Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:19 PM Dec 2012

BREAKING Boehner is an idiot.

Nothing breaking about it all of course but its such a great OP title.

Watching CNBC was great fun.

Every single commentator (all conservatives) said that they were unable to bring in the votes to lower taxes for 99% of the people in one of the greatest political failures of recent times.

The President gave them rope and they made nooses for the entire caucus.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
1. He would have plenty of votes if ...
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:24 PM
Dec 2012

he worked with the Democrats.

Screw the teabaggers. There would be plenty of votes in the House to pass Obama's proposal. It only takes 15 Republican votes. If the Republican leadership were to step up, they would only need 11 more votes from Republicans.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
3. I won't miss the Rachael show tonight. Here it comes ...
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:30 PM
Dec 2012

Another edition of "Why is Boehner so bad at his job?"

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
15. For the first time, I think Boehner's job is in real jeopardy
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 01:28 AM
Dec 2012

This was horrible, and it appears that Cantor undermined Boehner. The long knives are out now. I don't see how it gets better in time fr Boehner to win another term on Jan 3.

But Cantor seems to be the alternative. That forces a real showdown because there are a lot of people in the caucus who aren't as crazy as the teabaggers, but have not bene willing to stand up to the teabaggers. If they don't want their leader to be a world class teabagger, they will have to back Boehner. It will be interesting.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
17. Do you think Cantor will stand up to the baggers? He's pretty extreme, no?
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 01:43 AM
Dec 2012

Other than some crooked legislation and a few other stunts, I don't know much about him. I do believe he's a Koch puppet, like Scott Brown and will continue to try to destroy the government. It amazes - and at the same time - it frightens me that people elected these hateful people to office. They are real fascists, wanting to give it all to corporations and churches. I'd be relieved to see anything that will reduce their influence.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
18. Cantor would be worse
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 10:55 AM
Dec 2012

His ambition is 100 times greater than his brainpower. He is much closer to the teabaggers.

But really, I don't see how it could be any worse than Boehner on a practical basis. Boehner has managers to outmaneuver Obama on many occasions, which is remarkable considering:

-Obama is 55% popular, the House Republicans are 10% popular

-Democrats control the Senate (at least numerically, although McConnell has that body complete sabotaged.)

I do think a big, loud, bloody fight for the Speaker seat would be a good thing. I expect Boehner would ultimately prevail because there are enough non-teabaggers who would never vote for Cantor. And this might just be the factor that convinces the non-teabaggers and Boehner to split with the teabaggers and start withing with the Democrats.

There are over 100 Republicans in the House who aren't teabaggers. If they could find common ground with Democrats, they could pass any bill they wanted.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
16. I should point out it is "the Hastert rule" that prevents working with Democrats
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 01:41 AM
Dec 2012

Dennis Hastert had a rule that said the Speaker would not bring up any legislation that didn't have a majority vote from the Republican caucus.

This isn't a formal rule, but it has stuck and now it is a noose around Boehner's neck, albeit one that he seems to invite.

He could simply take the noose off and say "I think that is good business most of the time, but I won't be bound by it in every case.

Strict, dogmatic adherence to these inflexible rules (like the pledge to Norquist) is killing the ability to govern. A democracy just cannot work that way. Hastert has been gone 5 years and Norquist was never elected to any office. This place is being run by ghosts. That is not democracy.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
7. These people are absolutely illogical. The entire thing is getting really boring.
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:32 PM
Dec 2012

Can we please bring out the steamroller now?!

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
14. With any luck, this gets us across "the cliff" without any more capitulation from Obama
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 12:27 AM
Dec 2012

Those morons can't think 2 steps ahead. It is a whole different dynamic after all the laws have expired.

He should drop this "grand bargain" nonsense. Our biggest problem is employment, not deficits.

Jennicut

(25,415 posts)
11. This is my birthday present!
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 10:34 PM
Dec 2012

Who says having a birthday so close to Christmas means you get gypped? Boehner's failure and the GOP implosion is a pretty good b-day present.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BREAKING Boehner is an id...