Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

pecosbob

(8,029 posts) Wed Jul 2, 2025, 10:48 PM Jul 2

5

Update: 217 nays, 207 yeas, 8 GOP NVs...looks like this procedural vote is going to fail

Last edited Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:40 PM - Edit history (1)

Not sure if the Speaker's vote is included in this tally, but I assume so.

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Update: 217 nays, 207 yeas, 8 GOP NVs...looks like this procedural vote is going to fail (Original Post) pecosbob Jul 2 OP

Looks like four Republican nays Quiet Em Jul 2 #1

I believe there is still time for their clueless leader to threaten any of the four into changing their vote. pecosbob Jul 2 #3

ah, Quiet Em Jul 2 #4

Happened in the Senate when some changed their minds, if the rules are the same then things can change ... cliffside Jul 2 #6

And that would still not be enough. Wiz Imp Jul 2 #8

They want to be 'Murkowskied' pfitz59 Jul 2 #2

It's a done deal newdeal2 Jul 2 #5

If it was a done deal, they wouldn't have spent over 14 hours so far today trying just to get Wiz Imp Jul 2 #7

What exactly gives you hope that this terrible bill won't be passed? newdeal2 Jul 2 #9

A Bill will pass. It doesn't appear to me like it will be the same version of the bill as what the Senate passed. Wiz Imp Jul 2 #11

I wake up to read that all but one caved newdeal2 Jul 3 #16

From C-Span, No votes include ... cliffside Jul 2 #10

That doesn't seem to include Massie Quiet Em Jul 2 #12

Hope so! Think someone just flipped to a No, Yea 207, Nay 5, 8 NV. nt cliffside Jul 2 #14

Massie No! nt cliffside Jul 2 #15

Five nays now. Quiet Em Jul 2 #13

It's all for show. Kingofalldems Jul 3 #17

It is 219 to 213 dalton99a Jul 3 #18

Quiet Em

(2,086 posts)

1. Looks like four Republican nays

Reply to pecosbob (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2025, 10:54 PM

Jul 2

Isn't that enough to end it?

At least this go round?

pecosbob

(8,029 posts)

3. I believe there is still time for their clueless leader to threaten any of the four into changing their vote.

Reply to Quiet Em (Reply #1)

Wed Jul 2, 2025, 10:57 PM

Jul 2

Quiet Em

(2,086 posts)

4. ah,

Reply to pecosbob (Reply #3)

Wed Jul 2, 2025, 10:58 PM

Jul 2

thanks.

cliffside

(1,023 posts)

6. Happened in the Senate when some changed their minds, if the rules are the same then things can change ...

Reply to pecosbob (Reply #3)

Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:02 PM

Jul 2

until the vote is called.

Wiz Imp

(5,971 posts)

8. And that would still not be enough.

Reply to pecosbob (Reply #3)

Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:16 PM

Jul 2

They need at least 6 more votes if no Republicans end up voting no. And if some do, then they need 10 more votes for a majority.

pfitz59

(11,617 posts)

2. They want to be 'Murkowskied'

Reply to pecosbob (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2025, 10:55 PM

Jul 2

'What's in it for ME!'

newdeal2

(3,351 posts)

5. It's a done deal

Reply to pecosbob (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:01 PM

Jul 2

If not today, tomorrow, or the next day…

They’ve signed on to America’s death warrant.

Wiz Imp

(5,971 posts)

7. If it was a done deal, they wouldn't have spent over 14 hours so far today trying just to get

Reply to newdeal2 (Reply #5)

Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:12 PM

Jul 2

a procedural rules vote passed - and they still have not been successful.

newdeal2

(3,351 posts)

9. What exactly gives you hope that this terrible bill won't be passed?

Reply to Wiz Imp (Reply #7)

Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:22 PM

Jul 2

Maybe this vote fails, but there will be more as needed and right now the four No’s look pretty lonely. They will not be able to withstand Trump’s attacks.

Wiz Imp

(5,971 posts)

11. A Bill will pass. It doesn't appear to me like it will be the same version of the bill as what the Senate passed.

Reply to newdeal2 (Reply #9)

Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:29 PM

Jul 2

Which means it needs to go back to the Senate again. It's not remotely clear at this point what the final bill that passes both the House and Senate will look like.

newdeal2

(3,351 posts)

16. I wake up to read that all but one caved

Reply to Wiz Imp (Reply #11)

Thu Jul 3, 2025, 08:05 AM

Jul 3

After they got “assurances” from the White House (what is that worth?) and may get future opportunities to do more cuts.

It doesn’t give me any joy to be right but this is the reality we have to confront. No Republican will save us.

cliffside

(1,023 posts)

10. From C-Span, No votes include ...

Reply to pecosbob (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:26 PM

Jul 2

Self (TX) Spartz (IN) Clyde (GA) Fitzpatrick (PA)

8 Repubs have not voted.

Quiet Em

(2,086 posts)

12. That doesn't seem to include Massie

Reply to cliffside (Reply #10)

Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:30 PM

Jul 2

who was a pretty adamant no.

I think this is done and is going back to the Senate.

cliffside

(1,023 posts)

14. Hope so! Think someone just flipped to a No, Yea 207, Nay 5, 8 NV. nt

Reply to Quiet Em (Reply #12)

Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:33 PM

Jul 2

cliffside

(1,023 posts)

15. Massie No! nt

Reply to Quiet Em (Reply #12)

Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:34 PM

Jul 2

Quiet Em

(2,086 posts)

13. Five nays now.

Reply to pecosbob (Original post)

Wed Jul 2, 2025, 11:32 PM

Jul 2

I'm keeping Mr. Werp's hopium.

Kingofalldems

(39,715 posts)

17. It's all for show.

Reply to pecosbob (Original post)

Thu Jul 3, 2025, 08:06 AM

Jul 3

dalton99a

(89,383 posts)

18. It is 219 to 213

Reply to pecosbob (Original post)

Thu Jul 3, 2025, 08:07 AM

Jul 3

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Update: 217 nays, 207 yea...