DNC votes to oust David Hogg and Malcolm Kenyatta.

[usaf-vet]

DNC succeeds in convincing this retired couple from sending one cent more to the DNC.

David Hogg's promise to challenge lazy contented members holding those seats is what gave us the initiative to send money to LeadersWeDeserve

We now feel the DNC is acting like the RNC by changing the rules after the fact to discard any attempt to SHAKE UP the contented seat holders.

It reminds me of hearing Republicans say I didn't leave the party; they left me.

[Silent Type]

1. Doubt I would vote in primaries for many of his endorsed candidates. But think this might be a mistake.

Input is important from everyone, even if some of it is discarded quickly. But leadership supposedly knows more than most of us.

[usaf-vet]

3. If you are talking about DNC leadership. HERE WE SIT with a maniac in the White House and any attempt to change the.....

..... the direction of the DNC is thwarted internally by the DNC. Not a path to success in the midterms or 2028 from where I sit.

AT THIS POINT IN TIME

[Silent Type]

4. Believe me, I don't miss fact we lost to the worst candidate in history. That is hard to do.

[LexVegas]

2. Excellent. nt

[EdmondDantes_]

5. The rules about one man and one woman were pretty clear

I'm not sure why the issue wasn't noticed immediately, but it was the rule when they ran.

[Intractable]

6. Hogg is now free to work full time on primary challenges.

[usaf-vet]

8. With what funding?

[Intractable]

9. I'm sure he can wrangle that to the best of his abilities.

[betsuni]

12. His PAC, Leaders We Deserve.

[Mountainguy]

14. I guess thats his problem

He shouldn't have used a dime of DNC money for it anyway.

[JI7]

16. His group has raised millions

it's up to him how he wants to spend it .

[Mountainguy]

7. Good

Should have never been put in that chair anyway.

[usaf-vet]

10. So we should be content with the Democratic party we have.

What should we do in 2028.or Are we just settling for what is in our future.

[betsuni]

11. DNC didn't change the rules after the fact and didn't "oust" Hogg. He dropped out of the race.

That's the reporting I saw.

[PunkinPi]

17. You're correct on both points. nt

[mountain grammy]

13. Damn.

I hoped this wouldn’t happen. I think it’s a mistake.

[Omaha Steve]

18. Here is his letter about this

I am no longer a DNC Vice Chair.

The DNC Vote to have a new election comes after weeks of contention about our work here at Leaders We Deserve, especially our plan to challenge ineffective Democrats in the primaries.

I started Leaders We Deserve for a simple purpose: to be the EMILY's List for progressive young Democrats. We’ve sought to find the best of the best of our generation and do everything we can to help them run the best campaigns possible and get the financial support they need to win.

We spent millions last year fighting to elect incredible young people: Molly Cook, Mo Jenkins, Averie Bishop and Kristian Carranza in Texas; Bryce Berry and Ashwin Ramaswami in Georgia; Dante Pittman in North Carolina, Nadarius Clark in Virginia, Christine Cockley in Ohio, Sarah McBride in Delaware, Nate Douglas in Florida, Oscar De Los Santos in Arizona and others. We focused on open blue seats and defeating incumbent Republicans, hoping that these open seats would be space enough to achieve what we wanted.

After seeing a serious lack of vision from Democratic leaders, too many of them asleep at the wheel, and Democrats dying in office that have helped to hand Republicans an expanded majority, it became clear that Leaders We Deserve had to start primarying incumbents and directly challenging the culture of seniority politics that brought our party to this place to help get our party into fighting shape again.

We have a real challenge ahead of us. We lost voting share with almost every demographic across the board, and despite all that Trump has done, our approvals remain at 27%.

If we don’t show our country how we are dramatically changing and provide an alternative vision for the future as a party, we will continue to lose. Not because we don't have money, but because we don’t have a compelling vision for the future and we lack the courage we used to have to take on massive policy fights that have helped millions like the Affordable Care Act, Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, the first Assault Weapons ban and more.

Even if we had gained a three seat Congressional majority, the three deaths this session would have once again put millions of Americans on the line.

Let me be clear: this is not solely an issue of age — it's an issue of effectiveness that at times is compounded by age.

This is not a call for every older person to leave government. There are lots of great older people who we need, there’s lots of terrible younger people we don’t.

But it’s clear this culture of staying in power until you die or simply fail to do a good job but don’t need to worry about a challenge because you are in a safe seat has become an existential threat to the future of this party and nation that must be addressed.

This crisis of competence and complacency has already cost us an election and millions of Americans their rights. Let's not let it cost us the country.

This culture simply will not change by only focusing on open seats or just throwing half a billion dollars into 30 competitive House seats. We must change the culture of our party that has brought us here and if there is anything activism or history teaches us it's that comfortable people, especially comfortable people with power, do not change. In this moment of crisis, comfort is not an option.

The American people are looking for an answer for how to revive the American Dream that they feel has become more of a fiction than a possibility. We have a crisis of faith in this country, in our elected leaders and in our parties. So far Donald Trump has convinced many people that the answer is to look backward instead of forward. At this moment of darkness we have a sacred obligation not to this party, but to this country as a party.

In his 1960 acceptance speech to the DNC to accept the Democratic nomination to become president, John F. Kennedy said:

“The times are too grave, the challenge too urgent, and the stakes too high — to permit the customary passions of political debate. We are not here to curse the darkness; we are here to light the candle that can guide us through that darkness to a safe and sane future.”

We relight that candle by providing a new vision for the future and leaders to bring us there. That new vision will come from new leaders. Building a future where voters vote for us not because of who we aren’t but because of who we are. That is why it is important we not only defeat Republicans but we use a healthy competitive primary process to make us a stronger party.

The alternative is a continuation of the politics that brought our party to this place. That is unacceptable. We must embrace a healthy culture of competitive primaries to build the strongest party possible.

Being a Democrat means believing in the politics of the possible like we did after Parkland. It's about believing in who we could be not only as a party but as a country. If we put our minds to it and we work hard enough, we can do anything, no matter what stands in our way. That’s why I’m a Democrat.

I came into this role to play a positive role in creating the change our party needs. It is clear that there is a fundamental disagreement about the role of a Vice Chair — and it's okay to have disagreements. What isn’t okay is allowing this to remain our focus when there is so much more we need to be focused on.

Ultimately, I have decided to not run in this upcoming election so the party can focus on what really matters. I need to do this work with Leaders We Deserve, and it is going to remain my number one mission to build the strongest party possible.

I’m thankful to everyone who has supported me in this role. I’m proud to have travelled to 10 states to do 30+ events, raising money for state parties, organizing with young Democrats, and getting out the vote for special elections in Wisconsin and Florida.

I have nothing but admiration and respect for my fellow officers. Even though we have disagreements, we all are here to build the strongest party possible.

Let me be extremely clear: Yes, we need to defeat Republicans. Leaders We Deserve will have many candidates challenging Republican incumbents. But we also need to build a party not defined by not being the less bad of two options in voters' eyes. We need to be the best option period at every level of government.

That change can only come through a full embrace of Democracy not only to defeat Republicans but to elect new Democrats to show voters how we are changing and regain their trust by listening to them, doing all we can to give them the best representation possible. Leaders We Deserve exists to do just that.

We need your support to do this work. If you’re with us in the fights ahead, consider donating $3 or anything that makes sense for you today.

Thank you,

David Hogg