Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

digonswine

(1,485 posts)
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 10:49 PM Dec 2012

Are there studies that show-?

how many crimes are not thwarted because a person who could have successfully intervened did not do so due to the fear of confronting a criminal that has a gun?
Most people will not carry a gun. Even with one, confronting a criminal with a gun would be VERY dangerous, certainly.

If one could be reasonably sure that a criminal has no gun, I would think that one would be more likely to confront the criminal.

This is an anti-gun stance-not a pro-gun one.

I have thought through how I might deal with a domestic violence situation. If I would confront the violent person in this country, I would stand a reasonable chance of getting shot. Thus, I might not confront the person.

I know there are no such studies. My idea is that this is a much more likely situation with which to be confronted than one where I could use my (non-existent) gun to stop a crime.

I only thought of this because I watched a movie that took place in Canada, where a person confronts, and kicks out, a potential date-rapist. While watching this interaction, my first reaction was that this would be unlikely here in America, as the criminal could likely be armed.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
1. People won't call the police when a woman is being repeatedly stabbed in the courtyard below
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 10:53 PM
Dec 2012

Just sayin'

(Actually that whole story is more complex than the story that came down to us, but still.)

digonswine

(1,485 posts)
4. I think that has more to with the idea that-
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 10:56 PM
Dec 2012

we tend to assume someone else has done, or will deal with it. Part of the crowd mentality.

I was referring to an emergent situation in front of us.

digonswine

(1,485 posts)
5. Can you possibly reduce this into something that-
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 10:59 PM
Dec 2012

deals directly with the situations I brought up?

 

jody

(26,624 posts)
6. "the Department of Justice sponsored a survey in 1994 titled, Guns in America: National Survey on
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 11:02 PM
Dec 2012

Private Ownership and Use of Firearms (text, PDF). Using a smaller sample size than Kleck's, this survey estimated 1.5 million DGU's annually."

digonswine

(1,485 posts)
9. Please re-read my post. I am NOT talking about DGU's.
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 11:14 PM
Dec 2012

I admit-I am asking something that you cannot answer and I can't either.

Please see my post #7.

I find it hard to believe that, given the smallish number of gun owners, that more than 1% of people per year avoid a problem with a flash of the gun.

This has nothing to do with my OP, but I think this percentage is much too high. And this is assuming a 50% gun-ownership rate. At this rate, I feel lucky I have not had to brandish my 20 gauge against an intruder at least twice by now. I guess I'm lucky.

digonswine

(1,485 posts)
11. Perhaps I miss something-
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 11:22 PM
Dec 2012

It was a bit rhetorical- how can we calculate the number of crimes that were NOT stopped by people that would have otherwise done so, but that did not, due to the reasonable fear of confronting a guy with a gun?

This is either with or without a gun for the person intervening.

Again-I can't expect you or anyone else to answer this. It is just something to consider. I am damn sure I would consider it if it was me.

Warpy

(111,277 posts)
3. On the day of a dinner party in Boston
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 10:55 PM
Dec 2012

I was coming home with a full backpack of food and a grocery bag in front, very loaded down. As I got ready to enter the foyer of the building, I saw a couple of guys in the glass starting to follow me in.

I decided if they were going to do anything, they could bloody well do it on the street, right in front of gawd and everybody, so I whirled around and looked right in their faces with a big shiteating grin on my face and said "Well, HI THERE!"as I came back down the steps.

They both turned and ran down the street. I was halfway to the apartment complex office when the guns they had pointed at me registered.

Shit.

digonswine

(1,485 posts)
7. I think surprise and confusion helps-
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 11:06 PM
Dec 2012

but I was talking about a single person's decision to take action in a crime or event that does not necessarily involve them.

Admittedly, what I am wondering about is not measurable in any way.

I wonder this because of the pro-gun argument whereby a gun-toting hero saves the day. I wonder how many potential crimes/rapes/assaults, etc happen because unarmed(most of us) bystanders or witnesses are unwilling to take the chance of going against a gun in this gun-rich country.

Warpy

(111,277 posts)
12. All I know is that unpredictability has served me very well.
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 01:26 AM
Dec 2012

This isn't the only story I have about doing something weird and getting away from bad guys with my virtue and wallet both intact. It's just the most dramatic one.

If I'd pulled a gun out, I'd be dead. So, I imagine, would anyone who had come to my rescue with a gun.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are there studies that sh...