General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDid you get the email from Social Security administration saying what a great thing the big beautiful Bill passing
Was?
I tried to post a picture of it here, but I dont know how to do that. How disgusting that Nazis run the SSA now .
https://blog.ssa.gov/social-security-applauds-passage-of-legislation-providing-historic-tax-relief-for-seniors/
I know what Im doing, I checked the email address before I posted it, this is from the SSA
Just do a Google, Search SSA applauds, big beautiful, Bill
You will only get the email if you are subscribed to all subscriptions for SSA as I am.
One last time, if you dont trust the link, thats fine. Just do a Google search for it. You will find it. You will see that this is really from them.
Why would anyone be surprised, the maga filth run the SSA

Ocelot II
(125,910 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(33,127 posts)Social Security Administration
Subscription.service@subscriptions.ssa.gov
wanderer54
(90 posts)EdmondDantes_
(613 posts)It's Trump being the tiniest egotistical clown to ever live.
Celerity
(50,833 posts)


peggysue2
(12,021 posts)And I'm sure I would have remembered it, Eliot.
Bizarre.
Eliot Rosewater
(33,127 posts)Its real
Dont know why we cant attach a screenshot here
Celerity
(50,833 posts)peggysue2
(12,021 posts)Celebrating the passage of the bill and declaring that there will be no taxes on SS for 90% of recipients and an enhanced deduction (whatever that means) for retirees 65 and older.
WTF!
My husband's notification went straight to junk mail.
We are living in the upside down world.
yardwork
(67,154 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(33,127 posts)yardwork
(67,154 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(33,127 posts)yardwork
(67,154 posts)This is appalling. It even refers to "the big beautiful bill!!"
I'm so disgusted.
Eliot Rosewater
(33,127 posts)The American people better respond to all of this with the kind of anger and fury that weve never exhibited before.
Eliot Rosewater
(33,127 posts)markodochartaigh
(3,334 posts)But my email for Social Security is AOL. It may be a few days. Lol.
Eliot Rosewater
(33,127 posts)markodochartaigh
(3,334 posts)I believe you. I'm just saying that AOL is really, actually slow.
On a side note, authoritarian Strong Leaders love to have their names on everything. It doesn't surprise me at all. And I think that Democratic politicians could actually adopt this strategy for their own benefit.
Eliot Rosewater
(33,127 posts)About AoL email. And I didnt think you were doubting me. Im used to being doubted thoughwhen I post YouTube videos about the election being rigged you wouldnt believe how many people here wont even watch it. Theyll just make fun of me without even watching it
All kidding aside
does AOL really still exist?
markodochartaigh
(3,334 posts)I'm about the only person still using AOL.
And, I just checked my spam and reloaded my mail and it still hasn't come through. But AOL is free, and much easier to use now that they updated their language from Ancient Sumerian.
Eliot Rosewater
(33,127 posts)You can have at SSA, probably most people arent signed up for this particular one so you wouldnt get the email, which is a good thing
Deuxcents
(23,027 posts)markodochartaigh
(3,334 posts)I recall there is a regular mail option and an email option, and maybe an option for both. I received my Social Security email at 8:27 tonight. Previously I donated to a few candidates using my AOL email and now I get at least 50 emails a day and far more when they are really raising money.
markodochartaigh
(3,334 posts)I understand what you mean about the election rigging. I find Greg Palast's videos completely persuasive and I wish that the Democratic party would have supported him at the highest level. But with the supremacist court and the maga movement it would have been incredibly difficult to achieve any kind of justice. Everyone says "That would be so divisive" LMFAO, WE'RE ALREADY THERE!
SheltieLover
(71,439 posts)Don't click any links. Sounds like spam to me!
John1956PA
(4,272 posts). . . ninety percent of Social Security recipients will not pay taxes on their benefits.
I am thinking that such percentage (or greater) was always the case.
markodochartaigh
(3,334 posts)thousand dollar increase in the standard exemption for those over 65. I bet that this 90% is just some bs number Trump came up with on the fly.
Projections1 show that an annual average of about 56 percent of beneficiary families will owe federal income tax on their benefits from 2015 through 2050
Among beneficiary families that owe income tax on their benefits, the median percentage of benefits owed as income taxes will increase from about 11 percent in 2015 to 12 percent in 2025 and remain stable through 2050.
https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/research-summaries/income-taxes-on-benefits.html
For now, about 2 out of every 5 Social Security recipients will pay federal income taxes on their benefits, usually because they have other income in addition to their benefits, according to the IRS
https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/personal-finance/is-social-security-taxed
John1956PA
(4,272 posts). . . Social Security benefits to be taxed is not high. If there is somewhere around $16,000 in other income, the Social Security benefits start to get taxed. If the other other income is only a little over the threshold, then only a small percentage of the Social Security benefits gets added to the net income which is taxed pursuant to Form 1940.
Klarkashton
(3,670 posts)I'm sure that is the case with a lot of people.
Klarkashton
(3,670 posts)On Bitcoin scams
Wiz Imp
(5,971 posts)(see post #32) Not exactly the major windfall that Trump promised, is it?
Eliot Rosewater
(33,127 posts)It is as usual a lie, they do nothing but lie. Wait thats wrong. They dont do nothing but lie, now they kill.
rzemanfl
(30,698 posts)take much outside income to start having SS taxed.
WENSTJDON
(147 posts)I deleted it after I saw the words big beautiful bill.
generalbetrayus
(1,077 posts)Soviet-style propaganda on US government websites for the win, Alex.
Eliot Rosewater
(33,127 posts)This is not business as usual, this is not politics, this is war. Actual fucking war and until we respond accordingly, were dead meat.
Klarkashton
(3,670 posts)To get signed up. I waited unit I was 70.
Nothing those doge and maga fucks can say right now except pay the fuck up.
beaglelover
(4,306 posts)Wiz Imp
(5,971 posts)It's total propaganda. More imitation of third world dictator stuff. This makes me really mad. It's also a lie:
https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/personal-finance/one-big-beautiful-bill
Temporary provisions good for 4 years
In addition to the permanent provisions, the legislation includes numerous temporary deductions and credits good only for tax years 2025 through 2028, including:
An added senior tax deduction. People who are age 65 and older will get an additional $6,000 deduction that begins to phase out at incomes of $75,000 for single filers and $150,000 for joint filers. Note: The enhanced deduction would be in addition to the $2,000 single filers and $3,200 married filers are currently able to deduct if they are 65 or older.
What isn't in the new law?
No taxes on Social Security. The legislation does not include President Trump's proposal to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits, which are taxable up to 85% for individuals with income of more than $34,000 or a couple with combined income of $44,000 or more. However, the additional $6,000 deduction for people who are 65 and older may help offset taxes on Social Security benefits for some individuals with income at these thresholds for the next 4 years.
So not only was eliminating taxes on SS benefits a lie, the alternative measure which is supposed to help seniors is only temporary for 4 years. Not only that but check this out:
https://apnews.com/article/trump-congress-big-bill-tax-social-security-adea287e00c7c553f69f3667d3ef78cc
The average benefit is a whopping $670. Now, I know, even $670 would be a welcome benefit for many seniors. However, since that is the average benefit, those with lower income will see even lower benefits than that. Not exactly the windfall that Trump was promising, is it?
Croney
(4,966 posts)Rebl2
(16,672 posts)gotten oneyet.
deRien
(277 posts)that was a quick response for this administration...
dem4decades
(12,957 posts)Totally Tunsie
(10,976 posts)
Greg_In_SF
(351 posts)a few seconds ago @10:12pm EDT.
LexVegas
(6,864 posts)moondust
(20,936 posts)Trump Toady Frank Bisignano was sworn in on May 7 as the new SSA Commissioner. Of course he's going to spin and hype everything if he wants to keep his job.