Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(124,861 posts)
Wed Jun 18, 2025, 09:01 PM Wednesday

Clarence Thomas urges courts to end deferring to 'experts' on gender-affirming care

Justice Clarence Thomas said Wednesday that courts should not defer to “self-described experts” on gender-affirming care, suggesting it is a matter of medical uncertainty.

Thomas’s concurring opinion came as the Supreme Court upheld in a 6-3 decision Tennessee’s ban on puberty blockers and hormone treatments for transgender minors, a ruling that could reverberate through several states that have similar laws.

“This case carries a simple lesson: In politically contentious debates over matters shrouded in scientific uncertainty, courts should not assume that self-described experts are correct,” the justice wrote in a solo concurring opinion.

Tennessee’s law, S.B. 1, bars health care providers from prescribing puberty blocking and hormone therapy medications to minors when the intent is to help them transition. Signed in 2023, it also bans gender-transition surgeries for minors, though the justices did not consider that provision.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/clarence-thomas-urges-courts-end-153055265.html

Need to add Thomas to "is he dead yet?" threads

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clarence Thomas urges courts to end deferring to 'experts' on gender-affirming care (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Wednesday OP
We have to stop listening to people BOSSHOG Wednesday #1
Why defer to experts when you can defer to bigoted idiots? unblock Wednesday #2
He prefers self-described experts without credentials bucolic_frolic Wednesday #3
In Slappy we trust (not me). rsdsharp Wednesday #4
I think we should stop listening to grifting Supreme Court justices. sinkingfeeling Wednesday #5

BOSSHOG

(42,932 posts)
1. We have to stop listening to people
Wed Jun 18, 2025, 09:07 PM
Wednesday

Who know what they are talking about and depend on the wisdom and patriotism of those who do everything for a political reason. The Supreme Court should not conduct high tech lynchings against self described experts, instead we should round up every non Christian, non conservative motherfucker and disappear them to our sister country El Salvador. Sincerely Slappy Thomas

unblock

(55,268 posts)
2. Why defer to experts when you can defer to bigoted idiots?
Wed Jun 18, 2025, 09:09 PM
Wednesday

Gender-affirming care is a medical treatment proven successful based on suicide rates alone, never mind any other consideration.

Banning it, or allowing states to ban it, is cruel, inhuman, and motivated by a psychopathic desire to see more dead Americans.

bucolic_frolic

(50,974 posts)
3. He prefers self-described experts without credentials
Wed Jun 18, 2025, 09:13 PM
Wednesday

as opposed to medical professionals with advanced degrees, research, experience in treatment and assessment.

SCOTUS 6R disposed of expertise today. and declared states can ignore the Bill of Rights. 6-3.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Clarence Thomas urges cou...