Does anyone else wonder?

[bluescribbler]

I wonder if the reason why Holy Mike refuses to release the Epstein files is because his name is in there?

[sop]

1. He doesn't immediately come to mind as someone associated with Epstein.

[usonian]

2. My opinion: Regardless, the entire GOP/wealthy donor/worldwide (heads of state?) buddies, justices? empire collapses.

The whole damn shooting match.

Dershowitz represented Epstein.

Dershowitz alleged that key documents in the Epstein case are being “deliberately, willfully suppressed” to protect certain individuals. He claimed to know both the names and the officials suppressing the information.

Pressed by Spicer on whether those individuals were politicians or business leaders, Dershowitz replied, “They’re everything.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/dershowitz-claims-he-saw-full-epstein-client-list-while-defending-himself-in-giuffre-case/ar-AA1ImMKQ

[SheltieLover]

3. Or scRotus folks?

[usonian]

5. Do you mean vile, pompous, untouchable, lewd, drunk, rapist, hypocritcal, smug, imperious, manipulative, vicious ...

Oh,

[SheltieLover]

6. The gang of 6.

[usonian]

7. I can't speak for the woman, but there are Maxwells in this world. No opinion (yet)

I'm a guy. I understand "lewd" but I'm a gentleman.
It's a choice.
They chose poorly.

I'll surely go to heaven.
Problem is
I'm Buddhist.

Can't win, eh?

But I do practice the good that I "preach". Sick world when that's extraordinary.

Nobody pulls the strings on me.


Fee to use and share. No doubt the base image is AI. I couldn't find a live photo!

[EYESORE 9001]

4. Hadn't crossed my mind

Although he’s fully committed to covering for those who are on the list.

[Greg_In_SF]

8. No

I never wondered that.

[JustABozoOnThisBus]

9. In the Epstein heyday, was Mike rich or influential? If not, then no he wasn't there.

[Torchlight]

10. He's wholly (and holy) under trump's thumb. I doubt it's anything more, anything less

his choke chain discipline dictates what's he's allowed to say and what he's instructed to ignore.

[GoCubsGo]

11. Nope. He's protecting those who keep him in power.

I'm sure he also fears the wrath of Trump's cult followers.

[no_hypocrisy]

12. Seems to me that it isn't Mike specifically. I could see Kevin McCarthy

taking the same stance.

[lame54]

13. He hasn't heard of the Epstein files

[WmChris]

14. He's being watched

Isn't his adopted son and babysitting each other to control their porn problems.