General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDidja know people on the terrorist watch list can legally buy guns here?
ARE WE SAFE YET?
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Have managed to get laws passed where you get your gun rights restored after five years of leaving prison...used to be permanent.
treestar
(82,383 posts)But not their right to have a gun. Amazing.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Democrats in congress added the restoration language to the 1986 bill, allowing those who have had convictions expunged, set aside, or pardoned to petition for restoration of their rights- all except the right protected by the second amendment, if the state has such a statute prohibiting felons from possession of arms or ammunition.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)That petition process to restore one's rights (all rights, including voting)? Was a democratic push, as part of the compromise to get the 1986 Firearm Owners Protection Act passed.
However, the republicans de-funded it in 1993, and amendments to the Treasury Department Appropriations Bill every year since (again, by republicans) have kept it from being enforced.
-..__...
(7,776 posts)You're probably thinking of program that was enacted that would allow convicted felons to appeal and have their RKBA restored via the ATF.
However, the program was a wash because it was never funded.
Anyone convicted of a felony (with one exception... you must know which one it is with your treasure trove of knowledge), is barred for life from owing, purchasing and possession of firearms.
Even misdemeanors handed down by a local or state court of law can be a lifetime disqualification (if the potential maximum sentence that could be imposed exceeds 2 years or more).
One can have their RKBA restored if the conviction is expunged from their records, or if granted a pardon.
Glad I could help
Turbineguy
(37,343 posts)That way we have to have even more guns in the hands of the good guys.
geomon666
(7,512 posts)Do I really need the sarcasm tag here?
neverforget
(9,436 posts)Thanks Wayne you human scum.
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/need-to-know/the-daily-need/on-terrorist-watch-list-but-allowed-to-buy-guns/8927/
-..__...
(7,776 posts)or at least confine it to persons known and verified to be terrorists, or have proven connections to terrorist organizations and/or activities?
derby378
(30,252 posts)I don't think anyone would object to using that list to screen out potential gun buyers.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts).. themselves, and a right to free speech, and a right to petition the government for redress of grievances, and.. oh yeah..
Not have their rights infringed except via DUE PROCESS.
Imagine that.
hack89
(39,171 posts)the one that we have no idea what it takes to get on?
-..__...
(7,776 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)The list for which there is no legal recourse by which a person can challenge his or her name being on it?
That's not very liberal or progressive, or very Democratic.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Either:
1) The list is full of dangerous people, and it's stupid to let them buy all sorts of weapons.
or
2) The list is a moronic piece of crap full of innocent people, and should be eliminated.