Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMr President, Don't Even Think About It
http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/12/will-obama-crack-down-on-legal-weed.htmlWell, since they're asking: if they decide to treat the law-abiding citizens of Colorado and Washington as dangerous felons; if they decide to allocate their precious law enforcement powers to persecuting and arresting people for following a state law that they have themselves just passed by clear majorities; if they decide that opposing a near majority of Americans in continuing to prosecute the drug war on marijuana, even when the core of their own supporters want an end to Prohibition, and even when that Prohibition makes no sense ... then we will give them hell.
And it will get personal. The president wasn't just once a pot-smoker, he was a very serious pothead. His own life and career prove that this substance is no more potentially damaging to a human being than alcohol, which is not only legal but marketed to us with abandon. The future coalition he has built - especially its Millennial base - will splinter. Maybe even some libertarian Republicans will seize the issue and champion federalism consistently for a change.
But the main reason the president should instruct the Justice Department that this is not an area for discretionary prosecution is that choosing to focus on pot-prohibition in states that have legalized it defies reason. One of my core arguments for Obama has long been his adoption of what I consider pretty reasonable, if always debatable, policies. He is not an extremist, proposing laws and regulations that are designed to make a cultural point or wage a cultural war; he's a pragmatist, trying to fix existing problems.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 1814 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mr President, Don't Even Think About It (Original Post)
Pryderi
Dec 2012
OP
"Between this and Syria". And there's also the pending let's-send-more-jobs-to-foreign-countries
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2012
#4
TPP, or as noted in Salon, "Trans-Pacific Partnership: The biggest trade deal you’ve never heard of"
AnotherMcIntosh
Dec 2012
#8
Taverner
(55,476 posts)1. Between this and Syria, I'm wondering how useful "winning" is
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)4. "Between this and Syria". And there's also the pending let's-send-more-jobs-to-foreign-countries
"free-trade" agreement.
When it is signed, it will join the first three that he signed as a warm-up with no serious opposition.
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)5. Which trade agreement?
Do you mean the one with Europe? If so, I read that it's not too much of a labor problem b/c Europe has high labor standards. As far as I know the unions have not been vocal about opposing it, and I think even Sherrod Brown voted for it.
But I have not had time to follow all the news that closely because exams are coming up, so can you just clarify what agreement you are talking about and whether my facts are right?
former-republican
(2,163 posts)6. I think he's talking about the South America free trade agreement
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)9. No. The TPP, the pending Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement.
http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/everything_you_wanted_to_know_about_the_trans_pacific_partnership/
It is a disaster in the making.
It is a disaster in the making.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)8. TPP, or as noted in Salon, "Trans-Pacific Partnership: The biggest trade deal you’ve never heard of"
"...
"What exactly is in the Trans-Pacific Partnership?
"Its hard to know. While negotiations started in 2007, most negotiating documents and draft chapters are classified. Stakeholders including 600 corporations but also several labor unions including the AFL-CIO can see the draft text, but the public and Congress cannot. Nevertheless, a few draft chapters have been leaked. Some of the more controversial aspects that have been revealed include making medicine in poor countries much more expensive, banning Buy American preferences in our procurement procedures, rules that may force the deregulation of the financial sector, and a new part of the agreement that might force the privatization of state-owned assets. ...
http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/everything_you_wanted_to_know_about_the_trans_pacific_partnership/
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,635 posts)2. Couldn't agree more!
K&R
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)3. K&R nt
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)7. We can't afford to crack down on weed
I say screw it. People wanna smoke, let 'em smoke.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)10. Don't smoke pot, you could become the greatest swimmer of our time, or President of the USA
or record the greatest album ever, or write a earth-shattering novel. BEWARE!
Pryderi
(6,772 posts)11. lol! Great meme to put on a pic. nt