Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 03:07 PM Dec 2012

Obama chooses Kerry for Secretary of State (updated)

Last edited Fri Dec 21, 2012, 05:19 PM - Edit history (1)

Obama chooses Kerry for Secretary of State

By Steve Benen

It took a little longer than expected, but President Obama today introduced Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) as his nominee for Secretary of State in his second term.

To call Kerry well qualified for the post is a dramatic understatement, given the senator's lengthy career in international affairs, including having served as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Indeed, Kerry quietly sought this position four years ago, and has almost been a Secretary of State in-waiting ever since -- he has in recent years "shepherded the passage of a critical arms-control treaty and conducted a series of quiet missions on behalf of the president, notably at moments of crisis with Afghanistan and Pakistan."

- more -

http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2012/12/21/16070996-obama-chooses-kerry-for-secretary-of-state


Obama: Kerry Won’t Need A Lot Of ‘On The Job Training’ As Secretary Of State

Announcing Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) as his nominee for Secretary of State, President Obama on Friday hailed Kerry's foreign policy bonafides.

"John has earned the respect and confidence of leaders around the world. He is not going to need a lot of on the job training," Obama said at the White House.

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/obama-kerry-wont-need-lot-of-on-job

Congratulations, Senator Kerry.

Updated to add:



h/t DUer Cha



34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama chooses Kerry for Secretary of State (updated) (Original Post) ProSense Dec 2012 OP
Yippee! This will make the Senate more bi-partisan leftstreet Dec 2012 #1
You're upset? ProSense Dec 2012 #2
No. Brown's probably more liberal than most DLCers n/t leftstreet Dec 2012 #14
So you want the ProSense Dec 2012 #23
K&R closeupready Dec 2012 #3
Another boso tama Dec 2012 #4
He's the most pro-active environmentalist the State Dept's ever had. You proved you haven't a clue blm Dec 2012 #6
My source is DU tama Dec 2012 #16
More proof you don't know anything - Kerry voted against Keystone. He's been against it blm Dec 2012 #25
If I don't anything tama Dec 2012 #29
You posted like you cared about an issue then proved you're unfamiliar with the significant details. blm Dec 2012 #30
Yep tama Dec 2012 #31
If you actually cared, you'd know Kerry's been against Keystone. blm Dec 2012 #33
Hey, stop kicking when I'm lying down! tama Dec 2012 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author politicasista Dec 2012 #5
you are SO full of............. 'concern' yet again. You're never 'concerned' about any other blm Dec 2012 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author politicasista Dec 2012 #8
I doubt it's important to you in any way - you use anything to take shots at Kerry the last 7 years. blm Dec 2012 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author politicasista Dec 2012 #13
You worded it to sound like Kerry should b blamed for abandoning the issue. You don't fool me, never blm Dec 2012 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author politicasista Dec 2012 #17
'all of a sudden'....try 7 years of you taking shots at Kerry while pretending to be 'concerned' blm Dec 2012 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author politicasista Dec 2012 #27
Once again Obama does what the cons tell him to do...... bowens43 Dec 2012 #9
It appears that you, not the President, is the one afraid of Republicans. n/t ProSense Dec 2012 #10
Obama wanted Kerry in 2008. The real cons don't want Kerry - they wanted another neocon Dem. blm Dec 2012 #11
Your post shows you don't have a clue. Cha Dec 2012 #18
Congratulations Senator Kerry and President Obama Cha Dec 2012 #19
Thanks for the link, added to OP. n/t ProSense Dec 2012 #20
You're Welcome~ Cha Dec 2012 #21
There is no one who could do a better job for the peace loving people amongst us madokie Dec 2012 #22
It's a happy day. ginnyinWI Dec 2012 #28
Sorry for ruining the thread politicasista Dec 2012 #24
Kerry is owed this...and it will be interesting to see how it plays out. n/t KoKo Dec 2012 #32

leftstreet

(36,108 posts)
1. Yippee! This will make the Senate more bi-partisan
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 03:10 PM
Dec 2012

When that nekkid GOP dude gets in

We need to work together with the Republicans!

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
23. So you want the
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 05:36 PM
Dec 2012

Blunt Amendment supporting "nekkid GOP dude" to win over a MA Democrat who might not be as progressive as you (I assume you're a progressive)?



 

tama

(9,137 posts)
4. Another boso
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 03:19 PM
Dec 2012

who has more money than he can ever spent but yet wants more and invests millions in Tar Sands and horrible destruction of environment and our lives. Skulls and Bones, truly.

blm

(113,063 posts)
6. He's the most pro-active environmentalist the State Dept's ever had. You proved you haven't a clue
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 03:59 PM
Dec 2012

about environmental causes and who pro-active environmentalists actually trust on the issues. If you did you wouldn't make such absurd statements.

blm

(113,063 posts)
25. More proof you don't know anything - Kerry voted against Keystone. He's been against it
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 06:25 PM
Dec 2012

publicly for some time now. His stock is also in a blind trust and has been for over a decade. That poster did not give the reader the full story, perhaps unintentionally, perhaps not. Probably just dug in protecting Rice from the McCain dog and pony show.

REAL environmentalists and not those who play one on the internet are thrilled to have the senate's leading environmentalist as Secretary of State.

>>>
Kerry is among the most fierce advocates for climate action in the Senate. Here he is in a floor speech from August talking about why climate change is "as significant a level of importance" as Syria and Iran:

Well, this issue actually is of as significant a level of importance, because it affects life itself on the planet. Because it affects ecosystems on which the oceans and the land depend for the relationship of the warmth of our earth and the amount of moisture that there is and all of the interactions that occur as a consequence of our climate.
>
That's not to say that Clinton hasn't also expressed interest in climate change; she has. But it seems that it would be far higher up the priorities list for Kerry.


http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2012/12/john-kerry-would-be-climate-hawk-state

blm

(113,063 posts)
30. You posted like you cared about an issue then proved you're unfamiliar with the significant details.
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 08:57 PM
Dec 2012

.

 

tama

(9,137 posts)
31. Yep
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 09:10 PM
Dec 2012

Stopping Keystone seems pretty important.

Thanks for informing. Here's to Kerry and rest of the admin doing what activists demand and what is right: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1252&pid=4668

blm

(113,063 posts)
33. If you actually cared, you'd know Kerry's been against Keystone.
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 03:33 PM
Dec 2012

But, apparently you missed that bit of key info in your eagerness to push your preferred narrative.

 

tama

(9,137 posts)
34. Hey, stop kicking when I'm lying down!
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 08:08 PM
Dec 2012

I'm not terribly interested in representative and partisan politics - and not even American. Happy holidays!

Response to ProSense (Original post)

blm

(113,063 posts)
7. you are SO full of............. 'concern' yet again. You're never 'concerned' about any other
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 04:01 PM
Dec 2012

person in DC, but, always full of 'concern' about Kerry. My, my, sooooo concerned.

Response to blm (Reply #7)

blm

(113,063 posts)
12. I doubt it's important to you in any way - you use anything to take shots at Kerry the last 7 years.
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 04:27 PM
Dec 2012

You're even willing to refer to the disabilities treaty in an effort to take yet another shot at him out of .........concern.

Response to blm (Reply #12)

blm

(113,063 posts)
15. You worded it to sound like Kerry should b blamed for abandoning the issue. You don't fool me, never
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 04:38 PM
Dec 2012

.

Response to blm (Reply #15)

blm

(113,063 posts)
26. 'all of a sudden'....try 7 years of you taking shots at Kerry while pretending to be 'concerned'
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 06:27 PM
Dec 2012

Funny how you never seem so 'concerned' about any other person in the Dem party, but, Kerry.

Response to blm (Reply #26)

blm

(113,063 posts)
11. Obama wanted Kerry in 2008. The real cons don't want Kerry - they wanted another neocon Dem.
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 04:24 PM
Dec 2012

Last edited Fri Dec 21, 2012, 06:28 PM - Edit history (1)

Kristol argued against Kerry, telling his friends at FOX that Rice was the better fit for interventionist goals.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
22. There is no one who could do a better job for the peace loving people amongst us
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 05:30 PM
Dec 2012

JK will make a great SoS

ginnyinWI

(17,276 posts)
28. It's a happy day.
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 06:50 PM
Dec 2012

Kerry will be a wonderful Secretary of State. He's been preparing for this, well, since he was a kid, watching his diplomat father. His whole life will inform this work.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama chooses Kerry for S...