Joseph Stiglitz: America’s Hope Against Hope
Joseph E. Stiglitz
Americas Hope Against Hope
<...>
In fact, the election had several salutary effects beyond showing that unbridled corporate spending could not buy an election, and that demographic changes in the United States may doom Republican extremism. The Republicans explicit campaign of disenfranchisement in some states like Pennsylvania, where they tried to make it more difficult for African-Americans and Latinos to register to vote backfired: those whose rights were threatened were motivated to turn out and exercise them. In Massachusetts, Elizabeth Warren, a Harvard law professor and tireless warrior for reforms to protect ordinary citizens from banks abusive practices, won a seat in the Senate.
Some of Mitt Romneys advisers seemed taken aback by Obamas victory: Wasnt the election supposed to be about economics? They were confident that Americans would forget how the Republicans deregulatory zeal had brought the economy to the brink of ruin, and that voters had not noticed how their intransigence in Congress had prevented more effective policies from being pursued in the wake of the 2008 crisis. Voters, they assumed, would focus only on the current economic malaise.
The Republicans should not have been caught off-guard by Americans interest in issues like disenfranchisement and gender equality. While these issues strike at the core of a countrys values of what we mean by democracy and limits on government intrusion into individuals lives they are also economic issues. As I explain in my book
The Price of Inequality, much of the rise in US economic inequality is attributable to a government in which the rich have disproportionate influence & and use that influence to entrench themselves. Obviously, issues like reproductive rights and gay marriage have large economic consequences as well.
A comprehensive program to increase economic opportunity and reduce inequality is also needed its goal being to remove, within the next decade, Americas distinction as the advanced country with the highest inequality and the least social mobility. This implies, among other things, a fair tax system that is more progressive and eliminates the distortions and loopholes that allow speculators to pay taxes at a lower effective rate than those who work for a living, and that enable the rich to use the Cayman Islands to avoid paying their fair share.
- more -
http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/a-reform-agenda-for-the-second-obama-administration-by-joseph-e--stiglitz