Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe unfortunate reason Hegseth still has an incomplete leadership team at the Pentagon
The search is on for qualified officials who are both MAGA-friendly and willing to work with an unqualified defense secretary. Its not going well.
The unfortunate reason Hegseth still has an incomplete leadership team at the Pentagon www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
— Belinda Ballard (@lynieb.bsky.social) 2025-06-10T16:19:14.586Z
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/unfortunate-reason-pete-hegseth-incomplete-leadership-team-pentagon-rcna212037
Donald Trump sat down with The Atlantic in April, and when the discussion turned to his beleaguered defense secretary, the president offered support in an awkwardly worded way. I think hes gonna get it together, Trump said about Pete Hegseth.
That might yet be true, but the hapless Pentagon chief apparently hasnt gotten it together just yet. NBC News reported:
.....While a Pentagon spokesperson denied the accuracy of the reporting, NBC News added: So far, though, the administration has not had much luck identifying people who are either willing to work for Hegseth or who fit the bill politically.
It was that sentence that stood out for me because it spoke to the complexity of the challenge: The search is on for qualified officials who are both MAGA-friendly and willing to work with an unqualified and scandal-plagued television personality who was elevated to one of the worlds most difficult administrative positions.
Finding people who check one of the boxes is easy; finding people who check all of the boxes is apparently not going well.
As for why the public should care, The Atlantics latest report on DOD developments summarized the landscape nicely: Hegseth oversees a workforce of more than 3 million, and a budget of close to $1 trillion, without a chief of staff. His shrunken circle of close aides lacks extensive Pentagon experience. Key military commanders are preparing to retire without replacements in sight. Sidelined aides have aired details of unseemly feuds at the departments senior levels, and a series of unflattering media reports have fueled what numerous officials describe as Hegseths fixation on stopping leaks.
There may come a day when the Pentagon chief, to borrow the presidents phrase, gets it together, but that day has not yet arrived
.
That might yet be true, but the hapless Pentagon chief apparently hasnt gotten it together just yet. NBC News reported:
The White House is looking for a new chief of staff and several senior advisers to support Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth after a series of missteps that have shaken confidence in his leadership, but it has so far found no suitable takers, according to four current and former administration officials and a Republican congressional aide.
.....While a Pentagon spokesperson denied the accuracy of the reporting, NBC News added: So far, though, the administration has not had much luck identifying people who are either willing to work for Hegseth or who fit the bill politically.
It was that sentence that stood out for me because it spoke to the complexity of the challenge: The search is on for qualified officials who are both MAGA-friendly and willing to work with an unqualified and scandal-plagued television personality who was elevated to one of the worlds most difficult administrative positions.
Finding people who check one of the boxes is easy; finding people who check all of the boxes is apparently not going well.
As for why the public should care, The Atlantics latest report on DOD developments summarized the landscape nicely: Hegseth oversees a workforce of more than 3 million, and a budget of close to $1 trillion, without a chief of staff. His shrunken circle of close aides lacks extensive Pentagon experience. Key military commanders are preparing to retire without replacements in sight. Sidelined aides have aired details of unseemly feuds at the departments senior levels, and a series of unflattering media reports have fueled what numerous officials describe as Hegseths fixation on stopping leaks.
There may come a day when the Pentagon chief, to borrow the presidents phrase, gets it together, but that day has not yet arrived
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

The unfortunate reason Hegseth still has an incomplete leadership team at the Pentagon (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
Jun 10
OP
Nobody wants to work for this unqualified, incompetent, WhiskeyLeaks, DUI hire...Pete Kegseth!
LetMyPeopleVote
Jun 14
#2
BOSSHOG
(43,225 posts)1. The Art of the Deal
Dont hire for competence, knowledge and experience. Appoint people who you will ensure will fall on a sword when you fuck up. TACO has appointed people throughout our government pre equipped with swords. Its all someone elses fault. When foreign leaders fuck up his tariff bullshit he orders Marines to LA. What will he order when LA becomes untenable for him? I think he will make a hero of Newsom eventually.
LetMyPeopleVote
(166,210 posts)2. Nobody wants to work for this unqualified, incompetent, WhiskeyLeaks, DUI hire...Pete Kegseth!
