General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMaddowBlog-AG Pam Bondi eyes case against Office Depot employee who wouldn't print Charlie Kirk flyer
The attorney generals hate speech comments were a mess. Her line on an Office Depot employee with personal objections to Kirk made the mess worse.
AG Pam Bondi eyes case against Office Depot employee who wouldnât print Charlie Kirk flyer
— (@enuffsaysv.bsky.social) 2025-09-17T18:50:20.228Z
The attorney generalâs âhate speechâ comments were a mess. Her line on an Office Depot employee with personal objections to Kirk made the mess worse.
Read in MSNBC: apple.news/AtFMq9yaMQ5y...
ðseriously ð¤¦ð
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/ag-pam-bondi-eyes-case-office-depot-employee-wouldnt-print-charlie-kir-rcna231860
In an interview on Fox Newss Hannity late Monday, Ms. Bondi suggested that she might direct the Justice Departments civil rights division to prosecute businesses if they turned away customers who wanted to print pictures of Mr. Kirk for memorial vigils, citing the case of an Office Depot employee in Michigan who was fired for rejecting such an order.
.......Just so were all clear, this isnt exactly conservative orthodoxy. When state officials in Colorado sanctioned a baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex couple and the case went to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2018, conservatives sided with the baker, arguing that if a private business wants to discriminate on the basis of personal beliefs, it should be able to do so. (Spoiler alert: The high court's conservative justices agreed.)
Bondi, however, apparently believes its a federal civil rights violation if an Office Depot employee had personal objections to Kirk and didnt want to print fliers with his picture.

Sanity Claws
(22,261 posts)prevented her from printed the materials. If the religious exemption is good for doctors and pharmacists, it should be good for workers at Office Depot.
MrWowWow
(1,377 posts)-Where some pigs living and dead, are more equal than others.
__________
Let's get right to it:
U.S. civil rights and anti-discrimination law:
1. Refusing to print someones flyer (content-based refusal):
A private printer or print shop generally has the legal right to decline a job if they object to the message or content of the flyer (for example, political, religious, or offensive speech). Courts usually treat this as an exercise of free speech or free association. Businesses are not legally required to produce expressive content they disagree with, unless a state or local law says otherwise.
2. Refusing to serve a Black person in a restaurant (status-based refusal):
This is explicitly prohibited by federal law most importantly, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title II, which bans discrimination in places of public accommodation (restaurants, hotels, theaters, etc.) on the basis of race, color, religion, or national origin. Here, the refusal is not about the content of what someone wants produced but about the persons protected characteristic, and that is unlawful.
Key legal distinction:
Content-based refusal (flyer): Usually protected under free speech rights, provided it applies to the message and not to the identity of the customer.
Status-based refusal (restaurant): Illegal discrimination under civil rights statutes when based on protected classes such as race.
maxrandb
(16,864 posts)or, the Negan Cult in The Walking Dead.
I actually thought the Latimore Family from Game of Thrones was "fictional", but it's got all the Donnie Dipshit cult characteristics; incest, pedophilia, sexual assault, corruption, violence, cruelty and fealty.
Check, check, check, check, check, check and check.
jmowreader
(52,682 posts)"I need you to print 500 copies of a picture of Charlie Kirk."
"Do you have copyright clearance for this?"
"Uh...no."
"Then I'm sorry but I can't legally print this."