General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums****BREAKING**** Fairleigh Dickinson National Poll Harris 50% TFG 43%
https://www.fdu.edu/news/fdu-poll-finds-race-and-gender-push-harris-above-trump-nationally/
Fiendish Thingy
(20,108 posts)Celebrate the trend (movement, not averages), not the individual poll.
RedSpartan
(1,766 posts)Also a great school. Full disclosure: my daughter goes there.
Jersey Devil
(10,424 posts)Teaneck (now Metropolitan) Campus.
Their polling has long been respected.
UnderThisLaw
(331 posts)GreenWave
(11,110 posts)Johnny2X2X
(23,090 posts)Harris +6, +7, and +8.
FDU is a very highly ranked poll, this is the 32nd higest ranked pollster on 538 out of about 400 pollsters. Probably would be considered an A- rated poll under their old system.
Jacson6
(1,441 posts)Just like it was in 2020 this presidential race is going to come down to a few thousand voters in a few States to win the electoral college. IMHO.
Johnny2X2X
(23,090 posts)State polls are looking great too though, according the the polling averages:
Arizona Harris +1.4
Georgia Trump +0.5
Michigan Harris +3.4
Nevada Harris +0.6
Pennsylvania Harris +1.8
Wisconsin Harris +3.8
Harris also leads in North Carolina and Maine's 4th district.
ColinC
(11,098 posts)Galvanize support in metro areas that spill over into neighboring states -such as was the case with Obamas 2008 Chicago suburbs turnout that spilled over into Indiana and won him the state.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,052 posts)Can you please tell our friend we can impute state movement in polls from national movement in polls since it's ultimately coming from the same universe of voters.
Mountainguy
(2,145 posts)That national polls are state polls are not disconnected. They move together.
lees1975
(6,700 posts)Johnny2X2X
(23,090 posts)People should ignore RCP altogether, it's like the Trump campaign's polling.
538 is still legit and transparent. But I agree theyt're behind the curve as they're including stale polls in their average still, so that 3.6 average could really be +5.0 fo rHarris, we'll see that in the coming weeks.
ColinC
(11,098 posts)And do translate -with enough of a lead, to electoral college victories.
obamanut2012
(28,653 posts)ShazzieB
(21,179 posts)If you're not interested in posts about polls, national or otherwise, don't read them. Ignore them, skip right over them. If they really bug you, trash those posts so you don't have to see them on your screen again. Easy peasy.
Some of us here are interested in these polls. (If you need evidence, this one has 133 recs at the moment - probably more by the time I post this.) I think most of us know better than to take polls as absolute gospel truth, but they are still relevant and interesting, as an indication of general trends.
If you're concerned that positive polls might make us overconfident, I really don't think that's going to happen. We all lived through the 2016 election, and we all know what happened then. I would bet anything that nobody here at DU is going to cut back on donations or working to GOTV, much less (dog forbid) not bother to vote, just because the polls are positive.
most of us can't freaking WAIT to vote! If positive polls lift our spirits and put a little extra spring in our step, we'll probably do a better job, if anything. Especially not the latter, because most of us can't freaking WAIT to vote!
So please, let the rest of us enjoy this news. I think we're entitled to it, after all the misery we've been through since the Orange Hellbeast came riding down that escalator. After the DNC convention, I feel better about the direction things are going in than I have in years. I feel optimistic, I felt energized, I feel joyful. I know I'm not the only one, so please, don't rain 🌧 on our parade!
ColinC
(11,098 posts):bounce;
Swede
(36,827 posts)But that 30 per cent of humans have something wrong in their heads. The rest are grifters and haters.
kansasobama
(1,750 posts)About RFK Jr endorsement.
Johnny2X2X
(23,090 posts)RFK Jr's endorsement means very little.
NoRethugFriends
(3,437 posts)kansasobama
(1,750 posts)Yes
Emile
(36,032 posts)Norbert
(7,173 posts)With an ample amount of coattails. Nice to see though.
Deminpenn
(16,920 posts)I've posted before that I believe the local school board elections, both primary and general elections, are a bellwhether. With a few exceptions, voters across the country, are rejecting the "moms for liberty" and other reactionary candidates running for local school boards and even recalling some that weren't up for election or re-election. I believe that's real life proof that Americans are just tired of the hate and division and want a return to normalcy.
Sure Trump will still get the votes of his cultists, but they are a shrinking minority.
democratsruletheday
(1,364 posts)if we all keep our nose to the grindstone, we can blow them out. But after '16 we're not gonna leave anything to chance obviously. I'll have PTSD from that election the rest of my life.
Jersey Devil
(10,424 posts)You'd have to add the convention bounce to get a more accurate reading of what it would be today.
elocs
(24,486 posts)So excuse my lack of enthusiasm for their having Harris ahead.
Johnny2X2X
(23,090 posts)They're one of the better polls on 538, ranked 32nd overall out of 400+ polls. Better than Gallup.
peggysue2
(12,027 posts)After the phenomenal Democratic Convention, even Michael Steele said he expected a strong bounce (something Trump did not have after his own dismal Convention). Steele predicted those numbers will grow right into the September 10th debate, another opportunity to gain support. After Kamala's speech, Steele also said he received a text from a prominent Republican (he wouldn't say who) that read simply:
Now that's how you become President!
Impressive Convention, extraordinary speech. Can't wait for the debate!
Lulu KC
(8,168 posts)But I get a little buzz when we're ahead. Must be a dopamine receptor going off.
pat_k
(11,486 posts)I'm not sure what to make of their experiment on priming. Is the overall gap being driven by the gender/race priming effect? Or does the addition of questions on gender and/or race somehow "dilute" the effect of being asked the importance of the other five issues? (Tax Policy, Immigration Policy, Climate Change, Abortion and Foreign Policy.)