General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumshandmade34
(22,756 posts)loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Ive worked union and non union. Personally there should be unions but you dont have to join if you dont want to.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,660 posts)Blue states don't have right to work.
doc03
(35,348 posts)Rob H.
(5,352 posts)Then again, they're a red state with a Democratic governor and US Senators.
Edited to add: one of my uncles in Great Falls was a union worker before he retired and I think a lot of the people he knows are pro-union, so that may be one of the reasons why it isn't a right-to-work state.
Cha
(297,323 posts)Libertas1776
(2,888 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)xmas74
(29,674 posts)We aren't right to work but we don't offer the same rights as a "worker's rights" state, either. We're somewhere in the middle, though a Repub-led state house has been pushing for a turn to right to work.
femrap
(13,418 posts)think KY was 'right to work?' Did it change of late? I remember applying at Amazon and they made a big to-do about it...but maybe they were just lying to deter me....after all a woman engineer isn't exactly welcome. I worked at Peterbilt Trucks for a short time....was cornered by the workers a few times. It was as if mgt. had encouraged them to do so. No biggie. Ended up at the Devil's Institution of Bechtel...working on Arab projects. I didn't work very hard.
doc03
(35,348 posts)to the states, I worked 40 years in a closed shop in Ohio.
Omaha Steve
(99,660 posts)Nebraska was one of the first right to work states after Taft Hartley. They put it in the state constitution.
Take that one sentence out of Taft Hartley, and there is no right to work exemption.
doc03
(35,348 posts)plant that refused to join the union or pay union dues. Before I stared there they had a short strike and the guy crossed the picket lines. He got all the benefits we got and demanded all the rights we had and paid nothing, you think that is right?
ananda
(28,866 posts)Workers have no collective-bargaining rights.
Response to ananda (Reply #4)
rDigital This message was self-deleted by its author.
ashling
(25,771 posts)Right to work = employment at will = right to fire.
Marta Steele
(17 posts)my PR person sez: If only rocks could vote . . . (thinking of all those rocks in Montana)
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Cha
(297,323 posts)tiredtoo
(2,949 posts)A few years ago. The plutocrats have placed their puppets in many state legislators/governors offices. This is of course a result of the tea party gang. It is a damn shame and hopefully we can work together to throw the bums out next election. In closing I say to those that supported these scoundrels "be careful what you wish for."
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)something rightwingnuts supposedly object to
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)stupidicus
(2,570 posts)the "right to work" laws I assumed he's referencing, are all about saddling the unions with the time, effort, and expense of defending scabs like they do their union brothers and sisters.
Opponents argue that right-to-work laws restrict freedom of association by prohibiting workers and employers from agreeing to contracts that include fair share fees, and so create a free rider problem.[15][16] The absence of fair share fees forces dues paying members to subsidize services to non-union employees (who are bound by the terms of the union contract even though they are not members of the union). Thus, these individuals benefit from collective bargaining without paying union dues.[15][17]
any other questions
rDigital
(2,239 posts)nicky187
(137 posts)Ownership propaganda used to sell their preferences to stupid people, versus exercising your right to organize under collective bargaining.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)I read the title as a question that needed an answer. I'm thinking I'll be clever and say "The right to work for less!", alas you've beat me to it.
Union Yes.
dcmfox
(211 posts)been shit wages ever since.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)For good reason, bad reason, or no reason at all.
I know.
I was trained as a supervisor in Texas.
Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)that increased pollution and "Healthy Forests Initiative" that allowed clear-cutting. Any time repukes name a bill or movement, it means the opposite of that.