Would Kamala Harris Have Bombed Iran?

[MineralMan]

I think not.

Too bad...

[Ocelot II]

1. Not without Congressional approval, for sure.

[betsuni]

2. Was literally thinking a second ago: But she said something on "The View." But she's genociding Gaza.

But eggs. But she didn't go on Joe Rogan's show. But too many celebrities. But I'm not inspired. But both sides. But but but but but...

[hlthe2b]

3. She would not have allowed Netanyahu to manipulate her every day since the inauguration...

So, I do not see us getting to this point--at least not in the same way or this quickly. I do believe she would have been successful in bringing the international community together to negotiate an ENFORCEABLE NUCLEAR deal with thorough inspections-albeit it might require more time. I don't negate the difficulties in dealing with its regressive theocratic regime but she would have brought in the best negotiators.

So, no. I don't think she would have bombed Iran because I think it quite possible she would NOT have NEEDED to.

Face it. Bebe has drug Trump into this like he would a bull with a nose ring. ZERO evidence that a developed nuclear bomb was any more imminent than it was a year ago, two years ago, 5 years ago, 10 years ago, 20... So, what next to appease Bebe?

[sakabatou]

4. No. She would've definitely kept up the inspections

[Xolodno]

5. Carter was measured in his retaliation.

As was Reagan and every GOP and Democratic President since. Bibi basically butt fucked TACO into a war.

Sorry for the visual...

[markie]

6. I would have

trusted whatever she decided to do.... I do not trust the person now making decisions