General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRosie O'Donnell's response to the tyrant

https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2025/07/12/donald-trump-threatens-revoke-rosie-odonnell-citizenship/84803705007/





bif
(25,884 posts)SuzyandPuffpuff
(198 posts)Simply fabulous... I ditto your thoughts...thank you
newdeal2
(3,352 posts)Shes dealt with his BS for longer than most.
twodogsbarking
(14,368 posts)Deuxcents
(23,027 posts)Go raibh míle maith agat!
Translates: Rosie, a thousand thank yous
mwmisses4289
(1,511 posts)Hekate
(98,530 posts)
red dog 1
(31,429 posts)Best description of VonShitzInPantz I've ever seen.
Good for you, Rosie!
SheltieLover
(71,439 posts)

Goblin812
(1 post)In other words he is a REPUBLICAN !
amuse bouche
(3,672 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(166,212 posts)republianmushroom
(20,616 posts)dalton99a
(89,383 posts)In 1967, the U.S. Supreme Court declared in Afroyim v. Rusk that the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment bars the government from stripping citizenship, stating: In our country the people are sovereign and the government cannot sever its relationship to the people by taking away their citizenship, she said in an email.
Mr. Trumps feud with Ms. ODonnell dates back to 2006, when she mocked the president on The View for defending a Miss USA contestant roiled in a controversy. She questioned his own moral compass and role as a businessman. Mr. Trump, who at the time was best known for his show, The Apprentice, threatened to sue The View over her comments.
Soon after, Mr. Trump began hurling insults at Ms. ODonnell, calling her fat and wacko. In a 2015 G.O.P. debate on Fox News, one of the moderators said, Youve called women you dont like fat pigs, dogs, slobs and disgusting animals. Mr. Trump interjected: Only Rosie ODonnell.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/12/us/politics/trump-rosie-odonnell-citizenship.html
speak easy
(11,947 posts)His brain is squirming like a toad, He has no moral compass
Cha
(312,980 posts)Rosie moved to Iceland! I'd love t visit there.. with their hot springs and healing waters.
TY
speak easy
(11,947 posts)but I Loathe him, The murder of my childhood dreams.
ybbor
(1,657 posts)However, Id also love to visit Ireland, where Rosie moved.
Cha
(312,980 posts)for the correction, ybbor!
I guess that makes more sense.
My sister went to Iceland last year and the experiences they had and pictures... Nothern Lights!.. were every bit as great as I thought it would be.
ybbor
(1,657 posts)Some day! You live in a pretty special place yourself. I lived on Maui forever ago. One of, if not the greatest, places Ive called home.
Aloha
Cha
(312,980 posts)Never been but I can see how beautiful it is 🌊🏝️🌈💙
My sister has been to Ireland 🇮🇪 too.. she gets around 🌎
ybbor
(1,657 posts)I spent a week in Hanalei for a friends wedding years ago. Also beautiful!
Cha
(312,980 posts)What a lovely place on earth for a wedding 😎💕
Pinback
(13,311 posts)OMGWTF
(4,840 posts)I would like to visit both places.
Cha
(312,980 posts)it to me.
Joinfortmill
(18,528 posts)wolfie001
(5,682 posts)





llmart
(16,620 posts)yobrault1
(187 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(166,212 posts)Link to tweet
bif
(25,884 posts)Un-fucking-real. He's like a little kid with his spats and revenge. WTAF?!?! Can you Imagine President Obama or Biden doing shit like this?
Karasu
(1,591 posts)we're at now.
GoCubsGo
(34,059 posts)With everything going on in his country, and in the world, his top priority is fighting with effin' Rosie O'Donnell??? As if he hasn't already made this country a big enough laughingstock...
TalenaGor
(1,185 posts)chouchou
(2,130 posts)Never, ever, ever fuck with Rosie O'Donnell !
mvd
(65,698 posts)More responses need to be like that. Trump is a bully.
RockRaven
(17,621 posts)calimary
(87,039 posts)Rosie speaks for ME!!!
malaise
(286,487 posts)Rec
B.See
(5,834 posts)right between the eyes and SPOT ON... loved every syllable of it.
Did she read him the fkn riot act, or did she read him the fkn RIOT act??
Nanjeanne
(6,290 posts)Both Rosie and AOC are showing the Dems how it needs to be done. Leave it to the women to be fearless.
Evolve Dammit
(20,997 posts)kacekwl
(8,461 posts)spoke to him like this. What exactly could he do ?
Justice matters.
(8,622 posts)Some from Russia? Just 'asking'...
C Moon
(12,995 posts)
GoCubsGo
(34,059 posts)Never lived more than a 5 minute cab/golf cart ride from each other during that time--both in NYC and in Florida.
Farmer-Rick
(11,866 posts)Everyone knows he's a pedo. They either don't care or deluding himself.
Is he still flying around in his BFF's private jet paid for by selling sex with little girls?
Cheezoholic
(3,095 posts)BurnDoubt
(802 posts)Skittles
(165,955 posts)
ReRe
(11,699 posts)Wish I could be in Ireland at this moment too. I need a vaca so bad and it's only been 6 months into this debacle.
Cheers, dalton99a & Rosie!
bmichaelh
(865 posts)Most of what Trump accused O'Donnell of could apply to Trump.
He is projecting again.
"..not in the best interests of our Great Country.."
"..Threat to Humanity.."
dalton99a
(89,383 posts)AllaN01Bear
(26,383 posts)sidenote: she types like me you go gal
bif
(25,884 posts)I seem to recall she was a Republican not that long ago. Or am I confused?
Stargleamer
(2,455 posts)ODonnell is a Democrat it says and she was at odds with Bush: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosie_O%27Donnell
LetMyPeopleVote
(166,212 posts)Here is a good analysis of denaturalization. It would be almost impossible for trump to strip Rosie of her citizenship without a nasty lawsuit
With President Trump threatening to revoke Rosie OâDonnellâs citizenship, it seems like a good time to re-up my explainer on denaturalization and expatriation â and why what Trump is suggesting is ⦠not viable:
— Steve Vladeck (@stevevladeck.bsky.social) 2025-07-12T18:40:26.584Z
https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/146-denaturalization-and-expatriation
Historically, and for good reasons, it has been exceptionally difficult for the government to involuntarily revoke an Americans citizenship. 8 U.S.C. § 1481 identifies seven classes of activities that can subject citizens to a loss of citizenship:
(1) obtaining naturalization in a foreign state upon his own application or upon an application filed by a duly authorized agent, after having attained the age of eighteen years; or
(2) taking an oath or making an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state or a political subdivision thereof, after having attained the age of eighteen years; or
(3) entering, or serving in, the armed forces of a foreign state if (A) such armed forces are engaged in hostilities against the United States, or (B) such persons serve as a commissioned or non-commissioned officer; or
(4)(A) accepting, serving in, or performing the duties of any office, post, or employment under the government of a foreign state or a political subdivision thereof, after attaining the age of eighteen years if he has or acquires the nationality of such foreign state; or (B) accepting, serving in, or performing the duties of any office, post, or employment under the government of a foreign state or a political subdivision thereof, after attaining the age of eighteen years for which office, post, or employment an oath, affirmation, or declaration of allegiance is required; or
(5) making a formal renunciation of nationality before a diplomatic or consular officer of the United States in a foreign state, in such form as may be prescribed by the Secretary of State; or
(6) making in the United States a formal written renunciation of nationality in such form as may be prescribed by, and before such officer as may be designated by, the Attorney General, whenever the United States shall be in a state of war and the Attorney General shall approve such renunciation as not contrary to the interests of national defense; or
(7) committing any act of treason against, or attempting by force to overthrow, or bearing arms against, the United States, violating or conspiring to violate any of the provisions of section 2383 of title 18, or willfully performing any act in violation of section 2385 of title 18, or violating section 2384 of title 18 by engaging in a conspiracy to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, if and when he is convicted thereof by a court martial or by a court of competent jurisdiction.
As should be clear from this list, most of the circumstances involve behavior in which an individual has manifested a specific and voluntary desire to surrender their citizenshipand not when citizenship has been revoked as a punishment. And even for subsection (a)(7), the one part that doesnt seem to require that on its face, the statute today includes an umbrella conditionthat loss of citizenship depends upon whether the individual voluntarily perform[ed] any of the [specified] acts with the intention of relinquishing United States nationality.......
Section 1481 applies to all U.S. citizens. For naturalized citizens (i.e., those who become citizens after birth), theres one additional basis for revoking citizenshipand thats if and only if their citizenship was illegally procured or . . . procured by concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation. Here, too, the statute (and, almost certainly, the Constitution) requires notice and meaningful judicial review before an Americans citizenship can be stripped. As 8 U.S.C. § 1451(b) mandates,
The party to whom was granted the naturalization alleged to have been illegally procured or procured by concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation shall, in any such proceedings under subsection (a) of this section, have sixty days personal notice, unless waived by such party, in which to make answers to the petition of the United States . . . .
Of course, the government can pursue denaturalization on broader grounds than it can pursue expatriationsince the Constitution doesnt create a substantive right to naturalization in the same way it does for birthright citizenship. But the key is that here, too, the Supreme Court has regularly insisted not only on meaningful judicial review of denaturalization proceedings, but on construing the relevant statutes narrowlyincluding, most recently, in 2017. (For much more on the complexities of denaturalization, see this fantastic February 2020 Practice Advisory from the National Lawyers Guild and the Immigrant Legal Resource Center.)
In other words, although denaturalization is potentially available in more cases than expatriation, it still requires meaningful, individualized judicial reviewreview that holds the government to a significant burden in providing that an individual wrongfully obtained their citizenship, and not just that they engaged in questionable behavior thereafter. There is, simply, no easy, fast path to revoking any Americans citizenship without their consentand there hasnt been for decades. That may not stop the current administration from trying it anyway, or from removing citizens unlawfully and then resisting the legal consequences. But its important to be clear on what the actual legal authority for such maneuvers would be. Here, there isnt any.
I was so sad to see Professor Vladeck leave the University of Texas Law School.
dalton99a
(89,383 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(166,212 posts)When an American president with an authoritarian-style vision starts claiming abusive powers he does not have, its best not to look away.
Targeting a critic, Trump claims a power he does not have in new authoritarian move
— (@gypsydaveh.bsky.social) 2025-07-14T16:06:28.680Z
flip.it/Q3n3xy
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/rosie-odonnell-trump-threatens-citizenship-power-rcna218623
Because of the fact that Rosie ODonnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship. She is a Threat to Humanity, and should remain in the wonderful Country of Ireland, if they want her.
.....To hear Trump tell it, ODonnell used speech he found objectionable, which has led him to give serious consideration to stripping the comedian of her U.S. citizenship. Implicit in the statement is the presidents apparent belief that he has such power.
He does not. As NBC News report noted, Trump cannot legally take away Americans citizenship because that presidential authority simply doesnt exist.
Amanda Frost, an expert on citizenship law at the University of Virginia School of Law, told The New York Times, In 1967, the U.S. Supreme Court declared in Afroyim v. Rusk that the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment bars the government from stripping citizenship, stating: In our country the people are sovereign and the government cannot sever its relationship to the people by taking away their citizenship.
Trump, however, doesnt appear to understand this or more to the point, doesnt seem to care. An American citizen criticized him in ways he did not like, leading him to believe he should consider taking away his critics citizenship, as if this were somehow normal in our constitutional system.
It comes against a backdrop of Trump threatening to deny funding to cities that govern in ways he doesnt like. Which came on the heels of Trump threatening to prosecute a news organization for running reports he didnt like. Which came on the heels of Trump musing publicly about arresting a Democratic candidate he doesnt like. Which came on the heels of Trump floating the possibility of deporting American citizens. Which came on the heels of Trump endorsing the arrest of a Democratic governor who has opposed the White Houses agenda. Which came on the heels of Trump ordering a Justice Department investigation into his Democratic predecessor without cause.
And thats just from the last month or so.
The idea of two prominent public figures engaging in some kind of feud is forgettable, but when an American president with an authoritarian-style vision starts claiming abusive powers he does not have, its best not to look away.
Heftylefty
(18 posts)The ONLY reason citizenship can be stripped from a natural-born American citizen is treason. Rosie's not the one who should be worried.