General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAdam Lanza was wearing a bulletproof vest. How could armed teachers have stopped him?
Or rather, for that matter, armed security guards or even a single police officer?
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/12/20/the-other-loophole-bulletproof-armor-newtown-guns
"Adam Lanza wore a bulletproof vest as he opened fire at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., last Friday, killing 26 people20 of them children under the age of 10. James Holmes, the alleged perpetrator of the Aurora, Col., theater massacre in July, wore an armor vest and a ballistic helmet."
Ordinary citizens with concealed guns are no match for a gunman with a bulletproof vest, and even armed security guards and a single police officer are no match for a gunman with bulletproof vests and military grade machine guns, and imagine if gunmen load their guns with armor piercing bullets (as in the case of the bank robbers in the 1998 North Hollywood Shootout.)
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,627 posts)I think you'd need to be an awful good shot to do it, though.
And the chaotic conditions would make it difficult.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)Shooting him in the face is how. You could go for the femoral artery too I guess. Headshot seems more efficient.
Since the whole thing is hypothetical, the armed guard in my scenerio is well trained and competent. He/she can make the shot against an amateur like this Lanza jerkoff.
Besides, he was a complete coward, the second authorities started to arrive he opted out. If there was a guard there or someone to confront him he probably wouldn't have done it at all or shot himself much sooner.
But that's all speculation, it could have gone another way entirely.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)yeah, I want a million Zimmy's all over the country playing Paul Blart Mall Cop excpet that Paul Blart didn't have a gun and commonly forgotten was he was an inept asshole too
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)How do we get from well trained security to a fucking cowardly asshole like Zimmerman or a buffoon movie character being the defense?
We're no longer talking about the same thing.
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)By doing so, you're going to wind up with a bunch of Zimmermans at schools all over the country.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)The hypothetical was brought up by the OP, I just went with it.
And one would hope that wanna be tough guys like Zimmerman would be shunted off in the interview process. Only real pros should be considered for such positions.
None of this is going to happen anyway.
yardwork
(61,630 posts)The poster is correct. If the NRA's stupid idea were put into play we would have hundreds of thousands of George Zimmermans standing around lunch rooms holding enormous guns. This would cost millions of dollars. And it's very unlikely they would prevent many massacres.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)We shouldn't do anything those idiots suggest.
jmowreader
(50,559 posts)Paul Blart Mall Cop was supposed to be a comedy, and competent law enforcers aren't funny. Incompetent ones are a comedy staple; think Police Squad, Police Academy and South Park's Officer Barbrady.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)jmowreader
(50,559 posts)Zimmerman isn't a cop, he wasn't trying to be funny and I didn't mention him.
exboyfil
(17,863 posts)rampage. Maybe he accomplished what he wanted. Maybe he saw the corpses and felt guilt.
Armed Security at every school
How effective was Neil Gardner (armed security) at Columbine? Why didnt he run into Columbine and take down the shooters? One of a two of first responders to the Sikh Temple shooting was shot even though he was forewarned and working with his partner. The same for the Ft. Hood shooting with one wounded as a team of two first responders encounter the shooter outside the building.
Four cops were killed in a local coffee shop in Washington.
Four cops killed including two SWAT by Mixon in Oakland.
Most recently two cops killed outside a grocery store in Kansas.
The Newhall shooting is instructive as to what happens when you are outgunned (so unless the security is carrying a long rifle with a 30 round magazine he would have been outgunned).
Remember based on statistics and the population of the U.S. you can go 80,000 years without encountering a mass shooting event. Guards have marvelous training but, unless you are in an active combat zone, it is difficult to keep your guard up.
Not to say that you could have some deterence value to an armed uniformed officer at the only entrance to a school. That is usually the first target.
Video of police station shooting. What would have happened with a single armed officer at the entrance of a school? In this case that was the first one to go down. Lamar Moore was using a 20 gauge pump action shotgun (Moosberg Model 500 which carries from 5 to 8 rounds). I dont know what load or which version he was using. Consider how long it takes to reload a shotgun compared to a magazine fed weapon, how many rounds can be fired before reload (max 8 vs. 30), and how fast a semiautomatic fires in comparison to a pump action shotgun.
http://www.freep.com/article/20110128/NEWS01/110128009/Watch-video-released-by-Detroit-police-showing-police-station-gun-battle
Of course a couple of husky 12 year olds should have been able to take Lanza down.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)All I did was mention how to kill a guy wearing a vest and it turned into a big brewhaha.
I don't want guns in schools, I don't want armed guards in schools. But if we did have them I laid out how I thought it should happen.
I'm in favor of universal health care that includes mental health and tighter gun laws.
I'm with you.
thucythucy
(8,067 posts)all these well trained armed school guards?
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)Which is probably the main reason it won't happen. All that baggers are for this nuttery but not a one would pay for it. Socialism you know.
MANative
(4,112 posts)a SharpShooter marksman in the Army for 27 years. They both say they were always trained to shoot for body mass. Head shots are ridiculously difficult, even for trained snipers.
randome
(34,845 posts)Because no police officer ever misses what he shoots at.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)not to be callous but a few kids killed is better than the alternative
peacebird
(14,195 posts)dlwickham
(3,316 posts)a teacher should never be put in that position
rustydog
(9,186 posts)If it is yours, your sibling,your parent, is that OK with you because you've decided that is a price we are going to have to pay and accept?
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,627 posts)MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)And yes, you are trained to shoot the body. But that does not mean that it has no effect when you hit a guy wearing a vest. Getting shot with a vest on still hurts like getting kicked by a donkey. It would put a skinny punk like this Lanza character on his ass. And remember, he killed himself at the first sign of authority coming. He had no stomach for a fight.
And accuracy is not impossible for a well trained pro. My dad can still spell your name on a paper target at the age of 70.
Acting as if there was no chance to stop this dude because he was wearing a vest is ludicrous.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Look back at the article in the OP.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)That isn't the question that was asked. It was about the latest asshole.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Comeon, be realistic.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)That is realistic. A well trained shooter can hit the mark like he/she is pointing their finger. And not everyone panics and freaks out in stress situations, particularly people trained for such situations.
If you're talking about putting a gun in the hand of an untrained teacher or whatever, I'll agree. But a trained pro can make the shot fairly easily.
frylock
(34,825 posts)MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)It's impossible to ever hit what you're shooting at.
I'm failing to see how what I'm saying is stupid or out of line.
frylock
(34,825 posts)have you ever fired a gun under duress?
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)My dad was an army sharpshooter and a police officer for thirty years so, yes, I know how to shoot. I'm pretty good at it, not as good as he but good enough to hit what I'm aiming at.
Now, to answer your second question, no. I've never been in a shoot out with anyone but I have been in plenty of street fights and dangerous situations and I'm not a panicky guy. It's not bragging or internet tough guying or anything but I'm just able to maintain my cool in hairy situations. That doesn't mean I'd be able to dead eye people like Wild Bill Hickok but I don't think I'd just loose my head and shoot at random if something did happen. If I'm alone, the first thing I'm looking to do is escape. That is always the best option.
It's all hypothetical anyway. It's not like I walk around carrying a gun. I don't even have one in my house. When I had kids I gave my gun to my dad to hold and he still has it. I only use it when we target practice, maybe twice a year.
I have a dog for home protection. She's a big sissy though so its not much protection but at least she'll bark.
exboyfil
(17,863 posts)shot up by someone with a 20 gauge pump action. He is wearing no body armor and using a weapon not in the class of a 30 round magazine semiautomatic carbine. They take him down after he shoots four officers (all survived but one definitely because of her vest). They are using the desks and other furniture for cover. An armed guard/LEO stationed at the front door could be the first one shot in the school just like in this scenario.
http://www.freep.com/article/20110128/NEWS01/110128009/Watch-video-released-by-Detroit-police-showing-police-station-gun-battle
JHB
(37,160 posts)The nearest I've come to shooting under duress was with air-powered pistols in paintball games (also long out of practice). Not a strictly even comparison since the air guns had less mass and lighter kick, but it was amazing at what range you could miss thanks to a little jerking of the trigger pulling it to the right.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Yet, they miss way more often that they hit their targets. There's no guarantee that school security people will be better trained than cops. In fact, it's highly unlikely.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)You are correct. In my hypothetical the guards are well trained, well paid ex-military types that don't need to work for Blackwater or whomever.
None of this is ever going to happen in reality. Hiring these guys would be government spending which we all know is "socialism". The people screaming most loudly for this are the people least likely to want to fund it.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)not hired professionals. He proposes that the NRA train them, and that they volunteer. Who do you suppose will be eligible for this? I'm betting only NRA members.
Google School Shield. The NRA has already launched a website. No content yet, but it's coming.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)As someone mentioned above, the volunteers would most likely be a bunch of Zimmerman or Minuteman types just itching to shoot someone.
It has to be real pros or nothing.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Expect them to flesh out their website soon, and then watch the teabaggers sign up so they can carry their guns around our schools.
MichaelHarris
(10,017 posts)they didn't hit dick
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,330 posts)There are DOZENS if not hundreds of videos like that - cops ducking and panic firing.
And this one is an example of the cops being a little more in control - about as good as it gets.
MichaelHarris
(10,017 posts)Last edited Fri Dec 21, 2012, 09:19 PM - Edit history (1)
we want all that in our schools, the ducking, the firing, bullets flying!! My nips are hard at the thought of it!
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)They're proposing a very expensive solution to the problem, when you have a GOP controlled House that is so intent on protecting millionaires that they won't raise taxes even a penny on the richest Americans.
randome
(34,845 posts)The guard stands ready with his weapon drawn and an itchy trigger finger ready to fire at the first sign of trouble?
That's not a viable scenario.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)I'm starting to wonder why I bothered answering. Obviously the answer everyone is looking for is that there was nothing that could be done simply because he was wearing a vest.
Why is it impossible for security to react to a situation without him/her being a hyper-paranoid, finger on the trigger at all times superhero/psycho? And why is it impossible that anyone can hit what they shoot at?
1-Old-Man
(2,667 posts)AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Puhleeze, be reasonable. Even police get panic. Think about all the situations where police accidentally kill someone because they couldn't make a reasonable judgement at the heat of the moment. It would be hard to make a reasonable judgement in such a quick time.
frylock
(34,825 posts)right, sport?
rustydog
(9,186 posts)are you like the gamers who brag about sniper shots at 1000 yards? Real life to someone who is trained and practices regularly still produces shots that missed. what would occur to the teacher who "qualifies to carry but has nefer been shot at? The armedcivilian passing by and hearing the shots...odds are they will be severely wounded or shot dead and the shootr will be killing more people.
One school deputy at columbine shot at least 4 rounds at one of the shooters from 60 yards and missed. The shooter entered the school and the carnage continued...
Assuming that others being armed guarantees the bad guy will lose is a horrible premise, but that is what the NRA and most2nd amendment hardliners cling to, a false premise.
1-Old-Man
(2,667 posts)And the comment, for those who are just to fucking dense to see it, was metaphorical - meaning of course that there places where a bullet might strike a person that would not be covered by a vest. If you're to fucking stupid to realize that you've got no business posting replies.
But as to your first comment - I served three tours of duty in Viet Nam, on the ground, as a grunt. I not only have been in shooting situations I have been on both the delivering and receiving end of a gun, with a Bronze Star with V-device as well as the Purple Heart. I know what a real assault weapon is and can do, I am more than familiar with what a .223 can do.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)By the time that happens cop or teacher is dead.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)Was this dude Rambo? Robocop? Taking two in the chest even with a vest still hurts. Still stops you or slows you down. I'll bet anything this guy still missed more than he hit with his shots. It's not like this Lanza was a fucking Seal or something, he was just a skinny little punk point blanking kids. At the first sign of authority coming he killed himself.
You're giving him too much credit.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)He was suicidal.
Also Mr. Lanza actually suffered from a rare syndrome where he did not feel physical pain.
Serious, I was trained to drop and not move if I got shot when wearing level III-A armor...I also took care of a few cops who were, who were so jacked up on Adrenalin, they didn't want to have nothing to do with us EMS types until they saw the holes.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)We just have to wait for the guy to kill himself?
I don't doubt the validity of anything you're saying here but getting blasted in the chest with a vest on is still going to knock you down and getting hit in the head is still going to kill you even if you can't feel it.
I don't like the way people are making this little putz into an invincible killing machine. He was not and it was not impossible to stop him.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)A bullet, even a .45 ACP, no, not really. Another rifle will defeat the III-A by the way.
It, quite honestly, will stop folks who are not intent on killing themselves by cop.
Nah, what we need to do is stop these hunters before they show up at a school, church, shopping mall, place of work, and other public places. If you have to engage an active shooter, you are already behind the eight ball.
This is where all kinds of things the NRA wants is not a solution, it's just adding gas to an active fire.
Yes, a trained shooter might take the very difficult head shot, and even succeed, but we should make it plain, it's unacceptable to get to that point.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)This is the wrong conversation. Prevention should absolutely be the focus.
But the question was asked, so I answered. I'm not in favor of any guns in schools or anywhere in public really.
SQUEE
(1,315 posts)And we assumed when they started to raise hell in the cantonment areas and kassernes, as well as the Pershing II sights prior to a push through the Fulda, they would have body armour and "sphera" helmets, it was decided best action was start at groin and allow the muzzle to rise. Idea was to score a femoral hit before reaching COM.
spanone
(135,843 posts)dlwickham
(3,316 posts)or the leg or any other part of the body not covered by the vest
Rex
(65,616 posts)so how much money will it cost to train teachers to hit a small moving target like the face? Your answer it sounds easy, which no doubt you intended but did not derail the overall point - which it seems everyone else got but you.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)That no one could have done anything? I disagree.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)That's a kilojoule or so of kinetic energy, spread out across your rib cage. You will definitely drop what you are holding and be stunned. There's a high probability you will lose consciousness (it was a punch to the chest that knocked out Tyson, remember).
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)The bullets simply bounced from them.
Go to 2:32 in this video:
frylock
(34,825 posts)NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Several solid body shots with 12 ga slugs would knock him down, or buckshot rounds to the head or face would probably distract him.
Alternatively, buckshot to the legs could easily throw him off and damage to either femoral artery would kill him in a matter of minutes.
Handguns, on the other hand, would require more precise aim and would have both a greater danger of harming others and of missing altogether or just pissing him off more.
Not advocating for any of this, but if you're going to ask a technical question you need to be prepared for answers.
.......
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Yep, you really feel safe knowing that you could be in the crossfire of a shootout between a gunman and an armed security guard. So that is better than responsible gun control?
Still, an ordinary citizen would not be able to carry a shotgun around, lol.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)...that you then turn into "Your [sic] asking police and security....".
Look, I'm not asking squat from anyone.
Just answering your question, not recommending anything from anyone about any shotguns or guards and shit.
Rex
(65,616 posts)We've had cops in schools now for 30 years. Your point is a very valid one, just some in here are going to snark at you for pointing out the obvious stupidity of the NRA talking points from today.
Just ignore the snark.
Toronto
(183 posts)are A) secondary schools and B) there as much to control violence in the schools, as to keep out gang bangers...
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Pathetic.
Somebody asked a question, I answered, advocating nothing.
budkin
(6,703 posts)MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)No one can hit anything they shoot at regardless of training, everyone panics like a child when shit goes bad and a vest makes you invincible.
It's amazing.
MindPilot
(12,693 posts)then used some martial arts moves to subdue the shooter while catching the gun as it falls. It's really easy to do; I see it on teevee all the time!
Shouldn't be necessary, but
Just as a aside, no shooter would make it past the nuns who taught in my school. Sister Anna John would have taken him down with a ballistic eraser strike, and then neutralized him with a yardstick.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)like that Texas congressman who claimed ping pong was deadlier than guns. I've even heard that Russian special forces are switching to ping pong paddles & balls as their standard issue weapon.
Bucky
(54,016 posts)That's when a trained cop, theater usher, deacon, line chef, or school guidance counselor can spring into action and take out the bad guys with a flying scissor kick.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Along with ancient Korean war machines.
Bucky
(54,016 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)If it was good enough for Monty Python....
Arming the teachers and commit them to a fire fight in a school full of children with walls that will not stop bullets. What a great idea. why not just let them call in an air-strike. The military could let loose with a Hell fire Missile and no more Adam Lanza. want-a-bees.
Teachers jobs are already long. How much mandatory training will they need to hunt down and kill an intruder. why no just turn the U.S. Army into school teachers?
randome
(34,845 posts)It's so easy.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)zero tolerance
no guns in streets
they couldn't clean it up themselves, now it's too late
no more
and the public won't stop this time. Social media has outgunned the NRA
napoleon_in_rags
(3,991 posts)AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Yep, they would be able to draw it as fast as the rifleman
obamanut2012
(26,080 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)behind bullet proof glass that they can run to and shoot the killer through a little square?
No??.... won't work????
obamanut2012
(26,080 posts)napoleon_in_rags
(3,991 posts)I'm just pointing out a fact. The only safe way to defend against kevlar armored shooters is for people to walk around with rifles, concealed carry doesn't matter.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)and were not able to stop a majority of the killings.
Additionally, while some RW publications have decried the fact that there were no men at Sandy Hook to overpower the shooter, when the killers entered the library at Columbine, it was full of high school students, male and female, some of whom were jocks
Yet, they somehow didnt want to charge two armed psychopaths
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Police waited until they had sufficient force to confront the shooters. They secured the perimeter until SWAT arrived
Now, the tactics have changed. "Active shooter protocol" is the new training regime. Confront the shooter as soon as possible with as much force as can be mustered quickly.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)then, those police called for backup, the two killers then went into the library while the police waited for SWAT. The library was where over 20 were either killed or wounded.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)That wasn't a dig at the officers on scene, btw- those were the tactics at the time.
Logical
(22,457 posts)the cops to enter the building sooner. It annoys me to read it.
It seems like the police do not want to risk anything even though they know people are dying.
exboyfil
(17,863 posts)One cop of a two man team was put down even after being forewarned and prepared. A single guard at the door is going to be the first casualty (like in the Detroit Police Station shooting). Now you want two guards? $20B/yr.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)We should also issue them armor piercing rounds and small ordnance such as hand grenades.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)So much for the idea that armed guards or police officers would be the solution:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/21/columbine-armed-guards_n_2347096.html
"In 1999, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold killed 15 people and wounded 23 more at Columbine High School. The destruction occurred despite the fact that there was an armed security officer at the school and another one nearby -- exactly what LaPierre argued on Friday was the answer to stopping "a bad guy with a gun."
Deputy Neil Gardner was a 15-year veteran of the Jefferson County, Colo., Sheriffs Office assigned as the uniformed officer at Columbine. According to an account compiled by the police department, Gardner fired on Harris but was unsuccessful in stopping him:
Gardner, seeing Harris working with his gun, leaned over the top of the car and fired four shots. He was 60 yards from the gunman. Harris spun hard to the right and Gardner momentarily thought he had hit him. Seconds later, Harris began shooting again at the deputy.
After the exchange of gunfire, Harris ran back into the building. Gardner was able to get on the police radio and called for assistance from other Sheriffs units. "Shots in the building. I need someone in the south lot with me."
The second officer was Deputy Paul Smoker, a motorcycle patrolman who was near the school writing a speeding ticket. When he heard a dispatch of a woman injured at the high school, he responded. He, too, fired at Harris but didn't stop him."
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)I once shot at a target that was 100 yards out with a handgun from a bench. The bullet hit the ground before it reached the target. I can't imagine that 60 yards would be easy by any stretch.
onenote
(42,714 posts)How do you guarantee that a guard get close enough, or in proper position to take out the shooter, particularly when the guard presumably will not want to hit any bystanders or other innocents, while the shooter not only will be firing back at the guard but won't give a damn whther he hits anyone else.
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)I get what you are saying completely. I'm not saying that we should have guards at all. I was just commenting on the difficulties that even a police trained individual would have had in that situation. I feel the officer had acted quite appropriately, the situation was stacked against him to begin with.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)would accidentally hit one of the kids or teachers instead.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)that's what the vest protects. So, odds are the armed teacher would shoot once, and then get shot.
Iggy
(1,418 posts)with head or leg extenders..
SHOOT the perp in one or both knees.. that will end the battle. Mr. Lanza looks like he weighed maybe 120 pounds. even with a vest, a shot to the chest with a large caliber pistol is going to knock him on his ass... slow him down.
That said, I am not in favor of arming teachers or principals. I am not an NRA member, but Mr. LaPierre does have a point: we spend Billions on foreign aid to arsehole nations like Pakistan.. and the deadbeats in congress just spent $2 Trillion on two wars of choice. the notion "we can't afford" to post one or two armed cops in every school and "we can't afford" state of the art security systems in our schools is total, weak bullcrap.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Shooting the gunman in the knees won't stop a determined shooter from shooting back, maybe disabling him from walking.
Iggy
(1,418 posts)you do realize, right, that if I shoot you in the knee with a .38 or .45, you're going to be in immense pain? how are you going to aim your gun straight when you're writhing in pain?? and probably in shock from the injury????
are we dealing with Robocop here?
how convenient you ignore my main point: that a perp wearing a Kevlar vest is NOT invulnerable. the notion a vest makes you some sort of unstoppable superman is a total joke.
WhoIsNumberNone
(7,875 posts)Give the teachers depleted uranium ammunition. Maybe some mustard gas. And put landmines in the hallways. That'll keep the nutjobs away...
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)Glassunion
(10,201 posts)I've been stabbed and that shit hurts. When at work, if we are having someone arrested that day, I have a vest on. Are vests now bad and only the tools of criminals and madmen?
WhoIsNumberNone
(7,875 posts)I have no problem with anyone who has a security/law enforcement type job having a vest. But much like assault rifles and cop-killer bullets, what does your average civilian really need one for?
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)What if I'm walking home in a hoodie, with some Skittles and an Iced Tea?
WhoIsNumberNone
(7,875 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)WhoIsNumberNone
(7,875 posts)Glassunion
(10,201 posts)Hoodie - just about every day in the colder months.
Vest - only when I have to accompany security (I'm not in security)
WhoIsNumberNone
(7,875 posts)it's a reasonable precaution.
What your previous post seems to be implying is that if only Trayvon Martin had been wearing a vest when he went out to buy Skittles, he could have survived Zimmerman's attack. So do you think it's reasonable to wear body armor to the convenience store?
And to clarify- I did mean a vest.
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)A vest hurts no one. If someone wishes to wear one for whatever reason what is the problem? What does the vest do or have the potential to do to others around the person wearing it?
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)I could, and probably still can, make a good shot at a head-sized target in a classroom sized space, if I have the time to aim properly. Generally, that time isn't available. That's why trained cops are taught to shoot at the center of mass. Most of them could hit a head if they had time, like they do at the range. There is no time, though, when some guy is firing off rounds from a semi-auto rifle or pistol. Taking time to aim properly at a smaller target gets you shot.
So, armed teachers? I don't think so. If they aimed for center of mass, they might actually hit their target sometimes. If they're shooting, say a 9mm pistol, the shooter will simply aim at the teacher and fire a few rounds. That's it.
This entire exercise is foolish. The answer is not in arming teachers, who don't want to be armed in the first place. They want to teach. The answer lies elsewhere, and not on the schoolgrounds.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)This last press conference should be evidence to that
TheManInTheMac
(985 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)wickerwoman
(5,662 posts)Why oh why can we not recommend posts?
rustydog
(9,186 posts)Everyone on the Right and the NRA knows for certain it is a GIVEN that the flag-waving, gun-totin HERO will be the winner by default. more guns means the shooter will lose, duh!
If that fails, then the good-guy should be able to pull off a "head shot" no problem negating the kevlar.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)fit up his ass...and that some clever Security Guard might have just had the training or the skill, or god rest him, provided the first fatality OUTSIDE so the Principal was not the first person to be aware. Or, maybe he'd have had time to press his 911 button and do some talking. That is what they are trained to do. At least she'd have had immediate backup...if not prevention.
Geez, guess we all just better throw up our hands and let 'em come at us.
The defenses get stupider every day.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Many of these shooters were gifted children or known to be intelligent. You think they would be stupid to not take potential armed security into consideration?
Ok, lets say that one school has armed security. They will pick another target. Will everywhere have to have armed security?
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)What we do know, is that he knew no one in the school was armed.
And not every "target" has a classroom of little ones. That we also know.
Pretend like the classrooms are airplanes and the pilots and attendants are teachers. We figured out a way to keep them safe without burdening them with guns and we all got used to it.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)When somebody is shot with a bullet proof vest, they still feel pain, sometimes get broken ribs etc.
When people get shot, even with bulletproof vest, they do feel the pain, and it affect them.
By your same logic, should cops not be issued guns because some criminals have bulletproof vest?
former-republican
(2,163 posts)onenote
(42,714 posts)Also, despite reports describing the Aurora shooter as wearing body armor, the reality apparently is that he was wearing a tactical vest that provides easy access to multiple magazines of ammunition, but is not body armor or made out of any bulletproof material (its made out of nylon). The vest worn by the Aurora shooter was manufactured by a company known as TacticalGear and probably retailed for $100 or less. A true bullet proof vest or body armor will cost upwards of $400 or $500. Here is a link to a description of the type of vest that the aurora shooter apparently was wearing. Nowhere does it give any suggestion that it provides protection from bullets. http://tacticalgear.com/blackhawk-urban-assault-vest
I say this not as support for the idea of arming teachers or even placing armed guards in schools. That's a bad idea, not because the shooter may be wearing bullet proof clothing, but because a teacher or guard, no matter how well trained, will always be at a disadvantage when confronting a homicidal maniac. The teacher or guard will always be a bit slower on trigger because the teacher or guard will always be concerned about hitting an innocent person or bystander -- will always have to wait for a "clean" shot. On the other hand, the homicidal maniac will be firing back at the guard/teacher indiscriminately -- the shooter doesn't care whether or not innocents are hit -- indeed, there are no "innocents" -- just targets and potential targets.
As far as the suggestion that an armed teacher or guard can take out a shooter with a bullet proof vest by shooting them in the head or leg -- I suspect that these people have an inflated sense of the marksmanship of the average trained gun user. Consider that this is likely to be a panicked situation and the homicidal shooter may not be standing still presenting a clean target and will likely be firing in the direction of the guard/teacher, the idea that the guard/teacher can "pick their spot" simply is going to be unrealistic many if not most of the time.
SQUEE
(1,315 posts)Equip them with 5.7, in its proper and original configuration.
former-republican
(2,163 posts)SQUEE
(1,315 posts)We are arguing over something that many on both sides don't understand, and I mean on a technical level.
The Belgians, created a round and 2 platforms to utilize it that are actually tailor made for the exact scenario being debated.
FNH made the P90 specifically for non "hi-speed" rear echelon personal. And the round is engineered to penetrate most common configurations of body armor. Compact, and to be honest a less than intimidating design,and simple to use.
former-republican
(2,163 posts)That's not what members want to talk about here.
bullimiami
(13,096 posts)Glassunion
(10,201 posts)Everytime there is a republican president.
However even if the money was there I do not think schools need armed guards. I would make school building code changes with that money.
Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)AND a helmet.
All of these Rambo-wannabes keep thinking they can "shoot them in the face" and "take them out like John Wayne" don't realize that when a tragedy like this happens, it happens quickly.
Even the most prepared human being on the planet, someone vigilantly looking for a situation like this is going to be daunted by body armor. That's why members of our military and our police officers wear it, and they are far more prepared and vigilant than Joe Six-Pack who thinks he's a badass because he shoots on the weekend. That's because they KNOW they are going into a dangerous situation during the course of their jobs and are expecting it.
Who expects to get shot at during a movie, or teaching a class?
onenote
(42,714 posts)it was a nylon "urban assault" vest made by a company called TacticalGear. Police officials have confirmed its not a "bullet proof" vest and no where on the company's website does it indicate that the vest offers any such protection.
http://www.gjsentinel.com/breaking/articles/retailer-who-sold-to-aurora-shooter-getting-backlash
valerief
(53,235 posts)wearing any cologne or anything, you sneak up behind him and shoot him in the head.
Otherwise, it can't be done. Well, not unless you OUTLAW FREAKIN' ASSAULT WEAPONS AND KEEP THEM OUT OF HIS HANDS TO BEGIN WITH.
I vote for option 2.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)on the shelf.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)bad reporting and misinformation on this story, how do we know for sure Lanza was actually wearing a bullet resistant (there is no such thing as a bullet proof vest) vest?
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)....pretty much never.
Blackhawk44
(34 posts)a steel bullet would defeat any
non-hardshell Body Armor
TroglodyteScholar
(5,477 posts)Every teacher, regardless of their stance on guns, should have to demonstrate the ability to successfully connect with a head shot! What good is a teacher if they can't do that?
( , for those who are so impaired)
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)like John Wayne
in the middle of a science experiment I can't imagine going for my gun and shooting the intruder in the middle of the forehead with kids in the way.
Chiyo-chichi
(3,581 posts)I assume he didn't take those from his mother. Did she buy them for him? Do we know?
Not the most pressing issue in all this, but where/how/under what circumstances did he get them?