Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 03:32 PM Dec 2012

Radio Pranksters Who Posed as Queen Pulled Off Air After Nurse's Death

Radio Pranksters Who Posed as Queen Pulled Off Air After Nurse's Death


The two Australian radio hosts who prank called the hospital where Kate Middleton was being treated have been pulled off the air "until further notice" after the hoaxed nurse was found dead today.

"Southern Cross Austereo (SCA) and 2Day FM are deeply saddened by the tragic news of the death of nurse Jacintha Saldanha from King Edward VII's Hospital and we extend our deepest sympathies to her family and all that have been affected by this situation around the world," the radio station said in a statement posted on their Facebook page.

The station's chief executive spoke with the DJs, Mel Greig and Michael Christian, and "they are both deeply shocked," the statement said. The parties agreed that the hosts would not comment on the situation.

"SCA and the hosts have decided that they will not return to their radio show until further notice out of respect for what can only be described as a tragedy," the statement said.


http://abcnews.go.com/International/royal-hoaxers-pulled-off-air-nurses-death/story?id=17903539#.UMJENKnp4Vs

46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Radio Pranksters Who Posed as Queen Pulled Off Air After Nurse's Death (Original Post) The Straight Story Dec 2012 OP
How about the manager that hired them TrogL Dec 2012 #1
Horrible. liberalmuse Dec 2012 #2
Sadly nothing will be done. This is truly a sad story because the young woman was doing her job. southernyankeebelle Dec 2012 #3
Well, I hope they're still enjoying their prank. Sheldon Cooper Dec 2012 #4
And I hope they will carry the guilt of their deed for the rest of their lives. n/t RebelOne Dec 2012 #5
They shouldn't. It is not their fault. NYC Liberal Dec 2012 #6
You're right. It's the stupid nurse's fault magical thyme Dec 2012 #10
Understandable anger. yardwork Dec 2012 #11
So true and it is so sad- Tumbulu Dec 2012 #30
Why does someone have to be at fault? NYC Liberal Dec 2012 #12
Those radio personalities ARE part of the media and they pulled this stunt to Skidmore Dec 2012 #34
What they did was irresponsible and cruel magical thyme Dec 2012 #36
"vile", "beyond thoughtless", "stupid and cruel"... NYC Liberal Dec 2012 #39
How convenient to leave out the beginning of the call magical thyme Dec 2012 #44
I hope you're enjoying your selective outrage here. NYC Liberal Dec 2012 #46
Thanks for this! It was a joke! They happen every day! Logical Dec 2012 #13
Oh yes it is! rainin Dec 2012 #29
good post lunasun Dec 2012 #31
No, it is not. NYC Liberal Dec 2012 #32
Why Don't You Just Pin A Good Conduct Medal On Those DJ's? Paladin Dec 2012 #33
Or I could simply said that they are not at fault for someone committing suicide, NYC Liberal Dec 2012 #37
Do As You Please. Paladin Dec 2012 #38
I don't have any "sunny thoughts". NYC Liberal Dec 2012 #41
I did not say this was bullying. rainin Dec 2012 #35
"difference between taking responsibility and blaming others" NYC Liberal Dec 2012 #40
I agree. Sheldon Cooper Dec 2012 #7
Absolutely. nt Raine Dec 2012 #9
I wish these a long life with many miseries. Stinky The Clown Dec 2012 #8
Really? So the people who did it to Scott walker were evil too? Logical Dec 2012 #14
Scott Walker is a governor. This woman was a private citizen, and a nurse anneboleyn Dec 2012 #16
So if Scott walkers secretary would have killed herself then that was ok? Same fucking thing! Logical Dec 2012 #17
Hospitals and other places concerning Medical care usually are more STrict JI7 Dec 2012 #19
Exactly. For a nurse, this could well be career-ending. Sorry, not funny. anneboleyn Dec 2012 #21
yes, that's why it's different from things callign news shows which is where they should JI7 Dec 2012 #23
You lost me. The point is about the practical effect on a NURSE anneboleyn Dec 2012 #24
Well . . . since we all had a good laugh at Scott Walker's expense. And before him, at . . . . Stinky The Clown Dec 2012 #42
WTF are you talking about? The point is that we love pranks when they make fun of the GOP! Logical Dec 2012 #43
Some jokes have tragic unforeseen consequences Kaleva Dec 2012 #15
Seems rather dim not to realize that a nurse could lose her job over this anneboleyn Dec 2012 #20
I'm curious if the radio show was taped or live Kaleva Dec 2012 #28
Taped - and management and lawyer(s) said it was OK to broadcast muriel_volestrangler Dec 2012 #45
They were just doing their job as well... Comrade_McKenzie Dec 2012 #18
Don't do something that can put a person's job at risk. That's when things stop being funny. Michigan Alum Dec 2012 #22
"Don't make someone a worldwide laughingstock" is a good rule of thumb, too Posteritatis Dec 2012 #25
like the freeper thread where i saw someone ask "she could have turned off her computer" JI7 Dec 2012 #26
Yep, and we get those here too. Posteritatis Dec 2012 #27

TrogL

(32,822 posts)
1. How about the manager that hired them
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 03:41 PM
Dec 2012

Back in the 80's a local "shock jock" outed me to the entire province.

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)
4. Well, I hope they're still enjoying their prank.
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 06:25 PM
Dec 2012

They've got plenty of downtime to relive it over and over. Assholes.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
10. You're right. It's the stupid nurse's fault
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 08:36 PM
Dec 2012

For entering a profession where the stress levels are phenomenal; where you are required to sacrifice your own health, finances, and families for assholes like the "shock jocks" that pulled their stupid-shit prank and put her career on the line for the "fun" of publicly humiliating her in front of her colleagues and the world; where other people's lives depend on you all day or night; where everybody in line ahead of you might fuck up and if you're the last one in the line that costs a life your career is over; where privacy laws rule every word you say and scrap of paper you toss in the wrong place; and where somebody trained as a nurse was made to fill in for a receptionist.

She was right to kill herself. I can't tell you how close I've come to suicide in my 2 years of training in med lab technology and my 1 year on the job. As of 2 weeks ago I've returned to the CSR job I had while in school. Too bad she only had her nursing career and nothing else to fall back on. But I suppose that was her fault too.

for the impaired

yardwork

(61,650 posts)
11. Understandable anger.
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 08:39 PM
Dec 2012

I think that a lot of posters who are dismissing this young woman's despair have no idea how much stress there is in nursing, and how career-ending a mistake that violates patient confidentiality can be, not to mention the nursing professional's deep commitment to patient care and protecting their patients. The young woman must have been devastated.

NYC Liberal

(20,136 posts)
12. Why does someone have to be at fault?
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:13 AM
Dec 2012

No, it's not her fault and it's not their fault either.

You can look all day long for someone to blame, for someone to burn, but at the end of the day some tragedies just don't have anyone to blame. This is one of them.

However, if you DO really need someone to blame, you should start with the media that hyped this to the extreme and played the tape over and over and over, and whipped up millions into a frenzied outrage. Had the media not done that, how many people would have heard about this? How many would have cared?

(And this is NOT )

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
34. Those radio personalities ARE part of the media and they pulled this stunt to
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 08:25 AM
Dec 2012

get their show some publicity.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
36. What they did was irresponsible and cruel
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:05 PM
Dec 2012

Hospitals are not the place to be playing pranks. This is on a level with fake 911 calls and should be made illegal.

People go to hospitals because they are seriously ill or injured. Employees in hospitals have enormous responsibilities -- they literally have lives in their hands.

The job is complex and demanding. The work environment is extremely stressful. The hours are long and exhausting, the workload can be quite high and fast-paced, the investment in training is extremely high and the pay quite low. It takes a very dedicated person to make nursing their career. There is a reason there is a chronic shortage of nurses.

The price for making mistakes is very, very high. The mistake those assholes deliberately and maliciously tricked her into for their supposed entertainment were career-ending, with or without publicity. Not long ago, the hospital that I am leaving escorted a receptionist out the door for making a privacy mistake.

Obviously there would be publicity -- that was the nature of their stupid and cruel stunt. The fact that it involved royalty just made the situation for that poor woman all the worse.

It was a vile, vile thing to do. Beyond thoughtless. Those assholes should be forced to spend a year scrubbing floors on a burn ward. Frankly so should anybody else who thinks this was some harmless little joke.

NYC Liberal

(20,136 posts)
39. "vile", "beyond thoughtless", "stupid and cruel"...
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 01:03 PM
Dec 2012

Yes, that certainly describes a minute-long conversation in which the "pranker" says hello and asks how someone is doing.



Here is the entirety of the conversation:

GREIG: Hello, I’m just after my granddaughter Kate. I wanted to see how her little tummy bug is going.

NURSE: She’s sleeping at the moment. And she had an uneventful night. And sleep is good for her. As we speak, she’s been getting some fluids to rehydrate her. She was quite dehydrated when she came in. But she’s stable at the moment.

GREIG: Okay, ill just feed my little corgies then.

CHRISTIAN: Lovely. But they’re all okay, everything’s alright?

NURSE: Yes, she’s quite stable at the moment. She hasn’t had any retching with me, since I’ve been on duty. And she’s been sleeping on and off.

CHRISTIAN: Wonderful.

NURSE: And I think it’s difficult sleeping in a strange bed as well.

CHRISTIAN: Yes, of course! It’s hardly the palace, is it?

GREIG: Oh, it’s nothing like the palace, is it, Charles?


Oh wait. It involves "royalty", as you note. Thus it was necessary for people to get OUTRAGED over this call. If we'd been talking about a mere "commoner", few people would have given a shit. Like in this case:



There's another "prank call" to a hospital. But nobody gave a shit that it was done because a "royal" wasn't involved. In fact, you can do a search on YouTube and find many more. I personally think 99% of prank calls are stupid and lame (this one and the others found on YouTube) with only a few being really well done.

But I'm talking about the selective outrage here.

NOBODY here on this site gave a shit when news of this call was released. Now suddenly people are talking about how horrible and cruel it was. Well if the prank itself was cruel then it would have been so whether this nurse committed suicide or not; yet no one here was calling it cruel. And the nurse, as far as we know, had NOT been fired.
 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
44. How convenient to leave out the beginning of the call
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 04:31 PM
Dec 2012

You know, the part with nurse on duty as receptionist whom they tricked. Not the nurse who gave out the info, the nurse they tricked. The one who killed herself as a direct result.

And exactly what do the other instances have to do with this one? What is your point? This one led to outrage not because it was heavily publicized due to the victims, but because it drove somebody to SUICIDE.

Just because nobody noticed the other prank privacy violations doesn't mean they weren't important too. A lot of threads disappear on DU before they're ever seen. If the targets in this case were as famous as the Queen of England, then it probably would have been seen. That has zip to do with the outrage.

What part of this do you not understand?

There are only certain people allowed medical information. Any violation of patient privacy -- no matter who it is -- is grounds for termination. Deliberately tricking somebody into inadvertently breaking a rule is a vicious and cruel thing to do regardless of the intended target.

No, she wasn't fired, as far as we know. That does not mean she was not about to be fired, or punished in a big way, or tortured into quitting. Do you think that does not happen? For all we know, she may have found herself right back at square one, scheduled to work 14 hour overnight shifts forever or until she quit or died, whichever came first. Because if you think managers won't torture people into quitting, you are living in a very different working world than I've lived in for the last 50 years or so.

All prank calls to hospitals are stupid and they all should be illegal. In this case, a prank call led directly to a suicide. In another case, it could easily lead to distraction that could impact care of other patients.

Maybe the publicity surrounding this one, not to mention the minor little SUICIDE, will lead to action against deliberate perpetrators of privacy violations, instead of only leading to action against their victims.

But just keep trying to find some reason that it's nobody's fault this poor nurse was driven to suicide.

NYC Liberal

(20,136 posts)
46. I hope you're enjoying your selective outrage here.
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 05:21 PM
Dec 2012

The fact is you are looking for someone, anyone to blame without considering what actually happened. Instead of spewing your outrage at the people most responsible in this instance -- those being the people in the media who hyped this by playing the tape over and over, and whipping everyone into a hysterical frenzy of outrage -- you put all blame on someone who literally said hello and asked how Catherine was doing.

You want the beginning of the call? I didn't include it because it's even more innocuous than the bit I did post. Here you go:

Receptionist: Hello, good morning, King Edward VII Hospital.

Greig (Queen voice): Oh hello there, could I please speak to Kate please, my granddaughter.

Receptionist: Oh yes, just hold on ma’am.

Greig: Thank you.


They literally only said "Hello, can I speak to Kate?" And the receptionist put the call through. Actually, the incompetence is pretty amazing. Someone calls and simply asks to the Duchess of Cambridge -- with a terribly fake English accent, no less -- and they are put through right away to her nurse, no questions asked. Incredible.

So please, spare me the outrage. This is a tragedy and not grabbing the pitchforks doesn't make it any less of one.

rainin

(3,011 posts)
29. Oh yes it is!
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 01:16 AM
Dec 2012

The consequences were unintended, but they are still 100% responsible for these consequences. Your comment reminds me of the parents of bullies who can't see how their children could be responsible when their bullying results in tragedy.

I tell my kids that if they make prank calls, they don't know how fragile the person is and they might be responsible for doing harm. Same think for ding-dong-ditch. These pranksters will have to live with the consequences of their actions and unless they are psychopaths, they are likely impacted deeply.

Actions have consequences. That's that.

NYC Liberal

(20,136 posts)
32. No, it is not.
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 04:58 AM
Dec 2012

Bullying? BS. Tell me how this is "bullying":

GREIG: Hello, I’m just after my granddaughter Kate. I wanted to see how her little tummy bug is going.

NURSE: She’s sleeping at the moment. And she had an uneventful night. And sleep is good for her. As we speak, she’s been getting some fluids to rehydrate her. She was quite dehydrated when she came in. But she’s stable at the moment.

GREIG: Okay, ill just feed my little corgies then.

CHRISTIAN: Lovely. But they’re all okay, everything’s alright?

NURSE: Yes, she’s quite stable at the moment. She hasn’t had any retching with me, since I’ve been on duty. And she’s been sleeping on and off.

CHRISTIAN: Wonderful.

NURSE: And I think it’s difficult sleeping in a strange bed as well.

CHRISTIAN: Yes, of course! It’s hardly the palace, is it?

GREIG: Oh, it’s nothing like the palace, is it, Charles?


The guy asked to speak to Kate and how she was doing.

That is LITERALLY it. That is not "bullying" by any stretch of the imagination.

You want to blame someone? How about blaming the media that went completely overboard and whipped people up into a frenzy over this non-story? Sarah Palin was prank called in 2008 by a guy pretending to be the president of France -- and he actually got through to her. There was zero outrage about that (nor should there have been).

Paladin

(28,264 posts)
33. Why Don't You Just Pin A Good Conduct Medal On Those DJ's?
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 08:22 AM
Dec 2012

As long as you're trying to absolve them from all guilt, you might as well go all the way.....

NYC Liberal

(20,136 posts)
37. Or I could simply said that they are not at fault for someone committing suicide,
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:34 PM
Dec 2012

without thinking what they did was either great or evil.

Yep, I think that's what I'll do.

Paladin

(28,264 posts)
38. Do As You Please.
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 01:02 PM
Dec 2012

Your sunny thoughts don't change the fact that those DJ's and their little joke were the proximate cause of that nurse's suicide. They were media professionals, so they knew about how the media might handle their little stunt---they surely reveled in the sort of big-time publicity they got. And just a tad of research would have indicated the London hospital they targeted had been taking care of the royal family for a long time, thus making the nursing staff gullible marks for such an ugly prank.

There may not be any legal recourse for the nurse's family, but those DJ's should be fired, and they should never be allowed near a microphone again. And they ought to put in some time at the nearest suicide hot line, to see if they can save some lives, for a change.

NYC Liberal

(20,136 posts)
41. I don't have any "sunny thoughts".
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 01:21 PM
Dec 2012

I have no problem at all with them being fired. As I understand it, they already have been. And remember, this wasn't even their planned prank. This was just them trying to reach Catherine. If they had reached her, I think whatever they had planned was far worse (and they are known for this).

The hospital should also make some changes -- perhaps starting with better training for staff about handling calls to patients and giving out patient information or changing the way such calls are handled.

And I also think the media shares some responsibility. Media outlets all over the world replayed that tape over and over and whipped people into a frenzy.

rainin

(3,011 posts)
35. I did not say this was bullying.
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 08:59 AM
Dec 2012

I said that this reminds me of how people don't take responsibility for the unintended consequences of their actions.

I find it interesting that you don't know the difference between taking responsibility and blaming others. You might look up "learner path and judger path" for a good explanation online.

These two radio personalities likely know they are responsible. While the public takes sides, they will be uncomforted by reassurances that it was not their fault. In one's heart, we know.

Perhaps you might consider a more personal example. You play a joke on someone. You don't think through how this joke might embarrass, humiliate, or cause them harm. This joke turns out to not be funny to the other person. You laugh "ha,ha,ha" cause it was so funny to you. They are devastated because it is embarrassing and humiliating to them. Would you not take responsibility for having caused them pain? If not, well then, you missed some life lessons along the way.

NYC Liberal

(20,136 posts)
40. "difference between taking responsibility and blaming others"
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 01:14 PM
Dec 2012

Interesting, because I'm not the one who has a problem in that department. It's other people here who seek to blame someone, anyone, for this tragedy. Should the prankers in this case take responsibility for the fact that their "prank" had an unintended consequence? Yes, they absolutely should. But that doesn't mean they are to blame here, nor does it mean it is their fault. Not all tragedies have someone to blame.

Remember during the debates when President Obama said about the Benghazi tragedy that as president he was "responsible"? Does that mean it was his fault? No. It meant he had a responsibility, once he was aware of the situation, to take appropriate action. In this case, the DJs also have a responsibility to take appropriate action -- which may mean apologizing for the unintended consequences.

anneboleyn

(5,611 posts)
16. Scott Walker is a governor. This woman was a private citizen, and a nurse
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:32 AM
Dec 2012

meaning that her job was literally on the line when she made a mistake (violating her patient's privacy so the DJs could then make a "joke" of whatever she revealed) and talked to these idiots. Pranking a public official is one thing (thought I am not a fan of "shock jock" antics)-- deliberately using/abusing/manipulating private citizens who may very well lose their jobs to enable a "joke" that will go 'round the world is deeply unethical -- and very callous.

JI7

(89,252 posts)
19. Hospitals and other places concerning Medical care usually are more STrict
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:39 AM
Dec 2012

and making a mistake would hurt an employee more than in many other areas .

anneboleyn

(5,611 posts)
21. Exactly. For a nurse, this could well be career-ending. Sorry, not funny.
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:44 AM
Dec 2012

I have family members in careers that demand very high levels of confidentiality -- a public mistake like this one, then spread around the world, could easily end a career. Not a joke, just the truth for certain professions.

JI7

(89,252 posts)
23. yes, that's why it's different from things callign news shows which is where they should
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:48 AM
Dec 2012

try to pull pranks. and other things involving public figures like politicians. in those cases the people who work for them are prepared to deal with this stuff. and if they make a mistake like in the case of prank on palin the worst is humiliation of apublic figure.

but in this case it involves someone's medical information being made public.

there are differences, just like there were when Sandra Fluke was being attacked and it wasn't the same as attacks on Romney. remember republicans trying to say Obama was a hypocrite for not defending political attacks on Romney when he defended Fluke ?

Stinky The Clown

(67,808 posts)
42. Well . . . since we all had a good laugh at Scott Walker's expense. And before him, at . . . .
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 01:39 PM
Dec 2012

. . . . Caribou Barbie's expense, and assuming you laughed with us, it follows logically that you laughed at this pranks and the nurse's reaction.

Did you?

Kaleva

(36,312 posts)
15. Some jokes have tragic unforeseen consequences
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:29 AM
Dec 2012

No ill will or harm was intended but a human being took her life because of it.

anneboleyn

(5,611 posts)
20. Seems rather dim not to realize that a nurse could lose her job over this
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:41 AM
Dec 2012

These "DJs" had to be extremely narrow individuals not to realize that such a prank, conducted on a member of the hospital staff in order to get info about one of the biggest international stories of the week, would have some degree of "harm" for the hospital staff member.

Kaleva

(36,312 posts)
28. I'm curious if the radio show was taped or live
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 01:15 AM
Dec 2012

If it was taped or delayed, then someone involved with the show ought to have realized the nurse would get into trouble. But if it was live, then I don't think the radio hosts could have foretold that the nurse would give out confidential info.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,321 posts)
45. Taped - and management and lawyer(s) said it was OK to broadcast
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 04:44 PM
Dec 2012
The call was recorded before being assessed by the station's lawyers and then broadcast.

"King Edward VII's Hospital cares for sick people, and it was extremely foolish of your presenters even to consider trying to lie their way through to one of our patients, let alone actually make the call," Lord Glenarthur wrote.

"Then to discover that, not only had this happened, but that the call had been pre-recorded and the decision to transmit approved by your station's management, was truly appalling."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20650721
 

Comrade_McKenzie

(2,526 posts)
18. They were just doing their job as well...
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:35 AM
Dec 2012

I have the utmost respect for shock jocks and anyone that pushes the envelope; even if I disagree with them.

I'm not going to put the blame of the suicide on them at all and I respect their self-imposed leave of absence.

Michigan Alum

(335 posts)
22. Don't do something that can put a person's job at risk. That's when things stop being funny.
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:47 AM
Dec 2012

As a former HR person, I was always aware of the ramifications of someone being fired or having their jobs put at risk. It is not something to be taken lightly.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
25. "Don't make someone a worldwide laughingstock" is a good rule of thumb, too
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 12:55 AM
Dec 2012

A lot of people pooh-poohing this whole thing (or the few scumbags actively defending the DJs) have a nice blind spot in their worldviews shaped almost exactly the same as what that kind of experience would be like in this day and age.

JI7

(89,252 posts)
26. like the freeper thread where i saw someone ask "she could have turned off her computer"
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 01:01 AM
Dec 2012

to the girl who committed suicide from being bullied on the internet.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
27. Yep, and we get those here too.
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 01:04 AM
Dec 2012

Nothing like someone being driven to fatal despair to highlight empathy deficits in just about any group. Ugh.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Radio Pranksters Who Pose...