Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

In It to Win It

(12,648 posts)
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 02:14 PM Nov 2025

🚨 BREAKING: A panel of federal judges has enjoined Texas from using its redrawn congressional maps

Kyle Cheney
@kyledcheney

BREAKING: A panel of federal judges has enjoined Texas from using its redrawn congressional maps , ordering the state to use its 2021 boundaries. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txwd.1150387/gov.uscourts.txwd.1150387.1437.0.pdf





NEWS: This is a 2-1 decision of a three-judge district court blocking the mid-decade Texas redistricting map as a racial gerrymander. It will (undoubtedly) be appealed, and it goes directly to the Supreme Court.

Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) 2025-11-18T18:40:01.400Z
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
🚨 BREAKING: A panel of federal judges has enjoined Texas from using its redrawn congressional maps (Original Post) In It to Win It Nov 2025 OP
isn't California Prop 50 dependent on Texas changing their maps? MichMan Nov 2025 #1
In "response to," but not "contingent on..." hlthe2b Nov 2025 #3
I believe so - something like that. Not sure if it's Texas specific. Jbraybarten Nov 2025 #6
Yes, but theirs was approved by a vote of the people so TX can't change theirs but CA probably can ChicagoTeamster Nov 2025 #14
If that's what happens, this would be incredible for the country Johnny2X2X Nov 2025 #17
How fast will this make it to SCOTUS? johnnyfins Nov 2025 #2
It is directly appealable to the Supreme Court. onenote Nov 2025 #7
Honestly Im kinda rooting for this dummymander to stick around SSJVegeta Nov 2025 #23
Will make their Prop 50 ruling more difficult lame54 Nov 2025 #20
The judge authoring the opinion is a Trump appointee onenote Nov 2025 #4
K&R UTUSN Nov 2025 #5
SCOTUS needs to get on this right quick johnnyfins Nov 2025 #8
They will BlueWaveNeverEnd Nov 2025 #11
D'oh! C_U_L8R Nov 2025 #9
As a Texan I'm torn about this MagickMuffin Nov 2025 #10
I just hope this supreme court doesn't use this to stop California. bluestarone Nov 2025 #12
Im good with nothing gerrymandered. SSJVegeta Nov 2025 #22
Yeah malaise Nov 2025 #13
Has Trump deported them yet? Orrex Nov 2025 #15
How many seats were they hoping to flip from D to R? TheRickles Nov 2025 #16
5 Deminpenn Nov 2025 #18
That's a good-sized chunk. Thanks. TheRickles Nov 2025 #19
Lol if california can and texas cant. SSJVegeta Nov 2025 #21
This ruling is going to affect a number of Texas races LetMyPeopleVote Nov 2025 #24

ChicagoTeamster

(952 posts)
14. Yes, but theirs was approved by a vote of the people so TX can't change theirs but CA probably can
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 04:21 PM
Nov 2025

Johnny2X2X

(24,207 posts)
17. If that's what happens, this would be incredible for the country
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 04:30 PM
Nov 2025

But I don't have much faith the SCOTUS wouldn't step in in a completely partisan manner and rule, "Because California used the wrong font, their maps get thrown out until they can hold another vote on them in 2028, Texas on the other hand, used an approved font, so theirs are good to implement. Now mail me your "tip" check!"

onenote

(46,140 posts)
7. It is directly appealable to the Supreme Court.
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 03:05 PM
Nov 2025

28 US CODE 1253. Direct appeals from decisions of three-judge courts
Except as otherwise provided by law, any party may appeal to the Supreme Court from an order granting or denying, after notice and hearing, an interlocutory or permanent injunction in any civil action, suit or proceeding required by any Act of Congress to be heard and determined by a district court of three judges.

Appeals of three judge district court decisions go directly to the Supreme Court, not he court of appeals. And Supreme Court review is mandatory -- in other words, it does not require the Court to grant certiorari before hearing the case.

onenote

(46,140 posts)
4. The judge authoring the opinion is a Trump appointee
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 02:35 PM
Nov 2025

He was joined by an Obama appointee. The third judge, a senior judge appointed by Reagan, dissented.

johnnyfins

(3,767 posts)
8. SCOTUS needs to get on this right quick
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 03:15 PM
Nov 2025

so they can save Texas for Dirty Donnie right before the holidays.

MagickMuffin

(18,318 posts)
10. As a Texan I'm torn about this
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 03:30 PM
Nov 2025


The main reason is because they overplayed their hand (on many levels) however, the main reason for me is they actually diluted the voter districts so they are now what I would consider purple at this point.

Then again this IS Texas anything can happen.


bluestarone

(22,177 posts)
12. I just hope this supreme court doesn't use this to stop California.
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 03:33 PM
Nov 2025

That's possible to me. That would be the ONLY reason this supreme court would decide against Texas.

SSJVegeta

(2,849 posts)
22. Im good with nothing gerrymandered.
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 04:56 PM
Nov 2025

My fantasy is that they force every state to do non partisan redistricting.

LetMyPeopleVote

(179,847 posts)
24. This ruling is going to affect a number of Texas races
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 06:14 PM
Nov 2025

Al Green is one of the plaintiffs in this case and was one of the main targets of this redistricting scam. I have known Al for 20 or so years and has work on voter protection efforts with Al. Al represents CD 9 but was redistricted so that much of his district is now in CD 18. Al is currently going to run in CD 18 which was Sylvester Turner's district. Abbott has been an asshole and has kept this seat open for 11 months. There will be a runoff on January 31 between two great young democrats, Christen Menefee and Amanda Edwards. The winner and loser of that runoff would then have to run against Al Green in the March primary.



Jasime Crockett was also targeted and there were rumors that she may run for Texas Senate. If this ruling stand, Jasime will not have to change offices.


In another race, Lloyd Doggett's and another younger democrat's district were in effect merged and Lloyd was going to retire. If this ruling stand, Lloyd does not have to retire


Finally, Al's old district was redrawn to be a very white district and an asshole name Briscoe Cain was going to run in that district. Cain is a real asshole and I would hate to see him in Congress. Here what Cain posted about this ruling


I am really hoping that this ruling stands
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»🚨 BREAKING: A pan...