Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRepublicans Are Suing to Kill California's Pro-Democratic Gerrymander. They Have a Huge Problem.
California Republicans, now joined by the Trump administrations Department of Justice, have sued California in federal court to stop implementation of Proposition 50, a voter-passed ballot measure that creates a Democratic gerrymander of the states congressional districts, adding up to five more Democratic seats. The lawsuit argues that the Legislature had an unconstitutional race-focused intent on the states Latino voters when it passed the maps. In fact, whatever the Legislature intended should be irrelevant to the Republicans claim, and they likely will lose because California voters were acting with a predominantly political, not racial, intent.
If Republicans lose the Prop 50 lawsuit and the United States Supreme Court does not interfere with a new federal district court ruling putting Texas new gerrymander on hold for 2026, Democrats could have an advantage going into 2026, even as the Supreme Court contemplates even more changes in redistricting rules in its pending case out of Louisiana.
The Republicans main argument in Tangipa v. Newsom is that the California Legislature violated the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution when it drew new congressional district lines based on race, specifically to favor Hispanic voters, without cause or evidence to justify it. Plaintiffs in particular argue that 16 California congressional districts are unconstitutional racial gerrymanders in violation of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.
To succeed on such a claim, a plaintiff first must show that when a state drew district lines it made race the predominant factor in doing so, and second that no compelling reason justified it. When a state makes political considerations, traditional districting criteria, or something else the predominant factor in drawing the lines rather than race, a racial gerrymandering claim fails on the first prong.
If Republicans lose the Prop 50 lawsuit and the United States Supreme Court does not interfere with a new federal district court ruling putting Texas new gerrymander on hold for 2026, Democrats could have an advantage going into 2026, even as the Supreme Court contemplates even more changes in redistricting rules in its pending case out of Louisiana.
The Republicans main argument in Tangipa v. Newsom is that the California Legislature violated the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution when it drew new congressional district lines based on race, specifically to favor Hispanic voters, without cause or evidence to justify it. Plaintiffs in particular argue that 16 California congressional districts are unconstitutional racial gerrymanders in violation of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.
To succeed on such a claim, a plaintiff first must show that when a state drew district lines it made race the predominant factor in doing so, and second that no compelling reason justified it. When a state makes political considerations, traditional districting criteria, or something else the predominant factor in drawing the lines rather than race, a racial gerrymandering claim fails on the first prong.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/republicans-suing-kill-california-pro-220109148.html
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republicans Are Suing to Kill California's Pro-Democratic Gerrymander. They Have a Huge Problem. (Original Post)
In It to Win It
Yesterday
OP
CaliforniaPeggy
(155,771 posts)1. Well said and I agree. The repubs have a huge problem, indeed.
Race has nothing to do with that legislation.
modrepub
(3,967 posts)2. Someone Explained
That TX drew based on race to deny representation while CA drew based on race to protect representation.
Sane people will see this difference and conclude one should pass and one should fail. Well see how the SC handles these I guess.
Cha
(315,940 posts)3. Best of Luck to California in Court ..
Dems aren't "Racist" like Texas.
ancianita
(42,642 posts)4. Yo rethugs, good luck arguing in court against the people and governor of the 4th largest economy on the planet.
aeromanKC
(3,767 posts)5. Projection. It's always projection with Trump and MAGAt's.