General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums🚨 BREAKING: A panel of federal judges has enjoined Texas from using its redrawn congressional maps
@kyledcheney
BREAKING: A panel of federal judges has enjoined Texas from using its redrawn congressional maps , ordering the state to use its 2021 boundaries. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txwd.1150387/gov.uscourts.txwd.1150387.1437.0.pdf

Link to tweet
NEWS: This is a 2-1 decision of a three-judge district court blocking the mid-decade Texas redistricting map as a racial gerrymander. It will (undoubtedly) be appealed, and it goes directly to the Supreme Court.
— Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) 2025-11-18T18:40:01.400Z
MichMan
(17,150 posts)hlthe2b
(113,955 posts)Jbraybarten
(265 posts)ChicagoTeamster
(952 posts)Johnny2X2X
(24,207 posts)But I don't have much faith the SCOTUS wouldn't step in in a completely partisan manner and rule, "Because California used the wrong font, their maps get thrown out until they can hold another vote on them in 2028, Texas on the other hand, used an approved font, so theirs are good to implement. Now mail me your "tip" check!"
johnnyfins
(3,767 posts)And how quickly will they rule?
onenote
(46,140 posts)28 US CODE 1253. Direct appeals from decisions of three-judge courts
Except as otherwise provided by law, any party may appeal to the Supreme Court from an order granting or denying, after notice and hearing, an interlocutory or permanent injunction in any civil action, suit or proceeding required by any Act of Congress to be heard and determined by a district court of three judges.
Appeals of three judge district court decisions go directly to the Supreme Court, not he court of appeals. And Supreme Court review is mandatory -- in other words, it does not require the Court to grant certiorari before hearing the case.
SSJVegeta
(2,849 posts)lame54
(39,765 posts)onenote
(46,140 posts)He was joined by an Obama appointee. The third judge, a senior judge appointed by Reagan, dissented.
UTUSN
(77,795 posts)johnnyfins
(3,767 posts)so they can save Texas for Dirty Donnie right before the holidays.
BlueWaveNeverEnd
(14,235 posts)C_U_L8R
(49,384 posts)No bad deed, etc.
MagickMuffin
(18,318 posts)The main reason is because they overplayed their hand (on many levels) however, the main reason for me is they actually diluted the voter districts so they are now what I would consider purple at this point.
Then again this IS Texas anything can happen.
bluestarone
(22,177 posts)That's possible to me. That would be the ONLY reason this supreme court would decide against Texas.
SSJVegeta
(2,849 posts)My fantasy is that they force every state to do non partisan redistricting.
malaise
(296,096 posts)Rec
Orrex
(67,111 posts)TheRickles
(3,383 posts)nt
TheRickles
(3,383 posts)SSJVegeta
(2,849 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(179,847 posts)Al Green is one of the plaintiffs in this case and was one of the main targets of this redistricting scam. I have known Al for 20 or so years and has work on voter protection efforts with Al. Al represents CD 9 but was redistricted so that much of his district is now in CD 18. Al is currently going to run in CD 18 which was Sylvester Turner's district. Abbott has been an asshole and has kept this seat open for 11 months. There will be a runoff on January 31 between two great young democrats, Christen Menefee and Amanda Edwards. The winner and loser of that runoff would then have to run against Al Green in the March primary.
Link to tweet
Jasime Crockett was also targeted and there were rumors that she may run for Texas Senate. If this ruling stand, Jasime will not have to change offices.
Link to tweet
In another race, Lloyd Doggett's and another younger democrat's district were in effect merged and Lloyd was going to retire. If this ruling stand, Lloyd does not have to retire
Link to tweet
Finally, Al's old district was redrawn to be a very white district and an asshole name Briscoe Cain was going to run in that district. Cain is a real asshole and I would hate to see him in Congress. Here what Cain posted about this ruling
Link to tweet
I am really hoping that this ruling stands