General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHakeem Jeffries Statement on Donald Trump's unilateral military action in Iran.
Hakeem Jeffries: "The Trump administration bears the heavy burden of explaining to the American people why this military action was undertaken."
— Joshua J. Friedman (@joshuajfriedman.com) 2025-06-22T01:35:55.594Z


dalton99a
(88,939 posts)Harker
(16,382 posts)MustLoveBeagles
(13,413 posts)BonnieJW
(2,941 posts)niyad
(124,594 posts)niyad
(124,594 posts)as insults to men?
Bohunk68
(1,395 posts)Would that work?
Plenty of names we can call him without diminishing women yet again.
niyad
(124,594 posts)Javaman
(64,107 posts)MustLoveBeagles
(13,413 posts)Cha
(312,267 posts)MustLoveBeagles
(13,413 posts)
Cha
(312,267 posts)July 17th..
My question is.. Is this what Putin wanted?
MustLoveBeagles
(13,413 posts)Aren't Russia & Iran BFF's?
Cha
(312,267 posts)the honchos in Iran are buds.
I'm holding onto that until I hear otherwise .. Traitor going Off the Putin playbook.
srobertss
(271 posts)If it's true that alot of their nuclear facilities were relocated
( https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/images-show-unusual-activity-at-iran-nuclear-site-before-strikes/ar-AA1HbAqv ) then Putin might have played Trump into attacking just to get us in another middle east mess. Otherwise, Russia stood to lose alot and it seems like Putin would have tried to stall him. But I don't know much about this, just speculating.
littlemissmartypants
(28,248 posts)Strikethrough over "no" and "kings" isn't that creating an ambiguous message?
The striking of words usually means negation at least when editing. So, wouldn't that mean a double negative?
Subsequently, it's reversing the "no kings" opinion, changing the meaning to "no kings" is not ok, and kings are cool.
It's very confusing.
❤️
Cha
(312,267 posts)just through kings
Thanks smartypants!
💙
littlemissmartypants
(28,248 posts)Cha
(312,267 posts)


greatauntoftriplets
(177,807 posts)He needs to be tried by the ICC, and prosecuted by Jack Smith.
LetMyPeopleVote
(165,173 posts)littlemissmartypants
(28,248 posts)What screams peace more than bombing something?
President Psychopath strikes again.
J_William_Ryan
(2,818 posts)Trump attempts to deflect attention from his failed, unpopular, lawless regime.
Karasu
(1,423 posts)aka-chmeee
(1,208 posts)they have only two synapses which respond to unfavorable polls. One evokes the TAX CUT response, the other the BOMB SOMEONE response. It seems to work for them.
videohead5
(2,669 posts)Have been saying for months that Iran has not even decided to build a nuclear weapon. They were nowhere near having a nuclear weapon. Trump rejected his own intelligence agencies findings.
Karasu
(1,423 posts)as a result, they've been working on turning them into Fox News-style video presentations to keep his attention. Yes, really.
It's fucking pathetic.
lastlib
(26,133 posts)and "Moozlims" in particular. TheFelon wants to wants to burnish his white supremacy/Xtian nationalist creds with having bombed an "inferior race" into submission.
Joinfortmill
(18,265 posts)Karasu
(1,423 posts)flamingdem
(40,521 posts)Right words for this crazy moment.
Scrivener7
(56,110 posts)Bobstandard
(1,933 posts)We get a lot of strongly worded missives from Democratic leaders. Looking forwarded to a well organized, highly promoted, dramatically rendered public spectacle where he proclaims his opposition to Trumps illegal and immoral actions.
betsuni
(28,019 posts)Hornedfrog2000
(279 posts)Yup. We all just watch as it gets worse and worse.
sheshe2
(92,542 posts)Perhaps he can explain the War on America and the one on Iran at the same time.
Alice B.
(535 posts)... why isn't there some kind of mechanism to prevent military action without Congressional authorization? In these instances?
Like the second key to a safety deposit box?
How does this work? TSF can order bombs be dropped like he's ordering a pizza?
littlemissmartypants
(28,248 posts)President Psychopath.
1. Aggressive, callous, and cunning
2. Complete absence of conscience and empathy
3. Very adept at manipulating others
4. Willingness to engage in immoral, criminal conduct
5. Willingness to take what they want and do as they please, regardless of who is hurt or wronged
6. Deceptive ability to appear outwardly benevolent
7. Deceptive ability to behave in superficially charming ways to hide purely selfish motives
8. Willingness to use intimidation and violence to control others in order to satisfy their own needs
9. Willingness to intentionally violate the basic inherent human rights of others
10. Complete absence of any sense of guilt or remorse for the harm their actions have caused to others
11. Rationalization of their own immoral behavior
12. Will attempt to lay blame upon someone else for their own conduct
13. Denial, will deny their own wrongdoing outright
14. Utter contemptuousness toward the feelings and desires of their fellow beings
15. Pathological lying, will say anything without any concern for truth to advance their own hidden agendas
16. Ablity to feign [fake] normal human emotions and empathy
17. Distorted sense of the consequences of their actions
18. Total failure to accept any responsibility for their own socially irresponsible ways
19. Strong bellef that they will never be brought to justice for their criminal behavior
patphil
(7,990 posts)A provocative action like this could lead to war. Even though it's a Republican Congress, they should have had a chance to make their voices heard prior to an action that could suck us into the middle east quicksand.
Yes, I know that Congress doesn't have the courage to oppose Trump, but they should have been given a chance to at least say, "whatever you say master".
Hornedfrog2000
(279 posts)He is a dictator.
patphil
(7,990 posts)Thank you.
Actually, it looks like he told the Republican leadership, but not the Democrats.
littlemissmartypants
(28,248 posts)FakeNoose
(37,637 posts)Great message Hakeem!
Grins
(8,513 posts)Should have been screaming a week ago.
MorbidButterflyTat
(3,184 posts)"Pathetic" democrats screaming would have definitely dissuaded the psychopathic narcissistic criminal from his destructive asinine actions.
Cha
(312,267 posts)That's Not Helping Anything.
MissouriDem47
(187 posts)How will TACO and Republicans try to blame President Biden and the Democrats?
TexasTowelie
(121,521 posts)I don't remember what they were, but my brother had Fox News on the TV earlier in the evening.
red dog 1
(31,277 posts)With VonShitzInPantz's GOP enablers controlling both houses of Congress and SCOTUS, we are all doomed!
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(13,195 posts)Given the antipathy he has toward non-whites -- especially ones in positions of authority -- Obama's award has been eating at him since early in his first term.
The Nobel Peace Prize isnt something you apply forits something youre nominated for, and only by a select group of people:
Members of national governments and parliaments,
University professors in fields like history, law, philosophy and theology,
Directors of peace research institutes,
Past Nobel Peace Prize laureates,
Members of the International Court of Justice and similar bodies, and
Current and former members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee.
Sorry TACO, unlike the presidency, the Peace Prize can't be bought.
Deminpenn
(16,849 posts)consequences on Trump right out of the gate
solara
(3,893 posts)If left un-checked, trump is a menace to the U.S. and to the world.
joewicker_TX
(86 posts)He won't explain anything and the cult will applaud him for starting WWIII because he owned the libs 🙄
Dreamer Tatum
(10,984 posts)President Barack Obama authorized several military actions during his presidency that raised questions about bypassing Congress. Here are the most notable instances:
---
### **1. Libya (2011)**
Obama launched airstrikes in Libya as part of a NATO-led intervention to prevent a humanitarian crisis during the Libyan civil war. He did **not seek congressional authorization**, instead citing a United Nations Security Council resolution and humanitarian concerns. Critics argued this violated the **War Powers Resolution**, which requires congressional approval for sustained military action beyond 60 days.
---
### **2. Iraq and Syria (20142016)**
In response to the rise of ISIS, Obama ordered airstrikes in Iraq and later expanded them into Syria. He **relied on the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF)**originally passed to target al-Qaeda after 9/11as legal justification. Many lawmakers and legal scholars argued this was a stretch, since ISIS did not exist in 2001 and had split from al-Qaeda.
---
### **3. Yemen and Somalia (Drone Strikes)**
Obama significantly expanded the use of **drone strikes** in countries like Yemen and Somalia, targeting suspected terrorists. These operations were often conducted **without specific congressional approval**, under the broader umbrella of counterterrorism and the 2001 AUMF. The lack of transparency and oversight drew criticism from both human rights groups and members of Congress.
---
### **4. Iraq (2014 Airstrikes Against ISIS)**
In 2014, Obama authorized airstrikes in Iraq to protect U.S. personnel and humanitarian missions. He again **did not seek new congressional authorization**, instead citing his constitutional powers as Commander in Chief and the 2001 AUMF.
---
These actions reflect a broader trend in U.S. foreign policy where presidentsboth Democratic and Republicanhave increasingly relied on **executive authority and outdated AUMFs** to conduct military operations without new congressional approval.
Jilly_in_VA
(12,195 posts)If we didn't need him so much where he is, I'd say Hakeem for President. But we do! Right smack dab where he is!
IzzaNuDay
(987 posts)After the Signal breaches, I would be surprised if the government can hold anything secure.