Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJSTOR (digital academic library) has joined the resistance! Good article in yesterday's newsletter.
I've been getting their newsletters for awhile for their very interesting articles on all kinds of historical topics. If they delve into politics, it's usually about something historical. This article is about our current crisis, but includes a lot of historical context.
There's a lot you can access for free on their site, but you do have to pay if you want access to everything. Also, a lot of their stuff is accessible through school or public libraries.
The Power of the Purse
On January 27, 2025, a week into the second Trump administration, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued a memo announcing that all federal financial assistance was being paused to assess programs consisten[cy] with the Presidents policies and requirements.
Two days later, a second memo rescinded the first. Two major suits had already been brought by parties affected by the cutoff, and one temporary injunction issued. The rescission announcement brought a brief sense of relief, but a tweet by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt hours later removed any doubts about its intention:
This is NOT a rescission of the federal funding freeze.
It is simply a rescission of the OMB memo.
Why? To end any confusion created by the courts injunction.
The Presidents EOs [sic] on federal funding remain in full force and effect, and will be rigorously implemented.
@PressSec, January 29, 2025, 1:40pm
As the week progressed, more information emerged, not only about funds being frozen, but about how the mechanisms and agencies that administrate these funds were being taken over by the non-governmental Department of Government Efficiency, comprised of Elon Musk and a cadre of young men with previous experience in his companies. Private servers were patched into payment systems (theres a lawsuit for that), legacy code bases accessed and changed, and the personal data of millions of Americans made accessible to Musk employees with no governmental experience.
We, as a country, have not been here before, but in 1974 we briefly visited the neighborhood.
https://daily.jstor.org/the-power-of-the-purse/?utm_term=Read%20More&utm_campaign=jstordaily_02132025&utm_content=email&utm_source=Act-On+Software&utm_medium=email
On January 27, 2025, a week into the second Trump administration, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued a memo announcing that all federal financial assistance was being paused to assess programs consisten[cy] with the Presidents policies and requirements.
Two days later, a second memo rescinded the first. Two major suits had already been brought by parties affected by the cutoff, and one temporary injunction issued. The rescission announcement brought a brief sense of relief, but a tweet by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt hours later removed any doubts about its intention:
This is NOT a rescission of the federal funding freeze.
It is simply a rescission of the OMB memo.
Why? To end any confusion created by the courts injunction.
The Presidents EOs [sic] on federal funding remain in full force and effect, and will be rigorously implemented.
@PressSec, January 29, 2025, 1:40pm
As the week progressed, more information emerged, not only about funds being frozen, but about how the mechanisms and agencies that administrate these funds were being taken over by the non-governmental Department of Government Efficiency, comprised of Elon Musk and a cadre of young men with previous experience in his companies. Private servers were patched into payment systems (theres a lawsuit for that), legacy code bases accessed and changed, and the personal data of millions of Americans made accessible to Musk employees with no governmental experience.
We, as a country, have not been here before, but in 1974 we briefly visited the neighborhood.
https://daily.jstor.org/the-power-of-the-purse/?utm_term=Read%20More&utm_campaign=jstordaily_02132025&utm_content=email&utm_source=Act-On+Software&utm_medium=email
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

JSTOR (digital academic library) has joined the resistance! Good article in yesterday's newsletter. (Original Post)
tanyev
Feb 2025
OP
SheltieLover
(71,414 posts)1. Excellent!

tanyev
(47,106 posts)2. Ooh! Greenland, too!
The article in the OP was the first article in the newsletter and now that I'm looking at the rest of it, there's also an article about the Greenland saga.
Its been incredibly nice to meet people, and people were very happy to meet with us. Dad will have to come here. So said Donald Trump Jr. to the press when the family jet made a four-hour visit to Greenland last month.
The demands of United States President Trump at the outset of his second term in office have put the worlds largest island into direct conflict with the worlds most powerful state. The Trump administrations desire to make Greenland part of the US has caused considerable consternation among the Indigenous population of just 57,000 peoplethough this isnt the first time that America has made a bid for ownership of this gargantuan Arctic landmass.
The Trump administrations ambitions put the White House in direct conflict with both Greenland and Denmark, a development that may have been foreseeable. As Hans W. Weigert wrote in Foreign Affairs in 1944,
https://daily.jstor.org/greenland-polar-politics/?utm_term=Greenland%3A%20Polar%20Politics&utm_campaign=jstordaily_02132025&utm_content=email&utm_source=Act-On+Software&utm_medium=email
The demands of United States President Trump at the outset of his second term in office have put the worlds largest island into direct conflict with the worlds most powerful state. The Trump administrations desire to make Greenland part of the US has caused considerable consternation among the Indigenous population of just 57,000 peoplethough this isnt the first time that America has made a bid for ownership of this gargantuan Arctic landmass.
The Trump administrations ambitions put the White House in direct conflict with both Greenland and Denmark, a development that may have been foreseeable. As Hans W. Weigert wrote in Foreign Affairs in 1944,
the consciousness that the far north is an area of great strategic importance to the United States is no longer limited to the small group of men [ ] It is no longer necessary to deplore the lack of a national awareness of the north, but rather to warn against over-enthusiastic generalizations which threaten to cloud realities. The strategy of this war has accelerated the pace of Arctic progress, but there are certain barriers raised by nature against the development of this area; and political realities set limits to the possibilities of an American march north.
https://daily.jstor.org/greenland-polar-politics/?utm_term=Greenland%3A%20Polar%20Politics&utm_campaign=jstordaily_02132025&utm_content=email&utm_source=Act-On+Software&utm_medium=email
2naSalit
(97,317 posts)3. Good to hear!
I used JSTOR a lot in college. Glad to hear, though not surprised, that they are standing up for knowledge and academia.