Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

proud2BlibKansan

(96,793 posts)
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 02:08 PM Dec 2012

Wouldn't that bad guy with a gun go after the good guy with a gun before he kills any kids?

I mean, wouldn't that be the logical way to carry out a school shooting if there was a good guy with a gun in the building? I'm not a bad guy but that's what I would do.

This is just a really stupid idea. Not as stupid as arming teachers but still stupid.

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wouldn't that bad guy with a gun go after the good guy with a gun before he kills any kids? (Original Post) proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 OP
That's why there's another armed guard to guard the armed guard, silly. cthulu2016 Dec 2012 #1
So instead of a billion dollars, we would need TWO billion to put armed good guys in every school? proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #2
and randomly arm 2 of the kids in the class. russspeakeasy Dec 2012 #3
...with ar-15s or frog nukes? They have a right to bear arms too yah no... /sarcasm uponit7771 Dec 2012 #5
I would suggest hand grenades.. russspeakeasy Dec 2012 #9
Not if he didn't know who they "good guy with gun" was... uponit7771 Dec 2012 #4
But the good guys would be trained to shoot the gun out of the bad guy's hand, Roy Rogers-style. Gidney N Cloyd Dec 2012 #6
BINGO! liberal N proud Dec 2012 #7
You need to stop using logic when posting questions about guns LynneSin Dec 2012 #8
So that's where I screwed up. Thanks. proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #16
I find it's one of the things we progressives find challenging. LynneSin Dec 2012 #20
Or worse yet, the bad guy enters the school on the opposite side of the building from where the.... OldDem2012 Dec 2012 #10
No, because good guys have magical powers riqster Dec 2012 #11
How about a giant net that drops down from the ceiling, or russspeakeasy Dec 2012 #12
Yes. They totally ignore the research* that is out there Iris Dec 2012 #13
I keep posting... everywhere... Bigmack Dec 2012 #14
YES! Wish I could rec your post. proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #18
Armed guards are a reactive solution. backscatter712 Dec 2012 #15
If a mentally unstable person was plotting to mass murder a group of people ... IggleDoer Dec 2012 #17
sure he would. in ct it would have been 27 dead. spanone Dec 2012 #19

proud2BlibKansan

(96,793 posts)
2. So instead of a billion dollars, we would need TWO billion to put armed good guys in every school?
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 02:11 PM
Dec 2012

Let me get my check book . . .

russspeakeasy

(6,539 posts)
9. I would suggest hand grenades..
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 02:18 PM
Dec 2012

I can't see any possible problem with that. . and you're right, they have a right to protect themselves..

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
8. You need to stop using logic when posting questions about guns
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 02:16 PM
Dec 2012

Trust me - lack of logic will help this all make sense

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
20. I find it's one of the things we progressives find challenging.
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 03:50 PM
Dec 2012

Everytime we try to think without logic it creeps back in there and takes over.

OldDem2012

(3,526 posts)
10. Or worse yet, the bad guy enters the school on the opposite side of the building from where the....
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 02:19 PM
Dec 2012

....good guy is located. How long will it take for the good guy to get to the scene of the shooting?

Really dumb idea!!

riqster

(13,986 posts)
11. No, because good guys have magical powers
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 02:20 PM
Dec 2012

So they always die heroically, killing yhe bad guy and protecting the innocent.

I saw it in a Hollywood movie, so it MUST be true...

russspeakeasy

(6,539 posts)
12. How about a giant net that drops down from the ceiling, or
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 02:22 PM
Dec 2012

attack dogs roaming the halls..I know it's stupid, but it's as good as wayne came up with.

Iris

(15,657 posts)
13. Yes. They totally ignore the research* that is out there
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 02:23 PM
Dec 2012

Usually in these cases, the "bad" gunman has planned the episode long in advance. They would account for an armed guard.

*When I say research, I mean the research that is allowed to exist and be public. Apparently the gun lobby has been successful in keeping research about gun violence done by the government under wraps, even making rules that forbid the CDC from even conducting such research.

 

Bigmack

(8,020 posts)
14. I keep posting... everywhere...
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 02:24 PM
Dec 2012

Do you imagine some kindergarden teacher... even heavily armed and trained... kindergarten teacher is gonna be able to “hold 'em and squeeze 'em” while under fire and trying to shield her kids..? Somebody who has never fired a round in combat is going to calmly fire a head shot on somebody wearing body armor? Dream on. The "Die Hard" movies are not documentaries.

Where is the teacher going to wear or store their weapon? Kids get into everything in classrooms. Any teacher will tell you about how their keys/purse/grade book was stolen. Imagine a handgun going adrift in a school. You really want teachers wearing a handgun at their waists? That’s a recipe for an accidental discharge. If the teacher’s weapon is locked away securely, how long would it take to retrieve it in an emergency?

Ever hear of fratricide... blue on blue... friendly fire...? It happens with the best of trained troops. Think Pat Tilman. Now think 3 or 4 untrained shooters spraying rounds around a school. I've been in firefights, and I can tell you it's not like the movies.

With teachers - or anybody else - you're talking about a bloodbath before the bad guy gets off a single round. How would the teacher/guard know that anybody with a weapon wasn't the bad guy? They’d shoot each other, or more probably miss and kill those they are trying to protect.

And what do think the cops are going to see when they arrive...? A teacher standing there with a weapon. Bye-bye (hero) teacher!

Teachers are trained to teach. They are not warriors. These days, I'd even be nervous having a cop armed with a handgun on campus... he could be overpowered and the weapon used on students.

I have no idea what to do to stop the school shootings, but I know arming the teachers or students is the dumbest goddam idea I've heard in some time.

Besides, teachers - especially elementary teachers - are surrogate parents, counselors, nurses.....are you gonna ask them to be armed guards, too.? Anybody willing to pay teachers combat pay..?

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
15. Armed guards are a reactive solution.
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 02:25 PM
Dec 2012

Barring posting at least one in every classroom, the armed guard will arrive at the scene of the crime too late in almost all cases.

IggleDoer

(1,186 posts)
17. If a mentally unstable person was plotting to mass murder a group of people ...
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 02:49 PM
Dec 2012

... the first thing he would do is apply for a position as a security guard.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wouldn't that bad guy wit...