew.php?id=/news/local/brewer-in-afghanistan-calls-war-unimaginable/article_2951ba85-859e-5743-a590-8a4b3ab60f0a.html&h=Brewer, in Afghanistan, calls war 'unimaginable'

From the comments to the on-line article, Arizonans are not much liking her trip ... all except for the usual suspects that excused her cutting of education, medicaid and refusing to set up a healthcare exchange, (and spit fire, whenever President Obama leaves the Whitehouse), who are trying to spin this as a patriotic mission that all elected officials should take.

 

lonestarnot

(77,097 posts)
8. Not much has been said about the nutball that blew up the social security office here now that you
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 11:58 AM
Dec 2012

mention it.

 

RoxyNexus

(39 posts)
51. Suspect in Social Security explosion to remain in custody
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 04:04 PM
Dec 2012
A U.S. District Magistrate ruled Wednesday that the man suspected of setting off an explosive device outside of a federal office building in CasaGrande last week will remain in custody as both a danger and a flight risk.

Magistrate David K. Duncan scheduled a preliminary hearing next Tuesday for AbdullatifAlyAldosary, 47, in U.S. District Court in Phoenix.

Duncan also appointed an attorney for Aldosary, but said the lawyer will have to keep track of hours worked on the case in the event that the $20,000 Aldosary has in a bank account can cover his legal fees.

Aldosary is accused of detonating an unknown explosive device about 8:30 a.m. Friday outside the U.S. Social Security Administration Building at 501 N. Marshall St.


http://www.azcentral.com/community/pinal/free/20121205social-security-explosion-suspect-set-court.html

Abnredleg

(670 posts)
9. Commanders are expected to visit their troops
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 12:04 PM
Dec 2012

She is the head of the Arizona National Guard, as is the governor of Missouri who is making the trip along with her, and I would argue that she has an obligation to visit her troops deployed to Afghanistan. A quick Google search reveals that in the past years many governors, both Democrat and Republican, have visited their troops in places such as the Balkans, the Middle East and Southwest Asia so it is not an out of the ordinary thing for a governor to do . As to costs, there is a constant stream of aircraft flying to and from Afghanistan so I doubt there were much in the way of additional costs.

Not to say that there aren't political benefits to visiting the troops in a combat zone but it is hardly a "surreal" trip.

Abnredleg

(670 posts)
11. Security
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 12:13 PM
Dec 2012

She didn't keep it secret - the DOD kept it secret. Trips by politicians to war zones are typically quick in and out visits lasting a couple of hours with no advanced warning.

OldDem2012

(3,526 posts)
17. Sorry, but she's never publicly stated caring about "her" troops in the past....
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 12:26 PM
Dec 2012

....why would she start now unless she had a political motive for doing so?

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
18. They're under Centcom when they deploy. She isn't "commanding"
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 12:27 PM
Dec 2012

anybody when they're out of the state and called to active duty overseas. They're not "her troops" over there.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
29. But the troops and the voters expect a visit.
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 12:39 PM
Dec 2012

I don't see what the big deal is - if we want our leaders to make informed decisions about wars and foreign then they need to venture outside the borders. Unless you expect them to take the military's word for what is going on.

atreides1

(16,079 posts)
30. As if the troopps don't have enough on their plate
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 12:48 PM
Dec 2012

Now they have to be part of a dog and pony show, just so an outgoing politician can use them to pad her resume!

hack89

(39,171 posts)
33. Speaking from experience it was never that big a deal
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 01:03 PM
Dec 2012

We would simply clean up a little extra and remind the troops not to say "fuck".

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
36. Senators, Congressmen, Presidents, yeah. Governors are state-level.
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 01:38 PM
Dec 2012

I understand when they go out on trade/commerce trips and the like, but it's kind of silly that they would have anything to do with foreign war theatres. They can certainly visit the wounded and veterans when those folks come home. And edit to add: If Jan Brewer's doing it, you KNOW it's pointless.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
42. When a state National Guard is deployed
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 01:54 PM
Dec 2012

then I do think they should visit. First of all because the governor is the state NG commander in chief and therefore has a responsibility to understand what they do and to see that his troops are being treated well. And secondly the voters expect the governor to care about their sons,daughters, fathers, mothers, etc - they trust local officials more than federal officials and they want to see their governor is involved.

I don't see what the big deal is - this has been happening forever and will continue as long as their are politicians.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
49. The press made a big deal about "where in the world
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 02:43 PM
Dec 2012

is Jan Brewer". If it was routine and all govs do it, why the sudden fuss? Obviously she (or her staff) means to call attention to it, to further her political ambitions. Other than that, the NG stops being the responsibility of state governors on active-duty deployments. I don't expect my governor to go to Afghanistan, I think he should concern himself with state business--if there's any concern over treatment of troops on active duty deployments, that's a Congressman/Senator and DoD issue. So we disagree.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
59. That is a bright spot
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 01:42 AM
Dec 2012

In contrast, in my home state, whose postal abbreviation is often confused as being that of your state, we now have Republican Congressman representing all 4 districts, the first time that has happened since Reconstruction

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
14. More details please on how taxpayers were defrauded?
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 12:23 PM
Dec 2012

You make mention of that and give no evidence, details, etc. I'm curious, are there any facts attached to this?

Occulus

(20,599 posts)
32. Everything associated with the trip
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 12:57 PM
Dec 2012

It served no legitimate governmental purpose. They're not 'her' troops, she had nothing to add to the war effort, we have plenty of wounded soldiers here for her to exploit visit, etc., & etc.

Lots of legitimate questions, beginning with, why did she go?

hack89

(39,171 posts)
44. She went because that's what governors do
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 01:57 PM
Dec 2012

when National Guard units from their state deploy.

Where have you been for last 10 years - there has been a steady stream of governors, Dem and Republican alike, visiting the war zone. It would be hard to find one who has not.

 

HangOnKids

(4,291 posts)
34. Defrauded? That is your term
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 01:10 PM
Dec 2012

The OP states she used tax payer dollars for her trip, which is in fact true. The OP makes NO mention of defrauding. Interesting spin there from you.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
16. Many Governors have visited their state's National Guard troops in combat zones
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 12:25 PM
Dec 2012

It is a non-partisan issue.


More than 400 National Guard members from Arizona are serving in Afghanistan.

Then-Gov. Janet Napolitano made a similar unannounced trip to Iraq and Afghanistan in 2007.


Read more: http://www.abc15.com/dpp/news/state/mystery-solved-arizona-gov-jan-brewer-made-unannounced-visit-to-afghanistan#ixzz2EI1XMTIM

hack89

(39,171 posts)
27. Governor are the commander-in-chiefs of state NG units when not federalized
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 12:35 PM
Dec 2012

it can be argued they have a moral obligation to visit their troops overseas. As a soldier I would expect it.

OldDem2012

(3,526 posts)
35. The governors command nothing when those troops are in combat zones overseas....
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 01:31 PM
Dec 2012

....as a soldier, I would be a lot more concerned about coming back unharmed than the posturing of some politician who will never be in my foxhole and may never have served in the military.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
53. What were your experiences while overseas?
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 08:29 PM
Dec 2012

every unit I was with expected and enjoyed such visits.

And I think you don't understand the bond between a state and it's National Guard or Reserve units. It is unlike regular army troops - these are citizen soldiers that are not separate from and unknown by the public. In RI every time a NG unit leaves or comes back the Governor and many political leaders are there.

OldDem2012

(3,526 posts)
55. I was a Naval Gunfire Liaison Officer attached to the Marines...
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 09:15 PM
Dec 2012

...I saw the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs very close up for a period of about a week, and that was one time more than I ever saw a politician during my five years of active duty. Heck, I saw more French, Italian, and Spanish politicians overseas than I ever saw US politicians!

To be honest, I don't think you understand the extent to which politicians will resort to grandstanding on any issue, especially those involving the military. They don't give a crap about the troops, but they care a great deal about their public image.

I think we need to agree to disagree because you're not going to change my opinion on this subject and I'm not going to change yours.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
23. I know Jack Markell has visited Afghanistan and there are far less people from Delaware
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 12:29 PM
Dec 2012

serving than Arizona.

I'm no fan of Jan Brewer but her visiting Afghanistan is typical of any US Governor.

 

lonestarnot

(77,097 posts)
24. If she wanted to visit wounded, she didn't need to leave the fucking state on our dime. We have
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 12:29 PM
Dec 2012

plenty right here she could have exploited for her idiocy.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
26. Janet Napolitano made an identical trip in 2007
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 12:34 PM
Dec 2012

since she had no valid reason to go either, I can only assume it was to learn from the Taliban in preparation for her job as head of the TSA.



Damn near every governor has made a trip to either Iraq or Afghanistan - especially when National Guard units from their state are deployed. Governor are the commander-in-chiefs of state NG units when not federalized - it can be argued they have a moral obligation to visit their troops overseas. T

hack89

(39,171 posts)
40. No - my point is that this type of visit is common
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 01:47 PM
Dec 2012

and is not a big deal.

I see people making a mountain out of a molehill because they don't like Jan Brewer. Why don't we see similar criticism when popular democrats do exactly the same thing?

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
43. Agreed
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 01:55 PM
Dec 2012

Governor Nixon (D) of Missouri is either there or just completing a trip to visit the troops. This thread me thinks, is much ado about nothing.....

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
41. Don't you get it?
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 01:52 PM
Dec 2012

That austerity stuff is for the little people, not high rollers like self-important govs. Do you doubt that it was possible that Brewer might have been able solve the problem of Afghanistan by visiting there on your dime?

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
45. Brewer in Afghanistan? Why? Why would a governor of Arizona want, much less need,
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 02:04 PM
Dec 2012

to go to Afghanistan?

If I lived in Arizona, I would be crying foul so loud that Brewer would have to resign. What a waste of tax money. And even if she paid for it herself, doesn't she have better things to do?

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
46. Good point. What is the pressing need for the Governor of Arizona to spend our money
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 02:17 PM
Dec 2012

to pay for her travel expenses and accommodations on her little vacation in Afghanistan?

Is she an expert in military affairs, such as troop withdrawal? No, she is not.

What does this to for the people of the US, or the people of Arizona, who are also paying her incompetent ass while she is off on a useless spending spree.


And republicans would have us believe that they are interested in cutting government spending.

Considering this stupid little escapade, it is no wonder that Arizona is at the bottom, like 48th, in competency of all US state governments.

Walk away

(9,494 posts)
57. Maybe she thinks that if she flies around the world backwards she can reverse the aging process....
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 10:55 PM
Dec 2012

that has ravaged her face. That sounds like republican science!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How much did Jan Brewer's...