General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFuck you to those who say Medicare age eligibility needs to be changed upward.
No, thats not an exaggeration, and the failure of certain wonks to take that into consideration speaks to their isolation from "Everyday people, even the everyday people who provide services to them, such as grocery-store clerks, waitresses, and construction workers in right-to-work states. These are people who cannot wait until theyre 67 for the full complement of Medicare benefits. Many of them are people who will wind up paying the individual mandate penalty in Obamacare, because even if purchased through an exchange, the monthly premium will be more than they can afford.
Not to mention the added health risks of doing physical labor into ones golden years. Many of these people are lucky to make it to 65. As my AlterNet colleague Lynn Parramore notes, longevity gains have gone mostly to high earners. More from Parramore:
Life expectancy among the less educated and those with lower incomes has actually dropped. New research shows that between 1990 and 2008, white women lacking a high school diploma lost a shocking five years of life, while their male peers lost three years.
But if everyone in your family is college-educated and has a good job with adequate health insurance, why would it even cross your mind that not everybody does?
Heres my hope: that this rumor is being floated in order to create enormous pushback from the left that would give Obama cover for rejecting it. Time to push".
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2012_12/medicare_eligibility_age_on_th041669.php
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)The age of eligibility should be adjusted downward to sometime shortly after conception.
That would make it a universal single-payer plan. Just like Canada has.
trumad
(41,692 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)I didn't even bother reading the rest of your post, there might have been something good in it.
trumad
(41,692 posts)SemperEadem
(8,053 posts)this isn't nursery school.
patrice
(47,992 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)RegieRocker
(4,226 posts)but it's nothing you can rest on nor bank on it.
George II
(67,782 posts)...possibly others. Consider a first time reader of this site - seeing that on the home page? Some might never register or come back.
trumad
(41,692 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)trumad
(41,692 posts)Fuck---thought I had it covered.
George II
(67,782 posts)trumad
(41,692 posts)Your concern is duly noted.
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)iemitsu
(3,888 posts)Trumad's subject line is perfectly appropriate for the topic.
In fact the sentiment is mild for the reality they propose.
If Obama presides over the dismantling of any aspect of the social safety net Democrats will find themselves cursed in the eyes of the public just as Republicans now find themselves.
It will demonstrate to all Americans that our government doesn't work and ought to be overthrown.
Our government exists for the benefit of the people not just the rich and if that is what elected officials think is appropriate then they all need to go. Congress and the President need to give up their sweet retirement and health care deals before they touch ours. We pay the bills and they work for us.
world wide wally
(21,755 posts)markpkessinger
(8,401 posts)RC
(25,592 posts)You must miss so much of life.
George II
(67,782 posts)sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)to convey information, emotion and ideas. "Fuck" is one of if not the most versatile word in the English language. I'm an English teacher and I use it all the time, so does my friend the minister but less often and with less conviction of course.
AAO
(3,300 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)I always picture some pre-adolescent attempting to appear worldly
patrice
(47,992 posts)OP disagrees?
What's wrong with you?
DrDan
(20,411 posts)as I said.
Does it bother you that I do that? Why would that be?
patrice
(47,992 posts)the rest of us conform to your baseless idiosyncrasy?
DrDan
(20,411 posts)I simply said I do not read posts with frivolous profanity.
Why does that bother you?
patrice
(47,992 posts)a justification to itself, without other agendas, you'd simply not do it and, therefore, not display your not-doing for whatever social effect you expect to acquire from it.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)you sure are offended by that. I wonder why . . .
patrice
(47,992 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)posts? Why display false judgements about OP? Your offense at dirty words appears to be secondary to public display.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)what another DUer reads or choses to ignore?
patrice
(47,992 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)We are a huge fucking order magnitude more "mature" than they are. However there is some really good stuff posted there.
Have you considered using parental controls?
George II
(67,782 posts)Hard to avoid reading it.
patrice
(47,992 posts)you appear to be about the word fuck.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)serve to intentionally mistake OP's meaning?
DrDan
(20,411 posts)I just said i typically ignore posts with frivilous profanity.
Why does that bother you. Why are you ignoring that question?
patrice
(47,992 posts)some other taboo?
What precisely, pray tell, is your problem with OP?
DrDan
(20,411 posts)which of those words has you confused.
patrice
(47,992 posts)about OP's use of the word "fuck".
DrDan
(20,411 posts)you read what you want . . . and I will do the same
patrice
(47,992 posts)reading what you want.
Otherwise, you would just simply have skipped the offensive post and gone on your way.
I stand by my original hypothesis; this has something to do with acquisition of power to make people do what you want and that's why you found it necessary to post your unfair unjustified judgement of OP's meaning and completely disregard and disrespect his/her feelings about this issue.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)but feel free to offer your unsolicited analysis . . .
patrice
(47,992 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)just stated my reading preferences - and that sure does bother you . . . doesn't it
patrice
(47,992 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)that is really not hard to understand.
Call it rejection . . . I don't care.
It is my choice what to read - and what not to read.
Get it?
Why does that bother you so much?
patrice
(47,992 posts)Last edited Mon Dec 10, 2012, 04:26 PM - Edit history (1)
with anyone who disagrees with his perspective on this issue.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)but, guess what . . .
patrice
(47,992 posts)my mini-trampoline now.
Have a nice life.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)are you serious?
patrice
(47,992 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)Do you somehow need public display to validate something about yourself or for someone else?
You have every right to your own choices. If you're trying to elicit de facto censorship of this board, I'm kind of interested in that.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)if you read closely - I was just agreeing with a previous poster - one that was attacked because he/she feels similarly.
Why does that bother you
trumad
(41,692 posts)Living in their little curse free bubble.
You two are very strange dudes.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)sorry you feel your words are of such importance that they should not be skipped
trumad
(41,692 posts)You hijack a thread about Medicare because of the word fuck?
DrDan
(20,411 posts)trumad
(41,692 posts)Yeah---you hijacked my thread.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)I just made a comment to George
patrice
(47,992 posts)with a bunch of strangers.
Do you think that is what OP means by the word "fuck"?
If you do, it would seem quite likely that you have some very definite difficulty functioning in our semantic universe.
DainBramaged
(39,191 posts)every fucking word has a meaning, too bad you think you're better than the rest of us because your eyes don't pass over frivolity.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)DainBramaged
(39,191 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)wow - this place is gettting weirder and weirder.
Why would that bother you so much?
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)referring to, say, a black man?
If I say "crap" do you always assume I am referring to excrement?
If I invite you to a baby shower, do you think we're going to shower a baby?
If I say a certain gift "Was not an America made item" do you think I'm talking about an American who cleans houses?
If you don't make those kinds of mistakes, why do you make the same rather selective kind of mistake about OP? Tell me that you think OP is actually proposing that all of us have sexual intercourse with all of those with whom OP disagrees. What's wrong with you?
Hypothetical Answer: You're more interested in the kinds of power acquired from coercing others to meet your demands than you are in what they are actually saying.
George II
(67,782 posts)DainBramaged
(39,191 posts)look up pompous ass in the dictionary, maybe you'll get it.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)As a country we are really over-complicating the whole health insurance issue. It could be really simple. Other countries provide health care cheaper and get better results.
aquart
(69,014 posts)I hate being embarrassed by their sanity.
George II
(67,782 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)Auggie
(31,191 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)retread
(3,763 posts)the assholes are talking when they talk change.
Warpy
(111,352 posts)especially if they're old and in elective office and don't feel much like retiring, themselves.
I wish we could send all of them out to do about 6 months of hard physical labor and then see what they say about it.
People who do physical work largely can't do it any more after their mid to late 50s because their bodies can't stand it. This is what the "raise the age" doughboys don't understand.
What the really need to do in this period of high unemployment is lower it, not raise it. Lowering it to 55 with half benefits then would be great for a lot of people who have been thrown out of work by corporations or whose bodies can't handle full time physical labor. Such people would be able to eke out early retirement with part time work.
Benefits should rise to full at 65, the present system of keeping them at a lower point forever doesn't work, either.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)their lives. So don't count on anybody doing anything for us progressives...they'll always have an "out" for themselves...
Warpy
(111,352 posts)for SSD, a process that takes three years minimum as automatic rejection goes up the food chain and only the persistent get accepted. The good news there is that it pays better than getting Social Security at 62.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)retired. Luckily, he has a pension as a union member. But his knees and one shoulder are shot and he can't carry the heavy equipment, siinks, tubs and toilets any more...
AnneD
(15,774 posts)Hard physical labor all their lives. I have worked as a Nurse. One brother has just enough strength left to do his self sufficient farm work, but he calls on friends for help with the heavy stuff. He has SSI and a ton of health problems from working with concrete. My other brother was a welder and horse trainer. I can't count his injuries.
I am in far better health than they are (and Nursing is probably one of the more physical womens jobs you can have). I will last longer than they can but even I feel it more these days than I use too, and I am the oldest.
Raising the age is just another way to gyp us out of our fair shair of the wealth we helped create. It is just like stealing our pensions.
political parties are on the verge of losing touch with us. I think. One already has. The other is fighting for it's and our souls. I hope they and us win.
fasttense
(17,301 posts)Do they ever stop and think what it will be like when everyone around them is sick?
Yeah, the less than minimum wage maid who cleans your bathroom and kitchen could be carrying an infectious disease and spreading it all over your house. But that's alright, you don't have to provide her with health care to take care of it.
Yeah you can afford 1st class on the plane but that air is constantly circulated around and around it goes. Into first class out to business class back to first class with all those people who can't get health care. I wonder what diseases they are carrying and spitting out into the air?
Yeah it's great to have those young kids working their way through college serving as your waiter or waitress for you. Maybe with raising the minimum age for government health care you will get some real old timers waiting on you. Handing you glasses of water, giving your kids glasses of milk. But you know a lot of them are part time and have no health care. I really wonder if they ever bother to get their vaccinations for very contagious diseases like meningitis or even if they get their flu shots. If they don't, you get to have all the illnesses they spread through out the restaurant. Enjoy.
How foolish the idle rich are, cutting off their noses to spite their faces. Or hording health care for themselves and allowing everyone else to spread their diseases all over. Do they really think one of those diseases wont get them or their family?
Lydia Leftcoast
(48,217 posts)would actually help the economy, since they would certainly spend what they received.
Bigmack
(8,020 posts)Raising the medicare age would save us about $5.7 Billion. Problem is, it would cost us $11.4 Billion. Raising the eligibility age is like putting windshield wipers on a duck's ass... sounds like an interesting idea, but it just doesn't work.
http://www.usnews.com/debate-club/should-the-medicare-eligibility-age-be-raised/raising-medicare-age-will-increase-cost-for-people-of-all-ages
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)great article link BTW.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)would be cheaper than my husband covering me for $500/month with a $2,500 deductible under his employer insurance. Florida SUCKS when it comes to health insurance.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)You have hit exactly the right note.
The Congressional Caucus came out and said they have 43 votes and they will not support raising the eligibility rate for Medicare. They would consider means testing.
Whatever one's opinion is on the subject, he or she should be loudly screaming it. I personally like best the response from those that say they will leave the Democratic party if the Democratic politicians cave on this. I had seriously been thinking about this myself, remaining a progressive but calling myself an Independent. There is absolutely no reason for that eligibility age to be raised except to give the Republicans a "win." Protecting what the majority of citizens want protected is more important than giving the Republican politicians in the legislature a "win."
Sam
Aerows
(39,961 posts)actual regulations in place like other civilized countries that didn't allow pharmaceutical companies, insurance companies and hospitals to rip us off, we could lower the age. But we don't, and it doesn't appear that anyone in Congress wants to push for it.
The main problem is that the cost of health care in our country is outrageous and it is because no one is willing to go to the mat to fight for the people on this one.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)The stupid Ratshit Fucks.
geckosfeet
(9,644 posts)Or more accurately, healthcare should be available nationwide to anyone who needs it.
Even toothless rednecks who voted for failin palin.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)...of money for lying wars...low taxes of the filthy rich, tons of money for companies like McDonalds and WalFart plus..etc, etc, etc but Allofasudden ...oh my God..we have to do something about all the spending ??
Let the assholes get what they deserve..(which I can't say..cause I'm so pissed)
and the horse they road in on. Medicare for all would bring a lot of healthy people and their money into the system. Talk about your economic stimulus. Business would have a lighter burden and individuals would mostly spend the extra money they didn't have to pay the private blood sucking insurance companies. If they want to cut something, try the lard ass Defense Dept. with all their corrupt contractors (war profiteers). Anybody who votes to shortchange old and sick people can FOAD.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)until sixty-five and now later?
Do you really want grandma serving you coffee with her shaky seventy year old hands when you go to the diner? Do you really want that elderly man painting your house who barely can climb the ladder to do it? I mean if these people have no compassion, do they really have to be that stupid?
burnsei sensei
(1,820 posts)analysis of raising the retirement age to 67 last night, and concluded that to do so would be more costly than doing nothing.
The case for not raising the retirement age is more valid.
The bad news is that people are not made of steel. Now, for some of us, that's a reality.
For others, too many others, it's a poorly-understood FACT.
xxxsdesdexxx
(213 posts)I cited the 5.7 billion in savings not being worth it. I told them that raising the age would negatively impact those at and near the retirement age. I did remind them that going single payer would be the best way to cut down on health care costs and reduce the deficit.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)Medicare simply works better than private healthcare. We all pay for one or the other, one way or the other.
Where are all those supposed conservative rationalists on questions like these? The numbers don't work -- it's an emotional issue for those with a knee-jerk hatred of social program.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)madinmaryland
(64,933 posts)will live much past 70 which for me is less than 20 years away. What money I have in a 401k will have been raped by wall street.
eridani
(51,907 posts)snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)LittleGirl
(8,291 posts)and he's now turned 65 so he's eligible for Medicare but his 53 yr old wife is now uninsured with pre-existing conditions and the kids in high school aren't covered either. We need Single Payer like other posters have mentioned.
Madmiddle
(459 posts)are what senators, congressman and presidents get, fucking shit is what the rest of us get. Leave the American workingclass so called entitlements alone. This is why we need a huge turn around in favor of the workingclass. Term limits as well as entitlement reform for our governing officials. They get way to much from taxpaayers and this needs to change drastically.
and most of them leave office as millionaires. President Obama was not a millionaire until he became President. He is set for life.
RagAss
(13,832 posts)The fuckers want us piled up dead in the streets and our own party is going right along with it !!!!!
louis c
(8,652 posts)naturallyselected
(84 posts)The first step should be to lower the eligibility age to 62, the same as Social Security. This would allow people to retire early if they wanted, and supplement their SS benefits (and any employer-based retirement) with part time work or starting their own businesses. This would also help unemployment, and put a higher percentage of people on Medicare with somewhat lower medical costs.
I'm fortunate - I could retire today (at 58) and continue to receive health insurance from my employer until Medicare kicks in, but I know many others aren't so lucky. My wife and I run a reasonably thriving part-time business, and I'm counting the days until I'm 62 and I can retire and can collect SS and my employer account to supplement my business earnings.
Raising the age is crazy -
doc03
(35,378 posts)the company liquidated and dropped our insurance September 1st. I have to pay $809 a month for insurance for the next 7 months until I turn 65. At the same time the bankruptcy judge permitted them to drop our insurance he OKed $20 million in bonuses to 18 management people. USA USA USA ain't it great!
You say 809---wonder what your deductible is.
Its a scandal in mho.
doc03
(35,378 posts)$300 deductible, I pay 20% with a max yearly co-pay of $2000. That could be $12008 a year with premiums, deductibles and co-pays for a single. If you are married I believe the premiums are like $1400 and the deductibles and co-pays are doubled. Our emplyee insurance had no premium a $150 deductible and a max out of pocket of $1000. The 18 management people that bankrupted the company got $20 million to split up, some deal.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)retire from her job at 60, because her company, an umbrella organization that administers union benefits, would provide her health care until Medicare kicked in. She would collect her pension at that point, knowing she could get a similar job so her total income would remain the same. Then, a few months before she would have put in for retirement, they eliminated the health care benefit to retirees. So she's going to work at least through her 66th birthday, possibly a little longer.
I do wonder why our older brother, 69, is still working. I do suspect it's financial, in that he of course is earning more than his SS would be. I have no idea what kind of pension or 401k he might have.
I'm 64. I currently work part time, so I guess I can say I'm semi-retired. I am employed by a hospital and the health care benefits are great, at least I think they are but I have barely used them because I'm so amazingly healthy. In my case, when Medicare kicks in next year, my current insurance will be the first payer, and Medicare the second. I plan to continue work for some indefinite, undefined period of time because I still need the money. I will put off collecting SS as long as possible, just to let the amount grow.
I'll probably live at least into my 80's, and very possibly into my 90's.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)They aren't going to do it. Remember, PO has to SIGN it, and he won't sign shit like that. OK?
Generic Brad
(14,275 posts)There are people here endorsing this? It seems there are a lot of DU'ers upset recently and I am just not seeing the offending posts.
Are we talking one or two posters or an armada of DINO's?
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)Yesterday there were a few who were all for it explaining it is the fair and reasonable thing to do. We do have our share of third way well to do fossils here.
rickyhall
(4,889 posts)I'm 57 and SS tells me I can't get anything till I'm 66 and full payment at 70. 62 went away years ago. I've been slavin for these rich bastards since I was 17. I've been payin in for 40 years less those years I could only find a contract job that paid nothing in. Health insurance is nearly $200 a month while I'm currently workin 9 hours a week for burger king and collecting $149 unemployment for another 4 weeks. If it weren't for food stamps and housesitting I'd be starvin on the street in a month. This struggling week to week for 50 years could get real old.
shanti
(21,675 posts)and have been planning all along to take SS at 62. this is the first time i've ever seen anything about not being able to do so. from what i know, i can take a reduced amount at 62, with a full amount at 66+....
doc03
(35,378 posts)shanti
(21,675 posts)luckily, i have medical coverage thru my PERS pension until medicare kicks in, so 62 is doable.
doc03
(35,378 posts)full paid for health insurance until 65 so they liquidated in September now I have to pay the last 7 months until I turn 65 out of my pocket at $809 a month. I hope you have better luck with that than we did. While they cut the health insurance off for all active and retired employees the bankruptcy judge permitted the company to pay $20 million In bonuses to the top 18 management a--holes.
doc03
(35,378 posts)health insurance through your employer or maybe from you wife's employer it's pretty much impossible. Why would SS tell you you can't get (anything) until you are 66?
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)ancianita
(36,137 posts)People get exhausted paying this kind of bullshit any attention. I'll give Obama all the Fuck You Cover he needs, but this is still a bullshit tack.
Just stand your ground, Democrats! For fuck's sake! THAT alone would earn your inflated paychecks!
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)K&R
raccoon
(31,126 posts)Since more and more employers go to part-time, no benes workers. At my workplace, I think a little over 50% are part-time, no benes.
bread_and_roses
(6,335 posts)It's encouraging to see so many have their heads on straight on this one. Very encouraging to see anyone taking those who do physical labor recognized. I would just add on that - for people who do heavy labor, making it into even their 50's is a stretch. Many are suffering physically in their 40's or even earlier. Backs and joints especially.
tomp
(9,512 posts)he is being totally disingenuous. benefits will be cut. poor, working, and middle class people will suffer. the rich will still have plenty. that will be obama's enduring legacy because he allowed the discussion to take place on the wrong terms which allowed the media to spin it for the rich and give credibility to the defenders of the rich.
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)find themselves out of work with no insurance in their 50s and 60s. Not so easy finding another job when your hair is gray, no matter what your education and skill set. Happened to my husband when his division of a large corporation folded three years ago. Any talk of raising the Medicare age is cruel and irresponsible.
KG
(28,752 posts)JackHughes
(166 posts)Republicans have always opposed Social Security and Medicare and have sought ways to kill the programs. Not able to attack the popular entitlements directly, they have maneuvered to deprive them of funding. Cutting spending on Social Security and Medicare would reward the Republicans' long-term strategy of "starving the beast" with their tax cuts. It would deliver a victory to the Republicans' for their sleazy, dishonest tactics while hurting millions of the most vulnerable Americans..
Tax cuts caused our national debt. Raising taxes is the only solution -- first on the rich and in large measure, and later with modest incremental increases on the middle class once the economy has recovered. As Bill Clinton proved, it ain't rocket science.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)At Sun Dec 9, 2012, 11:40 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Fuck you to those who say Medicare age eligibility needs to be changed upward.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021948550
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
No comments added by alerter
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Dec 9, 2012, 11:46 AM, and the Jury voted 0-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Another case of overly sensitive alerter
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: cannot decide if alert is bogus, malicious, or simply accidental: post is fine, and I echo the sentiment
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Why the hell was this alerted... Looks like a stalking alert to me.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
trumad
(41,692 posts)At least I hope that is what it was....
Response to trumad (Reply #65)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)Still Blue in PDX
(1,999 posts)Too many people don't make it.
Breaks my heart to think about it.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)AAO
(3,300 posts)kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)along with the people who promote them.
Lithos
(26,404 posts)Only after we get a single payor system in place. Medicare should be an addition to single payor which adds benefits. Also, single payor should be better than what Medicare does today.
What I am thinking should be part of Medicare would include additional hospice and in-home care which are not provided today.
BTW, I am total agreement with you. Today's benefits should not be reduced by raising the limit, but rather expanded into a universal system with additional benefits being added that are more age appropriate
L-
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)I'm posting a portion of a speech President Obama gave to the Brookings Institute:
So you see, President Obama thinks the left is clinging to outdated policies and tired ideologies as well. It's not just the Republicans clinging to their guns, bibles, and tax cuts. Democrats are clinging to Social Security and Medicare and they're just tired, old ideologies as well! Don't you see? Raising the eligibility age for Medicare is a solution! Thousands and thousands will die because of this and problem solved! But not only that. Raising the Medicare eligibility age, automatically raises the retirement age for the majority of Americans, so that takes care of the little Social Security problem as well! I guess they think it's a slight of hand that most of us won't even notice! Get with the program Democrats! It's the 21st century for Pete's sake and globalization is the new game in town. It won't be "bloodless" as President Obama states toward the end of his speech. But at least now, they're REALLY serious this time about retraining us so we can work longer!
RegieRocker
(4,226 posts)wholeheartedly agree.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)warrprayer
(4,734 posts)Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)I think most Democrats will be shocked to see the number of Democratic representatives pushing for cuts in our safety net. I have video clips of Obama, Biden, Clinton, Pelosi, Hoyer, Clyburn, Reid, Durbin, Wasserman-Schultz, Schumer, Rendell, Booker, Ford, Geitner, Van Hollen, Udall, Conrad...on and on and on.
You're right. It's going to happen if we don't fight back hard.