General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
Torchlight
(5,788 posts)Let's hear ALL the pros and cons from Democrats as well as cons, every day, about why or why not Mr. trump is or is not batshit crazy. Roll that beautiful bean footage...
soldierant
(8,999 posts)along with petitions for impeachment.
As the problem with impeachment is that the Senate must vote to convict in order tp accomplish it, the problem with the 24th is that the impetus must come from his cabinet. Can you see this cabinet even considering it for a second? I can't. (And if they did, we'd have President Vance. Who wants that?"
Jefferson said, and Lincoln quoted, "[W]henever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it." But neither of them, and no Congress or Court, has ever given the people of the United States a mechanism to accomplish that end.
Kingofalldems
(39,918 posts)BunkieBandit
(133 posts)Irregardless of who runs in 28, it'll take a lot to move me away from Pritzer. Wow!!
Vinca
(52,775 posts)they'll invoke the 25th.
The less he's actually running things, the better for them.
I think it's pretty obvious he's not running much now.
canetoad
(19,583 posts)Are more loopy that he is. The rest are crooks and sadists.
Eliot Rosewater
(34,281 posts)That is a prerequisite requirement of getting the job.
You know like in those movies where if a group of cops are on the take and one of them isnt how that one isnt trusted.
If they are not stealing our money while in the administration, they will be fired.
Vinca
(52,775 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(34,281 posts)InstantGratification
(384 posts)That way, when Vance steps in, it won't count as a term for him and he will still be eligible in 2028 and again in 2032.
obamanut2012
(28,872 posts)popsdenver
(582 posts)for the 2025 group and Steven Miller to get at least 90% of their wet dream list done........
The 25th amendment process gives Trump/Republicans too much time to protest and nullify before it would go into effect.........Besides, it would only make Trump more of a martyr to his Trump Humpers.
I would love to believe that the Repubs have wanted rid of him as long as we have, they just worry about his 75M voters turning against all of them...
JDVance would do anything and everything the 2025 group and Miller order him to do, without questioning or going off constantly like a loose cannon which Trump does.......Then again, Trump serves as a constant diversion, and something for the Republican Mass Media to focus on, vs all the other things they are doing in the shadows and with smoke and mirrors............
rurallib
(64,201 posts)January 21, 2027 or some date shortly thereafter Trump will 'resign' and JD will be put in place. Trump will be unceremoniously removed by his owners and that will be that.
Election theft operation will go to high.
Bluetus
(1,612 posts)With Trump out of the way, it is going to be a big bag of rats cannibalize one another. I can't see Vance being more than a 1-percenter.
However, that is not what the polls say. The polls say Vance is 20 points underwater nationally, but he has very strong support among Republicans as of now. I don't believe that would hold, but what the Post-Trump world looks like is anybody's guess.
PortTack
(35,751 posts)Stonealone
(24 posts)quakerboy
(14,566 posts)Seems wildly optimistic to me. And thinking couch fucker Vance could win a term on his own merits is just.. funny.
InstantGratification
(384 posts)There will be an actual vote. Whether or not it's a rigged, Soviet style vote is still a matter to be contested. Peter Thiel is the power behind the scenes. He pushed for Trump to endorse Vance for Senator and he pushed for Trump to pick Vance as running mate. Without Thiel, Vance wouldn't be in politics. Thiel's governance model for America is for Vance to be an Andropov style premier as the figure head with the billionaire/oligarchs to be the politburo behind him wielding the real power. We are just the peasants serving the oligarchs.
ancianita
(42,097 posts)Bluetus
(1,612 posts)to put this discussion of removal into the national discussion and keep it there.
Oratorically, it can be tied to every other issue. For example, on tariffs:
"THe Trump tariff madness is driving the economy into the ground. People are seeing costs for everyday goods exploding. Farmers haven't sold a single soybean to China this year and many are at risk of losing their farms. We have now lost jobs in 3 of the last 4 months. This is not just bad policy. It is completely reckless. There is no plan. There is no rationale for any of this. It is just random and mostly unconstitutional and grievance-based - vindictive. It is time for the cabinet to do their duty under the 25th Amendment and remove this senile man from office."
Likewise, that can be the ending flourish for every issue. That puts the weight on the Republicans to explain why they are NOT taking action.
Attilatheblond
(7,378 posts)They won't give the side $ up. Besides that, he will only be replaced by someone who is also a puppet of the same people controlling Trump.
BaronChocula
(3,464 posts)That should be a slogan for every Dem in front of a camera. Of course it won't really end his presidency, but it will contribute to further weakening him and his party of toadies.
Kingofalldems
(39,918 posts)Cha
(314,760 posts)Not being Sanewashed by the Reality based Wing.
TY
ancianita
(42,097 posts)
PortTack
(35,751 posts)ancianita
(42,097 posts)A little less as winter approaches ... ... but I'm starting to think I'd rather be cold in my old blue state than remain a warm exile in this red state.
Amaryllis
(10,723 posts)orleans
(36,453 posts)ancianita
(42,097 posts)Which he might do.
erronis
(21,482 posts)With advice from putin and musk.
MineralMan
(149,853 posts)It's easy to understand. You just have to read the text of the amendment. As things are now, it is literally impossible to invoke that amendment. First block is the VP. For pete's sake, read the amendment.
ancianita
(42,097 posts)QueerDuck
(173 posts)If he leaves office before his term is complete, it will be feet-first.
tavernier
(13,980 posts)and takes the country with him (as in yesterday), there will be plenty of documentation that his party did not remove him after it was officially called for.
onenote
(45,697 posts)Trump's disrespect for established Constitutional norms including the separation of powers, is a very real and serious concern -- one that is most appropriately dealt with either at the ballot box or in an impeachment proceeding (which actually is less of a hurdle to overcome than removing a president via the 25th Amendment.)
IMO, the 25th is intended to address the situation described in the amendment -- a president who is "unable" to discharge the powers and duties of the office. Not a president who discharges those duties badly or even unlawfully. But a president who literally is not able to act -- not able to sign or veto legislation or make appointments vested to his authority by the Constitution etc.
As terrible and even unlawful as some of Trump's actions, and as unhinged as his oratory, his decisions have the support of his cabinet, of a majority of the Congress, and in many instances, the courts. Again, the 25th amendment was not intended as a means of sitting in judgment of a president's decision making, it was intended to address a situation where the president literally cannot make decisions, because for example, he or she is unconscious, in a coma, or otherwise incapacitated.
eppur_se_muova
(40,197 posts)leftstreet
(37,437 posts)You're absolutely right - although clever lawyers might decide there's money to be made in defining "unable" in this circumstance.
But Pritzker's bold statement lands in something of a vacuum right now.
It just sounds good!
lees1975
(6,786 posts)I doubt this cabinet will do it, though.
mdbl
(7,487 posts)Doesn't seem to matter to idiot right-wing voters and the idiots they put in power.
Uncle Joe
(63,307 posts)*rump's speech was a subliminal call for help and any cabinet members who are just silently watching his deteriorating grip on reality while remaining silent are betraying the best interests of both *rump and the nation.
Thanks for the thread Kingofalldems
Upthevibe
(9,837 posts)SheltieLover
(74,220 posts)His fa.ily is from Ukraine, so he has a burning hatred of ruskie govt. The antithesis to kraznov & natasha.
Response to SheltieLover (Reply #26)
Post removed
SheltieLover
(74,220 posts)SoFlaBro
(3,675 posts)leftstreet
(37,437 posts)WarGamer
(17,978 posts)
nycbos
(6,560 posts)Last edited Thu Oct 2, 2025, 09:22 AM - Edit history (1)
I am a big fan of my governor. However, I don't think that would solve anything because I think Vance is in many ways worse.
Deminpenn
(17,026 posts)Vance and the rest of cabinet are all politically ambitious. This sets them all up against each other.
Jack Valentino
(3,463 posts)"Just Dance" Vance may be a rabid white nationalist
(or maybe he just pretends to be one because he's Trump's Vice President),
but I've never thought that he was totally bat-shit INSANE,
like the orange mess who has his finger on the nuclear trigger RIGHT NOW!!!
I just hope Trump degrades so much very quickly
that they have no choice but to pull the 25th Amendment trigger,
before he destroys the world and ALL of us,
on a demented whim !!!!!
Lulu KC
(8,291 posts)Applause for him.
joshdawg
(2,874 posts)of one rabid lunatic just so we can have another rabid lunatic take its place.
Make no mistake about it, we are in a lose-lose situation.
trump is insane, no doubt about it.
vance is just as crazy as trump, maybe more so.
There are no sane reasonable people in trump's "cabinet."
Even johnson is mentally unstable.
I know of no valid solution to the problem. Perhaps someone could help me out here.
Sneederbunk
(16,859 posts)RogueRocket
(12 posts)JB is the best governor in the country by far
samsingh
(18,192 posts)SSJVegeta
(1,635 posts)That being said, I wonder if there is any major significance to Pritzker being from the same economic class as Trump. Like kinda a not too subtle dog whistle to his fellow billionaires?
LS0999
(262 posts)He surrounded himself with loyalists?
rsdsharp
(11,384 posts)So long as a President is conscious, the 25th Amendment is virtually incapable of removing a President, especially with a Congress as supine as the current one. And if it were possible to implement the Amendment, impeachment would be easier, and likely faster.