General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWow! Just learned that Mexico is nearing completion of an alternate rail route to...
Last edited Fri Mar 21, 2025, 02:13 AM - Edit history (1)
the Panama Canal. At first I thought it was an actual canal but later understood it's a railroad route across a southern Mexican isthmus between the Gulf of Mexico and the Pacific Ocean.
This makes me wonder will shippers want to offload their cargo to rail cars and then have to reload to another ship on the Pacific side?
If the alternative, shorter and less expensive route is successful it will certainly raise Mexico's international importance, and give a hard blow to the sick fuck bloviator.
RainCaster
(13,631 posts)He's fixated on an old high maintenance system. Meanwhile, Mexico & China are building a faster cheaper system. Dumbass will be the laughing stock of the world one more time.
brush
(61,033 posts)rampartd
(4,525 posts)and can be automated to an incredible degree.
brush
(61,033 posts)unblock
(56,158 posts)There are ongoing projects not yet complete -- a second train line and a port expansion, maybe that's what's "nearing completion".
I don't know if it's cheaper, I'm guessing the savings from not having to go all the way to Panama are swamped by the logistics costs of having to dock and offload, and reverse the process on the other side. But it should certainly be better than waiting in line when the canal is at capacity or temporarily blocked.
EarnestPutz
(2,843 posts)mwooldri
(10,813 posts)The interoceanic corridor isn't just for freight. Passenger trains run too. Featuring former British Rail High Speed Train sets. (High speed being relative, about 125 mph). Also some former Go Transit (Canada) locomotives, former Union Pacific locos, former Amtrak rolling stock.
MichMan
(17,073 posts)FSogol
(47,590 posts)I reply that we have environmental review and public comment time build into projects. Should we avoid considering impact on the environment, communities, and ignore safety considerations?
MichMan
(17,073 posts)https://panacrypto.com/environmental-challenges-panama/
Response to MichMan (Reply #15)
FSogol This message was self-deleted by its author.
Prairie Gates
(7,944 posts)They bring it up anytime they see an entry. They will often also claim that tariffs help auto workers and support Texas bussing migrants to Chicago and whatnot.
You know, real shitbags.
allegorical oracle
(6,407 posts)were abandoned, the public rights of way were sold to private hands. Buying them back has been a tough, expensive slog.
brush
(61,033 posts)What do you mean?
MichMan
(17,073 posts)Both the timeframe needed and the cost estimates ended up being just pie in the sky claims.
The current focus centers on the Central Valley, where officials estimate the 171-mile line from Merced to Bakersfield will be finished between 2030 and 2033.
Officials estimate it could cost about $35 billion to finish the first line from Bakersfield to Merced and roughly $100 billion more to complete the route from Los Angeles to San Francisco about $100 billion more than what was originally proposed years ago. And the source of most funds is unclear.
High-speed rail development relies on state and federal funding and Californias cap-and-trade incentive, which is set to expire in 2030. The authority hopes to secure private investments in the future, according to its most recent business plan, but currently uses none.
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-03-21/high-speed-rail
brush
(61,033 posts)an alternate railway connecting California and th Gulf of Mexico...something geographically impossible and an entirely different topic than the OP.
MichMan
(17,073 posts)It had nothing to do with California and is thousands of miles away.
It was your OP.
brush
(61,033 posts)the Gulf of Mexico and the Pacific Ocean...nothing to do with a railway from from Mexico to the Panama Canal.
MichMan
(17,073 posts)the Panama Canal."
brush
(61,033 posts)instead of the Panama Canal.
RetiredRNIowa
(10 posts)We toured the Panama Canal in 2019. Many of the newer ships are too large for the canal. Panama is working on making another larger passageway but that takes time.
Walleye
(44,585 posts)SusieCreamcheese
(42 posts)The Panama Canal has experienced significant decrease in water levels due to a lack of rainfall, reducing the number of ships that can travel through the canal. Climate change and the resulting drought in Panama might make the canal more and more unreliable, as lakes and reservoirs that supply water to the canal dry up. Mexico's plan for rail shipment as an alternative may prove quite lucrative as time goes by.
Wonder Why
(6,856 posts)yagotme
(4,135 posts)With the aid of a cutting torch or two...
Paladin
(32,354 posts)Amazing what having a shrewd and attractive chief executive will do for a country---and the damage that the absence of such a leader can do, as well. Such interesting times in which we're living...
David__77
(24,582 posts)Unfortunately they also take a terrible toll on people in the meantime. Hopefully Mexico can become more and more sovereign and prosperous and immune to outside pressure.
brush
(61,033 posts)significant international player that the foolish sick fuck has to keep his hands off in regards to sending troops into.
hunter
(40,635 posts)Send one big ship across the ocean to America, divide the cargo between smaller ships in Mexico, some ships heading north, some ships heading south. And vice versa.