General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums2naSalit
(98,384 posts)Only important for xitter users.
AZJonnie
(1,962 posts)"The White House just issued a sweeping federal directive transforming how dissent might be policed in the USheres why civil liberties groups are so alarmed." in the event you don't see that on DU.
In it he talks about NSPM-7 and how it labels people who are "anti-christianity, or anti-capitalism, or anti-fascism" as being linked to domestic terrorism.
2naSalit
(98,384 posts)canetoad
(19,735 posts)That the only true Americans are the christian, capitalist fascists.
JoseBalow
(8,836 posts)
LiberalArkie
(19,071 posts)UTUSN
(76,144 posts)**********QUOTE********
https://www.aclu.org/news/national-security/how-nspm-7-seeks-to-use-domestic-terrorism-to-target-nonprofits-and-activists
.... ...National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM-7) called Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence, essentially adding them to an ever-growing list of what he calls the enemy within. ....
When the president refers in the memo to designation of groups as domestic terrorism organizations, that rhetorical label is dangerously stigmatizing and harsh, but it does not in itself have legal force and the president does not cite any authority for it. That is because, unlike for foreign terrorism, there is no domestic terrorism labelling or designation regime. Congress has passed no law creating any such domestic designation regime, and for very good reason: it would inevitably sweep in First Amendment-protected beliefs, associations, and speech. No matter where civil society groups and activists might fall across the ideological spectrum, from far left to far right, nonpartisan to partisan, religious or not, everyones First Amendment rights would be at risk. For that reason, there is also no standalone crime of domestic terrorism. ....
Perhaps the most chilling rhetorical move the president makes is to use vague, broad labels that, even if trueand theres good reason to question the truth of virtually all of the memos assertionsencompass First Amendment-protected beliefs unconnected to any actual criminal conduct. These labels include: Anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity, support for the overthrow of the federal government, extremism on migration, race, and gender, and opposition to traditional American views on family, religion, and morality. The president even bizarrely imagines that support for law enforcement and border control are foundational American principles that his political opponents paint as fascist to encourage violence. No wonder many in civil society see NSPM-7s rhetoric as a threat to human rights, civil liberties, and democracy-building work.
Through the memo, the president instructs federal departments and law enforcement agencies to use authorities they already have and focus them on investigations of civil society groups including nonprofits, activists, and donorsto disrupt and prevent the presidents fever-dream version of terrorism and political violence. ....
*********UNQUOTE**********
Maru Kitteh
(30,888 posts)Kiss my ass, you fascist, neanderthal, whitechristiannationalist oligarch-felating pigs.
txwhitedove
(4,254 posts)2naSalit
(98,384 posts)I'm not on social media.
erronis
(21,732 posts)Don't make every single one of us have to search for this elsewhere.
TommyT139
(2,015 posts)That has the gist, from the ACLU.
Lovie777
(20,853 posts)S/V Loner
(9,449 posts)No Kings protest on the 18th. It put a smile on my face.