General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVery excited and happy about the Kerry nomination today
The Associated Press @AP
BREAKING: AP Source: Obama to nominate Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., as next secretary of state on Friday.
I still have a blue Kerry bumpersticker on the back window of my pickup truck. It just feels right to have it there, for all sides of the political landscape to take in.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)I am still disappointed he Did not win the presidency. Opportunity lost. I am concerned about the Senate seat, though. Anything on that
bigtree
(85,998 posts). . . but I wouldn't expect anything like the Brown victory to unfold. They were burned once . . . then they cleaned house. It's still a Democratic state, and it just voted like one this past November.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)bigtree
(85,998 posts). . . and lost to a political neophyte?
bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)blm
(113,063 posts)Does anyone really believe Dems in Massachusetts will take a senate seat for granted again?
Response to bigtree (Original post)
politicasista This message was self-deleted by its author.
Marr
(20,317 posts)He let them *pick* his Secretary of State. Not just vote on HIS choice-- PICK them.
That's *almost* funny.
bigtree
(85,998 posts). . . as gospel.
You fail to explain why in the world republicans would want someone they've opposed for decades on foreign policy in the job of SoS. How's that again?
How ignorant do you have to be to buy into that spin that republicans were herding Obama into choosing their arch rival in the Senate on foreign affairs (and more) to direct the President's foreign policy from the head of the State Dept.. You have to just close off all avenues of rational thought to pull that one out of your ass.
Wish people could see what you are seeing.
Marr
(20,317 posts)Just a fake out for no reason at all? Or... a bizarre attempt at reverse psychology? And after publicly pushing for Kerry, they would then vote against him...? Someone's certainly talking out of their ass here, I can't deny that.
There's been no shortage of commentary speculating on why they were doing that-- surely you didn't miss it. It all centers around numbers in the Senate, Scott Brown, etc.
I've got to say, it must be dizzying for you to reinterpret everyone's meaning all the time. When Republicans say "Kerry" they really mean, "please, not Kerry". When Obama says, "Chained CPI", he really means, "no way no how on Chained CPI".
bigtree
(85,998 posts). . . and some folks eat it up with a spoon and ask for more.
Cha
(297,275 posts)And, that's how the President makes his choices.