General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMy 2 cents?
Walz was impeccable. Vance was transparently disingenuous and dishonest.
If I'm being objective.
Waltz was great on tone and substance. So proud! Sent him $$!

ananda
(32,659 posts)He did well,
ClimateHawk
(356 posts)Vance was very passive and sounded like a robot that was programmed to tie anything bad to Harris. Hes a slimy and polished politician Ill give him that.
cilla4progress
(26,391 posts)when Tienanmen square happened.
Vance blamed the media then congress for his flip flops about tsf.
MLAA
(19,366 posts)mvd
(65,705 posts)If I was grading, I wouldnt grade on a traditional A-F scale. Walz gets a G for genuine and Vance an S for sleazy.
Bayard
(26,170 posts)But he seemed better about halfway through. He also stopped rushing so much. He did good.
One suggestion I would make is that he relax his face some.
SomedayKindaLove
(1,142 posts)BAM!
cilla4progress
(26,391 posts)Scapegoater.
Every answer he whined about Kamala.
Grievance-based
NBachers
(18,764 posts)Warpy
(113,745 posts)I'm sure he's dealt with a lot of punks just like JD Vance.
I was not worried a bit about this debate.