Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bluescribbler

(2,365 posts)
Mon May 19, 2025, 11:27 AM May 19

A serious question re: the "Big, Beautiful Bill"

Since it appears that the GOPukes in the House and Senate are poised to pass this bill which provides massive tax cuts for the very wealthiest, (who do not need lower taxes), at the expense of the rest of the people, is it oral, is it patriotic, to refuse to pay federal taxes? If we continue to pay state and local taxes but refuse to finance the destruction of our nation, are we wrong to do so?

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A serious question re: the "Big, Beautiful Bill" (Original Post) bluescribbler May 19 OP
Adding $5 Trillion to the debt has the credit markets worried LetMyPeopleVote May 19 #1

LetMyPeopleVote

(166,210 posts)
1. Adding $5 Trillion to the debt has the credit markets worried
Mon May 19, 2025, 12:05 PM
May 19

In 2011, the GOP was responsible for a U.S. credit rating downgrade. In 2023, it happened again. And in 2025, Republicans are again to blame.

Why the latest downgrade of the U.S. credit rating is an embarrassment for Republicans - MSNBC

apple.news/AJEUHJcLzQhO...

(@oc88.bsky.social) 2025-05-19T14:00:03.209Z



https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/latest-downgrade-us-credit-rating-embarrassment-republicans-rcna207652

There is still one other ratings agency, however, that hadn’t downgraded the nation’s credit rating — at least, that is, until last week. NBC News reported:

Moody’s Ratings cut the United States’ sovereign credit rating down a notch to Aa1 from the Aaa, the highest possible, citing the growing burden of financing the federal government’s budget deficit and the rising cost of rolling over existing debt amid high interest rates.


In terms of the practical economic impact, neither the 2011 nor the 2023 downgrades did meaningful harm, though as NBC News’ report added, the decision from Moody’s might end up lifting the yield that investors demand in order to buy U.S. Treasury debt and could dampen sentiment toward owning U.S. assets. Time will tell.

But in terms of the political impact, Donald Trump’s White House tried to blame Biden for the developments — a go-to move for this administration — despite the fact that deficits exploded during Trump’s first term and were far smaller under Biden.

Even more interesting, however, was the reaction from House Speaker Mike Johnson. The New York Times noted:

In his appearance on ‘Fox News Sunday,’ Speaker Mike Johnson tried to spin Moody’s recent downgrading of U.S. credit worthiness away from House Republicans’ multi-trillion-dollar spending package and recast it as a product of ‘the Biden spending spree.’ He argued that the inferior credit rating was evidence that ‘emphasizes the very need for the legislation we’re talking about.’


.....This need not be complicated. Moody’s downgraded the United States because of the country’s national debt and fiscal future. The GOP’s reconciliation bill, filled with massive tax breaks, would add nearly $3 trillion to projected budget deficits over the next decade. (As for the idea that there was a “Biden spending spree,” now seems like a good time to remind everyone that government spending has gone up, not down, since Donald Trump returned to power.)

In other words, the fiscal problem that led to the downgrade would get worse because of the Republican’s megabill, which is the opposite of the line GOP leaders have brought to the public.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A serious question re: th...