General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAdministration now proposes to demolish both entire White House and Jefferson Memorial
Leavitt Says Trump Can Destroy Entire White House if He WantsLeavitt Says Trump Can Tear Down Jefferson Memorial if He Wants
White House press secretary says Trump can tear down anything he wants
Fiendish Thingy
(21,202 posts)Not seeing a proposal in that reporting, just trolling.
struggle4progress
(125,079 posts)are just trolling
Fiendish Thingy
(21,202 posts)struggle4progress
(125,079 posts)but he's really a megalomaniac
Fiendish Thingy
(21,202 posts)Do you expect him to tear down the Jefferson memorial?
Take a stand.
haele
(14,793 posts)I'm pretty sure the Mall is going to become a golf course, also.
Just fence it all up, and charge admission to keep the hoi-polloi out.
Fiendish Thingy
(21,202 posts)Meanwhile actual evil atrocities are committed daily.
Dystopian fantasies distract from the important business of saving democracy.
stopdiggin
(14,581 posts)egregiously misleading.
(what Leavitt kept asserting was presidential authority - whether or not that is a correct, or fully legally grounded, assertion. nonetheless, quite different from saying that they 'propose' or 'plan' to tear down .. )
struggle4progress
(125,079 posts)they were only adjusting the facade -- before they tore it down without notice
So let's not be naive: if they're now saying they have the right to tear down the White House and Jefferson Memorial, that's exactly what they're planning to do
stopdiggin
(14,581 posts)and them NOT having said any such thing - remains substantive - and fairly important. (at least to some minds)
Neither the president nor the press secretary has 'proposed' tearing down the White House. Not what happened, and thus completely misleading to say so. Full stop.
struggle4progress
(125,079 posts)and then doing it
I see no reason to float tearing down the White House after tearing down part of it unless one planned to tear down the rest
stopdiggin
(14,581 posts)As for the first part - regardless of the veracity (or lack thereof) of the presidents remarks, that does not provide excuse for erroneous material or statement put forth by posters on DU. Two wrongs - n' all that .. ?
MerryBlooms
(12,079 posts)How about siding on protection of Our House. The language used by this administration all along has been deceiving, or out right lies. I don't think the headline is what we should have issue with, it's this damn administration that is shoveling absolute horrific garbage downhill on us, 24 7. It's not one or two things, it's constant.
Find a better hill to die on, instead of a headline that pissed you off. Eh?
Skittles
(168,298 posts)redwitch
(15,197 posts)Despicable woman.
Matthew28
(1,855 posts)Idiotic base will continue to vote the same! These fuckers are traitors and hate everything about this country.
Cha
(315,321 posts)Nazis?
BBbats
(254 posts)They're letting him tear down our government with no pushback.
IcyPeas
(24,503 posts)Note: nowhere in the actual article does Leavitt use the word "destroy"
Yes, that's what he's doing.... but she never says it.
Irish_Dem
(76,876 posts)They value none of our history or principles.
They can destroy anything important to the American people.
And no one can stop them.
MurrayDelph
(5,659 posts)Last edited Sun Oct 26, 2025, 02:04 PM - Edit history (1)
but in most places, if a tenant destroys the landlord's property, or makes changes without approval, he is responsible for the cost of restoration.
We need to get the costs of repairs taken out of Trump (or his estate).
I'd say we should make the demolition company tear down the Epstein Ballroom gratis for restitution of performing non-permitted work, but they'll probably be out of business by Christmas.
maxrandb
(16,953 posts)Donnie Dipshit's plan is to make the White House inhabitable so he has an excuse to move WH operations to Mar-a-Lago.