Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 07:18 PM Dec 2012

It appears the leaked offer may have put a nail in chained CPI's coffin.

Until now, a lot of people didn't understand its impact. It has been exposed as a benefit cut (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022034756).

Even Boehner was afraid to put it to a vote, likely because he didn't want to take ownership of it.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/12/20/1172424/-Boehner-Plan-B-does-not-include-chained-CPI-Take-it-off-the-table

No one wants it. Social Security can be strengthened by lifting the cap.

60 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It appears the leaked offer may have put a nail in chained CPI's coffin. (Original Post) ProSense Dec 2012 OP
Hopefully, Ma'am The Magistrate Dec 2012 #1
At this point, I'm thinking that a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #3
I'm convinced that President Obama knew that Boehner could not sell the offer to the Congress xtraxritical Dec 2012 #23
Like I said... a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #24
I considered this possibility as well. PragmaticLiberal Dec 2012 #34
Yes, Obama Is That Good. Some Groups and Types of People Are COMPLETELY PREDICTABLE Skraxx Dec 2012 #52
Methinks that someone's playing chess. elleng Dec 2012 #2
My Experience? liberalmuse Dec 2012 #12
With you, muse. elleng Dec 2012 #15
Bill Clinton, he kinda screwed us royally - let us mot forget then 1996 telecom bill that leftyohiolib Dec 2012 #37
Right, and a few other things. elleng Dec 2012 #49
Then someone needs to tell Nancy Pelosi to not consider it "strengthening" SS JHB Dec 2012 #25
What nail? President's spokesman said earlier today the deal was still Boehner's to accept. Poll_Blind Dec 2012 #4
But the president & the "president's spokesman" know that Boehner can't accept it. Tarheel_Dem Dec 2012 #7
He opened a door that should have remained closed - and for no good reason bread_and_roses Dec 2012 #50
Obama DID open the door! Unfrigging believable! N/T marew Dec 2012 #60
Exactly Liberalynn Dec 2012 #58
If this is "chess", I don't think it's right for the administration to have scared seniors with it DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2012 #5
I'm a senior. elleng Dec 2012 #16
I was hoping it would turn out this way bluemarkers Dec 2012 #40
We can take it, there is no other honorable choice. MissMarple Dec 2012 #42
Bingo! We're veterans, we've been through a lot of political wars over the years. nt. OldDem2012 Dec 2012 #46
I feel the same way. I think it's just a matter of time before Obama succeeds in cutting SS. forestpath Dec 2012 #51
Exactly! marew Dec 2012 #59
Or, perhaps Congress can pay back the money they've looted from SS over the years AndyA Dec 2012 #6
We need a war tax. A tax to pay for Bush's war. They have to be paid for some day. rhett o rick Dec 2012 #27
Ya' know, that's not such a bad idea... groundloop Dec 2012 #35
LOL. Very good. "Once the war tax is paid off the war tax will go away". Perfect. nm rhett o rick Dec 2012 #55
Brilliant! MissMarple Dec 2012 #43
Let's just tax the decision-makers and arms producers who get us into a war because.... OldDem2012 Dec 2012 #48
I thought about that but decided that the idiot Americans that allowed rhett o rick Dec 2012 #56
Yeah...no one ever talks about that... ms liberty Dec 2012 #36
"No one wants it." That's what I've been saying. Lone_Star_Dem Dec 2012 #8
More people need to know it's also a backdoor tax increase starroute Dec 2012 #9
yep limpyhobbler Dec 2012 #10
How hard is it? Leave SS the F*ck Alone! liberalmuse Dec 2012 #11
Absofuckinglutely Cosmocat Dec 2012 #22
Good. yardwork Dec 2012 #13
Chained CPI for Social Security is terrible policy alcibiades_mystery Dec 2012 #14
He might have been "playing nine deminisional chess", but....... socialist_n_TN Dec 2012 #17
Leaks like that one are meant to cause an uproar. *cough, cough* freshwest Dec 2012 #54
the Jane Hamshers here there and everywhere will be thoroughly pissed Whisp Dec 2012 #18
I'm fairly confident that the President and WH staff have received an earfull today. Left Coast2020 Dec 2012 #19
They did from me. Curmudgeoness Dec 2012 #28
Better tell that to Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer, they don't seem to have sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #20
Get rid of the cap, NO CAP. Do the math, FCS! Coyotl Dec 2012 #21
Lift the cap! neverforget Dec 2012 #26
He brought it up. Everyone learned what it is. Now they all hate it and reject it. drm604 Dec 2012 #29
Gawd, I hope your right. k&r Little Star Dec 2012 #30
We do NOT need to touch Social Security at this time at all! It's not part of the budget problem! Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #31
Yes! Great news. Raise the cap. Ineeda Dec 2012 #32
Personally I think anyone making over $107K could afford it groundloop Dec 2012 #38
Let's hope the outrage works Hydra Dec 2012 #33
Why should there be a cap at all? BainsBane Dec 2012 #39
It should actually be in reverse. Poor people at or near the poverty level shouldn't Cleita Dec 2012 #45
+1 forestpath Dec 2012 #53
Let us pray. nt MannyGoldstein Dec 2012 #41
or as some say: let us prey, on Obama's integrity. n/t Whisp Dec 2012 #47
Let's keep our fingers crossed. This would be devastating to seniors if passed. n/t Cleita Dec 2012 #44
K & R Scurrilous Dec 2012 #57
 

a geek named Bob

(2,715 posts)
3. At this point, I'm thinking that
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 07:23 PM
Dec 2012

our president maker a 9p Go Master look like a drunken frat boy on Seconal.

He think President Obama's going for the whole board.

 

xtraxritical

(3,576 posts)
23. I'm convinced that President Obama knew that Boehner could not sell the offer to the Congress
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 08:51 PM
Dec 2012

so he put a little cut to "entitlements" in there to make the RepubliCONs look even more intransigent and garnering them the "blame" for the fiscal cliff.

 

a geek named Bob

(2,715 posts)
24. Like I said...
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 08:52 PM
Dec 2012

I am NEVER playing power, chess, or GO against President Obama.

The contrast between President Obama and Shrub the younger is stunning.

Skraxx

(2,982 posts)
52. Yes, Obama Is That Good. Some Groups and Types of People Are COMPLETELY PREDICTABLE
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 10:16 PM
Dec 2012

You can predict how they will react with almost near certainty. This in turn makes them very easy to manipulate.

I think we just witnessed a master manipulation.

liberalmuse

(18,672 posts)
12. My Experience?
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 08:00 PM
Dec 2012

Just when I start to get down on President Obama, not understanding what he is doing, he comes through. Every single time! Let's be honest, as much as we loved Pres. Bill Clinton, he kinda screwed us royally on a few things (NAFTA, Glass/Stegall, Welfare reform, etc.) It's unfortunate that President Obama, a truly great President, is the one who is expected to clean up all the shit dropped on us since Reagan.

elleng

(131,129 posts)
15. With you, muse.
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 08:06 PM
Dec 2012

Very unhappy about trashing President Obama gets at DU, and never hugely supportive of President Clinton; he has done very well since the end of his tenure, however.

Thanks

 

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)
37. Bill Clinton, he kinda screwed us royally - let us mot forget then 1996 telecom bill that
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:32 PM
Dec 2012

privatized the air waves

bread_and_roses

(6,335 posts)
50. He opened a door that should have remained closed - and for no good reason
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 10:10 PM
Dec 2012

He "put SS on the table." It was supposed to be OFF the table.

And - he's gotten major pushback, including from the AFL-CIO and every other organization I can think of - I know my mailbox was overflowing with petitions, calls to contact the WH/Congress from every list I'm on - and that's a lot of lists.

 

Liberalynn

(7,549 posts)
58. Exactly
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 09:41 AM
Dec 2012

they raised the possiblity on MSNBC Last Word that if they could get a coalition of PUKES loyal to Boner and enough DEMS to go along with PRES plan it could still pass. Boner only said no because he had to try it his way first.

I won't be happy till we know The PRES plan is off the table as well to and we start from scratch with no SS on the table at all as was promised.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
5. If this is "chess", I don't think it's right for the administration to have scared seniors with it
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 07:24 PM
Dec 2012

Contrary to those who want to praise the president for his super-duper tricky negotiation skills, I don't think the President did senior citizens any good by letting them believe for several news cycles that this chained CPI was going to go through.

bluemarkers

(536 posts)
40. I was hoping it would turn out this way
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:37 PM
Dec 2012

but he sure scared the c r a p out of me. (but my hubby just got laid off, so I'm no edge anyway)

MissMarple

(9,656 posts)
42. We can take it, there is no other honorable choice.
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:46 PM
Dec 2012

Good for you, ellen! I think it's all a bluff by the goppers. They have nothing but a bluff and a prayer to Mammon.

AndyA

(16,993 posts)
6. Or, perhaps Congress can pay back the money they've looted from SS over the years
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 07:26 PM
Dec 2012

At one point, I heard it was over $2.5 Trillion. That might help for a while.

Before any benefits are touched, everything that has been taken out to balance the budget, fund wars, or whatever should be put back. It's a slap in the face of every American citizen to not do that first!

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
27. We need a war tax. A tax to pay for Bush's war. They have to be paid for some day.
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:04 PM
Dec 2012

Those of us that let it happen are responsible. Dont leave it for future generations.

In fact if we instituted a special tax to pay for the current wars, I think they would end a lot sooner.

groundloop

(11,523 posts)
35. Ya' know, that's not such a bad idea...
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:28 PM
Dec 2012

That would be upfront and honest, letting people know what their money is going for. PLUS, once the war was paid off the war tax would go away.

OldDem2012

(3,526 posts)
48. Let's just tax the decision-makers and arms producers who get us into a war because....
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 10:05 PM
Dec 2012

...the rest of us either don't know exactly what we're being brainwashed to do, or don't have the political power to stop it.

In addition to taxing the decision-makers and the arms producers, I would also pass a law requiring the decision-makers who get us into a war to have to spend a year on the front lines. That might make our "leaders" a lot more reluctant to jump into something in which they have a lot of financial and personal skin in the game.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
56. I thought about that but decided that the idiot Americans that allowed
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 11:18 PM
Dec 2012

their government to go to war to enrich the arms dealers are responsible and should pay. Maybe the next time some idiot politician tries to lie them (us) into a war, we will object a little stronger.

ms liberty

(8,600 posts)
36. Yeah...no one ever talks about that...
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:29 PM
Dec 2012

That was the whole point of us having a surplus, was to pay back SS. Al Gore wanted to put it in a lock box so we' d have it when we needed it. The GOP laughed at the analogy and screwed us out of it with tax cuts and wars of choice. I think we need to be talking about it.

Lone_Star_Dem

(28,158 posts)
8. "No one wants it." That's what I've been saying.
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 07:35 PM
Dec 2012

There is bipartisan dislike among voters on anything which resembles a cut to SS benifits.

Hopefully by raising our voices this can be killed before it's ever fully formed.

starroute

(12,977 posts)
9. More people need to know it's also a backdoor tax increase
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 07:38 PM
Dec 2012

It would also be applied to the annual adjustment in tax brackets, meaning that more people would get kicked into higher brackets even if their income is barely keeping pace with inflation.

Tell that to the tea partiers and maybe they'll start to understand.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
14. Chained CPI for Social Security is terrible policy
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 08:05 PM
Dec 2012

I'm so glad that this got out there, and that it will be very difficult for anybody of any party to vote for it after the offer leak.



(Job well done, ProSense!).

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
17. He might have been "playing nine deminisional chess", but.......
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 08:10 PM
Dec 2012

the outrage shown by people about the trial balloon had to have helped.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
18. the Jane Hamshers here there and everywhere will be thoroughly pissed
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 08:15 PM
Dec 2012

that seniors won't be eating obama brand cat food.

yes, they will be angry about this. he's supposed to be evil to the core.

Left Coast2020

(2,397 posts)
19. I'm fairly confident that the President and WH staff have received an earfull today.
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 08:40 PM
Dec 2012

Likey every phone call has been "keep your %$#@* hands off SS. Or something to that effect.

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
28. They did from me.
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:07 PM
Dec 2012

I sent an email and made a phone call. I said that to even think that a Democratic president would be involved in weakening a successful safety net disgusts me. I also said that President Obama should get in front of the people of this country and draw a line in the sand saying that there will be no changes under his presidency, period.

drm604

(16,230 posts)
29. He brought it up. Everyone learned what it is. Now they all hate it and reject it.
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:07 PM
Dec 2012

Democrats hate it because it's a bad idea. Republicans hate it because it's Obama's idea.

So now the Republicans can't propose it. He's taken it away from them.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
31. We do NOT need to touch Social Security at this time at all! It's not part of the budget problem!
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:08 PM
Dec 2012

It's solvent!!!!

This is simply a Republican demand.

Ineeda

(3,626 posts)
32. Yes! Great news. Raise the cap.
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:14 PM
Dec 2012

I've often wondered why there has been so little discussion about such a common sense solution, both in the media and by politicians. But raising the cap will raise taxes on the $107K to $250K range, which was promised not to happen. I wonder if I should start yelling about that broken promise now. Nah -- too early.

Thanks ProSense. I've always appreciated your posts.

groundloop

(11,523 posts)
38. Personally I think anyone making over $107K could afford it
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:33 PM
Dec 2012

I hit that cap one time and thought I was hot shit 'cause I had an extra 7% on my paychecks. Honestly it wouldn't have mattered had they continued taking that out.

But, hey, if nothing else eliminate the cap for people making over $250K.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
33. Let's hope the outrage works
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:18 PM
Dec 2012

It stopped even Bush when he tried for privatization.

And as much as I intensely do not like Boehner, he knows a pile of nuclear waste when he sees one- he wants the President to take full ownership of it.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
45. It should actually be in reverse. Poor people at or near the poverty level shouldn't
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:51 PM
Dec 2012

have to pay. Okay just so the billionaires don't whine, give them that deduction before we start collecting FICA.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It appears the leaked off...