General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNeil deGrasse Tyson for president
We need someone with a high profile to announce a run for president in 2028. A scientist! A Ph.D. in astrophysics. Someone that will dog the shit out of Trump and Musk and keep pointing out their lies and bullshit. A damn-near atheist to boot that can quote Scripture. A writer of books, a TV personality. A smooth-talking self-deprecator that can win arguments in multiple fields.
Why the fuck not?
https://russblib.blogspot.com/?m=1

valleyrogue
(2,227 posts)with people who don't know shit about government.
RussBLib
(9,958 posts)Hell, Tuberville still probably doesn't know how many branches of govt there are.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(126,213 posts)I respect the guy but I don't think he'd want to be part of that mess.
RussBLib
(9,958 posts)Lol.
He could be convinced.
dalton99a
(89,502 posts)
PoindexterOglethorpe
(28,003 posts)that Caroline Kennedy or Chelsea Clinton will run for office.
Has Neil deGrasse Tyson everl expressed interest in running for office? Does he have the skill set for the job?
And simply pointing out, true as it may be, that the current office holder is singularly unqualified, is hardly an endorsement for another completely unqualified candidate to run.
RussBLib
(9,958 posts)...but there is very, very, very little equivalency between Trump and Tyson.
Response to RussBLib (Original post)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
ZRB
(465 posts)I hate to see this BS spread here about a wonderful science educator. I seriously doubt he would want to lower himself to enter US politics.
Polybius
(20,559 posts)
edhopper
(36,355 posts)On illegal planets.
Polybius
(20,559 posts)It was a bit harsh for that dreamer.
edhopper
(36,355 posts)It can stay on a Visa.
Polybius
(20,559 posts)Pluto identifies as a planet and wants to participate in planetarial activities.
LeftInTX
(32,811 posts)DavidDvorkin
(20,262 posts)writerJT
(343 posts)JI7
(92,342 posts)And anyone impressed by his resume would not have supported Trump.
IcyPeas
(23,926 posts)He didn't know the correct answer (grumpy philosophers was the category ) answer was Hobbes (Calvin and Hobbes) . I was very disappointed that he didn't get that right.
Abolishinist
(2,649 posts)will never vote for a "damn-near atheist".
Too bad, of course, but the total lack of logic/reason in favor of religion vs. science for most of our population would never allow such to happen.