Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 02:45 PM Dec 2012

Did the NRA goons sexually assault protestor?

You decide:



Here's the video:



Doesn't this person have rights, like freedom of speech, and above all else,
the right to not have her breasts manhandled just so Wayne La Prick can keep talking?
47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did the NRA goons sexually assault protestor? (Original Post) Coyotl Dec 2012 OP
In answer to your question, no. cthulu2016 Dec 2012 #1
So, you are saying that was fine? They can manhandle her without regard for where they touch? Coyotl Dec 2012 #5
I am not here to teach you to read cthulu2016 Dec 2012 #9
So, do you think sexual battery or "unlawful touching" is NOT assault? Really? Coyotl Dec 2012 #13
Welcome to my ignore list. Brigid Dec 2012 #19
It is an honor to be ignored by cthulu2016 Dec 2012 #34
Do you agree with what happened to that woman? Leave out the sexual assault sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #46
no Duckhunter935 Dec 2012 #2
Why no. You say that is O.K.? Coyotl Dec 2012 #6
Um...no. HappyMe Dec 2012 #3
Why no. You say that is O.K.? Coyotl Dec 2012 #7
No -- but she was "manhandled" elfin Dec 2012 #4
Clearly. nt Comrade_McKenzie Dec 2012 #8
Let's not diminish the meaning of sexual assault nt ecstatic Dec 2012 #10
+1 Maine-ah Dec 2012 #11
So, have you had this experience? Coyotl Dec 2012 #14
yes, I have been sexually assaulted. Maine-ah Dec 2012 #16
Sexual battery or "unlawful touching" is assault, period! Coyotl Dec 2012 #12
Unwanted touching of breasts IS sexual assault obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #23
That behavior was wildly out of line, I most clearly agree with you. Judi Lynn Dec 2012 #15
Doesn't seem like she is interested... Coyote_Tan Dec 2012 #17
So, are you inferring something? Coyotl Dec 2012 #30
It doesn't seem she is interesting in rational conversations? "Rational" like strong-arming someone? Judi Lynn Dec 2012 #36
Not from this video mythology Dec 2012 #18
Since the NRA is basically a bunch of fucking thugs, it would not surprise me if madinmaryland Dec 2012 #20
i do not think so. nt seabeyond Dec 2012 #21
One of the many things I like about you is your cliffordu Dec 2012 #37
thank you. seabeyond Dec 2012 #41
This op is really bad..... Joe the Revelator Dec 2012 #22
That phrase doesn't mean what you think it means. Bucky Dec 2012 #24
No. Dumb accusation that trivializes actual sexual assault. nt Flatulo Dec 2012 #25
Would you prefer it if a choke hold or Taser was used? -..__... Dec 2012 #26
A polite point to the door, then only place hands on both shoulders maybe. Coyotl Dec 2012 #28
Do you realistically belive... -..__... Dec 2012 #29
Yes, a police officer handles it differently. Coyotl Dec 2012 #32
You're right... what was I thinking. -..__... Dec 2012 #43
No, But I Bet You Would. (nt) Paladin Dec 2012 #39
That's harsh, man. -..__... Dec 2012 #44
No. Sexual assault has sexual intent. A guard has the right to physically remove an intruder. nolabear Dec 2012 #27
Too bad she doesn't have shoulders, arms, etc. Coyotl Dec 2012 #31
Medea Benjamin is so tiny anyone, including another woman, could have taken her arm Judi Lynn Dec 2012 #35
Well stated. Thank you. Coyotl Dec 2012 #38
NRA goons on one hand and caveman tactics on the other lunatica Dec 2012 #42
I'm sorry you were assaulted and as I said I support her, but I also know nolabear Dec 2012 #45
No. She was physically removed from the room... TeeYiYi Dec 2012 #33
No. JoeyT Dec 2012 #40
I'd label more as being violated. I think of sexual assault as more involved then this BUT jillan Dec 2012 #47

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
1. In answer to your question, no.
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 02:47 PM
Dec 2012

This sort of rhetorical excess does not win friends or influence people.

It is tiresome.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
5. So, you are saying that was fine? They can manhandle her without regard for where they touch?
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 02:53 PM
Dec 2012

WOW, you have to be kidding!!

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
9. I am not here to teach you to read
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 02:55 PM
Dec 2012

My comment means what it says, not what a deeply dishonest person would like to pretend it said.

The OP is am embarrassment to pretty much everyone in the world.

You should delete it.

Brigid

(17,621 posts)
19. Welcome to my ignore list.
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 10:14 PM
Dec 2012

You have the dubious honor of being only the third person to be placed on it since I've been here on DU. This is not the first time I've seen you express that it seems OK in your eyes to manhandle women In any way some goon deems fit.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
46. Do you agree with what happened to that woman? Leave out the sexual assault
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 09:04 PM
Dec 2012

charges. But the way she was roughed up, do you think this was proper to do to someone protesting peacefully and UNARMED btw?

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
14. So, have you had this experience?
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 04:25 PM
Dec 2012

It will change your mind when some strange man grabs your sexual privates, trust me!!

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
12. Sexual battery or "unlawful touching" is assault, period!
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 03:04 PM
Dec 2012

Let's not diminish the seriousness of this act.

obamanut2012

(26,076 posts)
23. Unwanted touching of breasts IS sexual assault
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 11:43 PM
Dec 2012

In most states, including mine, it includes many things other than rape.

Judi Lynn

(160,542 posts)
15. That behavior was wildly out of line, I most clearly agree with you.
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 09:33 PM
Dec 2012

Absolutely unacceptable.

Total monsters, they're reavealing their deep hatred of ANYONE who challenges their filthy attitudes toward life.

No, people are NOT appropriate grabbing women like that. They are NOT tackling a mad dog killer, like themselves, they are physically assaulting a legally protected dissenter.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
30. So, are you inferring something?
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 01:38 AM
Dec 2012

Just one question: Does she need to be interested in a rational conversation to have the right to keep that goon's hands off her breasts?

Judi Lynn

(160,542 posts)
36. It doesn't seem she is interesting in rational conversations? "Rational" like strong-arming someone?
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 04:02 AM
Dec 2012

Maybe you approach your life that way, but it's not the right way.

That rough behavior merely points out the sad truth there are people who are more or less human sized, and human-looking, more or less, who walk among us who don't respect the human race, and will behave like wild animals when their brutal behavior is condemned. They immediately try to eliminate anyone who disaggrees with them.

They show uso there are monsters in our midsts, unfortunately. Their sympathizers swarm to protect their "rights" to snuff out dissent.

That's much further from "rational conversation" than one wee woman with a sign.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
18. Not from this video
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 10:01 PM
Dec 2012

She was being removed from the room, it's hard to grasp somebody who is fighting to escape your grasp.

I think in order for it to be sexual assault, there has to be intent. As best I can tell, he was just dragging her out of the room. I know when training the martial art I do, often times hands wind up accidentally in otherwise inappropriate locations. But it's certainly not sexual assault.

madinmaryland

(64,933 posts)
20. Since the NRA is basically a bunch of fucking thugs, it would not surprise me if
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 10:41 PM
Dec 2012

something inappropriate occurred.

FUCK THE NRA.

ETA: They are actually a bunch of corporate owned fucking thugs.

cliffordu

(30,994 posts)
37. One of the many things I like about you is your
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 04:14 AM
Dec 2012

devotion, beyond all other allegiances, to the truth.

I mean it. We have disagreed a couple of times in the past, but I have NEVER felt that you put politics above the truth.

And in this instance, I agree with you wholeheartedly.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
28. A polite point to the door, then only place hands on both shoulders maybe.
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 01:20 AM
Dec 2012

If that is even legal. Maybe calling an officer of the law is the correct and lawful action.

Can a bar legally get away with this kind of a bouncer?

 

-..__...

(7,776 posts)
29. Do you realistically belive...
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 01:38 AM
Dec 2012

that a "polite point to the door" would have diffused the situation in a timely a manner (if at all), or that a police officer would have handled it any differently?

The disputer was peaceably removed without harm, injury or mental anguish... save for those whom look for evidence of sexual assault where there is none.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
32. Yes, a police officer handles it differently.
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 01:54 AM
Dec 2012

But, I don't want to argue about you view of "peaceful removal" at this hour.

nolabear

(41,963 posts)
27. No. Sexual assault has sexual intent. A guard has the right to physically remove an intruder.
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 01:19 AM
Dec 2012

Mind you, I'm totally on her side. But he was wrapping his arms around her chest to muscle her out and those breasts are in the line of fire, so to speak. If she had kicked him in the balls that wouldn't have been sexual assault either.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
31. Too bad she doesn't have shoulders, arms, etc.
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 01:41 AM
Dec 2012

What with three big goons there, You'd think there would be a way to politely escort her out by the upper arms perhaps. This was a rush job with no consideration for her rights. It was all about how swiftly she could be removed out of sight and earshot.

Judi Lynn

(160,542 posts)
35. Medea Benjamin is so tiny anyone, including another woman, could have taken her arm
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 03:49 AM
Dec 2012

and led her out.

Much more is required of people as members of society than reverting to primitive, violent levels with someone who is protesting violence against human beings.

I fail to grasp why some of those who tried to attack this thread's point don't seem to recognize there is NO PLACE for cave-man tactics in this situation. There is NO justification.

I have to wonder what kind of people raised them, by god.

People who believe you actually have the right to rush up and grab anyone, and wrap big meaty paws around women are people I would never want to know. They represent the lower end of human developement which also seems oblivious to our moral command to treat others with respect, as in the golden rule.

Burbling "b-b-but she was yelling and causing a commotion" is so insufficient from adults.

It makes you wish their parents had actually taken the time to conscientiously live the way they want their children, not wild animals, to behave when they grow old enough to communicate and associate with others. If they don't we really don't have a society, do we? It's something much lower.

I have been assaulted myself, and I most deeply despised the way they grabbed Medea. I absolutely abhor it, and everyone knws that behavior from NRA storm troopers has NO place in the world.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
42. NRA goons on one hand and caveman tactics on the other
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 11:40 AM
Dec 2012

Hmmmm.... It doesn't seem such a far gone way of acting to me. Not for them. And their parents were probably just like them.

They were probably wishing they could take out their guns and shoot her in the head to shut her up. Then they could just get their underlings to carry her out and dump her somewhere.

I'm sure that's their vision of what Utopia would be.



nolabear

(41,963 posts)
45. I'm sorry you were assaulted and as I said I support her, but I also know
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 09:01 PM
Dec 2012

that you are assuming her experience from a very small bit of information and reacting to that. Arms dislocate, bones break. I hate that she was in the situation but her job was to loudly protest for as long as she could disrupt and theirs was to stop her without injuring her. I respect Code Pink and I respect her. Nowhere have I heard her claim sexual assault by these men.

And before you go off on me for "attacking" this thread I am trying to discuss the matter and simply disagree with you. How DARE you question how I was raised or what you assume I approve of. You are putting words in my mouth and then demeaning them and I will not stand for it. That is, itself, an assault, on my character, and I resent it.

TeeYiYi

(8,028 posts)
33. No. She was physically removed from the room...
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 02:05 AM
Dec 2012

... in the same way that any protester would have been removed, regardless of gender. The guy locked his arms around her chest beneath her underarms and pulled her from the room. His hands were clasped onto his own arms to secure his hold on her.

TYY

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
40. No.
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 10:46 AM
Dec 2012

Not sexual assault, just plain assault. (or battery, depends on where they were)

But no, she doesn't have freedom of speech there either. No more than Wayne would have free speech here. What they should've done was ask her to leave and if she refuses call the cops and have the cops remove her.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
47. I'd label more as being violated. I think of sexual assault as more involved then this BUT
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 09:14 PM
Dec 2012

he definitely was grabbing her breasts - and that is NOT okay.

He definitely crossed the line.

just my 2 cents.

One thing for certain is that Medea will speak out about it if she felt violated.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did the NRA goons sexuall...