Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 07:50 PM Dec 2012

How long should an ex-Republican be a Democrat before running for office



9 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
One year
0 (0%)
Two years
4 (44%)
Three years
0 (0%)
Four years
0 (0%)
Five years, minimum
0 (0%)
10 years, minimum
0 (0%)
No party switchers allowed
1 (11%)
Don't care
4 (44%)
Not sure
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How long should an ex-Republican be a Democrat before running for office (Original Post) ProSense Dec 2012 OP
5 years. That ought to discourage the impostors. nt Nay Dec 2012 #1
We have primaries for a reason dsc Dec 2012 #2
Right! IphengeniaBlumgarten Dec 2012 #3
I just wonder hfojvt Dec 2012 #5
And that is why I voted 'Pass'. We dont need a rule. Let Democratic Primary voters decide. nt stevenleser Dec 2012 #14
it depends more on the Republican than on time hfojvt Dec 2012 #4
How ever many it takes for them to change the positions that made them viable politicians TheKentuckian Dec 2012 #6
How about NEVER? Panasonic Dec 2012 #7
Jumpin Jim Jeffords MightyMopar Dec 2012 #8
He never became a Democrat. Panasonic Dec 2012 #9
Didn't say he did but we sure would have welcomed it at the time! Agree? MightyMopar Dec 2012 #15
I agree. Switches like this are never made on the spur of the moment... OldDem2012 Dec 2012 #10
As long as Charlie Crist has until the next election. KamaAina Dec 2012 #11
... Cha Dec 2012 #12
20 years nt Zorra Dec 2012 #13

dsc

(52,169 posts)
2. We have primaries for a reason
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 08:06 PM
Dec 2012

and they can be used to decide how long. It should be taken into account and a decision made.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
5. I just wonder
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 08:24 PM
Dec 2012

if it would be as hard for a conservative to win a Democratic primary as it is for a moderate to win a Republican primary.

Chances are the conservative is going to have a money advantage in the primary.

When I ran for office, I notice a newspaper column basically endorse one of my opponents. Their reason - he was known to be a good fundraiser.

Like policy does not even matter. It is all about the dollar bills. One dollar, one vote.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
4. it depends more on the Republican than on time
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 08:20 PM
Dec 2012

I would be happy to have, Republicans like this - Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, and Robert LaFollette.

Heck, any Republican who can win a primary should be free to run. My problem is that a primary is not likely to be a fair fight though, because, knowing my own state party, they would back a turncoat conservative over a liberal democrat in the primary. So, then when I have, what is supposed to be my own party working against me. Well, that makes it feel like it is not my party.

TheKentuckian

(25,029 posts)
6. How ever many it takes for them to change the positions that made them viable politicians
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 08:31 PM
Dec 2012

in a party that has been radically regressive for at least a generation.

I don't give a shit that the RapeTeaPubliKlans kicked up enough notches to make them no longer viable while holding the same positions. That segment should be without representation until they can bring some little sense back to their party and maybe they will actually and seriously change more than a letter by their name.

I'm fine with folks turning over a new leaf, I'm not fine with gathering right wingers that have been ideologically orphaned by forces they fostered and gave purchase to and giving them a home and a platform to make them viable again by ginning them up as the new left.

What the hell does the passage of arbitrary time have to do with anything?

 

Panasonic

(2,921 posts)
7. How about NEVER?
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 08:51 PM
Dec 2012

Sorry, but any Republican who switches to Democrat for the purpose of political ambitions will be laughed at and ignored.

Yeah, I'm including Crist in this. He's nothing but an opportunist.

 

MightyMopar

(735 posts)
15. Didn't say he did but we sure would have welcomed it at the time! Agree?
Sun Dec 9, 2012, 03:21 PM
Dec 2012

It depends on the person and the situation. I think we should get behind Charlie Crist. The Democrats biggest problem in swing states is getting legitimate votes counted and I think Charlie will deliver. After that is in place we can get real progressives elected across Florida.

Besides, I don't care what they call themselves, it's how they vote. Who's a better democrat/Democrat, Bernie Sanders or Ben Nelson?

OldDem2012

(3,526 posts)
10. I agree. Switches like this are never made on the spur of the moment...
Sat Dec 8, 2012, 09:25 PM
Dec 2012

...Any politician who switches parties takes plenty of time to think about making the switch. They understand they will be burning some major bridges once they go public.

But, once they make the switch, they're good to go as far as I'm concerned.

But, I personally welcome any GOPer who switches to the Democratic Party, and give a hearty "Get out and good riddance!!" to anyone leaving the Democratic Party.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How long should an ex-Rep...